Do social protection programmes affect the burden of breast and cervical cancer? A systematic review.

Background: Socioeconomic conditions are strongly associated with breast and cervical cancer incidence and mortality patterns; therefore, social protection programmes (SPPs) might impact these cancers. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of SPPs on breast and cervical cancer outcomes and their risk/protective factors. Methods: Five databases were searched for articles that assessed participation in PPS and the incidence, survival, mortality (primary outcomes), screening, staging at diagnosis and risk/protective factors (secondary outcomes) for these cancers. Only peer-reviewed quantitative studies of women receiving SPPs compared to eligible women not receiving benefits were included. Independent reviewers selected articles, assessed eligibility, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias. A harvest plot represents the included studies and shows the direction of effect, sample size and risk of bias. Findings: Of 17,080 documents retrieved, 43 studies were included in the review. No studies evaluated the primary outcomes. They all examined the relationship between SPPs and screening, as well as risk and protective factors. The harvest plot showed that in lower risk of bias studies, participants of SPPs had lower weight and fertility, were older at sexual debut, and breastfed their infants for longer. Interpretation: No studies have yet assessed the effect of SPPs on breast and cervical cancer incidence, survival, or mortality; nevertheless, the existing evidence suggests positive impacts on risk and protective factors.

Effect of hormone therapy on blood pressure and hypertension in postmenopausal women: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IMPORTANCE: Menopausal hormone therapy (HT) includes a wide variety of hormonal compounds, and its effect on blood pressure is still uncertain. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess evidence regarding the effect of HT on blood pressure in postmenopausal women and its association with arterial hypertension. EVIDENCE REVIEW: This systematic review and meta-analysis included randomized clinical trials and prospective observational studies. Systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and the incidence of hypertension were assessed. All stages were independently performed by two reviewers. For blood pressure outcome, standardized mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated as effect measures. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic. The results are presented based on the HT type. The incidence of hypertension was compared using descriptive analyses. FINDINGS: Eleven studies were included with 81,041 women evaluated, of which 29,812 used HT. The meta-analysis, conducted with 8 studies and 1,718 women, showed an increase in SBP with the use of oral conjugated equine estrogens plus progestogen (SMD = 0.60 mm Hg, 95% CI = 0.19 to 1.01). However, oral or transdermal use of estradiol plus progestogen (SMD = -2.00 mm Hg, 95% CI = -7.26 to 3.27), estradiol alone, and tibolone did not show any significant effect. No significant effect on DBP was observed for any formulation. Women who used oral estrogen plus progestogen had a higher risk of incident hypertension than those who never used it. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The effect of HT on blood pressure is influenced by the formulation used, especially the type of estrogen. The combined formulations of conjugated equine estrogens plus progestogen increased SBP and the risk of hypertension, which was not observed among estradiol plus progestogen, estradiol alone, and tibolone users.

Stroke Is Associated with Refractory Hypertension among Resistant and Refractory Patients in a Cross-Sectional Study

Abstract Background Refractory hypertension (RfH) is a severe phenotype of resistant hypertension (RH) linked to higher risk of stroke and other adverse cardiovascular events, but knowledge about it is still lacking. Objectives To evaluate the association between RfH and stroke. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study in a referral clinic for patients with severe hypertension in the period from 2018 to 2020. RH was defined as uncontrolled blood pressure (BP) despite the use of 3 antihypertensive agents, including a diuretic, or the use of ≥ 4 agents regardless of BP control. RfH was defined as lack of BP control despite use of ≥ 5 antihypertensive agents. Individuals were classified as RfH or RH, and multivariate logistic regression models were constructed to examine the association between RfH and stroke. Results We evaluated a total of 137 patients; 81% were female, and 93,3% were Black or multiracial. The mean age was 64.4 years. Stroke was more prevalent in the RfH group (35.7%), in comparison to the RH group (12.8%) (p value = 0.01). Unadjusted odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for factors associated with stroke were RfH (OR 3.77; 95% CI 1.45 to 9.80), systolic BP (OR 1.02; 95% CI 1.002 to 1.04) and diastolic BP (OR 1.03; 95% CI 1.001 to 1.06). Adjusted OR for factors associated with stroke were RfH (OR 3.55; 95% CI 1.02 to 12.42), systolic BP (OR 1.02; 95% CI 0.99 to 1.05) and diastolic BP (OR 1.01; 95% CI 0.96 to 1.06). Conclusion RfH was associated with higher prevalence of stroke. Efforts are required to better understand this association to prevent adverse cardiovascular outcomes in these patients.

Hormone therapy and Hypertension in Postmenopausal Women: Results from the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil). / Terapia Hormonal e Hipertensão em Mulheres na Pós-Menopausa: Resultados do Estudo Longitudinal de Saúde do Adulto (ELSA-Brasil).

BACKGROUND: Hypertension is a major risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in post-menopausal women. Although menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) is a very effective treatment for vasomotor symptoms during this period, the influence of this therapy on blood pressure is not yet clear. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between the use of MHT and hypertension in participants of the ELSA-Brasil. METHODS: A cross-sectional study using the baseline ELSA-Brasil data in a cohort of 2,138 women who had experienced natural menopause. This study analyzed hypertension, defined as arterial pressure ≥140/90 mmHg or previous antihypertensive use, and use of MHT, with participants being classified into never, past, and current users. Associations were assessed using an adjusted logistic regression model, with statistical significance set at p<0.05. RESULTS: Overall, 1,492 women (69.8%) had never used MHT, 457 (21.4%) had used it in the past, and 189 (8.8%) were current users. The use of MHT was more common in women who had a body mass index (BMI) <25 kg/m2and triglyceride levels <150 mg/dl, and who were physically less inactive, non-smokers, and non-diabetics. Current MHT users were less likely to have hypertension (OR=0.59; 95% CI: 0.41-0.85) compared to those who had never used MHT. In most cases, MHT was started at or before 59 years of age, within 10 years of becoming menopausal, and its use lasted for up to five years. CONCLUSION: Current MHT use was not related to hypertension, particularly in healthy women and in those under 60 years of age.

FUNDAMENTO: A hipertensão arterial é considerada um importante fator de risco de morbidade e mortalidade cardiovascular em mulheres na pós-menopausa. Embora a terapia hormonal da menopausa (THM) seja um tratamento muito eficiente para sintomas vasomotores nesse período, a influência dessa terapia na pressão arterial ainda não está clara. OBJETIVO: Avaliar a relação entre o uso de THM e a hipertensão em participantes do ELSA-Brasil. MÉTODOS: Um estudo transversal usando dados da linha de base da coorte ELSA-Brasil, com 2.138 mulheres que passaram por menopausa natural. Neste estudo, foi analisado a hipertensão, definida como pressão arterial ≥140/90 mmHg ou uso anterior de anti-hipertensivo, e o uso da THM, com participantes sendo classificadas em grupos daquelas que nunca usaram, que já usaram e que estavam em uso atual. As associações foram avaliadas usando-se um modelo de regressão logística multivariada com uma significância estatística definida em p<0,05. RESULTADOS: No total, 1.492 mulheres (69,8%) nunca tinham usado a THM, 457 (21,4%) tinham usado no passado, e 189 (8,8%) estavam em uso atual. O uso de THM foi mais comum em mulheres que tinham índice de massa corporal <25 kg/m2 e níveis de triglicérides <150 mg/dl, que eram fisicamente menos inativas, não fumantes e não diabéticas. As mulheres em uso atual da THM apresentaram menores chances de ter hipertensão (OR=0,59; IC 95%: 0,41-0,85), em comparação com as que nunca a usaram. Na maioria dos casos, a THM foi iniciada com idade até 59 anos, com menos de 10 anos de menopausa e o uso durou até cinco anos. CONCLUSÃO: O uso atual da THM não esteve relacionado à hipertensão, especialmente em mulheres saudáveis e que tinham menos de 60 anos de idade.

Terapia Hormonal e Hipertensão em Mulheres na Pós-Menopausa: Resultados do Estudo Longitudinal de Saúde do Adulto (ELSA-Brasil) / Hormone therapy and Hypertension in Postmenopausal Women: Results from the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil)

Resumo Fundamento A hipertensão arterial é considerada um importante fator de risco de morbidade e mortalidade cardiovascular em mulheres na pós-menopausa. Embora a terapia hormonal da menopausa (THM) seja um tratamento muito eficiente para sintomas vasomotores nesse período, a influência dessa terapia na pressão arterial ainda não está clara. Objetivo Avaliar a relação entre o uso de THM e a hipertensão em participantes do ELSA-Brasil. Métodos Um estudo transversal usando dados da linha de base da coorte ELSA-Brasil, com 2.138 mulheres que passaram por menopausa natural. Neste estudo, foi analisado a hipertensão, definida como pressão arterial ≥140/90 mmHg ou uso anterior de anti-hipertensivo, e o uso da THM, com participantes sendo classificadas em grupos daquelas que nunca usaram, que já usaram e que estavam em uso atual. As associações foram avaliadas usando-se um modelo de regressão logística multivariada com uma significância estatística definida em p<0,05. Resultados No total, 1.492 mulheres (69,8%) nunca tinham usado a THM, 457 (21,4%) tinham usado no passado, e 189 (8,8%) estavam em uso atual. O uso de THM foi mais comum em mulheres que tinham índice de massa corporal <25 kg/m2 e níveis de triglicérides <150 mg/dl, que eram fisicamente menos inativas, não fumantes e não diabéticas. As mulheres em uso atual da THM apresentaram menores chances de ter hipertensão (OR=0,59; IC 95%: 0,41-0,85), em comparação com as que nunca a usaram. Na maioria dos casos, a THM foi iniciada com idade até 59 anos, com menos de 10 anos de menopausa e o uso durou até cinco anos. Conclusão O uso atual da THM não esteve relacionado à hipertensão, especialmente em mulheres saudáveis e que tinham menos de 60 anos de idade.

Abstract Background Hypertension is a major risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in post-menopausal women. Although menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) is a very effective treatment for vasomotor symptoms during this period, the influence of this therapy on blood pressure is not yet clear. Objective To evaluate the relationship between the use of MHT and hypertension in participants of the ELSA-Brasil. Methods A cross-sectional study using the baseline ELSA-Brasil data in a cohort of 2,138 women who had experienced natural menopause. This study analyzed hypertension, defined as arterial pressure ≥140/90 mmHg or previous antihypertensive use, and use of MHT, with participants being classified into never, past, and current users. Associations were assessed using an adjusted logistic regression model, with statistical significance set at p<0.05. Results Overall, 1,492 women (69.8%) had never used MHT, 457 (21.4%) had used it in the past, and 189 (8.8%) were current users. The use of MHT was more common in women who had a body mass index (BMI) <25 kg/m2and triglyceride levels <150 mg/dl, and who were physically less inactive, non-smokers, and non-diabetics. Current MHT users were less likely to have hypertension (OR=0.59; 95% CI: 0.41-0.85) compared to those who had never used MHT. In most cases, MHT was started at or before 59 years of age, within 10 years of becoming menopausal, and its use lasted for up to five years. Conclusion Current MHT use was not related to hypertension, particularly in healthy women and in those under 60 years of age.