Molecular cloning and expression of a Toll receptor in the giant tiger shrimp, Penaeus monodon.

Invertebrates rely completely for their protection against pathogens on the innate immune system. This non-self-recognition is activated by microbial cell wall components with unique conserved molecular patterns. Pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) are recognised by pattern recognition receptors (PRRs). Toll and its mammalian homologs Toll-like receptors are cell-surface receptors acting as PRRs and involved in the signalling pathway implicated in their immune response. Here we describe a novel partial Toll receptor gene cloned from a gill library of the giant tiger shrimp, Penaeus monodon, using primers based on the highly conserved Toll/IL-1R (TIR) domain. The deduced amino acid sequence of the P. monodon Toll (PmToll) shows 59% similarity to a Toll-related protein of Apis mellifera. Analysis of the LRRs of shrimp Toll contained no obvious PAMP-binding insertions. Phylogenetic analysis with the insect Toll family shows clustering with Toll1 and Toll5 gene products, and it is less related to Toll3 and Toll4. Furthermore, RT-qPCR shows that PmToll is constitutively expressed in gut, gill and hepatopancreas. Challenge with white spot syndrome virus (WSSV) shows equal levels of expression in these organs. A role in the defence mechanism is discussed. In conclusion, shrimp possess at least one Toll receptor that might be involved in immune defence.

Intact B cell tolerance in the absence of the first component of the classical complement pathway.

A critical role for complement in the regulation of self tolerance has been proposed to explain the strong association between complement deficiency and autoimmunity. To elucidate the role of the classical pathway of complement in the maintenance of B cell tolerance, C1q-deficient (C1qa-/-) mice were bred with anti-hen egg lysozyme (HEL) immunoglobulin (Ig(HEL)) and soluble HEL (sHEL) transgenic mice. B cell tolerance was intact in C1qa-/- mice. In vivo, double-transgenic (Ig(HEL)/sHEL) C1qa-/- and wild-type control mice down-regulated surface immunoglobulin expression on splenocytes and equivalent numbers of HEL-binding B cells accumulated in the periphery. Maturation of B cells, evidenced by CD21 expression, was retarded to the same extent and at a similar time point. The frequency of anti-HEL-producing plasma cells and serum levels of anti-HEL immunoglobulin were comparably reduced in control and C1qa-/- double-transgenic mice compared to control Ig(HEL) and C1qa-/- Ig(HEL) mice. Furthermore, splenocytes from double-transgenic C1qa-/- or wild-type mice did not modulate intracellular calcium levels after stimulation with HEL in vitro. These data demonstrate that a stable form of B cell anergy persists in the periphery of C1qa-/- mice, suggesting that activation of the classical pathway by C1q is not essential for the maintenance of B cell tolerance in this transgenic model.

Different expression profiles of human cyclin B1 in normal PHA-stimulated T lymphocytes and leukemic T cells.

BACKGROUND: In a previous work, we demonstrated with flow cytometry (FCM) methods that accumulation of human cyclin B1 in leukemic cell lines begins during the G(1) phase of the cell cycle (Viallard et al. , Exp Cell Res 247:208-219, 1999). In the present study, FCM was used to compare the localization and the kinetic patterns of cyclin B1 expression in Jurkat leukemia cell line and phytohemagglutinin (PHA)-stimulated normal T lymphocytes. METHODS: Cell synchronization was performed in G(1) with sodium n-butyrate, at the G(1)/S transition with thymidine and at mitosis with colchicine. Cells (leukemic cell line Jurkat or PHA-stimulated human T-lymphocytes) were stained for DNA and cyclin B1 and analyzed by FCM. Western blotting was used to confirm certain results. RESULTS: Under asynchronous growing conditions and for both cell populations, cyclin B1 expression was essentially restricted to the G(2)/M transition, reaching its maximal level at mitosis. When the cells were synchronized at the G(1)/S boundary by thymidine or inside the G(1) phase by sodium n-butyrate, Jurkat cells accumulated cyclin B1 in both situations, whereas T lymphocytes expressed cyclin B1 only during the thymidine block. The cyclin B1 fluorescence kinetics of PHA-stimulated T lymphocytes was strictly similar when considering T lymphocytes blocked at the G(1)/S phase transition by thymidine and in exponentially growing conditions. These FCM results were confirmed by Western blotting. The detection of cyclin B1 by Western blot in cells sorted in the G(1) phase of the cell cycle showed that cyclin B1 was present in the G(1) phase in leukemic T cells but not in normal T lymphocytes. Cyclin B1 degradation was effective at mitosis, thus ruling out a defective cyclin B1 proteolysis. CONCLUSIONS: We found that the leukemic T cells behaved quite differently from the untransformed T lymphocytes. Our data support the notion that human cyclin B1 is present in the G(1) phase of the cell cycle in leukemic T cells but not in normal T lymphocytes. Therefore, the restriction point from which cyclin B1 can be detected is different in the two models studied. We hypothesize that after passage through a restriction point differing in T lymphocytes and in leukemic cells, the rate of cyclin B1 synthesis becomes constant in the S and G(2)/M phases and independent from the DNA replication cycle.

Flow cytometry study of human cyclin B1 and cyclin E expression in leukemic cell lines: cell cycle kinetics and cell localization.

Experiments by flow cytometry (FCM) after nuclei isolation have never been done to investigate cyclins. We have conducted different experiments by FCM using whole cells and isolated nuclei to study the immunolocalization and kinetic patterns of cyclin B1 and cyclin E in various leukemic cell lines. During asynchronous growth, all whole cells had a scheduled, cell cycle phase-restricted expression of cyclin B1. By using a washless immunostaining of unfixed nuclei, cyclin B1 was detected in all cell cycle phases, including G1, although to a lesser extent than in G2/M, suggesting that in whole cells the cyclin B1 epitope is masked and accessible only in isolated nuclei. When the cells were synchronized at the G1/S boundary by thymidine or in the G1 phase by sodium n-butyrate, an identical accumulation of cyclin B1 was observed. As for cyclin E, its expression was higher with thymidine treatment than with sodium n-butyrate, particularly in nuclei. The elevated cyclin B1 level in the cells arrested at the G1/S boundary may reflect the increased half-life of this protein stabilized as the result of cyclin E overexpression. However, our FCM data also support the notion that accumulation of human cyclin B1 in leukemic cell lines begins during the G1 phase of the cell cycle, probably in the nucleus. The detection of cyclin B1 by Western blot in cells sorted in the G1 phase of the cell cycle confirms this finding. It is possible, therefore, that tumor transformation or leukemic phenotype may invariably be associated with altered cyclin B1 expression.