Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Tipo de estudio
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Neurology ; 102(7): e207983, 2024 Apr 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38457772

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) is a low-cost, accessible, and noninvasive neuroprotective treatment strategy, but its efficacy and safety in acute ischemic stroke are controversial. With the publication of several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and the recent results of the RESIST trial, it may be possible to identify the patient population that may (or may not) benefit from RIC. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of RIC in patients with ischemic stroke receiving different treatments by pooling data of all randomized controlled studies to date. METHODS: We searched the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Elsevier, and Web of Science databases to obtain articles in all languages from inception until May 25, 2023. The primary outcome was the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at the specified endpoint time in the trial. The secondary outcomes were change in NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and recurrence of stroke events. The safety outcomes were cardiovascular events, cerebral hemorrhage, and mortality. The quality of articles was evaluated through the Cochrane risk assessment tool. This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023430073). RESULTS: There were 7,657 patients from 22 RCTs included. Compared with the control group, patients who received RIC did not have improved mRS functional outcomes, regardless of whether they received medical management, reperfusion therapy with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), or mechanical thrombectomy (MT). In the medical management group, patients who received RIC had decreased incidence of stroke recurrence (risk ratio 0.63, 95% CI 0.43-0.92, p = 0.02) and lower follow-up NIHSS score by 1.72 points compared with the control group (p < 0.00001). There was no increased risk of adverse events including death or cerebral hemorrhage in the IVT or medical management group. DISCUSSION: In patients with ischemic stroke who are not eligible for reperfusion therapy, RIC did not affect mRS functional outcomes but significantly improved the NIHSS score at the follow-up endpoint and reduced stroke recurrence, without increasing the risk of cerebral hemorrhage or death. In patients who received IVT or MT, the benefit of RIC was not observed.


Asunto(s)
Isquemia Encefálica , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Isquemia Encefálica/complicaciones , Terapia Trombolítica/métodos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/tratamiento farmacológico , Hemorragia Cerebral/complicaciones , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/tratamiento farmacológico , Reperfusión , Resultado del Tratamiento , Trombectomía/métodos
2.
Cerebrovasc Dis ; 52(4): 451-459, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36481613

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that intravenous tirofiban improves functional outcomes without promoting the risk of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) in stroke secondary to basilar artery occlusion (BAO) receiving endovascular thrombectomy. METHODS: Patients with acute BAO stroke who were treated with endovascular thrombectomy and had tirofiban treatment information were derived from "BASILAR": a nationwide, prospective registry. All eligible patients were divided into tirofiban and no-tirofiban groups according to whether tirofiban was used intravenously. The primary endpoint was the 90-day severity of disability as assessed by the modified Rankin scale score. Safety outcomes were the frequency of ICH and mortality. RESULTS: Of 645 patients included in this cohort, 363 were in the tirofiban group and 282 were in the no-tirofiban group. Thrombectomy with intravenous tirofiban reduced the 90-day disability level over the range of the modified Rankin scale (adjusted common odds ratio, 2.08; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.45-2.97; p < 0.001). The 90-day mortality of patients in the tirofiban group was lower than that in the no-tirofiban group (41.6% vs. 52.1%; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.47-0.77; p < 0.001). The frequency of any ICH (6.7% vs. 13.7%; p = 0.004) and symptomatic ICH (4.8% vs. 10.1%; p = 0.01) in the tirofiban group was significantly lower than that in the no-tirofiban group. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute BAO stroke who underwent endovascular treatment, intravenous tirofiban might be associated with favorable outcome, reduced mortality, and a decreased frequency of ICH.


Asunto(s)
Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Tirofibán/efectos adversos , Arteria Basilar , Resultado del Tratamiento , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Accidente Cerebrovascular/terapia , Trombectomía/efectos adversos , Hemorragias Intracraneales/inducido químicamente
3.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12058209

RESUMEN

A 1 131 bp cDNA fragment was amplified by RT-PCR from adult Schistosoma japonicum(Chinese strain) mRNA with primers designed according to published SmAct2 encoding Schistosoma mansoni actin. Sequence analysis indicated that this fragment, with 92% homology to SmAct2, was a complete open reading fragment (ORF) of actin gene of Schistosoma japonicum (Chinese strain). This gene was cloned into the expression vector pET28a( ) and subsequently expressed in Escerichia coli. SDS-PAGE revealed that the molecular weight of this expressed product was 47 kD. Western blotting showed that the recombinant protein had good reactivity with the rabbit serum immunized with Sj worm antigen, indicating that this gene encode actin of Schistosoma japonicum(Chinese strain).

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA