Cryopreservation, semen use and the likelihood of fatherhood in male Hodgkin lymphoma survivors: an EORTC-GELA Lymphoma Group cohort study.

STUDY QUESTION: How does the successful cryopreservation of semen affect the odds of post-treatment fatherhood among Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) survivors? SUMMARY ANSWER: Among 334 survivors who wanted to have children, the availability of cryopreserved semen doubled the odds of post-treatment fatherhood. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Cryopreservation of semen is the easiest, safest and most accessible way to safeguard fertility in male patients facing cancer treatment. Little is known about what proportion of patients achieve successful semen cryopreservation. To our knowledge, neither the factors which influence the occurrence of semen cryopreservation nor the rates of fatherhood after semen has been cryopreserved have been analysed before. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This is a cohort study with nested case-control analyses of consecutive Hodgkin survivors treated between 1974 and 2004 in multi-centre randomized controlled trials. A written questionnaire was developed and sent to 1849 male survivors. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Nine hundred and two survivors provided analysable answers. The median age at treatment was 31 years. The median follow-up after cryopreservation was 13 years (range 5-36). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Three hundred and sixty-three out of 902 men (40%) cryopreserved semen before the start of potentially gonadotoxic treatment. The likelihood of semen cryopreservation was influenced by age, treatment period, disease stage, treatment modality and education level. Seventy eight of 363 men (21%) used their cryopreserved semen. Men treated between 1994 and 2004 had significantly lower odds of cryopreserved semen use compared with those treated earlier, whereas alkylating or second-line (chemo)therapy significantly increased the odds of use; no other influencing factors were identified. We found an adjusted odds ratio of 2.03 (95% confidence interval 1.11-3.73, P = 0.02) for post-treatment fatherhood if semen cryopreservation was performed. Forty-eight out of 258 men (19%) who had children after HL treatment became a father using cryopreserved semen. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Data came from questionnaires and so this study potentially suffers from response bias. We could not perform an analysis with correction for duration of follow-up or provide an actuarial use rate due to lack of dates of semen utilization. We do not have detailed information on either the techniques used in cryopreserved semen utilization or the number of cycles needed. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: Lance Armstrong Foundation, Dutch Cancer Foundation, René Vogels Stichting, no competing interests.

Phase III study of ACVBP versus ACVBP plus rituximab for patients with localized low-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (LNH03-1B).

BACKGROUND: The superiority of a chemotherapy with doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vindesine, bleomycin and prednisone (ACVBP) in comparison with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristin and prednisone plus radiotherapy for young patients with localized diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) was previously demonstrated. We report the results of a trial which evaluates the role of rituximab combined with ACVBP (R-ACVBP) in these patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Untreated patients younger than 66 years with stage I or II DLBCL and no adverse prognostic factors of the age-adjusted International Prognostic Index were randomly assigned to receive three cycles of ACVBP plus sequential consolidation with or without the addition of four infusions of rituximab. RESULTS: A total of 223 patients were randomly allocated to the study, 110 in the R-ACVBP group and 113 in the ACVBP group. After a median follow-up of 43 months, our 3-year estimate of event-free survival was 93% in the R-ACVBP group and 82% in the ACVBP group (P = 0.0487). Three-year estimate of progression-free survival was increased in the R-ACVBP group (95% versus 83%, P = 0.0205). Overall survival did not differ between the two groups with a 3-year estimates of 98% and 97%, respectively (P = 0.686). CONCLUSION: In young patients with low-risk localized DLBCL, rituximab combined with three cycles of ACVBP plus consolidation is significantly superior to ACVBP plus consolidation alone.

Rituximab versus observation after high-dose consolidative first-line chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell transplantation in patients with poor-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: This study compared the induction regimens doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide and etoposide (ACE) with doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, bleomycin and prednisone (ACVBP) before high-dose therapy (HDT) followed by autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) for patients with poor-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). A second randomisation compared rituximab with observation post-ASCT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four hundred and seventy-six patients <60 years old with newly diagnosed CD20+ DLBCL were randomised to induction with ACE or ACVBP. Three hundred and thirty responders received HDT followed by ASCT. After ASCT, 269 patients were re-randomised to receive either maintenance rituximab or observation alone. Randomisation was stratified by the quality of response to ASCT. The primary end point of this study was event-free survival (EFS). RESULTS: At a median of 4 years' follow-up from the second randomisation, there was a trend (P = 0.1) towards increased EFS for patients who received rituximab compared with observation. CONCLUSION: The type of induction therapy (ACVBP or ACE) did not significantly affect overall survival at a median 51 months' follow-up.

Autologous stem-cell transplantation as consolidation therapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients with overexpression of bcl-2 protein. Results of the Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes de l'Adulte (GELA) trial LNH98-B2.

BACKGROUND: Overexpression of B-cell lymphoma 2 (bcl-2) protein is a simple biological adverse prognostic factor that could delimit the poor prognosis population candidate for improvement with high-dose therapy and autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Therefore, we conducted a risk-adapted phase II study with ASCT as consolidation therapy in low-intermediate risk (LIR) International Prognostic Index patients aged < or = 60 years with bcl-2 overexpression (bcl-2+). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Induction chemotherapy consisted of four courses of adriamycin, cyclophosphamide, vindesine, bleomycin, prednisone, once every 2 weeks. Responding bcl-2+ patients received ASCT as consolidation, and those without bcl-2 overexpression (bcl-2-) conventional chemotherapy. Three hundred and sixteen LIR patients with DLBCL, aged between 18 and 60 years, were included. Of these, 177 (56%) were bcl-2+ and 139 (44%) bcl-2-. RESULTS: Complete response rates after induction chemotherapy were similar in bcl-2+ and bcl-2- patients (74% versus 78%). Estimated 2-year event-free survival and disease-free survival for the bcl-2+ subgroup were 79% and 87%, for bcl-2- 84% and 92% and for the whole series 81% and 90%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that taking into account biological characteristics in prospective multicenter trials allow successful adjustment of treatment and indicate that ASCT may counteract the adverse prognostic value of bcl-2 overexpression in responding LIR patients.

Second malignancy risk associated with treatment of Hodgkin's lymphoma: meta-analysis of the randomised trials.

BACKGROUND: Despite several investigations, second malignancy risks (SMR) following radiotherapy alone (RT), chemotherapy alone (CT) and combined chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) remain controversial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We sought individual patient data from randomised trials comparing RT versus CRT, CT versus CRT, RT versus CT or involved-field (IF) versus extended-field (EF) RT for untreated HL. Overall SMR (including effects of salvage treatment) were compared using Peto's method. RESULTS: Data for between 53% and 69% of patients were obtained for the four comparisons. (i) RT versus CRT (15 trials, 3343 patients): SMR were lower with CRT than with RT as initial treatment (odds ratio (OR) = 0.78, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.62-0.98 and P = 0.03). (ii) CT versus CRT (16 trials, 2861 patients): SMR were marginally higher with CRT than with CT as initial treatment (OR = 1.38, CI 1.00-1.89 and P = 0.05). (iii) IF-RT versus EF-RT (19 trials, 3221 patients): no significant difference in SMR (P = 0.28) although more breast cancers occurred with EF-RT (P = 0.04 and OR = 3.25). CONCLUSIONS: Administration of CT in addition to RT as initial therapy for HL decreases overall SMR by reducing relapse and need for salvage therapy. Administration of RT additional to CT marginally increases overall SMR in advanced stages. Breast cancer risk (but not SMR in general) was substantially higher after EF-RT. Caution is needed in applying these findings to current therapies.

High survival rate with the LMT-89 regimen in lymphoblastic lymphoma (LL), but not in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL).

The most appropriate treatment for lymphoblastic lymphomas (LL) remains uncertain. We treated 27 patients with newly diagnosed LL according to an LMT-89 protocol, which is a modified version of the LMT-81 protocol previously reported in pediatric patients. The median age was 31 years. Mediastinal enlargement was present in 25/27 patients, with pleural effusion in 12. Four patients had central nervous system involvement and 12 had bone marrow involvement and 24/27 (89%) had advanced Ann Arbor stage III-IV disease. Complete remission (CR) was achieved in 20/27 patients, unconfirmed complete remission in three patients (residual mediastinal lesion on computed tomography scan) and four failed induction therapy (ORR: 85%). Twelve patients (44%) remained in continuous CR with a median follow-up of 95 months. Survival at 3 years (when all the events occurred in our series) was 63%. Bone marrow involvement was associated with a poor outcome. Overall survival was 85+/-20% in patients without bone marrow involvement compared to 37+/-30% in patients with bone marrow involvement. The Ann Arbor stage, age and serum lactate dehydrogenase level did not influence outcomes. This LMT-89 protocol is a safe regimen and is highly effective in advanced LL without bone marrow involvement.

How to define intermediate stage in Hodgkin's lymphoma?

BACKGROUND: Intermediate or unfavourable stage Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) definition relies upon at least three different scoring systems defined by cooperative groups (EORTC, GHSG and Canadian-ECOG). We aimed to investigate their efficacy and their correlation with International Prognostic Score (IPS) for advanced HL. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied a population of 1156 patients with localized stage HL treated prospectively within GELA centres in H8 (518 patients) and H9 (638 patients) protocols. Median age: 30 yr, 18%, Female 50%; stage I: 25%; stage II: 75%. According to scoring systems 70% had 0-1 EORTC factors; 60% 0-1 GHSG factors and 82% 0-1 Canadian factors. The IPS for advanced stages was available only in H9 study with 64% 0-1 factor. RESULTS: Survival curves according to each of the different scoring systems could significantly discriminate the subgroup populations. When a multivariate Cox analysis was performed for overall survival (OS) including all the scoring system variables: age > 45 yr, sex male, Haemoglobin < 10.5 g/dL, lymphocytes < 600/microL, B symptoms with elevated ESR, extra nodal sites did retain an independent significant value. Probability of OS was 99%, 98%, 92%, 82% and 73% for patients with 1-5 factors, respectively P < 0.0001. CONCLUSION: These factors are similar for most of them with those described in the IPS when stages III and IV are replaced by extra nodal localization. This new score should be validated in other prospective trials, as it will simplify the Hodgkin prognostic scoring systems for localized and advanced stages.

Prognostic value of the age-adjusted International Prognostic Index in chemosensitive recurrent or refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphomas treated with high-dose BEAM therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation.

High-dose therapy (HDT) is now recommended for patients under 60 years of age with chemosensitive relapsed aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. However, approximately half of these patients will be cured by HDT. Prognostic factors are needed to predict which patients with chemosensitive lymphoma to second-line therapy could benefit from HDT. We retrospectively investigated the prognostic value of the widely used age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (AA-IPI) calculated at the time of relapse (35 patients) or just before second-line salvage therapy for primary refractory disease (5 patients). The median age was 51 years (range 18-64 years). Thirty-six patients had diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Salvage cytoreductive therapy before HDT was DHAP/ESHAP (cytarabine, cysplatin, etoposide, steroids) in 17 patients, VIM3-Ara-c/MAMI (high-dose cytarabine, ifosfamide, methyl-gag, amsacrine) in 17 patients, CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone) or reinforced CHOP in 4 patients, high-dose cyclophosphamide and etoposide in 2 patients. The HDT regimen consisted of BEAM (carmusine, cytarabine, etoposide, melphalan) in all cases. Eleven patients were in partial remission and 29 in complete remission at the time of HDT. Ten patients had an IPI >1, 16 had relapsed early (<6 months after first-line therapy) or disease was refractory to first-line therapy (5 of the 16 patients). The median follow-up was 6.07 years (range 1.24-9.74 years). Overall survival was not statistically different in patients with refractory disease or in those who relapsed early compared with late failures (>6 months after first-line chemotherapy) (P=1), but the AA-IPI >1 was associated with a poor outcome (P=0.03). In conclusion, the AA-IPI could have a prognostic value in patients with chemosensitive recurrent lymphoma treated with BEAM HDT.

Long-term results of the R-CHOP study in the treatment of elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a study by the Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes de l'Adulte.

PURPOSE: To analyze the long-term outcome of patients included in the Lymphome Non Hodgkinien study 98-5 (LNH98-5) comparing cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) to rituximab plus CHOP (R-CHOP) in elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: LNH98-5 was a randomized study that included 399 previously untreated patients, age 60 to 80 years, with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Patients received eight cycles of classical CHOP (cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m(2), doxorubicin 50 mg/m(2), vincristine 1.4 mg/m(2), and prednisone 40 mg/m(2) for 5 days) every 3 weeks. In R-CHOP, rituximab 375 mg/m(2) was administered the same day as CHOP. Survivals were analyzed using the intent-to-treat principle. RESULTS: Median follow-up is 5 years at present. Event-free survival, progression-free survival, disease-free survival, and overall survival remain statistically significant in favor of the combination of R-CHOP (P = .00002, P < .00001, P < .00031, and P < .0073, respectively, in the log-rank test). Patients with low-risk or high-risk lymphoma according to the age-adjusted International Prognostic Index have longer survivals if treated with the combination. No long-term toxicity appeared to be associated with the R-CHOP combination. CONCLUSION: Using the combination of R-CHOP leads to significant improvement of the outcome of elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, with significant survival benefit maintained during a 5-year follow-up. This combination should become the standard for treating these patients.

Outcome of elderly patients with aggressive Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma refractory to or relapsing after first-line CHOP or CHOP-like chemotherapy: a low probability of cure.

We retrospectively evaluated the outcome of 94 consecutive elderly patients treated at our center for an aggressive lymphoma without a low-grade component. Median survival was 26 months and 5-year overall survival was 39% (27-50%). We then evaluated the outcome of patients refractory to or relapsing after CHOP or CHOP-like chemotherapy. Twenty patients were refractory to first-line therapy and only 1/20 is alive with active lymphoma. Eight patients achieved a partial response and only 3 maintained the partial response while the other 5 patients died. Only 2 of the 27 patients who relapsed after a first complete remission achieved a second sustained complete remission. This study suggests that conventional-dose second-line chemotherapy yields disappointing results in elderly patients with aggressive lymphomas.

Phase II trial of irinotecan (CPT-11) in relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphomas.

CPT11, a camptothecin analogue, is a specific DNA topoisomerase I inhibitor, with activity in tumor cell lines with MDR expression. CPT11 has a broad spectrum of activity in solid tumors (especially in colorectal, gastric and small cell lung cancers). Early reports have shown that CPT11 could be active in non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHL) with low-dose schedules. To further evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of CPT11 in patients with refractory or relapsed NHLs, we conducted a phase II trial with escalated doses. PATIENTS AND THERAPY: From 04/98 to 05/01, 28 patients with NHL were enrolled. PATIENTS CHARACTERISTICS: M/F 21/7; median age: 56 years (range 28-72); Ann Arbor stage at the time of the study I/II and III/IV in 6 and 21 patients, respectively. Sixteen patients had refractory disease when they were enrolled in this phase II study and 8 patients were previously treated with high-dose therapy and stem-cell transplantation. CPT11 was administrated at the doses of 350 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. Six courses were given in patients who achieved CR, PR or stable disease. Patients were evaluated every 2 courses. If no grade II or more toxicity was observed after the first course, escalated dose (500 mg/m2) was then undertaken. RESULTS: 19/28 patients received more than 2 courses of CPT11 and were evaluated for response. Nine patients received one course of therapy because of either progressive disease (n = 6), toxicity (n = 2) or refusal (n = 1). Ten patients received escalated dose (500 mg/m2). Complete remission and partial was achieved in 2/19 patients, stable disease in 7/19, and progressive disease in 10/19 patients. Median duration of responses was short (3 months, range 1-8 months). Seventy-five courses were evaluated for toxicity according to the WHO criteria. Diarrhea grade 2 or 3 occurred in 9/75 courses; cholinergic syndrome grade 2 in 3/75 courses; nausea grade 3 in 7/75 courses. Hematological toxicity: leucopenia grade 3 or 4 in 21/75 courses; thrombocytopenia grade 3 in 8/75 courses; infectious episodes grade 2 or 3 in 7/75 courses. In 2/7 courses with escalated doses, grade I/IV neutropenia occurred withoutother major toxicity. CONCLUSION: CPT11 has low activity in heavily pretreated NHLs. Responses were of short duration.

Model-based methodology for analyzing incomplete quality-of-life data and integrating them into the Q-TWiST framework.

BACKGROUND: The standard Q-TWiST approach defines a series of health states and weights each state's duration according to its quality of life (QOL) to calculate quality-adjusted lifetimes. However, a fixed weight may not adequately reflect time variations in QOL. METHODS: To account for measurements derived from irregular visits and informative missing data, the authors estimated the mean QOL profile using a mixed-effect growth curve model for the response, combined with a logistic regression model for the drop-out process. RESULTS: Using data from a clinical study of lymphoma patients, the authors demonstrated better readaptation to normal life for patients younger than 30. Sensitivity analyses and computer simulations demonstrated that modeling the drop-out probability as a function of the QOL measurements is necessary if conditioning by health state is not possible. CONCLUSION: Our model-based approach is useful to analyze studies with incomplete QOL data, especially when approximate QOL assessment by health state is not possible.

Current clinical trials for the treatment of adult advanced-stage Hodgkin's disease: GELA experiences. Groupe d'Etudes des Lymphomes de l'Adulte.

BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment for patients with advanced Hodgkin's disease (HD) responding to initial chemotherapy (CT) and an intensive salvage therapy for those who fail to respond completely after initial treatment were evaluated prospectively. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The Groupe d'etudes des Lymphomes de l'Adulte H89 trial compared two cycles of CT with (sub)total nodal irradiation (RT) as consolidation treatments for patients with stage IIIB/IV HD with a complete response (CR) or good partial response (PR) after six cycles of CT. Early salvage therapy, including intensified cytoreductive CT and high-dose CT with autologous stem-cell transplantation, was integrated into the trial for patients who had failed to respond completely or relapsed after initial treatment. RESULTS: The study does not demonstrate any advantage of RT over CT as consolidation treatment at the time of CT-induced CR or good PR. Early intensive therapy improves the outcomes of patients with PR and those who relapsed with unfavourable factors. This strategy remains unsatisfactory for patients with primary refractory disease and chemoresistant disease. CONCLUSION: Based on first intensification of conventional-dose CT, in the next trial (EORTC-GELA Intergroup Study), four escalated bleomycin-etoposide-doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide-procarbazine-prednisone (BEACOPP) followed by four baseline BEACOPP are compared with the eight doxorubicin-bleomycin-vinblastine-dacarbazine standard with no RT for patients who achieve CR/CR-uncertain after initial CT.

Advanced Hodgkin disease with large mediastinal involvement can be treated with eight cycles of chemotherapy alone after a major response to six cycles of chemotherapy: a study of 82 patients from the Groupes d'Etudes des Lymphomes de l'Adulte H89 trial.

BACKGROUND: The prognostic impact of large mediastinal involvement (mediastinum/thorax [M/T] ratio > 0.33) in advanced Hodgkin disease (HD) and the optimal treatment with chemotherapy or combined treatment remains controversial. METHODS: Among 533 assessable patients with Ann Arbor Stage IIIB/IV HD included in the H89 trial, 82 had large mediastinal mass defined on chest X-ray. All patients received induction with six cycles of chemotherapy (mechlorethamine, vincristine, procarbazine, prednisone-doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine or doxorubicin, vinblastine, bleomycin, procarbazine, prednisone); then complete and good partial responders were randomized between two consolidation treatments: 2 cycles of the same chemotherapy or (sub)total lymph node irradiation. RESULTS: Among 82 patients with an M/T ratio greater than 0.33, 48 were very large (ratio > 0.45). A large mediastinal mass was associated with supradiaphragmatic disease, younger age, histologic nodular sclerosis, and different sex ratio compared with other H89 trial patients. Biologic parameters and prognostic factors were similar for both groups. Although the major response rate to induction chemotherapy (after 6 cycles) was lower for patients with large mediastinal mass (78% vs. 86%), the 5-year overall survival rate (80% vs. 79%) and event free survival rate (59% vs. 61%) were similar (P = 0.64 and 0.3, respectively). The outcome was the same for patients (74%) with a large mediastinal mass randomized to 1 of the 2 consolidation arms. Analysis of progression showed that 68% (21 of 31) of failures occurred early during treatment and involved the mediastinum in 86% of the cases. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with large mediastinal mass and advanced HD who achieved a major response of at least 75% after 6 cycles of chemotherapy, a consolidation radiation therapy can be replaced by 2 additional cycles of chemotherapy.

Extranodal Hodgkin disease: spectrum of disease.

Extranodal lesions in Hodgkin disease may develop and spread to virtually any organ system, simulating other neoplastic or infectious diseases. It is important to determine whether extranodal involvement represents a primary manifestation or dissemination of systemic disease, which has a poorer prognosis. Computed tomography (CT) is the preferred modality, although ultrasonography and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging may also be helpful. CT is superior to conventional radiography in assessing chest disease, although MR imaging is more sensitive than CT in detecting chest wall involvement. CT is preferred for evaluating hepatic lymphoma and has proved particularly valuable in diagnosing gastric lymphoma and detecting renal or perirenal masses. CT and MR imaging are equally effective in detecting brain Hodgkin disease; however, the latter is superior in the detection of extracerebral tumor deposits in the subdural or epidural space. MR imaging is also preferred for evaluating meningeal and spinal cord involvement. Both MR imaging and CT allow excellent assessment of bone texture and accurate analysis of tumoral bone invasion, but MR imaging is superior in demonstrating bone marrow infiltration, and CT is superior in delineating the extent of cortical bone destruction. In the future, metabolic positron emission tomography may provide more information about extranodal lymphoma than do the current imaging modalities.

Comparison of chemotherapy to radiotherapy as consolidation of complete or good partial response after six cycles of chemotherapy for patients with advanced Hodgkin's disease: results of the groupe d'études des lymphomes de l'Adulte H89 trial.

The treatment of advanced Hodgkin's disease (HD) with chemotherapy (CTx) alone or combined modality treatments has been controversial. In 1989, we designed a randomized study to compare 2 cycles of CTx to (sub)total nodal irradiation (RTx) as consolidation treatments for patients with stage IIIB/IV HD in complete remission (CR) or good partial response after 6 cycles of CTx. A total of 559 patients were randomized to receive 6 cycles of MOPP/ABV (mechlorethamine, vincristine, procarbazine, prednisone/Adriamycin [doxorubicin], bleomycin, vinblastine) hybrid (n = 266) or ABVPP (n = 267). After induction treatment, 418 patients could be evaluated for the consolidation phase. With a median follow-up of 48 months, the 5-year disease-free survival estimates were 80% for 8 cycles of MOPP/ABV, 82% for 6 cycles of MOPP/ABV plus RTx, 68% for 8 cycles of ABVPP, and 75% for 6 cycles of ABVPP plus RTx (P =.01). The 5-year disease-free survival estimates did not differ between CTx and RTx, 74% and 79%, respectively (P =.07). After MOPP/ABV, the 5-year overall survival estimates did not differ between CTx and RTx, 85% and 88%, respectively (P =.2). After ABVPP, the 5-year survival estimates were 94% for CTx and 78% for RTx (P =.002). These results showed that RTx was not superior to CTx consolidation after doxorubicin-induced CR for patients with advanced HD. Because of the uncertainty of obtaining a prolonged second remission for patients relapsing after CTx and RTx and the possible long-term effects of RTx, we prefer 8 cycles of CTx as standard treatment when a CR has been achieved after 6 cycles.