Real-World Treatment Patterns and Clinical Outcomes among Patients Receiving CDK4/6 Inhibitors for Metastatic Breast Cancer in a Canadian Setting Using AI-Extracted Data.

Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) are widely used in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) advanced/metastatic breast cancer (ABC/MBC) in first line (1L), but little is known about their real-world use and clinical outcomes long-term, in Canada. This study used Pentavere's previously validated artificial intelligence (AI) to extract real-world data on the treatment patterns and outcomes of patients receiving CDK4/6i+endocrine therapy (ET) for HR+/HER2- ABC/MBC at Sinai Health in Toronto, Canada. Between 1 January 2016 and 1 July 2021, 48 patients were diagnosed with HR+/HER2- ABC/MBC and received CDK4/6i + ET. A total of 38 out of 48 patients received CDK4/6i + ET in 1L, of which 34 of the 38 (89.5%) received palbociclib + ET. In 2L, 12 of the 21 (57.1%) patients received CDK4/6i + ET, of which 58.3% received abemaciclib. In 3L, most patients received chemotherapy (10/12, 83.3%). For the patients receiving CDK4/6i in 1L, the median (95% CI) time to the next treatment was 42.3 (41.2, NA) months. The median (95% CI) time to chemotherapy was 46.5 (41.4, NA) months. The two-year overall survival (95% CI) was 97.4% (92.4, 100.0), and the median (range) follow-up was 28.7 (3.4-67.6) months. Despite the limitations inherent in real-world studies and a limited number of patients, these AI-extracted data complement previous studies, demonstrating the effectiveness of CDK4/6i + ET in the Canadian real-world 1L, with most patients receiving palbociclib as CDK4/6i in 1L.

Low-molecular-weight-heparin versus a coumarin for the prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism in high- and low-risk patients with active cancer: a post hoc analysis of the CLOT Study.

In patients with active cancer and acute venous thromboembolism (VTE), the low-molecular-weight-heparin (LMWH) dalteparin is more effective than vitamin K antagonist (VKA) in reducing the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (rVTE) without increasing the risk of bleeding. However, the relative benefit of LMWH versus VKA in patients with active cancer at high or low risk of rVTE and bleeding is unclear. This post hoc analysis used data from the CLOT study to explore the efficacy and safety of LMWH versus VKA in preventing recurrent thrombosis in high- and low-risk patients with active cancer. High-risk patients were defined by metastatic disease and/or antineoplastic treatment at baseline; low-risk patients presented with neither. Among high-risk patients, rVTE occurred in 25/318 (8%) (LMWH) versus 53/314 (17%) (VKA) (hazard ratio, 0.44; p = 0.001). No significant difference was detected in the rate of major or any bleeding. The 6-month mortality rate was 40% (LMWH) versus 41% (VKA). In low-risk patients, 2/20 (10%) (LMWH) had rVTE versus 0/24 (0%) (VKA) (hazard ratio, not estimable; p = 0.998). No significant difference was detected in the rate of major or any bleeding. The 6-month mortality rate was 20% (LMWH) versus 29% (VKA). In patients with cancer-associated thrombosis at high risk of rVTE and bleeding, the LMWH dalteparin was more effective than VKA in reducing the risk of rVTE without increasing the risk of bleeding. No difference in rate of rVTE or bleeding was observed between LMWH and VKA among low-risk patients.

An Adjustable Dalteparin Sodium Dose Regimen for the Prevention of Clotting in the Extracorporeal Circuit in Hemodialysis: A Clinical Trial of Safety and Efficacy (the PARROT Study).

BACKGROUND: Dalteparin sodium, a low-molecular-weight heparin, is indicated for prevention of clotting in the extracorporeal circuit during hemodialysis (HD). Product labeling recommends a fixed single-bolus dose of 5000 international units (IU) for HD sessions lasting up to 4 hours, but adjustable dosing may be beneficial in clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the PARROT study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of an adjustable dose of dalteparin in patients with end-stage renal disease requiring 3 to 4 HD sessions per week. DESIGN: A 7-week, open-label, multicenter study with a single treatment arm, conducted between October 2013 and March 2016. SETTING: Ten sites in Canada. PATIENTS: A total of 152 patients with end-stage renal disease requiring 3 to 4 HD sessions per week. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was the proportion of HD sessions completed without premature termination due to inadequate anticoagulation. METHODS: All participants initially received a dose of 5000 IU dalteparin, which could be adjusted at subsequent HD sessions when clinically indicated, by increment or decrement of 500 or 1000 IU, with no specified dose limits. RESULTS: Patients were followed for 256 patient-months. Nearly all (99.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 99.7-100) evaluable HD sessions were completed without premature clotting. Dose was adjusted for more than half (52.3%) of participants, mostly owing to clotting or access compression time >10 minutes. Median dalteparin dose was 5000 IU (range: 500-13 000 IU). There were no major bleeds, and minor bleeding was reported in 2.3% of all HD sessions. There was no evidence of bioaccumulation. LIMITATIONS: This short-term study, with a single treatment arm, was designed to optimize dalteparin dose using a flexible dosing schedule; it was not designed to specifically evaluate dalteparin dose minimization, provide a direct comparison of dalteparin versus unfractionated heparin, or provide information on long-term safety for flexible dalteparin dosing. Patients were excluded if they were at high risk of bleeding, including those on anticoagulants and those on antiplatelet agents other than aspirin <100 mg/d. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, an adjustable dalteparin sodium dose regimen allowed safe completion of HD, with clinical benefits over fixed dosing. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01879618, registered June 13, 2013.

CONTEXTE: La daltéparine sodique, une héparine de faible poids moléculaire, est indiquée pour prévenir la formation de caillots dans le circuit extracorporel durant l'hémodialyse (HD). Pour une séance de dialyse d'une durée maximale de quatre heures, l'étiquette du produit recommande une dose fixe de 5 000 unités internationales (U.I.) administrée en bolus. Cependant, il est possible qu'il puisse être bénéfique d'ajuster la dose en pratique. OBJECTIF: Le but de l'étude PARROT était d'analyser l'innocuité et l'efficacité d'une dose ajustable de daltéparine chez des patients atteints d'insuffisance rénale terminale (IRT) et nécessitant trois à quatre séances d'HD par semaine. TYPE D'ÉTUDE: Il s'agit d'une étude ouverte et multicentrique à traitement unique d'une durée de sept semaines couvrant la période entre octobre 2013 et mars 2016. CADRE: L'étude a eu lieu dans dix centres de dialyse au Canada. SUJETS: L'étude a inclus 152 patients atteints d'IRT et nécessitant trois à quatre séances d'HD par semaine. MESURES: Le résultat principal était la proportion de séances d'HD complétées, non interrompues de manière prématurée en raison d'une anticoagulation inadéquate. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Tous les participants ont initialement reçu 5000 U.I. de daltéparine, dose qui a pu être ajustée lors des séances subséquentes, lorsqu'indiqué par le contexte clinique, à raison d'augmentation ou de réduction de 500 ou 1 000 U.I., sans spécification quant aux doses limites. RÉSULTATS: Les patients ont été suivis sur une période de 256 mois-patients. Pratiquement toutes les séances d'HD évaluables (99,9 %; IC 95 % : 99,7-100) ont été complétées sans coagulation prématurée. La dose de daltéparine a été ajustée pour plus de la moitié (52,3 %) des participants, essentiellement en raison de coagulation ou d'un besoin de procéder à une compression de l'accès vasculaire au-delà de 10 minutes. La dose médiane de daltéparine était de 5 000 U.I. (entre 500 et 13 000 U.I.). Aucune hémorragie majeure n'a été rapportée, mais une hémorragie mineure est survenue dans 2,3 % de toutes les séances d'HD analysées. Aucune bioaccumulation n'a été détectée. LIMITES: Cette étude de courte durée à traitement unique a été conçue pour optimiser le dosage de daltéparine à l'aide d'un schéma de posologie flexible. Elle ne visait pas à évaluer spécifiquement la minimisation de la dose ou à fournir des informations sur l'innocuité à long terme d'une posologie flexible pour la daltéparine. Également, les patients à haut risque d'hémorragie ont été exclus de l'étude, notamment ceux qui prenaient des anticoagulants ou des antiplaquettaires autres qu'une dose quotidienne de moins de 100 mg d'aspirine. CONCLUSION: Dans l'ensemble, un schéma posologique flexible pour la daltéparine sodique a permis de compléter les séances d'HD de façon sécuritaire, en plus de fournir des avantages cliniques par rapport à une dose fixe.

Dalteparin versus vitamin K antagonists for the prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer and renal impairment: a Canadian pharmacoeconomic analysis.

BACKGROUND: Patients with cancer are at increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and the risk is further elevated after a primary VTE. To reduce the risk of recurrent events, extended prophylaxis with vitamin K antagonists (VKA) is available for use. However, in a large randomized trial (Comparison of Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin versus Oral Anticoagulant Therapy for the Prevention of Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism in Patients with Cancer [CLOT]; Lee et al), extended duration dalteparin reduced the relative risk of recurrent VTE by 52% compared to VKA (p=0.002). A recent subgroup analysis of patients with moderate-to-severe renal impairment also revealed lower absolute VTE rates with dalteparin (3% vs. 17%; p=0.011). To measure the economic value of dalteparin as an alternative to VKA, a patient-level cost utility analysis was conducted from a Canadian perspective. METHODS: Resource use data captured during the CLOT trial were extracted and linked to 2015 Canadian unit cost estimates. Health state utilities were then measured using the Time-Trade-Off technique in 24 randomly selected members of the general Canadian public to estimate the gains in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). RESULTS: For the entire CLOT trial population (n=676), the dalteparin group had significantly higher mean costs compared to the VKA group ($Can5,771 vs. $Can2,569; p<0.001). However, the utility assessment revealed that 21 of 24 respondents (88%) selected dalteparin over VKA, with an associated gain of 0.14 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.10-0.18) QALYs. When the incremental cost of dalteparin was combined with the QALY gain, dalteparin had a cost of $Can23,100 (95% CI: $Can19,200-$Can25,800) per QALY gained. The analysis in patients with renal impairment suggested even better economic value with the cost per QALY gained being <$14,000. CONCLUSION: Extended duration dalteparin is a cost-effective alternative to VKA for the prevention of recurrent VTE in patients with cancer, especially in those with renal impairment.

A post hoc analysis of dalteparin versus oral anticoagulant (VKA) therapy for the prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism (rVTE) in patients with cancer and renal impairment.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common and serious complication in patients with cancer; treatment guidelines recommend extended therapy of ≥6 months with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for treatment and prevention of recurrent VTE (rVTE) in this population. This post hoc analysis used data from the CLOT study-a phase III, randomized, open-label, controlled study (N = 676)-to compare the efficacy and safety of dalteparin, a LMWH, versus vitamin K antagonist (VKA) for prevention of rVTE in patients with cancer and renal impairment (creatinine clearance <60 ml/min). Overall, 162/676 (24 %) patients had renal impairment at baseline. Patients received subcutaneous dalteparin 200 IU/kg once daily during month 1, followed by 150 IU/kg once daily for months 2-6; or VKA once daily for 6 months, with initial overlapping subcutaneous dalteparin 200 IU/kg once daily for ≥5 days until international normalized ratio was 2.0-3.0 for 2 consecutive days. Endpoints included the rates of rVTE (primary) and bleeding events. Overall, fewer dalteparin-treated patients (2/74 [2.7 %]) experienced ≥1 adjudicated symptomatic rVTE compared with VKA-treated patients (15/88 [17.0 %]; hazard ratio = 0.15 [95 % confidence interval 0.03-0.65]; p = 0.01). Bleeding event rates for both treatments were similar (p = 0.47). In summary, compared with VKA, dalteparin significantly reduced risk of rVTE in patients with cancer and renal impairment (p = 0.01) while exhibiting a comparable safety profile. This analysis supports dosing patients with renal impairment in accordance with patients with normal renal function; however, anti-Xa monitoring could be considered to further support safety in selected patients, particularly those with very severe renal impairment.

Anticoagulant use in patients with cancer associated venous thromboembolism: a retrospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Long term anticoagulant therapy is recommended for treatment and secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients. We assessed outpatient anticoagulants [warfarin, low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs), fondaparinux and unfractionated heparin (UFH)] use in adult, cancer patients, 20years of age or older, who incurred a venous thromboembolism (primary or secondary in-hospital diagnosis) in Quebec, Canada between 2007 and 2009. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were obtained from the Quebec Health Insurance Agency. Patients with an in-hospital cancer diagnosis between April 2007 and June 2009 and an in-hospital venous thromboembolism diagnosis either concurrently or consequently were eligible at the date of discharge (index date). Those patients registered with the provincial drug plan and discharged to the community were included in the study and followed for 6months. RESULTS: Among 2,070 study patients, 72.4% received anticoagulant therapy at index date, 60% of whom were persistent with therapy and received it for ≥80% of follow-up days. Outpatient anticoagulant use was more likely in those with primary versus secondary diagnosis of venous thromboembolism and less likely in patients with cerebrovascular disease, peptic ulcer disease or previous anticoagulant use. The small number of patients who used either UFH (n=11) or fondaparinux (n=5) at index date were included in the LMWH group. Warfarin use was less likely than LMWH use in corticosteroid users, previous anticoagulant users, patients with metastatic cancer and those with catheter or chemotherapy in the previous three months. Warfarin use was more likely than LMWH use in: older patients, those residing in rural areas, those with lower income and those suffering from ischemic heart disease, atrial fibrillation or chronic kidney disease. Patients with ischemic heart disease were more likely to have used a non-dalteparin LMWH versus dalteparin (currently, the only LMWH approved by health Canada for chronic treatment of VTE), while those residing in rural areas and those with catheter/chemotherapy were less likely to have used them. A primary (versus secondary) discharge diagnosis of venous thromboembolism [Odds Ratio 1.42; 95% confidence interval (1.14, 1.76)], and metastatic cancer 1.27 (1.00, 1.60) were associated with persistence on anticoagulant treatment. CONCLUSION: Guideline recommended outpatient use of anticoagulant in cancer patients hospitalized with venous thromboembolism was influenced by cancer status, old age and low income. Risk factors for bleeding prevented outpatient anticoagulant use in some patients.