Prehabilitation for Older Adults Undergoing Lung Cancer Surgery: A Literature Review and Needs Assessment.

Early-stage lung cancer patients are increasingly considered for preoperative systemic therapy. Older adults in particular are among the most vulnerable patients, with little known on how preoperative therapies affect the risk-benefit of surgery. We sought to summarize the current literature and elucidate existing evidence gaps on the effects of prehabilitation interventions relative to age-related functional impairments and the unique needs of older patients undergoing lung cancer surgery. A literature review was performed using PubMed and Google Scholar databases, of all scientific articles published through April 2022 which report on the effects of prehabilitation on patients undergoing lung cancer surgery. We extracted current prehabilitation protocols and their impact on physical functioning, resilience, and patient-reported outcomes of older patients. Emerging evidence suggests that prehabilitation may enhance functional capacity and minimize the untoward effects of surgery for patients following lung resection similar to, or potentially even better than, traditional postoperative rehabilitation. The impact of preoperative interventions on surgical risk due to frailty remains ill-defined. Most studies evaluating prehabilitation include older patients, but few studies report on activities of daily living, self-care, mobility activities, and psychological resilience in older individuals. Preliminary data suggest the feasibility of physical therapy and resilience interventions in older individuals concurrent with systemic therapy. Future research is needed to determine best prehabilitation strategies for older lung cancer patients aimed to optimize age-related impairments and minimize surgical risk.

The association between neighborhood disadvantage and frailty: A retrospective case series.

Background: Frailty predicts poorer outcomes in surgical patients. Recent studies have found socioeconomic status to be an important characteristic for surgical outcomes. We evaluated the association of Area Deprivation Index (ADI) and Social Vulnerability Index (SVI), two geospatial atlases that provide a multidimensional evaluation of neighborhood deprivation, with frailty in a surgery population. Design & methods: A retrospective study of patients undergoing routine frailty screening was conducted 12/2020-8/2022. Frailty was measured using Fried's Frailty Phenotype (FFP) and the five-item Modified Frailty Index (mFI-5). ADI and SVI quartiles were determined using patient residence. Logistic regression models were used to evaluated associations of FFP (frail only vs not frail) and mFI-5 (≥2 vs 0-1) with ADI and SVI (α = 0.05). Results: Of 372 screened patients, 41% (154) were women, median age was 68% (63-74), and 46% (170) identified as non-White. Across ADI and SVI quartiles, higher number of comorbidities, decreasing median income, and frailty were associated with increasing deprivation (p < 0.01). When controlling for age, sex, comorbidities, and BMI category, frailty by FFP was associated with the most deprived two quartiles of ADI (OR 2.61, CI: [1.35-5.03], p < 0.01) and the most deprived quartile of SVI (OR 2.33, [1.10-4.95], p < 0.05). These trends were also seen with mFI-5 scores ≥2 (ADI: OR 1.64, [1.02-2.63], p < 0.05; SVI: OR 1.71, [1.01-2.91], p < 0.05). Conclusions: Surgical patients living in socioeconomically deprived neighborhoods are more likely to be frail. Interventions may include screening of disadvantaged populations and resource allocation to vulnerable neighborhoods.

Implementing a Frailty-Specific Postoperative Order Set to Improve Postoperative Outcomes in Frail Adults After Elective Thoracic Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is independently associated with adverse patient outcomes after surgery. The current standards of postoperative care rarely consider frailty status. LOCAL PROBLEM: There was no standardized protocol to optimize specialized postoperative care for frail patients at an academic medical center. METHODS: A quasi-experimental pre-/postimplementation study design, using the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance implementation framework, was utilized. INTERVENTIONS: A frailty-specific postoperative order set (FPOS) was developed, including tailored nursing care, activity levels, and nutritional goals. RESULTS: There were significant improvements in nurse's self-reported familiarity with frailty ( P = .003) and FPOS awareness ( P < .001). The number of orders for delirium prevention, elimination, nutrition, sleep promotion, and sensory support increased ( P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Implementing an FPOS showed improvements in nurse frailty knowledge, awareness, and order set utilization.

The risk analysis index is an independent predictor of outcomes after lung cancer resection.

BACKGROUND: The Risk Analysis Index (RAI) is a frailty assessment tool based on an accumulation of deficits model. We mapped RAI to data from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Database to determine whether RAI correlates with postoperative outcomes following lung cancer resection. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: This was a national database retrospective observational study based on data from the STS Database. Study patients underwent surgery 2018 to 2020. RAI was divided into four increasing risk categories. The associations between RAI and each of postoperative complications and administrative outcomes were examined using logistic regression models. We also compared the performance of RAI to established risk indices (American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI)) using areas under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves (AUC). Results: Of 29,420 candidate patients identified in the STS Database, RAI could be calculated for 22,848 (78%). Almost all outcome categories exhibited a progressive increase in marginal probability as RAI increased. On multivariable analyses, RAI was significantly associated with an incremental pattern with almost all outcomes. ROC analyses for RAI demonstrated "good" AUC values for mortality (0.785; 0.748) and discharge location (0.791), but only "fair" values for all other outcome categories (0.618 to 0.690). RAI performed similarly to ASA and CCI in terms of AUC score categories. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: RAI is associated with clinical and administrative outcomes following lung cancer resection. However, its overall accuracy as a surgical risk predictor is only moderate and similar to ASA and CCI. We do not recommend routine use of RAI for assessment of individual patient risk for major lung resection.

Chatbot Reliability in Managing Thoracic Surgical Clinical Scenarios.

BACKGROUND: Chatbot use in medicine is growing, and concerns have been raised regarding their accuracy. This study assessed the performance of 4 different chatbots in managing thoracic surgical clinical scenarios. METHODS: Topic domains were identified and clinical scenarios were developed within each domain. Each scenario included 3 stems using Key Feature methods related to diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment. Twelve scenarios were presented to ChatGPT-4 (OpenAI), Bard (recently renamed Gemini; Google), Perplexity (Perplexity AI), and Claude 2 (Anthropic) in 3 separate runs. Up to 1 point was awarded for each stem, yielding a potential of 3 points per scenario. Critical failures were identified before scoring; if they occurred, the stem and overall scenario scores were adjusted to 0. We arbitrarily established a threshold of ≥2 points mean adjusted score per scenario as a passing grade and established a critical fail rate of ≥30% as failure to pass. RESULTS: The bot performances varied considerably within each run, and their overall performance was a fail on all runs (critical mean scenario fails of 83%, 71%, and 71%). The bots trended toward "learning" from the first to the second run, but without improvement in overall raw (1.24 ± 0.47 vs 1.63 ± 0.76 vs 1.51 ± 0.60; P = .29) and adjusted (0.44 ± 0.54 vs 0.80 ± 0.94 vs 0.76 ± 0.81; P = .48) scenario scores after all runs. CONCLUSIONS: Chatbot performance in managing clinical scenarios was insufficient to provide reliable assistance. This is a cautionary note against reliance on the current accuracy of chatbots in complex thoracic surgery medical decision making.

Additive Impacts of Liveweight and Body Condition Score at Breeding on the Reproductive Performance of Merino and Non-Merino Ewe Lambs.

Ewe lambs that are heavier due to improved nutrition pre- and post-weaning achieve puberty at a younger age, are more fertile, and have a higher reproductive rate. Fatness is intimately linked to reproduction, and we hypothesised that higher body condition scores at breeding would have positive effects on the reproductive rate of ewe lambs over and above liveweight. We also expected that if only a proportion of ewe lambs were presented for breeding, then it would be more effective to select them based on both liveweight and body condition score. To test these hypotheses, we analysed data from over 17,000 records from Merino and non-Merino ewe lambs from 22 different flocks across Australia. Non-Merino ewe lambs were more fertile (69.4% vs. 48.7%) and achieved a higher reproductive rate than Merino ewe lambs (96.9% vs. 60.7%). There were significant curvilinear relationships between liveweight (p < 0.001) or body condition score (p < 0.001) prior to breeding and reproductive rate for both Merino and non-Merino ewe lambs. For both breeds, there was a significant (p < 0.001) quadratic effect of body condition score prior to breeding on reproductive rate, independent of the correlated changes in liveweight, and at the same liveweight, an extra 0.5 of a body condition score up to 3.3 improved reproductive rate by about 20%. Nevertheless, the results indicated that if only a proportion of ewe lambs were selected for breeding, then selection based on both liveweight and body condition scores may only improve the overall reproductive rate by 1 to 2% compared to selection based on liveweight alone. We conclude that liveweight is a more effective method than body condition score for selecting ewe lambs for breeding.

Barriers and facilitators to smartwatch-based prehabilitation participation among frail surgery patients: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: For older, frail adults, exercise before surgery through prehabilitation (prehab) may hasten return recovery and reduce postoperative complications. We developed a smartwatch-based prehab program (BeFitMe) for older adults that encourages and tracks at-home exercise. The objective of this study was to assess patient perceptions about facilitators and barriers to prehab generally and to using a smartwatch prehab program among older adult thoracic surgery patients to optimize future program implementation. METHODS: We recruited patients, aged ≥50 years who had or were having surgery and were screened for frailty (Fried's Frailty Phenotype) at a thoracic surgery clinic at a single academic institution. Semi-structured interviews were conducted by telephone after obtaining informed consent. Participants were given a description of the BeFitMe program. The interview questions were informed by The Five "Rights" of Clinical Decision-Making framework (Information, Person, Time, Channel, and Format) and sought to identify the factors perceived to influence smartwatch prehab program participation. Interview transcripts were transcribed and independently coded to identify themes in for each of the Five "Rights" domains. RESULTS: A total of 29 interviews were conducted. Participants were 52% men (n = 15), 48% Black (n = 14), and 59% pre-frail (n = 11) or frail (n = 6) with a mean age of 68 ± 9 years. Eleven total themes emerged. Facilitator themes included the importance of providers (right person) clearly explaining the significance of prehab (right information) during the preoperative visit (right time); providing written instructions and exercise prescriptions; and providing a preprogrammed and set-up (right format) Apple Watch (right channel). Barrier themes included pre-existing conditions and disinterest in exercise and/or technology. Participants provided suggestions to overcome the technology barrier, which included individualized training and support on usage and responsibilities. CONCLUSIONS: This study reports the perceived facilitators and barriers to a smartwatch-based prehab program for pre-frail and frail thoracic surgery patients. The future BeFitMe implementation protocol must ensure surgical providers emphasize the beneficial impact of participating in prehab before surgery and provide a written prehab prescription; must include a thorough guide on smartwatch use along with the preprogrammed device to be successful. The findings are relevant to other smartwatch-based interventions for older adults.

Oculoplastic Management of an Eyelid Zipper Injury.

We present a case of a zipper injury to an upper eyelid in a pediatric patient. The zipper was successfully removed in the operating room by using a double-action bone cutter to cut the median footplate of the zipper and release the entrapped tissue. Zipper injuries are well-described in urology literature, however, limited case reports exist in ophthalmology literature. We review several methods for zipper removal and present special considerations for eyelid injuries.

Racial differences in phenotypic frailty assessment among general thoracic surgery patients.

Objectives: The American Association for Thoracic Surgery recommends using frailty assessments to identify patients at higher risk of perioperative morbidity and mortality. We evaluated what patient factors are associated with frailty in a thoracic surgery patient population. Methods: New patients aged more than 50 years who were evaluated in a thoracic surgery clinic underwent routine frailty screening with a modified Fried's Frailty Phenotype. Differences in demographics and comorbid conditions among frailty status groups were assessed with chi-square and Student t tests. Logistic regressions performed with binomial distribution assessed the association of demographic and clinical characteristics with nonfrail, frail, prefrail, and any frailty (prefrail/frail) status. Results: The study population included 317 patients screened over 19 months. Of patients screened, 198 (62.5%) were frail or prefrail. Frail patients undergoing thoracic surgery were older, were more likely single or never married, had lower median income, and had lower percent predicted diffusion capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide and forced expiratory volume during 1 second (all P < .05). More non-Hispanic Black patients were frail and prefrail compared with non-Hispanic White patients (P = .003) and were more likely to score at least 1 point on Fried's Frailty Phenotype (adjusted odds ratio, 3.77; P = .02) when controlling for age, sex, number of comorbidities, median income, diffusion capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide, and forced expiratory volume during 1 second. Non-Hispanic Black patients were more likely than non-Hispanic White patients to score points for slow gait and low activity (both P < .05). Conclusions: Non-Hispanic Black patients undergoing thoracic surgery are more likely to score as frail or prefrail than non-Hispanic White patients. This disparity stems from differences in activity and gait speed. Frailty tools should be examined for factors contributing to this disparity, including bias.