Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Tipo de estudio
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Allergy ; 2024 Jul 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39044721

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS) is a severe phenotype of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP), characterised by localised and exaggerated type 2 inflammation. While fungal antigenic stimulation of unregulated Th2-mediated inflammation is the core pathophysiological mechanism, the direct and synergistic role of bacteria in disease modification is a pervasive hypothesis. We set out to define the microenvironment of AFRS to elucidate virulent organisms that may be implicated in the pathophysiology of AFRS. METHODOLOGY: We undertook a cross-sectional study of AFRS patients and non-fungal CRSwNP patients. Demographics, disease severity, culture and microbiome sequences were analysed. Multimodality microbiome sequencing included short-read next-generation sequencing (NGS) on the Illumina Miseq (16S rRNA and ITS) and full-length 16S rRNA sequencing on the Oxford Nanopore Technologies GridION (ONT). RESULTS: Thirty-two AFRS and 29 non-fungal CRSwNP patients (NF) were included in this study. Staphylococcus aureus was the dominant organism cultured and sequenced in both AFRS and NF groups (AFRS 27.54%; NF 18.04%; p = .07). Streptococcus pneumoniae (AFRS 12.31%; NF 0.98%; p = .03) and Haemophilus influenzae (AFRS 15.03%; NF 0.24%; p = .005) were significantly more abundant in AFRS. Bacterial diversity (Shannon's index) was considerably lower in AFRS relative to NF (AFRS 0.6; NF 1.0, p = .008). Aspergillus was the most cultured fungus in AFRS (10/32, 31.3%). The AFRS sequenced mycobiome was predominantly represented by Malassezia (43.6%), Curvularia (18.5%) and Aspergillus (16.8%), while the NF mycobiome was nearly exclusively Malassezia (84.2%) with an absence of Aspergillus or dematiaceous fungi. CONCLUSION: A low diversity, dysbiotic microenvironment dominated by Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae characterised the bacterial microbiome of AFRS, with a mycobiome abundant in Malassezia, Aspergillus and Curvularia. While Staphylococcus aureus has been previously implicated in AFRS through enterotoxin superantigen potential, Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae are novel findings that may represent alternate cross-kingdom pathophysiological mechanisms.

2.
Rhinology ; 62(2): 152-162, 2024 Apr 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38165666

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: 16S rRNA next generation sequencing (NGS) has been the de facto standard of microbiome profiling. A limitation of this technology is the inability to accurately assign taxonomy to a species order. Long read 16S sequencing platforms, including Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT), have the potential to overcome this limitation. The paranasal sinuses are an ideal niche to apply this technology, being a low biomass environment where bacteria are implicated in disease propagation. Characterising the microbiome to a species order may offer new pathophysiological insights. METHODOLOGY: Cohort series comparing ONT and NGS biological conclusions. Swabs obtained endoscopically from the middle meatus of 61 CRSwNP patients underwent DNA extraction, amplification and dual sequencing (Illumina Miseq (NGS) and ONT GridION). Agreement, relative abundance, prevalence, and culture correlations were compared. RESULTS: Mean microbiome agreement between sequencers was 61.4%. Mean abundance correlations were strongest at a familial/genus order and declined at a species order where NGS lacked resolution. The most significant discrepancies applied to Corynebacterium and Cutibacterium, which were estimated in lower abundance by ONT. ONT accurately identified 84.2% of cultured species, which was significantly higher than NGS. CONCLUSIONS: ONT demonstrated superior resolution and culture correlations to NGS, but underestimated core sinonasal taxa. Future application and optimisation of this technology can advance our understanding of the sinonasal microenvironment.


Asunto(s)
Microbiota , Rinosinusitis , Sinusitis , Humanos , ARN Ribosómico 16S/genética , Filogenia , Genes de ARNr , Microbiota/genética , Sinusitis/genética , Sinusitis/microbiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA