The development and appraisal of a tool designed to find patients harmed by falsely labelled, falsified (counterfeit) medicines.

BACKGROUND: Falsely labelled, falsified (counterfeit) medicines (FFCm's) are produced or distributed illegally and can harm patients. Although the occurrence of FFCm's is increasing in Europe, harm is rarely reported. The European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & Health-Care (EDQM) has therefore coordinated the development and validation of a screening tool. METHODS: The tool consists of a questionnaire referring to a watch-list of FFCm's identified in Europe, including symptoms of their use and individual risk factors, and a scoring form. To refine the questionnaire and reference method, a pilot-study was performed in 105 self-reported users of watch-list medicines. Subsequently, the tool was validated under "real-life conditions" in 371 patients in 5 ambulatory and in-patient care sites ("sub-studies"). The physicians participating in the study scored the patients and classified their risk of harm as "unlikely" or "probable" (cut-off level: presence of ≥2 of 5 risk factors). They assessed all medical records retrospectively (independent reference method) to validate the risk classification and documented their perception of the tool's value. RESULTS: In 3 ambulatory care sites (180 patients), the tool correctly classified 5 patients as harmed by FFCm's. The positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR+/LR-) and the discrimination power were calculated for two cut-off levels: a) 1 site (50 patients): presence of two risk factors (at 10% estimated health care system contamination with FFCm's): LR + 4.9/LR-0, post-test probability: 35%; b) 2 sites (130 patients): presence of three risk factors (at 5% estimated prevalence of use of non-prescribed medicines (FFCm's) by certain risk groups): LR + 9.7/LR-0, post-test probability: 33%. In 2 in-patient care sites (191 patients), no patient was confirmed as harmed by FFCm's. The physicians perceived the tool as valuable for finding harm, and as an information source regarding risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: This "decision aid" is a systematic tool which helps find in medical practice patients harmed by FFCm's. This study supports its value in ambulatory care in regions with health care system contamination and in certain risk groups. The establishment of systematic communication between authorities and the medical community concerning FFCm's, current patterns of use and case reports may sustain positive public health impacts.

[ISKRA guidelines on antimicrobial treatment and prophylaxis of urinary tract infections--Croatian national guidelines]. / ISKRA smjernice antimikrobnog lijecenja i profilakse infekcija mokracnog sustava--hrvatske nacionalne smjernice.

These guidelines refer to diagnosis, antimicrobial treatment and prophylaxis of urinary tract infections in adults and children older than 12 years of age and cover lower urinary tract in females, uncomplicated pyelonephritis, complicated UTI with or without pyelonephritis, asymptomatic bacteriuria and recurrent UTI. These guidelines do not cover sexually transmitted diseases. The guidelines are primarily intended for use by general practitioners and specialists working in primary health care and hospitals. The members of the Working Group for the development of guidelines on antimicrobial treatment and prophylaxis of urinary tract infections were appointed by the Croatian Ministry of Health and Social Welfare. The project was financially supported by the Dutch government and professional assistance was provided by international consultants. The evidence for this guidelines is based on a systematic review of the literature, local antibiotic resistance data, the existing clinical protocols on the treatment and prophylaxis of UTIs, as well as suggestions and comments made by colleagues physicians during more than 50 continuous medical education courses held in the last three years on antimicrobial treatment and prophylaxis of UTIs. Draft version of the guidelines was available for comments on the web site http://iskra.bfm.hr and during the two-month piloting period the guidelines were widely presented to general practitioners, specialists working in primary care and hospitals--urologists, gynecologists, infectious disease specialists, nephrologists. The final version of the guidelines was approved by the Intersectoral Coordination Mechanism for the Control of Antimicrobial Resistance (ISKRA) Board.