Oesophageal stasis is a risk factor for chronic lung allograft dysfunction and allograft failure in lung transplant recipients.

Background: Morbidity and mortality in lung transplant recipients are often triggered by recurrent aspiration events, potentiated by oesophageal and gastric disorders. Previous small studies have shown conflicting associations between oesophageal function and the development of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). Herein, we sought to investigate the relationship between oesophageal motility disorders and long-term outcomes in a large retrospective cohort of lung transplant recipients. Methods: All lung transplant recipients at the Toronto Lung Transplant Program from 2012 to 2018 with available oesophageal manometry testing within the first 7 months post-transplant were included in this study. Patients were categorised according to the Chicago Classification of oesophageal disorders (v3.0). Associations between oesophageal motility disorders with the development of CLAD and allograft failure (defined as death or re-transplantation) were assessed. Results: Of 487 patients, 57 (12%) had oesophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (OGJOO) and 47 (10%) had a disorder of peristalsis (eight major, 39 minor). In a multivariable analysis, OGJOO was associated with an increased risk of CLAD (HR 1.71, 95% CI 1.15-2.55, p=0.008) and allograft failure (HR 1.69, 95% CI 1.13-2.53, p=0.01). Major disorders of peristalsis were associated with an increased risk of CLAD (HR 1.55, 95% CI 1.01-2.37, p=0.04) and allograft failure (HR 3.33, 95% CI 1.53-7.25, p=0.002). Minor disorders of peristalsis were not significantly associated with CLAD or allograft failure. Conclusion: Lung transplant recipients with oesophageal stasis characterised by OGJOO or major disorders of peristalsis were at an increased risk of adverse long-term outcomes. These findings will help with risk stratification of lung transplant recipients and personalisation of treatment for aspiration prevention.

Triaging donor lungs based on a microaspiration signature that predicts adverse recipient outcome.

BACKGROUND: Aspiration is a relative contraindication to accepting donor lungs for transplant and is currently assessed by visual inspection of the airways via bronchoscopy. However, this method is limited as it does not assess for microaspiration. Bile acids measured in large airway bronchial wash (LABW) samples have been shown to be a marker of aspiration in lung transplant recipients. Herein, we investigate the utility of measuring total bile acids (TBA) in donor LABW to predict performance of donor lungs and recipient outcomes. METHODS: TBA was measured in 605 consecutive lung donors at the Toronto Lung Transplant Program. TBA levels were compared in donor lungs deemed unsuitable for transplant, requiring further assessment on ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP), and those suitable for direct transplantation using Mann-Whitney-U tests. Relationships between LABW TBA concentrations and recipient outcomes were evaluated using multivariable Cox-PH models and log-rank analysis. RESULTS: Donor TBA was highest in lungs deemed unsuitable for transplant and correlated with clinical assessment of aspiration. LABW TBA concentration correlated with calcium, decreased pH, and increased pro-inflammatory mediators in EVLP perfusate. TBA cut-off of 1245 nM was able to differentiate donor lungs directly declined from those suitable for direct transplantation with a 91% specificity (AUROC: 73%). High donor TBA status was associated with the increased rate of primary graft dysfunction, longer time to extubation, and shorter time to chronic lung allograft dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: In a large retrospective cohort, we observed that donor LABW TBA was associated with suitability of donor lungs for transplant, performance of the organ on EVLP, and adverse recipient outcomes.

Immunosuppressive Therapy in Lung Transplantation.

Long term survival and quality of life after lung transplantation are still affected by the development of chronic lung graft dysfunction (CLAD). CLAD is the number one cause of death one year after transplant; and there is no effective therapy available to date. Transplant centers' approaches include perioperative immunosuppression, maintenance immunosuppression, and the treatment of eventual rejection. This review will focus on maintenance immunosuppression and the available data that support these strategies, as well as a brief description of our desensitization protocol and immunologic risk stratification. Optimization of immunosuppression is key to increase survival and graft function in transplant recipients, mostly through the combination of drugs. Since the therapeutic options to manage CLAD are still very limited, more studies are necessary to test new therapies and to clarify the potential role of new agents.