Valorisation of residues from municipal wastewater sieving through anaerobic (co-)digestion with biological sludge.

The Circular and Green Economy principles is inspiring new approaches to municipal wastewater treatment plants (MWWTPs) design and operation. Recently, an ever-growing interest is devoted to exploring the alternatives for switching the WWTPs from being able to 'simply' removing contaminants from water to biorefinery-like plants where energy and material can be recovered. In this perspective, both wastewater and residues from process can be valorised for recovering nutrients (N and P), producing value added products (i.e. biopolymers), energy vectors and biofuels (i.e. bio-H2, bio-CH4 and bioethanol). As an additional benefit, changing the approach for WWTPs design and operation will decrease the overall amount of landfilled residues. In this context, the present research is aimed at evaluating the CH4 production potential of MWW screening units' residues. While such a stream is typically landfilled, the expected progressive increase of biodegradable matter content due to the ban on single-use plastic along with the boost of bioplastics makes the investigation of different biochemical valorisation routes more and more interesting from an environmental and economical perspective. Thus, a full-scale data collection campaign was performed to gain information on screening residues amount and properties and to analyse the relationship with influent flowrate. The most relevant residue properties were measured, and lab-scale tests were carried out to evaluate the bio-CH4 potential.

A simple informative intervention in primary care increases statin adherence.

PURPOSE: To assess the effectiveness of an informative intervention on general practitioners aimed at improving patients' adherence to statin therapy. METHODS: In the local health unit (LHU) of Bergamo, Lombardy (Italy), each general practitioner received a synthetic scientific document on dyslipidaemia and statins and aggregated data on adherence in 2006 for his/her patients compared to the means in the LHU and in his/her working district. Furthermore, a sample of seven districts received also a table of adherence levels for single patients. Patient's level data were retrieved from the health care utilisation databases of the LHU. Adherence parameters (proportion of patients with only one prescription, medication possession ratio [MPR] and proportion of non-persistent patients) were assessed after 1 year of follow-up. RESULTS: Overall, 5833 and 4788 new statin users were enrolled before and after the intervention, respectively. The percentage of patients with only one prescription decreased from 28.0 to 23.9 % (p < 0.001). MPR increased from 70.3 to 76.0 % (p < 0.001), and proportion of patients with MPR ≥ 80 % increased from 45.4 to 56.4 % (p < 0.001). The persistence also showed an improvement, both in terms of decreasing proportion of non-persistent (from 51.9 to 41.4 %, p < 0.001) and of increasing duration of continued therapy (from 235 to 264 mean days of persistent therapy, p < 0.001). There were not significant differences between the two types of intervention. CONCLUSIONS: This intervention resulted in an overall improvement of the short-term adherence to therapy. This tool can be replicated in other local contexts and with other chronic therapies.

Effects of a computerized decision support system in improving pharmacological management in high-risk cardiovascular patients: A cluster-randomized open-label controlled trial.

UNLABELLED: This study was aimed to investigate the effects of computerized decision support system in improving the prescription of drugs for cardiovascular prevention. A total of 197 Italian general practitioners were randomly allocated to receive either the alerting computerized decision support system integrated into standard software (intervention arm) or the standard software alone (control arm). Data on 21230 patients with diabetes, 3956 with acute myocardial infarction, and 2158 with stroke were analysed. The proportion of patients prescribed with cardiovascular drugs and days of drug-drug interaction exposure were evaluated. Computerized decision support system significantly increased the proportion of patients with diabetes prescribed with antiplatelet drugs (intervention: +2.7% vs. CONTROL: +0.15%; p < 0.001) or lipidlowering drugs (+4.2% vs. +2.8%; p = 0.001). A statistically significant decrease in days of potential interactions has been observed only among patients with stroke (-1.2 vs. -0.5 days/person-year; p = 0.001). In conclusion, computerized decision support system significantly increased the use of recommended cardiovascular drugs in diabetic patients, but it did not influence the exposure to potential interactions.

Global cardiovascular risk evaluation: pattern of algorithm use and risk modification in 'real life'.

AIMS: Although calculation of the global cardiovascular risk is strongly recommended, limited data are available regarding the use and the utility of this tool in clinical practice. We aimed at answering the following questions in the setting of Italian general practice: how many patients are evaluated via the cardiovascular risk algorithm; what are their characteristics; and what happens after their evaluation. METHODS: We used the Health Search/CSD Longitudinal Patient Database. The software used by about 800 participating GPs allows the calculation of the global cardiovascular risk in automatic. The following data were yearly extracted from the database within 2004-2008: age, sex, and recorded diagnosis of the main cardiovascular and other information encompassing smoking habits, blood pressure, total cholesterol, high density lipoprotein cholesterol (i.e., variables used to calculate cardiovascular risk), BMI, physical activity, triglycerides, glucose and creatinine; wherever available, current cardiovascular therapy and the automatically computed global cardiovascular risk were also extracted. RESULTS: In 2008, the observed population, aged 35-69 years, numbered 438 922 individuals; 78 617 (17.9%) had at least one calculation of cardiovascular risk; 20 181 patients were re-evaluated at least once: 61.1% among high-risk patients, 43.8% among moderate-risk patients, and 27.2% among low-risk patients. The level of cardiovascular risk measured at baseline increased in 6863 (34%), decreased in 11 791 (58.4%), and did not change in 1527 (7.6%) individuals. Overall, mean cardiovascular risk decreased over 4 years in 2.25% (SD 6.41%; P < 0.01) of patients. CONCLUSION: The calculation of global cardiovascular risk is underused by GPs, who generally assign a higher priority to high-risk individuals. In addition, the use of this algorithm seems to favor a reduction of risk in moderate-risk and high-risk patients.

Why is my hypertensive patient still not controlled?

UNLABELLED: Despite the well-known obstacles to blood pressure (BP) control, significant improvement can be obtained. Unfortunately more than a third of hypertensive patients remain non-controlled even after improving initiatives. We asked a group of General Practitioners (GPs) why their patients failed to reach the target despite their efforts. METHODS: After an audit the control rate increased from 50.8 % to 64.1 %. The 18 participating GPs analyzed the 2,674 patients who remained non controlled (no available BP recording in the last year or last available recorded value ≥140/90 mmHg -office BP-, ≥135/85 mmHg -home BP-, ≥130/80 mmHg -ambulatory BP-) and filled a questionnaire about the reasons for patients' non-attendance and for lack of BP control. RESULTS: BP values were missing in 1,769 (66.1 %) patients; reasons: contact impossible (19 %), contacted, but did not attend (29 %), forgot to check BP (19 %), BP checked at home, but not recorded (10 %), patients cared for by specialists (12 %), the patient is a doctor or a doctor's relative (4 %), other (12 %). Among the other 905 (33.9 %) non-controlled subjects (with recorded BP) 23 % were prescribed with ≥3, and 10 % with ≥4 drugs. Reasons not to increase therapy were: patient choice (29 %), wait and see strategy/patient not stable yet (26 %), increase inappropriate (20 %), others caring for hypertension (9 %), secondary hypertension (5 %), reached maximum possible therapy (4 %), "resistant hypertension" (4 %), forgot to increase therapy (3 %), other (5 %). CONCLUSIONS: The priorities for further improvement are the patients who do not see their doctors (regularly), followed by those unwilling to increase their therapy.

A multidisciplinary consensus document on follow-up strategies for patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention.

The number of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) is increasing worldwide. Follow-up strategies after PCI are extremely heterogeneous and can greatly affect the cost of medical care. Of note, clinical evaluations and non-invasive exams are often performed to low risk patients. In the present consensus document, practical advises are provided with respect to a tailored follow-up strategy on the basis of patients' risk profile. Three strategies follow-up have been defined and types and timing of clinical and instrumental evaluations are reported. Clinical and interventional cardiologists, cardiac rehabilitators, and general practitioners, who are in charge to manage post-PCI patients, equally contributed to the creation of the present document.

[Patients with heart failure in the last year of their life: the primary care perspective]. / I pazienti con scompenso cardiaco nell'ultimo anno di vita: il punto di vista della Medicina Generale.

BACKGROUND: The care of end-stage patients with heart failure (HF) represents a substantial cost and a relevant workload for health professionals and caregivers. Studies performed in out-of-hospital settings are limited. We aimed to provide data about management in primary care and professional needs of general practitioners (GPs). METHODS: One hundred fifty-one GPs provided information about patients with HF who died (whatever the cause) in the previous 365 days: a) where they died, b) cause of death, c) number and cause of hospital admission, d) who was mainly in charge of the patient during the year preceding death, e) place where patients were mainly cared for, f) relevant diseases other than HF. GPs were also requested to express their personal opinion about their professional needs. RESULTS: GPs identified 245 patients (mean age 83.8 ± 8.76 years, range 48-103, 53.9% female). The place of death was hospital (46.5%), home (42.9%), nursing home (4.9%), hospice (1.6%). Fifty percent of patients died of worsening HF, 14% of sudden death, 23% of noncardiovascular diseases. In the last year of life, 193 (78.8%) patients were hospitalized, 149 (60.8%) for HF. GPs were responsible for care in the majority of patients. Total number of hospitalizations was the only variable significantly associated with death in hospital. GPs reported clinical or organizational problems in 58.4% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: The care of HF patients is mostly home-based and provided by families and GPs. GPs often need simple and inexpensive cardiological and organizational support.

Assessment and potential determinants of compliance and persistence to antiosteoporosis therapy in Italy.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze adherence to antiosteoporosis drugs (AODs) and to assess the influence of patient-related and drug-related factors. STUDY DESIGN: Observational, retrospective study. METHODS: Data on prescriptions for AODs from 2007 through 2008 were retrieved from administrative databases of 10 Italian local health units. Key measurements included compliance and persistence at 1 year. Multivariate regression analyses were performed to estimate adjusted risk ratios for compliance less than 80% and adjusted hazard ratios for no persistence. RESULTS: Of 40,004 new patients (89.9% women, mean age 69.8 years), 84.0% were treated with bisphosphonates and 74.6% of administration regimens were weekly. Overall, 75.1% of patients had suboptimal levels of compliance and 84.7% were not persistent; almost one-third had only 1 prescription. In regression analyses, younger age, change of drug, and concomitant corticosteroid therapy were significantly associated to compliance and persistence in both genders. In women, weekly and monthly regimens reduced the risk for poor compliance (sex-adjusted relative risks 0.729 [0.697-0.762], 0.846 [0.817-0.876], respectively) and no persistence (sex-adjusted hazard ratios 0.591 [0.541-0.646], 0.508 [0.461-0.560], respectively) compared with a daily regimen. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, 75% of subjects had discontinuous treatment and inadequate drug supply. Age and frequency of administration were strongly associated with adherence. Improvement is urgently needed, and occasional prescriptions represent the main target.

[Screening of asymptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction in a population sample at high cardiovascular risk in Lombardy (Italy): the DAVID-Berg study]. / Lo screening della disfunzione ventricolare sinistra sistolica asintomatica in un campione di popolazione ad alto rischio cardiovascolare in Lombardia: lo studio DAVID-Berg.

BACKGROUND: Prevalence of asymptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction (ALVSD) increases with age and cardiovascular (CV) risk exposure. Early diagnosis and treatment allow reducing heart failure and fatal and non-fatal event rates. Data on ALVSD prevalence in Italy are still scarce and ALVSD remains commonly under-diagnosed in primary care, where diagnostic facilities are limited. Among subjects at high CV risk in primary care, we assessed the prevalence of ALVSD and the relative predictive value of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and the Framingham Heart Failure Risk Score (FHFRS). METHODS: Records of 4047 subjects aged 55-80 years, without history, symptoms or signs of heart failure, registered at three primary care practices in Lombardy, Northern Italy, were reviewed; 623 subjects at high CV risk underwent visit, ECG, echocardiography, NT-proBNP and FHFRS calculation. RESULTS: ALVSD, defined as left ventricular ejection fraction <50%, was detected in 33 subjects (5.3%) who showed higher NT-proBNP (p<0.001) and FHFRS (p=0.013) than those without ALVSD. NT-proBNP levels beyond normal age and gender-specific 95th percentile had a 97.7% negative predictive value for ALVSD and were associated with a 6-fold increase in ALVSD risk. Adding NT-proBNP to FHFRS significantly improved prediction (C-statistic 0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67-0.84 vs 0.63, 95% CI 0.53-0.73, p=0.04; net reclassification improvement 38.4%). The combination of FHFRS and major ECG abnormalities was not superior to stand alone NT-proBNP (C-statistic 0.71, 95% CI 0.63-0.80 vs 0.74, 95% CI 0.64-0.83, p=0.61). CONCLUSIONS: In subjects at high CV risk in primary care, prevalence of ALVSD is 5.3%; for diagnosis NT-proBNP adds predictive value to the FHFRS and is equivalent to the combination of FHFRS and ECG. Because of its practical advantages, NT-proBNP might be routinely used for ALVSD screening in primary care.

How many hypertensive patients can be controlled in "real life": an improvement strategy in primary care.

BACKGROUND: It is well known that hypertension control is non-satisfactory, but it is not clear how many hypertensive patients can be controlled in real life. We addressed this question implementing a simple, multifaceted improvement strategy in family practice. METHODS: Eighteen General Practitioner (GPs) agreed upon a simple improvement strategy including: 1) the use of occasional direct/indirect contacts (prescription refilling) to decrease missing blood pressure (BP) recording, and to increase therapeutic adherence, 2) the use of home BP measurements in non-controlled patients, 3) the addition of a new drug in non-controlled, but adequately adherent patients. Results were assessed after one year by automatic data extraction from the clinical records of all hypertensive subjects. RESULTS: The patients with a diagnosis of hypertension increased from 6.309 (age 58.5 +/- 12.4; M 45.5%) to 6.717 (age 58.6 +/- 12.9; M 45.7%): prevalence 25.3% to 27.0%. The BP recording increased: 4,305 patients (68.2%) vs 4,948 patients (78.4%) (+ 10.2%, ci 9.4%-10.9%; p < 0.001), as well as the BP control: 3,203 (50.8% of all the diagnosed hypertensive patients and 74.4% of the subjects with recorded BP value) vs 4,043 (64.1% of all the diagnosed hypertensive patients and 81.7% of the subjects with recorded BP value) (+ 13.3%, ci 12.5%-14.2%; p < 0.001 and + 7.3%, ci 6.7%-8.0%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Almost 82% of hypertensive subjects who contact their doctors can be easily controlled. Most non-controlled patients simply don't see their GPs; in almost all the remaining non-controlled patients GPs fail to increase drug therapy. A further improvement is therefore possible.

Stroke prophylaxis in high-risk patients with atrial fibrillation: rhythm vs. rate control strategy.

PURPOSE: "Rhythm" and "Rate" control strategies require partially different organization, and a different involvement of Specialists and General Practitioners; we verified whether the strategy assignment modified the approach to stroke prophylaxis. METHODS: Survey in general practice: 233 GPs identified all patients with codified atrial fibrillation (AF) diagnosis, checked the diagnosis (ECG/hospital discharge document), and filled a structured questionnaire on stroke risk-factors, prophylactic therapy, and reasons for warfarin non prescription in CHADS ≥2 patients. Data were collected as an "aggregate." RESULTS: Population observed: 295,906 patients aged >14; 6,036 with confirmed AF; 5,888 with complete data about anti-thrombotic prophylaxis are analyzed here. In the "rhythm strategy" group 45.6% of the CHADS score ≥2 patients (594) were on warfarin, vs. 73.2% (1,741) in the "rate strategy" group (p<0.0001). Overall reasons for warfarin non-use were significantly different in the two groups: clinical contraindications (12.3% vs. 19.7%), side effects (5.5% vs. 8.5%), patients' refusal (12.2% vs. 15.2%), unreliable patient/care-giver (14.4% vs. 25.9%); reasons were unknown to the GP in 55.6% in rhythm control vs. 30.9% in rate control group. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-thrombotic prophylaxis in CHADS ≥2 patients is different in subjects assigned to the Rhythm vs. the Rate control strategy, as well as reported reasons for warfarin non use. GPs do not know why warfarin is not used in a large percentage of cases, mainly in the rhythm control strategy group. Improving efforts should probably be differently tailored for patients assigned to the "rhythm" or the "rate" control strategy.

2012 consensus document of the Italian Society of Hypertension (SIIA): strategies to improve blood pressure control in Italy: from global cardiovascular risk stratification to combination therapy.

Observational clinical studies have demonstrated that only 30-40% of patients with arterial hypertension achieve the recommended blood pressure goals (below 140/90 mmHg). In contrast, interventional trials consistently showed that it is possible to achieve effective blood pressure targets in about 70% of treated hypertensive patients with different cardiovascular risk profiles, especially through the use of rational, effective and well tolerated combination therapies. In order to bridge the gap between current and desired blood pressure control and to achieve more effective prevention of cardiovascular diseases, the Italian Society of Hypertension (SIIA) has developed an interventional strategy aimed at reaching nearly 70% of treated controlled hypertensive patients by 2015. This ambitious goal can be realistically achieved by a more rational use of modern tools and supports, and also through the use of combination therapy in hypertension in daily clinical practice, especially if this approach can be simplified into a single pill (fixed combination therapy), which is a therapeutic option now also available in Italy. Since about 70-80% of treated hypertensive patients require a combination therapy based on at least two classes of drugs in order to achieve the recommended blood pressure goals, it is of key importance to implement this strategy in routine clinical practice. Amongst the various combination therapies currently available for hypertension treatment and control, the use of those strategies based on drugs that antagonize the renin-angiotensin system, such as angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists (angiotensin receptor blockers) and ACE inhibitors, in combination with diuretics and/or calcium channel blockers, has been shown to significantly reduce the risk of major cardiovascular events and to improve patient compliance to treatment, resulting in a greater antihypertensive efficacy and better tolerability compared with monotherapy. The present document of the Italian Society of Arterial Hypertension (SIIA) aims to gather the main indications for the implementation of combination therapy in the treatment of hypertension, in order to improve blood pressure control in Italy.

Left-ventricular hypertrophy and renal outcome in hypertensive patients in primary-care.

BACKGROUND: Subclinical cardiac damage has recently emerged as a potential predictor of adverse renal outcome. We therefore retrospectively evaluated the effect of left-ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), diagnosed electrocardiographically, on the renal outcome of hypertensive patients managed in primary care. METHODS: From a historical cohort of 39,525 hypertensive individuals evaluated in 2005, we retrieved 5-year data of the 18,510 surviving subjects for whom renal follow-up was available. RESULTS: The baseline prevalences of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and LVH in the study cohort were 25.6% and 5.6%, respectively. During the 5-year follow-up, 1.4% of patients with LVH and 0.5% of those without LVH progressed to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring dialysis (P < 0.01). Moreover, 25.6% of patients with LVH and 17% without LVH progressed from each stage of CKD to a more advanced stage (P < 0.01), whereas 0.9% of patients with LVH and 0.4% without LVH reached stage 5 CKD (P < 0.01). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that besides estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and male gender, LVH was the most significant modifiable predictor of progression to dialysis (hazard ratio (HR), 1.82; 95% CI, 1.05-3.17; P = 0.03). Multivariate logistic regression analysis also revealed LVH as a significant predictor of the risk of progression from each stage of CKD to a more advanced stage (OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.07-1.45; P < 0.01), as well as of progression to stage 5 CKD (OR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.17-2.95; P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Left-ventricular hypertrophy proved to be a significant predictor of adverse renal outcome in hypertensive patients managed with primary care, and systematic screening for LVH should be adopted for assessing renal risk in these patients.

Clinical management of rivaroxaban-treated patients.

INTRODUCTION: Until recently, only vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) were used for long-term anticoagulation. New oral anticoagulants, with pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics different to VKAs, are now available for some indications. Rivaroxaban (Xarelto®) is an oral Factor Xa inhibitor approved in many countries for long-term treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism. This article is addressed to all professionals involved in the management of treated patients to highlight the characteristics of rivaroxaban and provide practical guidance on management of treated patients. AREAS COVERED: This article is based on a consensus of specialists involved in the management of anticoagulant treatment, including thrombosis experts, cardiologists, neurologists, emergency medicine specialists, and general practitioners. The authors performed a nonsystematic review of the literature, and expressed guidance statements based on the results of the review as well as personal experience. EXPERT OPINION: Availability of new anticoagulant drugs, including rivaroxaban, is an important step forward to allow easier, more effective, and safer long-term anticoagulation in patients in whom adequate anticoagulation is currently denied due to the limitations of VKAs. However, given their totally new properties, associated risks, and expected broad clinical use, expert professionals and manufacturers must urgently tackle a series of issues.

Frequency, patient characteristics, treatment strategies, and resource usage of atrial fibrillation (from the Italian Survey of Atrial Fibrillation Management [ISAF] study).

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is 1 of the most important healthcare issues and an important cause of healthcare expenditure. AF care requires specific arrhythmologic skills and complex treatment. Therefore, it is crucial to know its real affect on healthcare systems to allocate resources and detect areas for improving the standards of care. The present nationwide, retrospective, observational study involved 233 general practitioners. Each general practitioner completed an electronic questionnaire to provide information on the clinical profile, treatment strategies, and resources consumed to care for their patients with AF. Of the 295,906 patients screened, representative of the Italian population, 6,036 (2.04%) had AF: 20.2% paroxysmal, 24.3% persistent, and 55.5% permanent AF. AF occurred in 0.16% of patients aged 16 to 50 years, 9.0% of those aged 76 to 85 years, and 10.7% of those aged ≥85 years. AF was symptomatic despite therapy in 74.6% of patients and was associated with heart disease in 75%. Among the patients with AF, 24.8% had heart failure, 26.8% renal failure, 18% stroke/transient ischemic attack, and 29.3% had ≥3 co-morbidities. The rate control treatment strategy was pursued in 55%. Of the 6,036 patients with AF, 46% received anticoagulants. The success rate of catheter ablation of the AF substrate was 50%. In conclusion, in our study, the frequency of AF was 2 times greater than previously reported (approximately 0.90%), rate control was the most pursued treatment strategy, anticoagulants were still underused, and the success rate of AF ablation was lower than reported by referral centers.

C-reactive protein distribution and correlation with traditional cardiovascular risk factors in the Italian population.

BACKGROUND: C-reactive protein (CRP) increases during an inflammatory response; its plasma levels are believed to be an independent predictor of future atherosclerotic disease. We report the distribution of plasma levels of CRP and its possible relationship with other cardiovascular risk factors in an Italian cohort. METHODS: CRP was assessed in frozen plasma samples of 1949 participants in the CHECK study (2001-2005), which collected clinical and biochemical data from randomly selected subjects (40-79 years) in the setting of Italian general practice. RESULTS: Median CRP (interquartile range) was higher in women (1.42 [0.58-2.86] vs 1.28 [0.58-2.50]; p=.163), in people aged ≥ 65 years (1.74 [0.89-3.34] vs 1.11 [0.52-2.45]; p<.001), in patients with obesity (2.37 [1.27-4.15] vs 1.16 [0.52-2.41]; p<.001), metabolic syndrome (2.12 [1.16-3.72] vs 1.10 [0.50-2.38]; p<.001), or higher cardiovascular risk (2.03 [1.01-3.42] vs 1.19 [0.53-2.50]; p<.001). Stepwise regression analysis showed significant associations (R(2)=.264) of circulating log(e)CRP with body mass index, fibrinogen, apoB, age, gender, smoking habits, physical inactivity, creatinine levels, and systolic blood pressure. CONCLUSION: This study provides epidemiological data of CRP in the Italian population and reinforces the existing evidences about the close correlation between CRP and markers of inflammation and adiposity.

[Strategies for improving blood pressure control in Italy: from global cardiovascular risk stratification to combination therapy. 2012 Position paper of the Italian Society of Hypertension]. / Strategie per migliorare il controllo della pressione arteriosa in Italia: dalla stratificazione del rischio cardiovascolare globale alla terapia di combinazione. Documento di Indirizzo 2012 della Società Italiana dell'Ipertensione Arteriosa (SIIA).

Observational studies demonstrate that the proportion of treated hypertensive patients who attain the recommended blood pressure goals (140/90 mmHg) does not exceed 30-40%. Conversely, clinical trials have consistently shown that effective blood pressure control within the recommended targets can be achieved in 70-80% of treated hypertensive patients with different cardiovascular risk profile, especially when appropriate, effective and well tolerated combination therapies are used. In order to bridge the gap between current and optimal blood pressure control rates and to achieve a more effective cardiovascular prevention, the Italian Society of Hypertension has recently developed an interventional strategy that aims to approximate 70% of treated controlled patients by 2015. This ambitious goal can be realistically achieved by the appropriate use of modern aids and tools, also including the implementation of combination therapy, especially if this approach can be simplified into a single pill, now available in Italy. At present, 70-80% of hypertensive patients require combination therapies based on at least two classes of antihypertensive drugs to achieve the recommended blood pressure goals. It is therefore of paramount importance to implement this strategy in routine clinical practice. Among the different combination therapies, the use of combination strategies based on drugs inhibiting the renin-angiotensin system, such as angiotensin receptor blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, combined with diuretics and/or calcium-channel blockers, have demonstrated to significantly reduce the rates of major cardiovascular events and discontinuations from prescribed therapies, resulting in higher antihypertensive efficacy and better tolerability than monotherapy. The present document of the Italian Society of Hypertension aims to provide main indications for implementing combination therapy in the clinical management of hypertension in order to improve blood pressure control in Italy.

Reaching LDL-c targets in high-risk patients requires high-efficacy cholesterol-lowering drugs in more than 50% of cases. The results of the CHECK study.

We estimated the need to use low-efficacy statins or high-efficacy statins or drug combinations to bring high- or very-high cardiovascular risk subjects to their LDL-c target, in a sample representative of the Italian adult population and according to the principles of reimbursement of hypercholesterolemic drugs currently used in Italy. The results allow us concluding that among high or very high cardiovascular risk patients about three patients out of five should be prescribed high-efficacy statins or drug combinations. The other two prescriptions might take into account lower-efficacy statins. If we also compute the values of HDL-c in these subjects--the large majority of which stands below the optimal values as suggested by International guidelines--we bring forward the need either to select specific statins able to increase the levels of these protective lipoproteins or to consider combination therapies of statins with fibrates or nicotinic acid. Our data might conceivably be applied to other low-cardiovascular risk countries and should be taken into account when defining the proportion of drugs with different efficacy and cost in the everyday clinical practice.

A national survey on aspirin patterns of use and persistence in community outpatients in Italy.

BACKGROUND: Aspirin is recommended as preventive therapy in patients with cardiovascular diseases (CVD), diabetes mellitus, and high cardiovascular risk due to multiple risk factors. However, the benefits of aspirin might be affected by its inappropriate use. Real-life information on aspirin use is therefore needed as an audit tool aimed to maximize the benefits and minimize the risks. DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional and cohort study. METHODS: Primary care data were obtained from 400 Italian general practitioners (GPs) providing information to the Health Search/CDS Longitudinal Patients Database. Prevalence of use was assessed in individuals aged 18 years and older, registered in the GP's list at the beginning of the observation period (year 2005). As potential correlates of aspirin use, clinical and demographic variables were also recorded. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to assess the relationship between such covariates and aspirin use. Persistence to aspirin treatment was examined among newly prescribed aspirin users during the years 2000-04. RESULTS: On a total sample of 540,984 patients, 45,271 (8.3%) were prescribed at least once with aspirin. On 35,473 patients with previous CVD, 51.7% were treated with aspirin, whereas only 15.2% of 151,526 eligible patients free of CVD received an aspirin prescription. In primary prevention, prevalence of aspirin use was significantly associated with the increased number of cardiovascular risk factors either among diabetic (p < 0.001) or non-diabetic (p < 0.001) patients. A negative association has been observed among patients with contraindication to aspirin use. Only 23.4% of patients at 1 year and 12.2% at 2 years remained persistent with aspirin use, although most of first-time users reported an intermittent use. CONCLUSION: Underuse and discontinuation of aspirin treatment is common among eligible patients. Increased cardiovascular risk only partially influences aspirin management. An effort aimed to improve appropriate aspirin use is likely to provide major benefits.