A phase I and pharmacokinetic trial of erlotinib in combination with weekly docetaxel in patients with taxane-naive malignancies.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to define the maximum tolerated dose of weekly docetaxel combined with daily erlotinib, an oral epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients with any solid tumor received 150 mg erlotinib with escalating doses of docetaxel (20, 25, 30, and 35 mg/m(2)) on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days. The pharmacokinetics of docetaxel and erlotinib was determined on cycle 2, day 1. Erlotinib was given for a maximum of 12 cycles and docetaxel was given for up to 6 cycles. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients (17 males and 8 females) were enrolled with a median age of 56 years (range, 34-76); Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0/1 was 20/5. One patient had a dose-limiting toxicity in cycle 1 at the 25 mg/m(2) level (grade 3 enterocolitis). At 35 mg/m(2) docetaxel dose level, 6 of 10 patients required dose reductions to 30 mg/m(2) beyond cycle 1 due to neutropenia (3 patients) and mucositis, increased bilirubin, and diarrhea (1 patient each). The clearance of docetaxel and erlotinib of 61.7 and 8.16 L/h, respectively, did not seem to differ from historical controls. Responses were seen in non-small cell lung cancer, prostate cancer, and hepatobiliary cancers, including a complete response lasting 36+ months in a patient with hepatocellular carcinoma. CONCLUSION: Although no maximum tolerated dose was reached in cycle 1 with 35 mg/m(2) docetaxel, repetitive dosing proved intolerable in a substantial number of patients; thus, the recommended phase II dose of weekly docetaxel is 30 mg/m(2) when combined with 150 mg of daily erlotinib.

A phase I, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic dose escalation trial of weekly paclitaxel with interferon-alpha2b in patients with solid tumors.

PURPOSE: Paclitaxel and interferon have demonstrated anti-angiogenic activity in vitro and in vivo. The toxicity, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of paclitaxel with interferon-alpha2b (IFN-alpha2b) were assessed in patients with solid tumors to assess the feasibility of this novel anti-angiogenic regimen. METHODS: IFN-alpha2b (1 million units) was administered twice daily by subcutaneous injection. Paclitaxel was given weekly over 1 h starting at 30 mg/m2 and increased to 50 mg/m2. Cycles were repeated every 4 weeks. RESULTS: Nineteen patients with a variety of solid tumors were enrolled. Dose-limiting toxicity in cycle 1 was observed at 50 mg/m2. Eleven patients were treated at 40 mg/m2 with no undue toxicity. Pharmacokinetic parameter comparison studies were completed in 11 patients who received days 1 and 29 paclitaxel. Mean paclitaxel clearance and area under the curve (0-infinity) were not statistically different from days 1 to 29. There was a 50% increase in the average Cmax from days 1 to 29. There was also a 73% decrease of matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) levels in these 11 patients from days 1 to 29 (p < 0.0005). All three patients with cutaneous angiosarcomas experienced clinically meaningful remissions. In addition, minor responses were observed in one patient with heavily pretreated ovarian cancer and another with adrenocortical carcinoma. CONCLUSION: This trial details the inability to dose escalate to the maximum tolerated dose of weekly paclitaxel when combined with low-dose interferon. However, this low-dose regimen caused a significant decrease in MMP-9 and demonstrated anti-cancer activity in cutaneous angiosarcomas.

Two drug interaction studies evaluating the pharmacokinetics and toxicity of pemetrexed when coadministered with aspirin or Ibuprofen in patients with advanced cancer.

PURPOSE: Pemetrexed is an antimetabolite that is structurally similar to methotrexate. Because nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) impair methotrexate clearance and increase its toxicity, we evaluated the pharmacokinetics and toxicity of pemetrexed when coadministered with aspirin or ibuprofen in advanced cancer patients. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: In two independent, randomized, crossover drug interaction studies, cancer patients with a creatinine clearance (CrCl) > or =60 mL/min received an NSAID (aspirin or ibuprofen) with either the first or the second dose of pemetrexed (cycle 1 or 2). Pemetrexed (500 mg/m(2)) was infused i.v. on day 1 of a 21-day cycle, and all patients were supplemented with oral folic acid and i.m. vitamin B(12). Aspirin (325 mg) or ibuprofen (400 mg; 2 x 200 mg) was given orally every 6 hours, starting 2 days before pemetrexed administration, with the ninth and final dose taken 1 hour before infusion. Pemetrexed pharmacokinetics with and without concomitant NSAID treatment were compared for cycles 1 and 2. RESULTS: Data from 27 patients in each study were evaluable for the analysis of pemetrexed pharmacokinetics. Coadministration of aspirin did not alter pemetrexed pharmacokinetics; however, ibuprofen coadministration was associated with a 16% reduction in clearance, a 15% increase in maximum plasma concentration, and a 20% increase in area under the plasma concentration versus time curve but no significant change in V(ss) compared with pemetrexed alone. No febrile neutropenia occurred in any patient, and no increase in pemetrexed-related toxicity was associated with NSAID administration. CONCLUSIONS: Pemetrexed (500 mg/m(2)) with vitamin supplementation is well tolerated and requires no dosage adjustment when coadministered with aspirin (in patients with CrCl > or =60 mL/min) or ibuprofen (in patients with CrCl > or =80 mL/min).

A phase II multicenter, randomized, double-blind, safety trial assessing the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and efficacy of oral 2-methoxyestradiol capsules in hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine whether the preclinical antitumor and antiangiogenic activity of 2-methoxyestradiol can be translated to the clinic. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Men with hormone-refractory prostate cancer were enrolled into this phase II randomized, double-blind trial of two doses of oral 2-methoxyestradiol capsules (400 and 1,200 mg/d) given in 4-week cycles. Pharmacokinetic sampling was done on day 1 of cycles 1 and 2 and trough samples were obtained weekly. RESULTS: Thirty-three men were accrued between February and September 2001. The notable toxicity related to therapy was one grade 2 and two grade 3 episodes of liver transaminase elevation, which resolved with continued treatment in two patients. There were two cases of deep venous thromboses. The drug had nonlinear pharmacokinetic, rapid conversion to 2-methoxyestrone and approximately 85% conjugation. Trough plasma levels of unconjugated 2-methoxyestradiol and 2-methoxyestrone were approximately 4 and 40 ng/mL, respectively. Prostate-specific antigen declines between 21% and 40% were seen in seven patients in the 1,200 mg group and in one patient in the 400 mg group. The higher-dose group showed significantly decreased prostate-specific antigen velocity (P = 0.037) and compared with the 400 mg dose had a longer median time to prostate-specific antigen progression (109 versus 67 days; P = 0.094) and time on study (126 versus 61 days; P = 0.024). There was a 2.5- and 4-fold increase in sex hormone-binding globulin for the 400 and 1,200 mg dose levels, respectively, at days 28 and 56. CONCLUSION: 2-Methoxyestradiol is well tolerated and, despite suboptimal plasma levels and limited oral bioavailability with this capsule formulation, still showed some anticancer activity at 1,200 mg/d.

A Phase I trial of a potent P-glycoprotein inhibitor, zosuquidar trihydrochloride (LY335979), administered intravenously in combination with doxorubicin in patients with advanced malignancy.

PURPOSE: Our intention was to (a) to investigate the safety and tolerability of a potent P-glycoprotein modulator, zosuquidar trihydrochloride (LY335979), when administered i.v. alone or in combination with doxorubicin, (b) to determine the pharmacokinetics of zosuquidar and correlate exposure to inhibition of P-glycoprotein function in a surrogate assay, and (c) to compare the pharmacokinetics of doxorubicin in the presence and absence of zosuquidar. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced malignancies who provided written informed consent received zosuquidar and doxorubicin administered separately during the first cycle of therapy and then concurrently in subsequent cycles. Zosuquidar was given i.v. over 48 h in a cohort-dose escalation manner until the occurrence of dose-limiting toxicity or protocol specified maximum exposure. Doxorubicin doses of 45, 60, 75 mg/m(2) were administered during the course of the trial. RESULTS: Dose escalation proceeded through 9 cohorts with a total of 40 patients. The maximal doses administered were 640 mg/m(2) of zosuquidar and 75 mg/m(2) of doxorubicin. No dose-limiting toxicity of zosuquidar was observed. Pharmacokinetic analysis revealed that, in the presence of zosuquidar at doses that exceeded 500 mg, there was a modest decrease in clearance (17-22%) and modest increase in area under the curve (15-25%) of doxorubicin. This change was associated with an enhanced leukopenia and thrombocytopenia but was without demonstrable clinical significance. The higher doses of zosuquidar were associated with maximal P-glycoprotein inhibition in natural killer cells. CONCLUSION: Zosuquidar can be safely coadministered with doxorubicin using a 48 h i.v. dosing schedule.

Phase I dose escalation trial of feverfew with standardized doses of parthenolide in patients with cancer.

PURPOSE: Feverfew is a botanical product that contains parthenolide. Parthenolide has in vitro and in vivo anti-tumor and anti-angiogenic activity. Feverfew has been used extensively without any formal pharmacokinetic analysis. A Phase I trial was conducted to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and toxicity of parthenolide given as a component of "feverfew." PATIENTS AND METHODS: Feverfew (Tanacet trade mark ) was administered as a daily oral tablet in a 28-day cycle. A starting dose of 1 mg per day was explored with subsequent dose escalations to 2, 3, and 4 mg. Assessment of plasma pharmacokinetics was performed on patients accrued to the trial. Solid phase extraction and mass spectroscopy were used to evaluate parthenolide plasma concentrations. The limit of detection for parthenolide in plasma was 0.5 ng/ml. Patients were evaluated for response after every two cycles. RESULTS: Feverfew given on this schedule had no significant toxicity, and the maximum tolerated dose was not reached. When parthenolide was administered at doses up to 4 mg as a daily oral capsule in the feverfew preparation, there was not detectable concentration in the plasma. Because of this, parthenolide pharmacokinetics were not able to be completed. CONCLUSION: Feverfew, with up to 4 mg of parthenolide, given daily as an oral tablet is well tolerated without dose-limiting toxicity, but does not provide detectable plasma concentrations. Purification of parthenolide for administration of higher doses will be needed.

Phase I trial of carboplatin and paclitaxel with escalating doses of oral topotecan in patients with solid tumors.

Carboplatin, paclitaxel, and topotecan have activity against a variety of cancers. This phase I study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose of oral topotecan when given in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel. Eligibility criteria were as follows: Karnofsky Performance score greater than or equal to 80; and adequate hepatic, renal, and bone marrow function. Patients received paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 intravenously followed by carboplatin AUC 5 iv on day 1 every 3 weeks for up to 6 cycles. Cohorts of 3 to 5 were treated with escalating doses of oral topotecan on days 1 to 5, initially at 0.75 mg/m2 then 1 mg/m2 and 1.25 mg/m2 in subsequent cohorts. Thirteen patients were treated. Three of three patients in cohort 1 had grade IV neutropenia, with one neutropenic fever and one patient requiring a platelet transfusion. In cohort 2, three of five patients had grade III/IV neutropenia including two with neutropenic fever. Four patients required blood transfusions and one required platelet transfusions. In cohort 3, three of five had grade III/IV neutropenia, one of five had grade IV thrombocytopenia, and one patient required blood transfusions. In conclusion, this three-drug regimen resulted in significant cumulative myelosuppression in the doses and schedule tested in this phase I trial. Subsequent combinations of these drugs should focus on alternate doses or schedules.

Phase I trial of topotecan plus vinorelbine with/without filgrastim (G-CSF) in patients with refractory malignancies.

The purpose of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of topotecan plus vinorelbine with and without filgrastim (granulocyte colony-stimulating factor) in refractory solid tumors. Cohorts of three patients with recurrent solid tumors previously treated with no more than one chemotherapy regimen were entered. All patients had a performance status of 0 to 1 with adequate hepatic, renal, and bone marrow function and were treated with topotecan 1.5 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1 to 3 followed by vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1 and 8 without filgrastim every 3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on standard criteria for phase I escalation with a maximum of five patients in a cohort until an MTD was defined (first without then with filgrastim). Three patients were treated at dose level 1 (topotecan 1.5 mg/m2 days 1-3 and vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 days 1 and 8) without filgrastim. All three experienced hematologic dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) including grade IV neutropenia in two patients and grade III thrombocytopenia in one patient. An additional two patients, supported with filgrastim, treated at dose level 1 experienced DLT. One patient had dose-limiting neutropenia and the other had significant nonhematologic toxicity. No objective responses were seen, and all patients died within 6 months of entering the trial. The combination of topotecan and vinorelbine was poorly tolerated in the dose and schedule tested in this phase I trial. Subsequent combinations of these drugs, if warranted, should focus on alternate doses, schedules, or routes of administration.

A phase I study of weekly gemcitabine and docetaxel in patients with advanced cancer: a Hoosier Oncology Group Study.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of weekly gemcitabine plus docetaxel, a dose escalation trial of both drugs was developed with each administered weekly for 3 weeks out of 4. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Dose levels for gemcitabine (mg/m(2)) and docetaxel (mg/m(2)) were as follows: level 1: 600/25; level 2: 600/35; level 3: 750/35; and level 4: 900/35. Sixteen patients with adequate renal, hepatic, and hematologic function and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2 were treated. Primary sites included pancreas (12) and others (4). RESULTS: Three patients were treated at each dose level from level 1 through level 4. The dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was neutropenia, the maximum tolerated dose being 750 mg/m(2) of gemcitabine and 35 mg/m(2) of docetaxel. No grade 4 nonhematologic toxicity was seen. Three patients had grade 4 neutropenia. Of the 12 patients with pancreatic cancer, 1 had a partial remission and 7 had stable disease with a median duration of 8 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Gemcitabine and docetaxel can be safely administered weekly at a dose of 750 and 35 mg/m(2), respectively. The DLT was neutropenia. Disease stabilization suggests that this may be an active regimen in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.