Enhancing cognitive control with transcranial magnetic stimulation in subject-specific frontoparietal networks.

BACKGROUND: Cognitive control processes, including those involving frontoparietal networks, are highly variable between individuals, posing challenges to basic and clinical sciences. While distinct frontoparietal networks have been associated with specific cognitive control functions such as switching, inhibition, and working memory updating functions, there have been few basic tests of the role of these networks at the individual level. METHODS: To examine the role of cognitive control at the individual level, we conducted a within-subject excitatory transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) study in 19 healthy individuals that targeted intrinsic ("resting") frontoparietal networks. Person-specific intrinsic networks were identified with resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging scans to determine TMS targets. The participants performed three cognitive control tasks: an adapted Navon figure-ground task (requiring set switching), n-back (working memory), and Stroop color-word (inhibition). OBJECTIVE: Hypothesis: We predicted that stimulating a network associated with externally oriented control [the "FPCN-B" (fronto-parietal control network)] would improve performance on the set switching and working memory task relative to a network associated with attention (the Dorsal Attention Network, DAN) and cranial vertex in a full within-subjects crossover design. RESULTS: We found that set switching performance was enhanced by FPCN-B stimulation along with some evidence of enhancement in the higher-demand n-back conditions. CONCLUSION: Higher task demands or proactive control might be a distinguishing role of the FPCN-B, and personalized intrinsic network targeting is feasible in TMS designs.

Evaluating and benchmarking the EEG signal quality of high-density, dry MXene-based electrode arrays against gelled Ag/AgCl electrodes.

Objective.To evaluate the signal quality of dry MXene-based electrode arrays (also termed 'MXtrodes') for electroencephalographic (EEG) recordings where gelled Ag/AgCl electrodes are a standard.Approach.We placed 4 × 4 MXtrode arrays and gelled Ag/AgCl electrodes on different scalp locations. The scalp was cleaned with alcohol and rewetted with saline before application. We recorded from both electrode types simultaneously while participants performed a vigilance task.Main results.The root mean squared amplitude of MXtrodes was slightly higher than that of Ag/AgCl electrodes (.24-1.94 uV). Most MXtrode pairs had slightly lower broadband spectral coherence (.05 to .1 dB) and Delta- and Theta-band timeseries correlation (.05 to .1 units) compared to the Ag/AgCl pair (p< .001). However, the magnitude of correlation and coherence was high across both electrode types. Beta-band timeseries correlation and spectral coherence were higher between neighboring MXtrodes in the array (.81 to .84 units) than between any other pair (.70 to .75 units). This result suggests the close spacing of the nearest MXtrodes (3 mm) more densely sampled high spatial-frequency topographies. Event-related potentials were more similar between MXtrodes (ρ⩾ .95) than equally spaced Ag/AgCl electrodes (ρ⩽ .77,p< .001). Dry MXtrode impedance (x̄= 5.15 KΩ cm2) was higher and more variable than gelled Ag/AgCl electrodes (x̄= 1.21 KΩ cm2,p< .001). EEG was also recorded on the scalp across diverse hair types.Significance.Dry MXene-based electrodes record EEG at a quality comparable to conventional gelled Ag/AgCl while requiring minimal scalp preparation and no gel. MXtrodes can record independent signals at a spatial density four times higher than conventional electrodes, including through hair, thus opening novel opportunities for research and clinical applications that could benefit from dry and higher-density configurations.

EEG Phase Can Be Predicted with Similar Accuracy across Cognitive States after Accounting for Power and Signal-to-Noise Ratio.

EEG phase is increasingly used in cognitive neuroscience, brain-computer interfaces, and closed-loop stimulation devices. However, it is unknown how accurate EEG phase prediction is across cognitive states. We determined the EEG phase prediction accuracy of parieto-occipital alpha waves across rest and task states in 484 participants over 11 public datasets. We were able to track EEG phase accurately across various cognitive conditions and datasets, especially during periods of high instantaneous alpha power and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Although resting states generally have higher accuracies than task states, absolute accuracy differences were small, with most of these differences attributable to EEG power and SNR. These results suggest that experiments and technologies using EEG phase should focus more on minimizing external noise and waiting for periods of high power rather than inducing a particular cognitive state.

Alerting attention is sufficient to induce a phase-dependent behavior that can be predicted by frontal EEG.

Recent studies suggest that attention is rhythmic. Whether that rhythmicity can be explained by the phase of ongoing neural oscillations, however, is still debated. We contemplate that a step toward untangling the relationship between attention and phase stems from employing simple behavioral tasks that isolate attention from other cognitive functions (perception/decision-making) and by localized monitoring of neural activity with high spatiotemporal resolution over the brain regions associated with the attentional network. In this study, we investigated whether the phase of electroencephalography (EEG) oscillations predicts alerting attention. We isolated the alerting mechanism of attention using the Psychomotor Vigilance Task, which does not involve a perceptual component, and collected high resolution EEG using novel high-density dry EEG arrays at the frontal region of the scalp. We identified that alerting attention alone is sufficient to induce a phase-dependent modulation of behavior at EEG frequencies of 3, 6, and 8 Hz throughout the frontal region, and we quantified the phase that predicts the high and low attention states in our cohort. Our findings disambiguate the relationship between EEG phase and alerting attention.