Patient reported outcome measure for upper limb in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: correlation with PUL2.0.

The increasing pressure to include non ambulant Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) boys in clinical trials has highlighted the need for outcome measures that could address the impact of upper limb function on activities of daily living. The aim of the present study was to establish the correlation between the recently developed Patient Reported Outcome Measure for the upper limb (PROM UL) and the observer rated functional scale Performance of Upper Limb (PUL 2.0) in a large cohort of DMD boys and young adults. As part of a larger natural history study, non ambulant DMD patients were assessed using PUL2.0 and PROM UL. One hundred and twenty-five concurrent PUL 2.0 and PROM UL evaluations from 60 non ambulant DMD boys were taken into consideration. The total PROM UL scores showed a strong correlation with both PUL 2.0 total scores and with PUL 2.0 entry item score. The strong correlation between the two tools confirms the clinical meaningfulness of the PUL2.0 and that the PROM UL can help to detect the gradient of progression of upper limb involvement.

Meta-analysis of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria interaction with host plants: implications for drought stress response gene expression.

Introduction: The molecular and physiological mechanisms activated in plants during drought stress tolerance are regulated by several key genes with both metabolic and regulatory roles. Studies focusing on crop gene expression following plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) inoculation may help understand which bioinoculant is closely related to the induction of abiotic stress responses. Methods: Here, we performed a meta-analysis following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to summarise information regarding plant-PGPR interactions, focusing on the regulation of nine genes involved in plant drought stress response. The literature research yielded 3,338 reports, of which only 41 were included in the meta-analysis based on the chosen inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis was performed on four genes (ACO, APX, ACS and DREB2); the other five genes (ERD15, MYB, MYC, acdS, WRKY) had an insufficient number of eligible articles. Results: Forest plots obtained through each meta-analysis showed that the overexpression of ACO, APX, ACS and DREB2 genes was not statistically significant. Unlike the other genes, DREB2 showed statistically significant results in both the presence and absence of PGPR. Considering I2>75 %, the results showed a high heterogeneity among the studies included, and the cause for this was examined using subgroup analysis. Moreover, the funnel plot and Egger's test showed that the analyses were affected by strong publication bias. Discussion: This study argues that the presence of PGPR may not significantly influence the expression of drought stress response-related crop genes. This finding may be due to high heterogeneity, lack of data on the genes examined, and significant publication bias.