AF Ablation Guided by Spatiotemporal Electrogram Dispersion Without Pulmonary Vein Isolation: A Wholly Patient-Tailored Approach.

BACKGROUND: The use of intracardiac electrograms to guide atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation has yielded conflicting results. OBJECTIVES: The authors evaluated the usefulness of spatiotemporal dispersion, a visually recognizable electric footprint of AF drivers, for the ablation of all forms of AF. METHODS: The authors prospectively enrolled 105 patients admitted for AF ablation. AF was sequentially mapped in both atria with a 20-pole PentaRay catheter. The authors tagged and ablated only regions displaying electrogram dispersion during AF. Results were compared to a validation set in which a conventional ablation approach was used (pulmonary vein isolation/stepwise approach). To establish the mechanism underlying spatiotemporal dispersion of AF electrograms, the authors conducted realistic numerical simulations of AF drivers in a 2-dimensional model and optical mapping of ovine atrial scar-related AF. RESULTS: Ablation at dispersion areas terminated AF in 95% of the 105 patients. After ablation of 17 ± 10% of the left atrial surface and 18 months of follow-up, the atrial arrhythmia recurrence rate was 15% after 1.4 ± 0.5 procedures per patient versus 41% in the validation set after 1.5 ± 0.5 procedures per patient (arrhythmia free-survival: 85% vs. 59%; log-rank p < 0.001). Compared with the validation set, radiofrequency times (49 ± 21 min vs. 85 ± 34.5 min; p = 0.001) and procedure times (168 ± 42 min vs. 230 ± 67 min; p < 0.0001) were shorter. In simulations and optical mapping experiments, virtual PentaRay recordings demonstrated that electrogram dispersion is mostly recorded in the vicinity of a driver. CONCLUSIONS: The clustering of intracardiac electrograms exhibiting spatiotemporal dispersion is indicative of AF drivers. Their ablation allows for a nonextensive and patient-tailored approach to AF ablation. (Substrate Ablation Guided by High Density Mapping in Atrial Fibrillation [SUBSTRATE HD]; NCT02093949).

Electrogram Fractionation-Guided Ablation in the Left Atrium Decreases the Frequency of Activation in the Pulmonary Veins and Leads to Atrial Fibrillation Termination: Pulmonary Vein Modulation Rather Than Isolation.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the impact of a complex fractionated atrial electrogram (CFAE)-guided ablation strategy on atrial fibrillation (AF) dynamics in patients with persistent AF. BACKGROUND: It is still unclear whether complete pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is required or if the ablation of well-delineated pulmonary vein (PV) subregions could achieve similar outcomes in persistent AF. METHODS: CFAE-guided ablations were performed in 76 patients (65.2 ± 10 years of age) with persistent AF. In 47 patients, we measured mean PVs and left atrial appendage (LAA) cycle length (CL) values (PV-CL and LAA-CL), before ablation and before AF termination. We defined "active" PVs as PV-CL ≤ LAA-CL, "rapid fires" as PV-CL ≤80% of LAA-CL, and "PV-LAA CL gradient" as a significant CL difference between the 2 regions. RESULTS: AF termination (sinus rhythm [SR] or atrial tachycardia [AT] conversion) occurred in 92% and SR conversion in 75%. The radiofrequency time for AF termination and total radiofrequency time were 26 ± 25 min and 61.1 ± 21.6 min, respectively. Thirty of 47 patients had active PV (with 19 PV "rapid fires"). Ablation significantly increased median CL, both at PVs and LAA from 188 ms (interquartile range [IQR]: 161 to 210 ms) to 227.5 ms (IQR: 200 to 256 ms) (p < 0.0001) and from 197 ms (IQR: 168 to 220 ms) to 224 ms (IQR: 193 to 250 ms) (p < 0001), respectively. After ablation, PV-LAA CL gradients were withdrawn and all PV "rapid fires" were extinguished (without PVI). After 17.2 ± 10 months of follow-up and 1.61 ± 0.75 procedures, 86.3% and 73% of the patients were free from AF and from any arrhythmia (AF/AT), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: CFAE-guided ablation leads to a large decrease in PV frequency of activation, preceding AF termination. A PV modulation approach, rather than complete PVI, may be preferable for persistent AF.

Active or passive pulmonary vein in atrial fibrillation: is pulmonary vein isolation always essential?

BACKGROUND: The role of pulmonary veins (PVs) in persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) perpetuation appears less important than in paroxysmal AF. Electrogram-based substrate ablation is not widely performed as a stand-alone strategy. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate PV activity in AF perpetuation and efficacy of our patient-tailored ablation strategy (electrogram-based substrate ablation with or without pulmonary vein isolation [PVI]). METHODS: One hundred twenty-one patients with paroxysmal (n = 19; 15.7%), persistent (n = 77; 63.6%), or long-standing persistent (n = 25; 20.7%) AF underwent electrogram-based substrate ablation with AF termination end point: sinus rhythm or atrial tachycardia conversion. Before ablation, we classified PVs as "passive" if silent PV or if PV cycle length is greater than left atrial appendage cycle length. No PVI was performed in such cases. RESULTS: Passive PVs were observed in 52 of 121 patients (paroxysmal AF = 0%, persistent AF = 40%, and long-standing persistent AF = 76%; P < .0001]). Substrate ablation terminated AF in 95.6% (sinus rhythm conversion in 80.2%). Compared with patients with active PVs, patients with passive PVs had longer AF sustained duration (19.1 ± 29.7 months vs 4.9 ± 11.1 months; P < .0001), larger left atrial diameter (46.9 ± 7.3 mm vs 41.9 ± 6.0 mm; P = .0014), lower left ventricular ejection fraction (45.4% ± 13.5% vs 55.1% ± 9.4%; P < .0001), and more often structural heart disease (57% vs 33%; P = .02). After a follow-up of 20.39 ± 11.23 months (1.6 procedures per patient), 82% were arrhythmia free with this strategy. CONCLUSIONS: PV activity during AF decreases with AF chronicity, left atrial dilatation, and left ventricular ejection fraction. Our patient-tailored ablation strategy without systematic PVI provides good results.

Diastolic asynchrony is more frequent than systolic asynchrony in dilated cardiomyopathy and is less improved by cardiac resynchronization therapy.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the incidence of diastolic and systolic asynchrony, assessed by tissue Doppler imaging (TDI), in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) and severe left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, and to assess TDI changes induced by cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). BACKGROUND: Thirty percent of CRT candidates are nonresponders. Besides QRS width, the presence of echographic systolic asynchrony has been used to identify future responders. Little is known about diastolic asynchrony and its change after CRT. METHODS: Tissue Doppler imaging was performed in 116 CHF patients (LV ejection fraction 26 +/- 8%). Systolic and diastolic asynchrony was calculated using TDI recordings of right ventricular and LV walls. RESULTS: The CHF group consisted of 116 patients. Diastolic asynchrony was more frequent than systolic, concerning both intraventricular (58% vs. 47%; p = 0.0004) and interventricular (72 vs. 45%; p < 0.0001) asynchrony. Systolic and diastolic asynchrony were both present in 41% patients, but one-third had isolated diastolic asynchrony. Although diastolic delays increased with QRS duration, 42% patients with narrow QRS presented with diastolic asynchrony. Conversely, 27% patients with large QRS had no diastolic asynchrony. Forty-two patients underwent CRT. Incidence of systolic intraventricular asynchrony decreased from 71% to 33% after CRT (p < 0.0001), but diastolic asynchrony decreased only from 81% to 55% (p < 0.0002). Cardiac resynchronization therapy induced new diastolic asynchrony in eight patients. CONCLUSIONS: Diastolic asynchrony is weakly correlated with QRS duration, is more frequent than systolic asynchrony, and may be observed alone. Diastolic asynchrony is less improved by CRT than systolic. Persistent diastolic asynchrony may explain some cases of lack of improvement after CRT despite good systolic resynchronization.