Bone union and mobility outcomes for reconstructed open tibial fractures: a plastic surgical experience from a major trauma center.

Introduction: The goal in open tibial fracture management is to achieve a united tibia in an extremity that allows pain free mobilization. The objective of this study was to assess factors that lead to this functional outcome in lower limb reconstruction, from a plastic surgical perspective. Materials and methods: The Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery lower limb database at a tertiary trauma hospital was searched for open tibial injuries from February 2015 to March 2020. The nature and severity of injury, timing and details of all operations including reconstructions were collected prospectively. Mobility including gait aids, pain, and complications were retrospectively collected. Union was assessed in two ways, depending on fracture location. Metaphyseal and diaphyseal tibial fractures were provided mRUST scores (union defined as RUST > 13) and epiphyseal tibial fractures were categorically classified as "united" or "non-union" by two independent radiologists. Results: During the five-year study period there were 148 open leg injuries in the database. Twenty-one patients underwent a primary amputation due to severity of their initial injury. One hundred patients underwent primary limb salvage. Sixty-one patients in the limb salvage group achieved primary tibial union with a mean follow-up time of 19.4 months post injury. Twenty-three additional patients were confirmed to subsequently unite. Patient who achieved union were more likely to mobilise without gait aids. Discussion: In this study definitive external fixation and soft tissue infection were both associated with higher rates of non-union. Longer times to soft tissue reconstruction was not associated with an increase in acute soft tissue complications. More importantly bone union, pain and mobility did not decline. After undertaking a primary limb salvage pathway for 100 patients, the ultimate tibial fracture union rate was 84% and the confirmed ambulation rate was 96%.

Intercostal Nerve Transfers to Native Triceps or Free Muscle Flaps for Elbow Extension in Brachial Plexus Injuries.

Intercostal nerve donors for traumatic brachial plexus injury reconstruction have been used to neurotize native muscles or free-functioning muscle transfers, with inconsistent outcomes reported. The aim was to record a substantial series, evaluate functional outcomes, and identify prognostic factors. We present a single-surgeon case series of 21 consecutive patients who underwent 21 transfer procedures to either native muscles or free-functioning muscles to reconstruct elbow extension over a 9-year period. Outcome parameters included target muscle power grade and timing of recovery. A Medical Research Council power grade ≥ M4 was achieved in 17 reconstructions. The free-functioning muscle group had significantly higher success rate and reached their best power grade 14 months earlier. Free-functioning muscle reconstruction with intercostal nerve transfer is a more complex procedure but has quicker functional recovery and greater reliability in achieving grade M4.

Bilateral Thoracic Outlet Syndrome from Anomalous 8th Cervical Vertebrae Ribs.

Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is a group of diverse disorders resulting from compression of neurovascular structures as they pass from the lower neck to upper limb. Neurological symptoms, such as pain, weakness, or paraesthesia, are much more common than vascular symptoms such as pallor or venous congestion. Anatomical abnormalities can contribute to this condition. Thirty percent of patients with TOS can have a cervical rib, arising from the transverse process of the 7th cervical vertebra, compared with 1% of the general population. We report the first case in the literature of neurogenic TOS from a cervical rib arising from a supernumerary 8th cervical vertebra. This patient had immediate improvement in TOS symptoms following scalene muscle surgery and resection of cervical and first thoracic ribs.

Incidence of brachial plexus injury with concurrent subclavian or axillary vascular injury and its influence on reconstruction.

INTRODUCTION: Brachial plexus reconstruction with free functional muscle transfers (FFMT) has become a reliable tool in the armamentarium of brachial plexus surgeon (Potter and Ferris, The Journal of hand surgery, European volume, 2017, 42,693-9). The successful execution of performing FFMT relies on favourable motor nerves for coaptation and appropriate vessels for microvascular anastomoses. Due to shared traumatic aetiology, subclavian and axillary vascular injury (SAVI) can coexist with the brachial plexus palsy and may pose a surgical dilemma with such FFMT execution. METHOD: We performed a retrospective study of 100 consecutive patients who presented to our hospital with brachial plexus injury over a 10-year period. Patient records were reviewed for concomitant SAVI and subsequent treatment that was required for both vascular (SAVI) and brachial plexus injuries (BPI). RESULTS: Concomitant BPI and SAVI occurred in 27% of patients. Open injuries predicted significantly higher rates of SAVI as well as complete plexus palsy. Complete plexus palsy was associated at a higher rate in the SAVI group compared to the non-SAVI group. CONCLUSION: Coexistence of SAVI and BPI is frequent. Complete plexus palsy and SAVI are more common in open injuries in this study. Complete plexus palsy is the most common indication for FFMT in BPI. Surgical execution of FFMT is more challenging in the setting of previous SAVI and requires careful consideration of the microsurgical plan. We recommend that all patients with previous SAVI or potential need for FFMT in this setting undergo vascular imaging at the time of acute injury and prior to any free flap reconstructive procedures.

Extensive abdominal surgery and scar does not absolutely contraindicate bilateral flap harvest from the abdomen: A case report.

INTRODUCTION: This case reports a female patient with a history of multiple laparotomies including stoma formations and reversals, who underwent successful bilateral abdominal flap based breast reconstruction. It highlights that even complex and repeated abdominal surgery is not an absolute contraindication to this procedure. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 52-year-old female with a history of bilateral mastectomy and implant-based breast reconstruction presented with bilateral capsular contracture, wanting removal and alternative breast reconstruction. Her history of ulcerative colitis and multiple complex and extensive abdominal surgeries initially seemed to preclude bilateral abdominal flap harvest and the patient was referred on for another opinion. CT-angiography after the subsequent opinion identified adequate deep inferior epigastric artery perforators and successful bilateral abdomen-based flap reconstruction was performed. DISCUSSION: This is the first case report of successful bilateral abdomen-based flap harvest in a patient with 6 previous laparotomies including stoma formations and reversals. CONCLUSION: Complex and extensive abdominal surgery is not an absolute contraindication to bilateral flap harvest from the abdomen. With accurate CT-angiography to guide pre-operative planning and meticulous surgery, safe flap harvest is possible.

Defining the Reliability of Deltoid Reanimation by Nerve Transfer When Using Abnormal but Variably Recovered Triceps Donor Nerves.

Upper brachial plexus injuries to the C5/6 roots or axillary nerve can result in severe deficits in upper limb function. Current techniques to reinnervate the deltoid muscle utilise the well-described transfer of radial nerve branches to triceps to the axillary nerve. However, in around 25% of patients, there is a failure of sufficient deltoid reinnervation. It is unclear in the literature if deltoid reanimation should be attempted with a nerve transfer from a weak but functioning triceps nerve. The authors present the largest series of triceps to axillary nerve transfers for deltoid reanimation in order to answer this clinical question. Seventy-seven consecutive patients of a single surgeon were stratified and analysed in four groups: (1) normal triceps at presentation, (2) abnormal triceps at presentation recovering to clinically normal function preoperatively, (3) abnormal triceps at presentation remaining abnormal preoperatively, and lastly (4) where pre-operative triceps function was deemed insufficient for use, requiring alternative reconstruction for deltoid reanimation. The authors considered deltoid re-animation of ≥ M4 as successful for the purpose of this study. Median Medical Research Council (MRC) values demonstrate group 1 achieves this successfully (M5), while median values for groups 2-4 result in M4 power (albeit with decreasing interquartile ranges). Median post-operative shoulder abduction active range of motion (AROM) values were represented by 170° (85-180) in group 1, 117.5° (97.5-140) in group 2, 90° (35-150) in group 3, and 60° (40-155) in group 4. For both post-operative assessments, subgroup analyses demonstrated statistically significant differences when comparing group 1 with groups 3 and 4 (p < 0.05), while all the other group to group pairwise comparisons did not reach significance. The authors postulated that triceps deficiency can act as a surrogate marker of a more extensive plexus injury and may predict poorer outcomes if the weakness persists representing the trending differences between groups 2 and 3. However, given no statistical differences were demonstrated between groups 3 and 4, the authors conclude that utilising an abnormal triceps nerve that demonstrates sufficient strength and redundancy intraoperatively is preferable to alternative transfers for deltoid reanimation. Lastly, in group 4 patients where triceps nerves are damaged and unusable for nerve transfer, alternative operations can also achieve sufficient outcomes and should be considered for restoration of shoulder abduction.

Ulnar and Median Fascicular Transfers for Elbow Flexion-Predicting Outcomes in a Heterogeneous Patient Group and Implications for Surgical Planning.

Purpose: To measure the outcomes in patients undergoing nerve transfers for elbow flexion restoration, and compare patient outcomes based on the pre-operative fascicular transfer plan. Methods: Single surgeon series of 48 consecutive patients who underwent median and/or ulnar fascicular nerve transfers for elbow flexion restoration to treat palsies of the brachial plexus or musculocutaneous nerve. Outcomes measured were Medical Research Council (MRC) power grade, strength in kilograms, and time taken to recover function. Results: Overall, 96% of patients achieved MRC M4 or greater power. The subgroup who were planned for, and particularly those who then underwent, double as opposed to single fascicular transfer, had significantly better results. Conclusions: Overall results were excellent. Double fascicular transfers were superior, with no failures in this group. If pre-operatively a single fascicle transfer alone is planned due to a paucity of expendable donors, the predicted outcomes are worse and other treatment options should be considered.

Outcomes after occupational therapy intervention for traumatic brachial plexus injury: A prospective longitudinal cohort study.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective longitudinal cohort study. INTRODUCTION: Traumatic brachial plexus injuries (BPIs) can be devastating and negatively impact daily function and quality of life. Occupational therapists play an important role in rehabilitation; however, studies identifying outcomes are lacking. PURPOSE: This study aims to describe outcomes including motor recovery, upper limb function, participation, pain, and quality of life for people receiving occupational therapy intervention. METHODS: A convenience sample of English-speaking adults (n = 30) with a traumatic BPI, attending the clinic between December 1, 2014, to November 30, 2016, participated. Participants received occupational therapy focusing on sensorimotor retraining and activity-based rehabilitation. Data on active range of motion (goniometry), strength (Medical Research Council (MRC)), upper-limb function (UEFI15, QuickDASH), participation (PSFS), pain (Brief Pain Inventory), and quality of life (EQ-5D-3L) were collected at baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. RESULTS: Elbow flexion strength showed significant improvement at all time-points, average increase 2.17 (MRC) (95% confidence interval: 1.29-3.04; P < .001) and mean final MRC grading 3.86 (standard error: 0.44). Significant improvements at 12 months were seen in: shoulder abduction strength and range, flexion strength and range, external rotation range; elbow extension strength and flexion range; thumb flexion and extension strength. Upper limb function (QuickDASH) showed significant improvement (mean change = 18.85; 95% confidence interval: 4.12-33.59; P = .02). Forearm protonation range and finger flexion strength were significantly worse. Remaining outcomes did not show significant improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Occupational therapy with surgical intervention can improve strength, range, and upper limb function with people following traumatic BPI. Further investigations into impact on participation, pain, and quality of life are required.

Proximal Trauma Increases Risk of Venous Thrombosis in Soft Tissue Reconstruction of Open Lower Limb Fractures.

Lower limb salvage after major trauma is a complex undertaking. For patients who have suffered multi-level trauma to their lower limb we postulated that pelvic injury or ipsilateral lower limb injury proximal to the site of a free flap may increase the rate of post-operative complications. All patients who underwent lower limb free flap reconstruction as a result of acute trauma between January 2010 and December 2017 were included. The patients were divided into the study group (50 patients), who sustained a lower limb or pelvic injury proximal to the free flap site, and control group (91 patients) who did not sustain proximal lower limb or pelvic trauma. Complication rates were compared between the two groups. Overall, the proximal trauma group anastomotic thrombosis rate of 18.0% was significantly higher than the control group thrombosis rate of 2.2%. There was no statically significant difference in rates of hematoma, swelling or infection. Flap loss rate in the proximal trauma group was 4.0%, compared to the control group at 2.2%. All patients with a failed flap went onto have a successful reconstruction with a subsequent flap in the acute admission and there were no amputations. In the proximal injury study group despite the significantly increased rate of microvascular thrombosis requiring revision, the ultimate primary free flap survival rate was still 96%. Overall, severe coexisting proximal trauma predicted a higher venous microvascular complication rate but was not a contraindication to limb salvage.

Anatomic symmetry of anterolateral thigh flap perforators: a computed tomography angiographic study.

BACKGROUND: The anterolateral thigh flap is a workhorse reconstructive flap. Versatility in design is a key strength but perforator anatomy can be variable. Inability to locate perforators prompts consideration of contralateral thigh exploration. However, such exploration would be futile if the absence of perforators proves symmetrical. This study assesses the symmetry of anterolateral thigh flap vasculature using computed tomography angiography (CTA). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 20 bilateral thigh CTAs was performed. Each limb was assessed for number, course, location and size of perforators. Only vessels >0.5 mm in size at origin were included. Location was standardized between patients using perforator distance/thigh length ratio. Results were analysed using Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS: In each thigh, the average number of perforators was 3.58 and average perforator distance/thigh length ratio was 0.358 ± 0.08. Between both limbs of the same patient, the mean difference in number of perforators was 0.55 (P = 0.002), and difference in average perforator size was 0.3 mm (P < 0.001). Average perforator location differed by a mean of 3% of thigh length (P < 0.001) between thighs. CONCLUSION: While average vessel size and location appear similar, there does not appear to be symmetry in the number of perforators. Surgical exploration of the contralateral thigh in an absence of perforators should be considered. In patients where abnormal anatomy is expected, mapping with CTA could be considered to reduce morbidity associated with unsuccessful surgical exploration and dissection.

Preliminary Psychometric Evaluation of the Brachial Assessment Tool Part 2: Construct Validity and Responsiveness.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate construct validity and responsiveness of the Brachial Assessment Tool (BrAT), a new patient-reported outcome measure for people with traumatic brachial plexus injury (BPI), and to compare it to the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) and the Upper Extremity Functional Index (UEFI). DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Outpatient clinics. PARTICIPANTS: Adults (N=29; age range, 20-69y) with confirmed traumatic BPI. INTERVENTIONS: Participants completed the BrAT 3 times over an 18-month period together with 16 DASH activity items and the UEFI. Evaluations were undertaken of construct validity, known-groups validity, 1-way repeated analysis of variance, and effect size. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: BrAT, DASH, and UEFI. RESULTS: The BrAT demonstrated a moderate to low correlation with the DASH activity items (<0.7) and a large correlation with the UEFI (>0.7). According to known-groups validity, only the BrAT was able to discriminate between people who stated they could use their hand versus those who were unable to use their hand to perform activities. All measures indicated a significant effect for time with the exception of BrAT subscale 1. The effect size was highest for the BrAT but lower than expected (BrAT, .52-.40; DASH, .15; UEFI, .36). CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary findings support the BrAT as a valid and responsive patient-reported outcome measure for adults with traumatic BPI. The BrAT activity items appear to be more targeted than the DASH or UEFI particularly for people with more severe BPI. The BrAT also appears to be measuring a different activity construct than the DASH and the UEFI. Further work is required to confirm these results with larger sample sizes.

Psychometric Evaluation of the Brachial Assessment Tool Part 1: Reproducibility.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate reproducibility (reliability and agreement) of the Brachial Assessment Tool (BrAT), a new patient-reported outcome measure for adults with traumatic brachial plexus injury (BPI). DESIGN: Prospective repeated-measure design. SETTING: Outpatient clinics. PARTICIPANTS: Adults with confirmed traumatic BPI (N=43; age range, 19-82y). INTERVENTIONS: People with BPI completed the 31-item 4-response BrAT twice, 2 weeks apart. Results for the 3 subscales and summed score were compared at time 1 and time 2 to determine reliability, including systematic differences using paired t tests, test retest using intraclass correlation coefficient model 1,1 (ICC1,1), and internal consistency using Cronbach α. Agreement parameters included standard error of measurement, minimal detectable change, and limits of agreement. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: BrAT. RESULTS: Test-retest reliability was excellent (ICC1,1=.90-.97). Internal consistency was high (Cronbach α=.90-.98). Measurement error was relatively low (standard error of measurement range, 3.1-8.8). A change of >4 for subscale 1, >6 for subscale 2, >4 for subscale 3, and >10 for the summed score is indicative of change over and above measurement error. Limits of agreement ranged from ±4.4 (subscale 3) to 11.61 (summed score). CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the use of the BrAT as a reproducible patient-reported outcome measure for adults with traumatic BPI with evidence of appropriate reliability and agreement for both individual and group comparisons. Further psychometric testing is required to establish the construct validity and responsiveness of the BrAT.

Partial tibial nerve transfer to tibialis anterior for traumatic peroneal nerve palsy.

BACKGROUND: Partial tibial nerve transfer to the motor branches of tibialis anterior is an emerging reconstructive technique for the treatment of traumatic common peroneal nerve (CPN) injury; however, few papers in the literature describe clinical outcomes. METHODS: A prospective single-surgeon series of nine consecutive patients who underwent partial tibial nerve transfers to the motor branches of tibialis anterior for traumatic CPN injuries between 2008 and 2014. Eight patients were male and the average age at operation was 28.2 years old (range 21-39). All nine patients experienced high-energy CPN injuries. The average time to operation was 5.8 months (range 1-10) and all patients scored M0 for ankle dorsiflexion preoperatively according to the Medical Research Council (MRC) grading system. Outcome parameters included time since operation, postoperative MRC grade for ankle dorsiflexion, and the use of an orthosis for walking. RESULTS: Seven of nine patients achieved an MRC grade of ≥M4, allowing for active dorsiflexion against gravity and some resistance, by a mean of 16.7 months postoperatively (range 8-26) and no longer required an orthosis for walking. No complications were recorded during the procedures, nor were any compromises to the tibial nerve donor site during follow-up. No patients were lost to follow-up with an average follow-up period of 30.8 months (range 15-61). CONCLUSIONS: This series provides good evidence that this evolving reconstructive technique may achieve excellent results and should be considered in traumatic common peroneal nerve injuries that would traditionally rely on conventional nerve grafting alone.

Upper Trunk Brachial Plexus Palsy Following Chiropractic Manipulation.

INTRODUCTION: Upper trunk brachial plexus palsy can result from high-energy trauma and has never been reported following spinal manipulation. BACKGROUND: The case is presented of a patient who developed an acute brachial plexus upper trunk palsy following spinal manipulative therapy. DISCUSSION: Discussion is made on the incidence of complications following manipulation and recommendations to prospectively capture all serious complications. CONCLUDING REMARKS: Risks exist with spinal manipulative therapy. Neurological injury can occur. Risk assessment and re-examination should occur at every visit. Large rigorous prospective studies are required to identify the true incidence of serious complications resulting from manipulative therapy and the benefit:risk ratio.

Evaluation of Internal Construct Validity and Unidimensionality of the Brachial Assessment Tool, A Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Brachial Plexus Injury.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the internal construct validity and dimensionality of a new patient-reported outcome measure for people with traumatic brachial plexus injury (BPI) based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health definition of activity. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Outpatient clinics. PARTICIPANTS: Adults (age range, 18-82y) with a traumatic BPI (N=106). INTERVENTIONS: There were 106 people with BPI who completed a 51-item 5-response questionnaire. Responses were analyzed in 4 phases (missing responses, item correlations, exploratory factor analysis, and Rasch analysis) to evaluate the properties of fit to the Rasch model, threshold response, local dependency, dimensionality, differential item functioning, and targeting. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Not applicable, as this study addresses the development of an outcome measure. RESULTS: Six items were deleted for missing responses, and 10 were deleted for high interitem correlations >.81. The remaining 35 items, while demonstrating fit to the Rasch model, showed evidence of local dependency and multidimensionality. Items were divided into 3 subscales: dressing and grooming (8 items), arm and hand (17 items), and no hand (6 items). All 3 subscales demonstrated fit to the model with no local dependency, minimal disordered thresholds, no unidimensionality or differential item functioning for age, time postinjury, or self-selected dominance. Subscales were combined into 3 subtests and demonstrated fit to the model, no misfit, and unidimensionality, allowing calculation of a summary score. CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary analysis supports the internal construct validity of the Brachial Assessment Tool, a unidimensional targeted 4-response patient-reported outcome measure designed to solely assess activity after traumatic BPI regardless of level of injury, age at recruitment, premorbid limb dominance, and time postinjury. Further examination is required to determine test-retest reliability and responsiveness.

Vascularized Thoracodorsal to Suprascapular Nerve Transfer, a Novel Technique to Restore Shoulder Function in Partial Brachial Plexopathy.

We describe the clinical outcome of a novel nerve transfer to restore active shoulder motion in upper brachial plexus injury. The thoracodorsal nerve (TDN) was successfully used as a vascularized donor nerve to neurotize to the suprascapular nerve (SSN) in a patient with limited donor nerve availability. At 4 years follow-up, he had regained useful external rotation of the injured limb, with no significant donor site morbidity. Shoulder abduction return was less impressive, however, and reasons for this are discussed. We provide a comprehensive review of the literature on this topic and a subsequent discussion on the details of this novel technique. This is the first reported case of TDN to SSN transfer, and also the first reported case of a vascularized TDN transfer in the English language literature. We advocate direct thoracodorsal to SSN transfer as a valid surgical option for the restoration of shoulder function in patients with partial brachial plexus avulsion, when conventional nerve donors are unavailable.