Perceived and Received Support by Academic Medicine Faculty During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Single Institution Study.

OBJECTIVE: The COVID-19 pandemic negatively impacted healthcare worker well-being, leading to increased burnout and decreased workplace engagement. To combat expected stressors from the pandemic, our mid-sized academic health center implemented numerous institutional support, such as town halls, and virtual support groups. This study aimed to evaluate faculty utilization of institutional support, its association with perceived organizational support, received organizational support, and burnout. METHODS: A retrospective, cross-sectional survey was distributed to 630 faculty employed at our institution in September 2020, assessing participant demographics, institutional support utilized, perceived organizational support, and burnout, through a combination of self-report measures and qualitative responses. RESULTS: A total of 79 (12.5%) faculty provided complete responses and were included in the analysis. Qualitative analysis identified 4 primary themes: (1) flexibility and adjusted expectations, (2) direct communication, (3) sense of community, and (4) no support felt, with additional subthemes within each larger theme. Increased utilization of institutional support was associated with decreased odds of experiencing burnout. CONCLUSION: Flexibility, communication, and sense of community emerged as important strategies for maintaining faculty well-being and engagement during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. This study suggests that utilization of workplace support is protective against burnout. Perceived support was not beneficial.

COVID-19 Exposure Risk, Burnout, and Shifts in Family Medicine Faculty's Efforts: A National Survey.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, academic family physicians had to change their clinical, teaching, research, and administrative efforts, while simultaneously balancing their home environment demands. It is unclear how the changes in effort affected physicians' personal well-being, particularly burnout. This study sought to identify changes in faculty's clinical, teaching, research, and administrative efforts during the COVID-19 pandemic and how effort shifts were associated with burnout. We also examined associations with important demographics and burnout. METHODS: We took data from the 2020 Council of Academic Family Medicine's Educational Research Alliance survey of family medicine educators and practicing physicians during November 2020 through December 2020. We analyzed self-report measures of demographics, effort (clinical, teaching, research, and administrative) before and during the pandemic, COVID-19 exposure level, and rates of burnout (emotional exhaustion and depersonalization) using logistic regressions. RESULTS: Most participants reported no change in efforts. If changes were reported, clinical (21.6%) and administrative (24.8%) efforts tended to increase from before to during the pandemic, while teaching tended to decrease (27.7%). Increases in teaching and clinical efforts were associated with higher rates of emotional exhaustion. Higher depersonalization was associated with increased clinical efforts. Being older and working in a rural setting was associated with lower burnout, while being female was associated with higher burnout. CONCLUSIONS: Shifts in effort across academic family physicians' multiple roles were associated with emotional exhaustion and, to a lesser degree, depersonalization. The high rates of burnout demand additional attention from directors and administrators, especially among female physicians.

Faculty Engagement and Productivity During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: COVID-19 has had an unprecedented effect on faculty of academic family medicine departments. We sought to characterize faculty's self-reported changes in engagement and productivity in clinical, education, and scholarly efforts during the COVID-19 pandemic, and to correlate the changes with age, gender, and level of COVID-19 exposure. We also sought to determine if differences in faculty engagement and productivity were related to departmental efforts to create virtual community, manage conflict, foster engagement with colleagues, and support faculty emotional well-being. METHODS: We surveyed family medicine department faculty nationally on the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on their engagement and productivity in clinical care, teaching and research, and on the effect of departmental efforts on well-being. RESULTS: Most respondents reported decreased engagement and productivity across clinical, teaching, and research domains. Older age and male gender were associated with higher clinical engagement. Most respondents were satisfied with their departments' virtual community but reported that social distancing had a negative impact on departmental ability to problem-solve and on personal emotional well-being. Higher engagement and productivity in all three domains of effort (clinical, teaching, and research) were associated with respondents' well-being and with positive perceptions of their department's efforts. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical, teaching, and research engagement and productivity for academic family physicians decreased during the COVID-19 pandemic. Faculty well-being and departmental interventions lessened the impact of diminished productivity and research engagement.

Impaired Family Functioning Affects 6-Month and 12-Month Postoperative Weight Loss.

PURPOSE: Prior cross-sectional research details the high rate of impaired family functioning, a measure of the overall family environment, among adult bariatric surgery patients; however, family functioning has not been explored in relation to adult patient's postoperative outcomes. The objective of this study was to determine how family functioning affects postoperative patient outcomes including readmission rates, early complications, and 6- and 12-month percent total weight loss (%TWL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: An observational design at a single-academic medical center was employed. The sample comprised 98 patients, living with ≥1 family member, who enrolled in one of two concurrent studies at the Center. Patients were followed from their surgical intake through 12 months postsurgery; family functioning was assessed within 2 months of their date of surgery. Chi-square and independent t tests determined significant associations between family functioning with readmission and complication rates. Average family functioning was an independent variable in multivariate linear regression models to determine significant correlates of %TWL at 6 and 12 months postsurgery. Patient age, race, and insurance status were included as covariates. RESULTS: Patients with higher impaired family functioning had significantly less %TWL at 6 (p=.004) and 12 months (p=.030). Black patients also had significantly lower %TWL at 6 (p=.003) and 12 months (p=.009). CONCLUSION: Family functioning and patient race were both correlates of weight loss at 6 months and 12 months. Future research should explore additional family factors as correlates of patient outcomes following bariatric surgery.

The Effect of Family Member Attendance at Bariatric Surgery Appointments on Patient and Family Weight-Related Outcomes.

PURPOSE: To assess the effect of family member attendance at routine pre- and postoperative appointments on early postoperative patients' weight loss and physical activity levels and family members' weight control practices. MATERIALS AND METHODS: As part of a RCT, patients were randomized to (1) invite a romantic partner or cohabitating family member to attend routine appointments (FA arm) or (2) proceed with treatment as usual (TAU arm). Patients in FA arm were asked to invite their family member to attend four routine appointments (T1 = pre-surgery class, T2 = 1 month pre-surgery, T3 = 2 weeks post-surgery, T4 = 2 months post-surgery). Assessments of patients' percent excess weight loss (%EWL), change in body mass index (ΔBMI), and levels of physical activity and family members' weight control practices (dietary control, self-monitoring, physical activity, and psychological coping) were conducted at T1-T4 with all dyads, and attendance was documented. Of the 213 dyads approached, 63 dyads consented to participate. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in patient outcomes between FA and TAU arms or based on consistent attendance of family members. There were no significant differences in weight control practices between FA and TAU dyads. At T3 and T4, family members with consistent attendance reported higher self-monitoring, physical activity, and psychological control practices. Family members with consistent attendance reported significant increases in physical activity and psychological control practices from T1 to T4. CONCLUSIONS: Family member attendance at routine appointments had greater positive effects on family members rather than on patient outcomes.