Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 17 de 17
Filtrar
1.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open ; 12(3): e5681, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38528844

RESUMEN

Background: The deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap is a predominant technique for autologous breast reconstruction. However, the best method of abdominal fascial closure in this technique is not well defined. This study details our initial experience with unidirectional barbed suture-only repair of abdominal donor site fascia. Methods: Patients who underwent DIEP flap breast reconstruction and abdominal fascial closure with Stratafix Symmetric Polydioxanone PDS Plus were retrospectively reviewed. Information regarding pertinent patient history, medical comorbidities, risk factors, and surgical technique was extracted, along with the incidence of eight separate postoperative abdominal surgical site occurrences. Results: Retrospective review identified 43 patients who underwent 19 unilateral and 24 bilateral DIEP flap breast reconstruction procedures (n = 67). Average patient follow-up was 791 days (range 153-1769). Six patients (14%) had a complication of the donor site. Seroma was most frequent (n = 3, 7%), followed by surgical site infection (n = 2, 5%). One patient had incisional dehiscence (2%) and another patient developed bulging (2%). No patients had chronic pain, weakness, hematoma, or hernia postoperatively. Patients with donor site complications had a history of abdominal/pelvic surgery significantly more often than the patients without donor site complications (100% versus 49%; P = 0.032). Conclusions: Abdominal fascial repair with Stratafix Symmetric suture alone led to low rates of abdominal donor site morbidity, including no hernia and rare bulging, following DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Additional advantages of this technique may be reduced operative times and lower operative costs compared with alternative methods of fascial repair, although prospective and randomized studies are warranted.

2.
Skeletal Radiol ; 53(4): 811-816, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37665347

RESUMEN

Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) was originally developed as a means for increasing intuitive prosthesis control, though later found to play a role in phantom limb pain and neuroma prevention. There is a paucity of literature describing the clinical course of patients with poor TMR surgical outcomes and the value of imaging in the postoperative recovery period. This report will illustrate the potential utility of ultrasound neurography to accurately differentiate TMR surgical outcomes in two patients that received upper extremity amputation and subsequent reconstruction with TMR. Ultrasound evaluation of TMR sites in patient 1 confirmed successful reinnervation, evident by nerve fascicle continuity and eventual integration of the transferred nerve into the target muscle. Conversely, the ultrasound of patient 2 showed discontinuity of the nerve fascicles, neuroma formation, and muscle atrophy in all three sites of nerve transfer, suggesting an unsuccessful procedure and poor functional recovery. Ultrasound neurography is uniquely able to capture the longitudinal trajectory of rerouted nerves to confirm continuity and eventual reinnervation into muscle. Therefore, the application of ultrasound in a postoperative setting can correctly identify instances of failed TMR before this information would become available through clinical evaluation. Early identification of poor TMR outcomes may benefit future patients by fostering the discovery of failure mechanisms and aiding in further surgical planning to improve functional outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Transferencia de Nervios , Neuroma , Miembro Fantasma , Humanos , Músculo Esquelético/diagnóstico por imagen , Músculo Esquelético/cirugía , Músculo Esquelético/inervación , Amputación Quirúrgica , Miembro Fantasma/prevención & control , Miembro Fantasma/cirugía , Transferencia de Nervios/métodos
3.
J Reconstr Microsurg ; 2023 Nov 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37751881

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Recent advancements in supermicrosurgery and promising preliminary outcomes have led to a surge in physiologic lymphedema surgery. This study is the first to evaluate lymphedema surgical education among U.S. plastic surgery residency programs, along with the background and experience of plastic surgeons subspecializing in the field. METHODS: Cross-sectional evaluation of 103 accredited U.S. plastic surgery residency programs was performed in January 2023. Web-based searches of program curricula, faculty profiles, and main institutional pages indicated whether a program provided nonclinical or clinical exposure to lymphedema surgery. Review of online faculty profiles, surname searches, Doximity, and Scopus determined the perceived demographics, academic productivity, and procedures performed by lymphedema surgeons. RESULTS: Compared with the 11 programs that incorporated lymphedema surgery into their online curriculum, 67 programs had a rotation site with a surgeon performing lymphedema procedures. Of the 33 programs without evidence of clinical exposure, 76% (n = 25) did not provide or specify providing elective time. Faculty perceived to be female or a race underrepresented in plastic surgery had significantly more assistant professor titles (p < 0.0214) and significantly fewer years of experience (p < 0.0293) than their counterparts. CONCLUSION: Great variation in lymphedema surgical education exists among U.S. plastic surgery residency programs. While few programs incorporate lymphedema surgery into their advertised curriculum, programs without clinical exposure frequently did not provide elective time to obtain it. Faculty that were female or a race underrepresented in plastic surgery were most often early in their career, suggesting lymphedema surgeons may grow increasingly diverse in years to come.

4.
Aesthet Surg J ; 44(1): NP69-NP76, 2023 Dec 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37738429

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The number of Brazilian butt lift (BBL) fatalities remains high in the United States despite numerous practice advisories geared towards patient safety and reducing the incidence of fatal pulmonary fat emboli. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate US board-certified plastic surgeons' opinions, understanding of BBL-related mortality, and current risk-reducing surgical practices for BBL procedures. METHODS: An online 18-question survey was distributed via email by the Aesthetic Surgery Education and Research Foundation to national board-certified plastic surgeon members of the The Aesthetic Society. Survey responses were collected over 21 days on the Qualtrics platform. RESULTS: The survey response rate was 10% (n = 178). Of the 77% who performed BBL procedures, 48% (n = 80) did not use ultrasound. Approximately 60% (n = 102) of all respondents disagreed with imposing regulations to require ultrasound, with the most frequent reason being that it was unnecessary with adequate surgeon experience (45%). Plastic surgeons thought that high-volume budget clinics (n = 64) and a lack of regulations imposed on individual surgeons by boards of medicine (n = 31) were the greatest contributors to BBL mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Most US plastic surgeons did not use ultrasound for BBL procedures and did not agree that ultrasound should be required, which may partially be the result of unsuccessful educational outreach for risk-reducing practices and training for ultrasound. Regulations by the boards of medicine imposed on individual surgeons, in combination with new legislation targeted at ownership of high-volume clinics, are strongly backed by surgeon respondents as measures that may improve patient safety.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica , Cirujanos , Cirugía Plástica , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Cirugía Plástica/efectos adversos , Brasil , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
5.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 2023 Sep 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37699106

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Direct-to-implant (DTI) reconstruction has multiple advantages over a staged tissue expander (TE) approach. However, its use may be limited by concerns of increased complications. This study is the largest series to date comparing postoperative outcomes for DTI versus TE reconstruction in the prepectoral plane. METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed 348 patients that received 536 total immediate, prepectoral implant-based breast reconstructions between January 2018 and December 2021. The authors compared the presence of risk factors and the rate of six separate complications between patients that received DTI versus TE reconstruction up to one year after surgery. RESULTS: Of 348 patients, 147 (42%) and 201 (58%) underwent TE and DTI reconstruction (p=0.1813), respectively. Overall infection rate was 16.4% (n=57). DTI patients had a significantly greater incidence of wounds (p<0.0001), including minor (p<0.0011) and major wounds (p<0.0053). Significantly greater mastectomy resection weights were found for DTI patients that experienced any complication (p<0.0076), postoperative wounds (p<0.0001), and major wounds specifically (p<0.0035). Compared to medium thickness, extra-thick acellular dermal matrix (ADM) was associated with significantly increased rates of infection (p<0.0408) and wounds (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Prepectoral DTI reconstruction in patients with adequate flap perfusion may have comparable complication rates to staged TE reconstruction apart from a higher incidence of postoperative wounds. Greater mastectomy resection weights and thickness of ADM may specifically contribute to infectious and wound-healing complications. Prepectoral DTI reconstruction is encouraged in the patients with adequate flap perfusion and moderate to low mastectomy resection weights that desire comparable or smaller implant volumes.

6.
Ann Plast Surg ; 91(3): 326-330, 2023 09 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37405878

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Increased representation from both women and non-White ethnicities remains a topic of discussion in plastic surgery. Speakers at academic conferences are a form of visual representation of diversity within the field. This study determined the current demographic landscape of aesthetic plastic surgery and evaluated whether underrepresented populations receive equal opportunities to be invited speakers at The Aesthetic Society meetings. METHODS: Invited speaker's names, roles, and allotted time for presentation were extracted from the 2017 to 2021 meeting programs. Perceived gender and ethnicity were determined by visual analysis of photographs, whereas parameters of academic productivity and professorship were collected from Doximity, LinkedIn, Scopus, and institutional profiles. Differences in opportunities to present and academic credentials were compared between groups. RESULTS: Of the 1447 invited speakers between 2017 and 2021, 20% (n = 294) were women and 23% (n = 316) belonged to a non-White ethnicity. Representation from women significantly increased between 2017 and 2021 (14% vs 30%, P < 0.001), whereas the proportion of non-White speakers did not (25% vs 25%, P > 0.050) despite comparable h-indexes (15.3 vs 17.2) and publications (54.9 vs 75.9) to White speakers. Non-White speakers oftentimes had more academic titles, significant in 2019 ( P < 0.020). CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of female invited speakers has increased, with room for further improvement. Representation from non-White speakers has not changed. However, significantly more non-White speakers holding assistant professor titles may indicate increased ethnicity diversity in years to come. Future efforts should focus on improving diversity in positions of leadership while promoting functions that target young minority career individuals.


Asunto(s)
Médicos Mujeres , Cirugía Plástica , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Sociedades Médicas , Bibliometría , Eficiencia
7.
Ann Plast Surg ; 90(6): 592-597, 2023 06 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37311314

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Migraine headache can be an extremely debilitating condition, with pharmacotherapy for prophylaxis or treatment of acute symptoms being unsuccessful in a large proportion of patients. Surgical management of migraine has recently gained popularity as an alternative to pharmacotherapy for severe disease. However, the novel nature of these procedures may lead to variable insurance coverage, limiting access to care. METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis of 101 US insurance companies was conducted. Companies were chosen based on greatest market share and enrollment per state. A Web-based search or phone call identified whether each company had a publicly available policy on nonsurgical or surgical management of migraine or headache. For companies with an available policy, coverage was categorized into covered, covered on a case-by-case basis, or never covered, with criteria required for coverage collected and categorized. RESULTS: Of the 101 evaluated insurers, significantly fewer companies had a policy on surgical treatment for migraine or headache (n = 52 [52%]) compared with nonsurgical treatment (n = 78 [78%]) (P < 0.001). For companies with a policy, the most frequently covered nonsurgical treatments were biofeedback (n = 23 [92%]) and botulism toxin injections (n = 61 [88%]). Headaches were an approved indication for occipital nerve stimulation in 4% (n = 2) of company policies and nerve decompression in 2% (n = 1) of policies. Migraines were never offered preauthorized coverage for surgical procedures. CONCLUSION: Approximately half of US insurance companies have a publicly available policy on surgical management of migraine or headache. Surgical treatment was seldom covered for the indication of headache and would never receive preauthorized coverage for migraine. Lack of coverage may create challenges in accessing surgical treatment. Additional prospective, controlled studies are necessary to further support the efficacy of surgical treatment.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Cefalalgia , Trastornos Migrañosos , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Cefalea , Cobertura del Seguro , Trastornos Migrañosos/cirugía , Estudios Prospectivos
8.
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord ; 11(5): 1055-1062, 2023 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37196921

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Computed tomography venography (CTV) is not routinely used to screen patients presenting with a presumed lower extremity lymphedema diagnosis for left iliac vein obstruction (IVO) or May-Thurner syndrome (MTS). The objective of this study is to determine the utility of routine CTV screening for these patients by evaluating the proportion presenting with clinically significant CTV-identified left IVO. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 121 patients who had presented to our lymphedema center with lower extremity edema between November 2020 and May 2022. Information regarding demographics, comorbidities, lymphedema characteristics, and imaging reports was collected. Cases of IVO present on CTV were reviewed by a multidisciplinary team to determine the clinical significance of the CTV findings. RESULTS: Of the patients with complete imaging studies, 49% (n = 25) had abnormal lymphoscintigraphy findings, 45% (n = 46) had reflux on ultrasound, and 11.4% (n = 9) had IVO on CTV. Seven patients (6%) had CTV findings of IVO and edema of either the isolated left (n = 4) or bilateral (n = 3) lower extremities. Cases of IVO on CTV were determined by the multidisciplinary team to be the predominant cause of lower extremity edema for three of these seven cases (43%; or 2.5% of all 121 patients). CONCLUSIONS: Six percent of patients presenting to a lymphedema center with lower extremity edema had left-sided IVO on CTV suggestive of MTS. However, the cases of IVO were determined to be clinically significant <50% of the time or for 2.5% of all patients. CTV should be reserved for patients with isolated left-sided or bilateral lower extremity edema with a greater left-sided component and a history of findings that raise clinical suspicion for MTS.


Asunto(s)
Linfedema , Síndrome de May-Thurner , Enfermedades Vasculares , Humanos , Flebografía/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Edema/diagnóstico por imagen , Edema/etiología , Linfedema/diagnóstico por imagen , Linfedema/complicaciones , Síndrome de May-Thurner/complicaciones , Enfermedades Vasculares/complicaciones , Extremidad Inferior
9.
Skeletal Radiol ; 52(10): 1997-2002, 2023 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37060462

RESUMEN

Historically, the use of ultrasound (US) in the management of peripheral nervous system (PNS) pathology has been limited to diagnostic confirmation or guidance for interventional injections. This technical case series will demonstrate the utility and versatility of preoperative US-guided needle localization for the excision of lower extremity neuromas and other pathology of the PNS. Five patients with symptomatic lower extremity PNS tumors were retrospectively reviewed. This case series corroborates the technical nuances of localizing lower extremity neuromas by US-guided needle and wire placement prior to operative excision. This was achieved by a multidisciplinary team that included plastic surgery, neurosurgery, and radiology. Five patients had US-guided needle localization of a lower extremity PNS target prior to operative intervention. Three patients had lower extremity neuromas of varying origins, including the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN), saphenous nerve, and sural nerve. The remaining two patients had a sciatic nerve sheath Schwannoma and a femoral nerve glomus tumor. Under sonographic visualization, a needle was advanced to the target perimeter and withdrawn, leaving behind a percutaneous guidewire. This technique simplified the marking of the nerve course prior to dissection and led to efficient intraoperative identification of all five PNS tumors without any complications. Preoperative US-guided needle localization led to safe, accurate, and efficient perioperative and intraoperative identification of neuromas and other PNS tumors of the lower extremity prior to excision. By reducing the challenges of nerve identification in a scarred tissue bed, this multidisciplinary approach may decrease postoperative patient morbidity.


Asunto(s)
Tumor Glómico , Neuroma , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Extremidad Inferior/diagnóstico por imagen , Extremidad Inferior/cirugía , Nervio Ciático , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/métodos
10.
Clin Breast Cancer ; 23(2): 211-218, 2023 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36588087

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is associated with a multitude of risk factors, such as genetic predisposition and mutations, family history, personal medical history, or previous radiotherapy. A prophylactic mastectomy (PM) may be considered a suitable risk-reducing procedure in some cases. However, there are significant discrepancies between national society recommendations and insurance company requirements for PM. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors conducted a cross-sectional analysis of insurance policies for a PM. One-hundred companies were selected based on the greatest state enrolment and market share. Their policies were identified through a Web-based search and telephone interviews, and their medical necessity criteria were extracted. RESULTS: Preauthorized coverage of PMs was provided by 39% of insurance policies (n = 39) and 5 indications were identified. There was consensus amongst these policies to cover a PM for BRCA1/2 mutations (n = 39, 100%), but was more variable for other genetic mutations (15%-90%). Coverage of PM for the remaining indications varied among insurers: previous radiotherapy (92%), pathological changes in the breast (3%-92%), personal history of cancer (64%) and family history risk factors (39%-51%). CONCLUSION: There is a marked level of variability in both the indications and medical necessity criteria for PM insurance policies. The decision to undergo a PM must be carefully considered with a patient's care team and should not be affected by insurance coverage status.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Mastectomía Profiláctica , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Neoplasias de la Mama/prevención & control , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Estudios Transversales , Cobertura del Seguro , Mastectomía , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
11.
J Assist Reprod Genet ; 40(3): 581-587, 2023 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36542313

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Infertility affects one in eight women in the USA. In vitro fertilization (IVF) is an effective but costly treatment that lacks uniform insurance coverage. We evaluated the current insurance coverage landscape for IVF in America. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of 58 insurance companies with the greatest state enrollment and market share, calculated to represent the majority of Americans with health insurance. Individual companies were evaluated for a publicly available policy on IVF services by web-based search, telephone interview, or email to the insurer. Coverage status, required criteria, qualifying risk factors, and contraindications to coverage were extracted from available policies. RESULTS: Fifty-one (88%) of the fifty-eight companies had a policy for IVF services. Thirty-five (69%) of these policies extended coverage. Case-by-case coverage was stated in seven policies (14%), while coverage was denied in the remaining nine (18%). The most common criterion to receive coverage was a documented diagnosis of infertility (n = 23, 66%), followed by care from a reproductive endocrinologist (n = 9, 26%). Twenty-three (45%) of the companies with a policy had at least one contraindication to coverage. Three companies (6%) limited the number of IVF cycles to be covered, capping payments after 3-4 lifetime cycles. CONCLUSION: Most Americans with health insurance are provided a public policy regarding IVF. However, there is great variation in coverage and requirements to receive coverage between insurers. Coupled with inconsistencies in state-level mandates and available choices for employer-sponsored plans, this may limit coverage of IVF services and, therefore, access to infertility treatment.


Asunto(s)
Fertilización In Vitro , Infertilidad , Humanos , Femenino , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Seguro de Salud , Infertilidad/epidemiología , Infertilidad/terapia , Cobertura del Seguro
12.
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord ; 10(6): 1367-1375, 2022 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35963504

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Over 35 million Americans have lymphedema. Nonetheless, lymphedema is underdiagnosed and undertreated worldwide. We investigated whether the rates of coverage for imaging and surgical procedures may contribute to the limited care provided for lymphedema. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional evaluation of 58 insurers, chosen based on state enrollment and market share. A web-based search or phone call determined whether a publicly available policy on lymphedema-specific imaging, physiological procedures, and excisional procedures was available. Coverage status and corresponding criteria were extracted. RESULTS: Of the two-thirds of insurers who included a policy on imaging, 4% (n = 2) provided coverage and 4% (n = 2) specified coverage only on a case-by-case basis. Forty-eight percent (n = 28) of insurers had a statement of coverage on lymphovenous bypass or vascularized lymph node transfer, in which reimbursement was almost universally denied (96%, n = 26; 93%, n = 26). Liposuction and debulking procedures were included in 25 (43%) and 13 (22%) policies, in which seven (28%) and four (31%) insurers would provide coverage, with over 75% having criteria. Coverage of liposuction was significantly more than for lymphovenous bypass (P < .04). CONCLUSIONS: Nearly one-half of American insurers do not have a publicly available policy on most imaging, physiological, or excisional procedures, leaving coverage status ambiguous. Reimbursement was uncommon for imaging and physiological procedures, whereas the majority of insurers who did offer coverage for excisional procedures also had multiple criteria to be met. These elements may together be a limiting factor in receiving appropriate care for lymphedema.


Asunto(s)
Linfedema , Anastomosis Quirúrgica , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Cobertura del Seguro , Sistema Linfático , Linfedema/diagnóstico por imagen , Linfedema/cirugía , Estados Unidos
13.
Cureus ; 14(6): e25988, 2022 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35859983

RESUMEN

We describe the case of a 43-year-old male diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia complicated by Fournier's gangrene. Multiple debridements led to the complete effacement of the scrotum, with 360 degrees of exposed testes and a narrow base of suspension. It was decided to reconstruct the scrotum using bilateral gracilis muscle rotational flaps, followed by split-thickness skin grafting from the thigh. The gracilis muscle as a donor flap allowed for the protection and support of the testes and suspensory tissue while achieving an aesthetically pleasing result that resembled the normal scrotum. We hope providers will consider this reconstructive method in future patients who present with similar extensive effacement of the scrotal tissue.

14.
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord ; 10(4): 929-936, 2022 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35364303

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Lymphedema affects >1 in 1000 Americans, most often resulting from breast cancer surgery. Conservative treatment, such as compression garments, combined decongestive therapy (CDT), and pneumatic compression pumps, is the current standard of care. Despite the wide availability of these therapies, lymphedema has remained undertreated worldwide. We investigated whether third-party insurance coverage might be a barrier to obtaining conservative treatment in the United States. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of publicly accessible insurance policies. A total of 58 insurers were included in accordance with their state enrollment data and market share. The analysis was conducted using a web-based search and individual telephone interviews. For those policies that extended coverage, the medical necessity criteria were abstracted. RESULTS: A total of 50 insurance companies (86%) had a policy in place addressing conservative management. Included in 37 policies (64%), compression garments were covered the least often (n = 33; 89%). Although CDT was included in only 22 policies (38%), it was universally covered. Noncalibrated pneumatic compression pumps were the most frequently addressed intervention (n = 46; 79%), significantly more often than CDT (P < .01) and were universally covered, significantly more often than were compression garments (P < .04). Criteria for reimbursement were present for more than one half of the policies that provided coverage. CONCLUSIONS: A large proportion of U.S. insurers provided coverage for conservative treatment of lymphedema. However, only 38% of the policies included a statement of coverage for CDT. Most of the policies that did provide coverage for these four therapies also had multiple criteria that were required to be met before considering reimbursement. These requirements could create barriers to the receipt of treatment.


Asunto(s)
Tratamiento Conservador , Linfedema , Tratamiento Conservador/efectos adversos , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Cobertura del Seguro , Linfedema/diagnóstico , Linfedema/terapia , Mastectomía , Estados Unidos
15.
J Card Surg ; 37(8): 2423-2425, 2022 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35485742

RESUMEN

We describe the management of a 59-year-old female with an unrepaired congenital ventricular septal defect (VSD) and end stage nonischemic cardiomyopathy necessitating placement of a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) as a destination treatment. Simultaneous repair of the VSD was performed during the LVAD implantation under a beating heart. The patient remained hemodynamically stable throughout her postoperative course, without signs of hypoxia or cyanosis. Following discharge, outpatient surveillance echocardiogram demonstrated successful VSD closure and no residual shunt.


Asunto(s)
Defectos del Tabique Interventricular , Corazón Auxiliar , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Torácicos , Cateterismo Cardíaco , Ecocardiografía , Femenino , Defectos del Tabique Interventricular/diagnóstico por imagen , Defectos del Tabique Interventricular/cirugía , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento
16.
J Card Surg ; 37(5): 1439-1443, 2022 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35152456

RESUMEN

Emerging data suggest an association between severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and the development of acute myocarditis, with children and older adults being most at risk. We describe the clinical course of a previously healthy 12-year-old female who rapidly deteriorated into cardiogenic shock and arrest due to coronavirus disease 2019 induced fulminant myocarditis, necessitating venous-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as a bridge to full recovery. This case highlights the importance of early clinical recognition of myocardial involvement, and the benefits of taking a multidisciplinary approach in treating these patients.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea , Miocarditis , Adolescente , Anciano , COVID-19/complicaciones , COVID-19/terapia , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Miocarditis/etiología , Miocarditis/terapia , Miocardio , Choque Cardiogénico/etiología , Choque Cardiogénico/terapia
17.
Cureus ; 14(12): e33184, 2022 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36726896

RESUMEN

Introduction Dermabrasion and chemical peels are infrequently utilized methods of treatment for medical-grade conditions despite demonstrations of favorable outcomes. Insurance coverage status has previously been shown to impact availability and accessibility to specific treatments. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the rate of insurance coverage provided for dermabrasion and chemical peel procedures in the treatment of acne, acne scarring, and non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSC). Methods A cross-sectional analysis of 58 insurance companies by web-based search or phone interview determined the number of insurers with a publicly available policy on dermabrasion or chemical peels. Coverage status and any corresponding criteria were extracted from existing company policies. Results Thirteen (22%) and 22 (38%) policies discussed dermabrasion in the treatment of basal cell carcinoma and actinic keratosis, with 62% and 73% of these policies providing coverage. Acne scarring was discussed in significantly more dermabrasion policies than basal cell carcinoma (45% vs 22%; p=0.018). However, significantly more insurers denied coverage of dermabrasion for active acne and acne scarring when compared to dermabrasion to treat basal cell carcinoma or actinic keratosis (p<0.001). Eighty-seven percent of companies (n=20) with a chemical peel policy for premalignant lesions would provide coverage, with required criteria present in 95% (n=19) of the policies that would cover chemical peels for actinic keratosis specifically. Of the 25 companies (43%) that discussed the treatment of acne with chemical peel procedures, 14 (56%) provided coverage, and 11 (44%) denied coverage. Coverage was denied by significantly less insurers for the treatment of active acne with chemical peel procedures compared to treatment with dermabrasion (44% vs 83%; p<0.006). Conclusion Significant discrepancies were noted in both the presence of a public policy and the coverage status of dermabrasion or chemical peel procedures among the United States health insurance companies. These inconsistencies, along with multiple criteria required for coverage, may create an artificial barrier to receiving care for specific medical-grade conditions.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...