Demographic and clinical profile of patients treated with proximal femoral nails - a 10-year analysis of more than 40,000 Cases.

BACKGROUND: Hip fractures are common in elderly populations and can be life threatening. Changes in healthcare delivery and outcomes for patients with hip fracture treated with intramedullary nails are not well characterized. The objectives of our study were: 1) the characterization of patients treated with the Trochanteric Fixation Nail -Advanced™(TFNA) Proximal Femoral Nailing System or comparable nails (index) and estimate 12-month all-cause readmissions (ACR) and reoperations following index; and 2) the evaluation of 10-year healthcare utilization (HCU) trends for treatment of femoral fractures with femoral nails. METHODS: This is a retrospective database analysis using the Premier hospital database. All adults with femoral fracture treated with an intramedullary nail, from 2010 to Q3 2019, in the inpatient setting, were identified. Exclusion criteria included patients with bilateral hip surgery and presence of breakage at time of initial surgery. The primary outcome was ACR and reoperation, the secondary outcomes were healthcare utilization metrics. Variables included demographics, comorbidities (Elixhauser Index (EI)), surgical intervention variables and hospital characteristics. RESULTS: Forty-one thousand one hundred four patients were included in the study, of which 14,069 TFNA patients, with average age 77.9 (Standard deviation (SD): 12.0), more than 60% with 3 or more comorbidities (more than 64% for TFNA), 40% with severe or extreme disease severity and one third with severe or extreme risk for mortality. ACR reached 60.1% (95% confidence interval (CI): 59.6%-60.5%) - for TFNA: 60.0% (95%CI: 59.2%-60.8%). The reoperation rate was 4.0% (95%CI: 3.8%-4.2%) - for TFNA: 3.8% (95%CI: 3.5%-4.1%). Length of stay (LOS) averaged 5.8 days (SD: 4.8), and 12-month hip reoperation was 4.0% (3.8%-4.2%), in TFNA cohort: 3.8% (3.5%-4.1%). From 2010 to 2019: the percentage patients operated within 48 h of admission significantly increased, from 75.2% (95%CI: 74.3%-76.1%) to 84.3% (95%CI: 83.9%-84.6%); LOS significantly decreased, from 6.2 (95%CI: 6.0-6.4) to 5.6 (95%CI: 5.5-5.7) days; discharge to skilled nursing facilities (SNF) increased from 56.0% (95%CI: 54.8%-57.2%) to 61.5% (95%CI: 60.8%-62.2%); ACR rates decreased but reoperation rates remained constant. CONCLUSIONS: ACR and reoperation rates were similar across device types and averaged 60.1% and 4.0%, respectively. Ten-year analyses showed reductions in hospital HCU and greater reliance on SNF.

Double fixation for complex distal femoral fractures.

For complex distal femoral fractures, a single lateral locking compression plate or retrograde intramedullary nail may not achieve a stable environment for fracture healing. Various types of double fixation constructs have been featured in the current literature. Double-plate construct and nail-and-plate construct are two common double fixation constructs for distal femoral fractures. Double fixation constructs have been featured in studies on comminuted distal femoral fractures, distal femoral fracture with medial bone defects, periprosthetic fractures, and distal femoral non-union. A number of case series reported a generally high union rate and satisfactory functional outcomes for double fixation of distal femoral fractures. In this review, we present the state of the art of double fixation constructs for distal femoral fractures with a focus on double-plate and plate-and-nail constructs.

Angular stable locking in a novel intramedullary nail improves construct stability in a distal tibia fracture model.

INTRODUCTION: Intramedullary nails are frequently used for treatment of unstable distal tibia fractures. However, insufficient fixation of the distal fragment could result in delayed healing, malunion or nonunion. Recently, a novel concept for angular stable nailing was developed that maintains the principle of relative stability and introduces improvements expected to reduce nail toggling, screw migration and secondary loss of reduction. The aim of this study was to investigate the biomechanical competence of the novel angular stable intramedullary nail concept for treatment of unstable distal tibia fractures, compared to a conventional nail locking in a human cadaveric model under dynamic loading. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten pairs of fresh-frozen human cadaveric tibiae with a simulated AO/OTA 42-A3.1 fracture were assigned to 2 groups for reamed intramedullary nailing using either a conventional (non-angular stable) Expert Tibia Nail (ETN) with 3 distal screws or the novel Tibia Nail Advanced (TNA) system with 2 distal angular stable locking low-profile retaining screws. The specimens were biomechanically tested under conditions including initial quasi-static loading, followed by progressively increasing combined cyclic axial and torsional loading in internal rotation until failure of the bone-implant construct. Both tests were monitored by means of motion tracking. RESULTS: Initial nail toggling of the distal tibia fragment in varus and flexion under axial loading was lower for TNA compared to ETN, being significant in flexion, P = 0.91 and P = 0.03. After 5000 cycles, interfragmentary movements in terms of varus, flexion, internal rotation, axial displacement, and shear displacement at the fracture site were all lower for TNA compared to ETN, with flexion and shear displacement being significant, P = 0.14, P = 0.04, P = 0.25, P = 0.11 and P = 0.04, respectively. Cycles to failure until both interfragmentary 5° varus and 5° flexion were significantly higher for TNA compared to ETN, P = 0.04. CONCLUSION: From a biomechanical perspective, the novel angular stable intramedullary nail concept provides increased construct stability and maintains it over time while reducing the number of required locking screws without impeding the flexibility of the nail itself and resists better towards loss of reduction under dynamic loading, compared to conventional locking in intramedullary nailed unstable distal tibia fractures.

Medial Submuscular Plating of the Distal Femur.

SUMMARY: Distal femur fractures are often treated with laterally based plate constructs. The use of medial plates is less common because of the concern for the proximity to vascular structures. With a solid understanding of the anatomy, the technique can be used more frequently to optimize fixation in medial distal femur fractures and osteoporotic, comminuted, bone loss, and periprosthetic fractures. This video demonstrates a safe technique for the medial submuscular plating of a distal femur fracture. The video covers indications for surgery and provides detailed anatomy of the structures at risk, especially the superficial femoral artery system.

Distally Based Peroneus Brevis Rotation Flap.

Soft tissue defects of the distal leg, ankle, and hindfoot pose challenges for orthopaedic surgeons. The distally based peroneus brevis muscle flap is a viable local muscle rotation flap to cover defects in these challenging circumstances, and can be learned and performed by most orthopaedic surgeons without the need for microvascular techniques. This video demonstrates the technique for a peroneus brevis rotation flap in a patient with a lateral ankle defect and exposed bone.

Biomechanics-Hot Topics Part II.

Orthopaedic surgery and biomechanics are intimately partnered topics in medicine. Biomechanical principles are used to design implants and fashion treatment protocols. Although it would seem that biomechanical principles in the design of fixation devices and fracture repair constructs have been already finalized, there are several points of controversy remaining. New technology has raised new questions, while at the same time, we still do not fully understand simple clinical principles such as time of fracture healing depending on the construct used. This review looks at several of these current controversies to better understand what work is needed in fracture care going forward.

Femoral Neck Fractures in Young Patients.

Femoral neck fractures in patients 55 years or younger, although relatively uncommon, may cause considerable surgeon stress because they may be thought to be surgical emergencies and are difficult to manage, resulting in serious complications. Orthopaedic surgeons should understand the optimal timing for, the reduction options and techniques for, the fixation options for, and the results of surgical management of femoral neck fractures in patients 55 years or younger. The optimal timing of the surgical management of femoral neck fractures in these patients is a subject of debate. Anatomic reduction, which correlates with patient outcomes, is the goal in the management of femoral neck fractures whether it is attained via open or closed means. Multiple surgical approaches, including the Watson-Jones, Smith-Petersen, and Hueter approaches, may be used for the open reduction of femoral neck fractures. Multiple options are available for fixation, with cannulated screws and the compression hip screw most used in the literature. These implants should provide torsional stability, minimal bone loss, and a length-stable construct. Currently, no ideal implant exists. The outcomes of young patients with a femoral neck fracture who undergo surgical treatment depend more on fracture type, fracture reduction, and stable fixation than early surgical management; however, surgical management should not be excessively delayed.

Reverse Sural Artery Pedicle Flap.

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the technical aspects of a reverse sural artery (RSA) flap. DESIGN: Video case presentation. SETTING: Community Level 2 Trauma Center. PATIENTS: Single patient with a full thickness soft tissue loss over the posterior calcaneal tuberosity requiring soft tissue coverage. METHOD: Video demonstration of the stepwise planning and technical aspects of performing an RSA flap. OUTCOME: Successful soft tissue coverage of an exposed calcaneal tuberosity using an RSA flap. CONCLUSION: The RSA flap is a relatively simple fasciocutaneous flap that can be used to cover wounds of the lower leg and foot. Orthopaedic trauma surgeons can easily perform this procedure after a short time reviewing the neurovascular anatomy of the lower leg and understanding some of the important technical aspects of the procedure. This flap does not require microsurgical skills and can be done fairly quickly. The flaps usually have some partial necrosis that may require debridement, dressing changes, and surgeon patience. The main morbidity of the operation is lateral foot numbness and the need to harvest a split thickness skin graft.

RIA: one community's experience.

The Reamer Irrigator Aspirator (RIA) has three main indications in our community trauma practice. The most common indication for RIA is harvesting of autololgous bone graft from the femur for nonstructural bone graft. The second most common indication is for irrigation and debridement of intramedullary osteomyelitis. The final indication for RIA is for acute nailing of femoral shaft fractures in patients with multiple long bone fractures with or without pulmonary injury. If one pays careful attention to the details of the technique, RIA is a safe and effective method of harvesting autologous bone graft with minimal morbidity. Autologous bone graft harvested with RIA is our graft of choice for nearly all of our bone grafting cases.

Utilization of the less-invasive stabilization system internal fixator for open fractures of the proximal tibia: a multi-center evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Locked plating has become popular and has clear biomechanical advantages when compared with conventional plating. When combined with minimally invasive surgical techniques, locked plating may cause substantially less iatrogenic tissue damage when compared with conventional plating. These characteristics may make locked plating an attractive option for treating open fractures of the tibial plateau and proximal tibia for which coverage over the plate can be obtained. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of the Less-Invasive Stabilization System (LISS) for high-energy open fractures involving either the tibial plateau or proximal tibia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study is a retrospective evaluation of a consecutive multicenter series of 52 consecutive patients operated by seven surgeons, who used LISS plating in open proximal tibia or tibial plateau fractures seen at one of four Level I Trauma Centers. All patients were treated using a locked plating system that was implanted using minimally invasive submuscular surgical techniques. The primary outcome measure was the incidence of deep and superficial infection. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients with open fractures have been evaluated, with a mean follow-up of 16.8 (12-36) months. Three patients (5.8%) developed deep infections. Two patients (6.3%) with tibial plateau and one (4.3%) of patients with a tibial shaft fracture developed deep infections. Fifteen patients required flap coverage of their open wounds. The incidence of deep infection as per Gustilo and Anderson classification was Type I and II - 0 (0%); Type IIIA - 2 (7.7%); Type IIIB - 1 (7.1%); and Type IIIC - 0 (0%). CONCLUSIONS: Biomechanically, the LISS functions as an "internal-external fixator" rather than a plate. Traditional plate osteosynthesis has yielded rates of infection between 18% and 35%. Our data indicate that locked plating using minimally invasive techniques yield deep infections rates that are no worse than published series using intramedullary nails or external fixators. Technical difficulties that can be encountered with the LISS system revolve primarily around obtaining and maintaining reduction while performing a minimally invasive procedure. Additional difficulties can include "cold welding" of screws to the plate and malposition of the plate leading to failure in the diaphysis. High-energy open fractures involving the tibia shaft or plateau remain high-risk injuries, but LISS is an acceptable alternative for treatment of these fractures.

High-energy proximal tibial fractures: treatment options and decision making.

High-energy proximal tibial fractures are complex injuries with significant associated soft-tissue damage. There is a high percentage of open injuries, compartment syndrome, and vascular injuries in patients with these fractures. These patients usually have significant articular depression, excessive comminution, condylar displacement, and metadiaphyseal extension of the fracture. Management of these complex injuries requires treatment of the soft tissues and bony components. Surgical treatment of these injuries traditionally has been associated with substantial complications such as infection, knee stiffness, malunion, loss of fixation, soft-tissue failure, and amputations. Staged treatment, with initial application of a spanning external fixator followed by definitive fixation, has been used in recent years to decrease the risk and rate of complications. Definitive fixation may be performed using traditional open approaches or percutaneously or an external fixator may be used. Development of a protocol for treating these injuries must be done to allow optimal fracture and patient outcomes.

Scapulothoracic dissociation: diagnosis and treatment.

Scapulothoracic dissociation is an important and increasingly common clinical condition resulting from massive traction injury to the anterolateral shoulder girdle with disruption of scapulothoracic articulation. It frequently is accompanied by an acromioclavicular separation, displaced clavicular fracture, or sternoclavicular disruption. Vascular lesions have been reported in 88% of patients and severe neurologic injuries occur in 94% of patients. Many patients have a poor outcome with a flail extremity in 52%, early amputation in 21%, and death in 10%. Early recognition of this injury combined with a logical treatment protocol can help to decrease the substantial morbidity and mortality associated with this condition.

Operative stabilization of supracondylar femur fractures above total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of four treatment methods.

Periprosthetic fractures of the distal femur above a total knee arthroplasty present a challenging surgical problem for orthopedic surgeons. Numerous operative and nonoperative treatment options exist including casting, Rush rods, supracondylar nails, and plate fixation. Potentially significant complications are associated with all current treatment alternatives. Plate or nail constructs frequently achieve limited distal fixation, leading to loss of fixation and varus angulation. This complication was not observed with the Less Invasive Stabilization System (LISS). In addition, our early results demonstrate the superiority of LISS treatment with low infection rates, no requirement for acute bone grafting, and secure fixation allowing for immediate postoperative mobilization. LISS fixation may offer a superior surgical treatment option for periprosthetic distal femur fractures.

Biomechanical comparison of posterior pelvic ring fixation.

OBJECTIVE: To determine relative stiffness of various methods of posterior pelvic ring internal fixation. DESIGN: Simulated single leg stance loading of OTA 61-Cl.2, a2 fracture model (unilateral sacroiliac joint disruption and pubic symphysis diastasis). SETTING: Orthopaedic biomechanic laboratory. OUTCOME VARIABLES: Pubic symphysis gapping, sacroiliac joint gapping, hemipelvis coronal plane rotation. METHODS: Nine different posterior pelvic ring fixation methods were tested on each of six hard plastic pelvic models. Pubic symphysis was plated. The pelvic ring was loaded to 1000N. RESULTS: All data were normalized to values obtained with posterior fixation with a single iliosacral screw. The types of fixation could be grouped into three categories based on relative stiffness of fixation: For sacroiliac joint gapping, group 1-fixation stiffness 0.8 and above (least stiff) includes a single iliosacral screw (conditions A and J), an isolated tension band plate (condition F), and two sacral bars (condition H); group 2-fixation stiffness 0.6 to 0.8 (intermediate stiffness) includes a tension band plate and an iliosacral screw (condition E), one or two sacral bars in combination with an iliosacral screw (conditions G and I); group 3-fixation stiffness 0.6 and below (greatest stiffness) includes two anterior sacroiliac plates (condition D), two iliosacral screws (condition B), and two anterior sacroiliac plates and an iliosacral screw (condition C). For sacroiliac joint rotation, group 1-fixation stiffness 0.8 and above includes a single iliosacral screw (conditions A and J), two anterior sacroiliac plates (condition D), a tension band plate in isolation or in combination with an iliosacral screw (conditions E and F), and two sacral bars (condition H); group 2-fixation stiffness 0.6 to 0.8 (intermediate level of instability) includes either one or two sacral bars in combination with an iliosacral screw (conditions G and I); group 3-fixation stiffness 0.6 and below (stiffest fixation) consists of two iliosacral screws (condition B) and two anterior sacroiliac plates and an iliosacral screw (condition C). DISCUSSION: Under conditions of maximal instability with similar material properties between specimens, differences in stiffness of posterior pelvic ring fixation can be demonstrated. The choice of which method to use is multifactorial.

Treatment of closed tibial fractures.

Closed tibial shaft fractures are common injuries that remain challenging to treat because of the wide spectrum of fracture patterns and soft-tissue injuries. Understanding the indications for surgical and nonsurgical treatment of these fractures is essential for good outcomes. Although cast treatment of stable tibial shaft fractures has traditionally been successful and continues to be widely used, recent clinical studies have shown that intramedullary nails may be more advantageous for fracture healing and function than casting. Surgical treatment (intramedullary nailing, plate fixation, or external fixation) of closed tibial shaft fractures varies depending on multiple factors. Metaphyseal fractures are well suited for plates, although newer intramedullary nail designs provide the option of intramedullary nailing of proximal or distal metaphyseal tibia-fibula fractures. External fixators are well suited for skeletally immature patients with unstable fracture patterns or for patients with unacceptably small intramedullary canals. Interlocking intramedullary nails are the treatment of choice for most unstable tibia-fibula shaft fractures.

Incision placement for intramedullary tibial nailing: an anatomic study.

OBJECTIVES: For intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures, a recent study has determined that the entry site should be just medial to the lateral tibial spine at the anterior margin of the articular surface. Gaining access to this site is often through a medial parapatellar or transpatellar approach. Several studies have indicated that a transpatellar approach may contribute to anterior knee pain. Our study sought to use anatomic measurement to determine the ideal incision site for insertion of an intramedullary tibial nail. DESIGN Part I: survey of Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) members. Part II: anatomic study. SETTING: A Level I trauma center in Sacramento, California. PARTICIPANTS: Part I: OTA members. Part II: a group of 56 healthy volunteers. INTERVENTION: Part I: questionnaire sent to OTA members. Part II: clinical examination and radiographic analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Part I: responses to questionnaire. Part II: anatomic measurements. RESULTS: Part I: based on a questionnaire, OTA members use at least one or more approaches to access their preferred tibial nail entry site. Fifty-seven percent use only one type of approach in all cases. Part II: the authors performed a clinical and radiographic study in 56 volunteers (112 knees) to determine the relationship of the lateral tibial spine to the patellar tendon. On the basis of this information, the tendon was divided into thirds to account for the three most common surgical approaches. The entry site was in the lateral zone in 29 knees, the middle zone in 75 knees, and the medial zone in 8 knees. If divided equally into purely a medial or lateral zone to avoid a transpatellar approach, the starting point fell into the medial zone in 42 knees and the lateral zone in 70 knees. CONCLUSIONS: Individual variations in patellar tendon anatomy should be considered when choosing the proper entry site for tibial nailing. Based on the assumption that the ideal entry point for tibial nailing is just medial to the tibial spine at the anterior margin of the articular surface, a preoperative fluoroscopic measurement before incision can guide the surgeon as to whether a medial parapatellar, transpatellar, or lateral parapatellar approach provides the most direct access to this entry site. The routine use of a single approach for all tibial nails may no longer be justified.

Treatment of femoral diaphyseal nonunions.

There have been conflicting reports regarding treatment of femoral diaphyseal nonunions using reamed intramedullary nailing. Although high union rates have been reported using this technique, not all orthopaedic surgeons have experienced the same success. A retrospective review of charts and radiographs of 39 adult patients with nonunions of the femoral diaphysis treated at the authors' institution with reamed intramedullary nailing, compression, and with and without interlocking was done. The time from the index procedure to nonunion repair was 4 to 75 months (average, 19 months). Fifteen patients had 18 procedures between the index operation and nonunion repair. The average followup from nonunion repair to the most recent examination was 22.5 months (range, 3-108 months) with a median of 15 months. At the last followup, the overall union rate was 74% after one procedure and 97% after two or more procedures. There were seven complications including two infections, one pulmonary embolus, one occurrence of a deep venous thrombosis, a hematoma, and one case of malrotation. The data support the use of antegrade reamed nailing as a successful technique for treatment of most femoral diaphyseal nonunions.