RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Trauma is a leading cause of global death, with 200 000 deaths and over 3 million non-fatal injuries/year in the United States. We aim to assess trauma care value for patients who underwent urgent laparotomies (LAP) and thoracotomies (THO) in our Health Network System. METHODS: Clinical variables (v = 84) from trauma patients (>18 yo) were retrieved retrospectively (Jan-2010 to July-2016) and prospectively (Aug-2016 to Sept-2021) from a Health System warehouse under IRB-approved protocols. Patients were divided according to their Injury Severity Score (ISS) into mild/moderate cases (ISS <15) and severe cases (ISS >15). Value was assessed using quality and cost domains. Quality surrogates included graded postoperative complications (PCs), length of stay (LOS), 30-day readmission (RA), patient satisfaction (PS), and textbook (TB) cases. Total charges (TCs) and reimbursement index (RI) were included as surrogates for cost. Value domains were displayed in scorecards comparing Observed (O) with Expected (E) (using the ACS risk calculator) outcomes. Uni-/multivariate analyses were performed using SPSS. RESULTS: 41,927 trauma evaluations were performed, leading to 16 044 admissions, with 528 (3.2%) patients requiring urgent surgical procedures (LAP = 413 and THO = 115). Although the M:F ratio (7:3) was similar in LAP vs THO groups, age and BMI were significantly different (41.8 ± 19.1 vs 51.8 ± 19.9 years, 28.6 ± 9.9 vs 27.4 ± 7 Kg/m2, respectively, P < .05). Blunt trauma was involved in 68.8/77.3% of the LAP/THO procedures, respectively (P < .05). Multivariate analyses showed ISS, age, ASA class, and medical center as factors significantly predicting PC (P < .05). Postoperative complication grades from the LAP/THO groups showed above-average outcomes; nonetheless, LOS was higher than the national averages. CONCLUSIONS: The Trauma Program holds high value in our Health Network System. Protocols for decreasing LOS are being implemented.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: To determine the feasibility and significance of lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in patients with gastric cancer. METHODS: From August 1999 to January 2002, 27 gastric cancer patients underwent lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy using isosulfan blue dye. RESULTS: The success rate of SLNB was 96.3% (26 of 27). Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 100%. There were no false negatives. In 26 successful cases, 8 patients had positive sentinel lymph nodes and 18 had negative sentinel nodes. Of 8 patients with positive sentinel nodes, 6 had positive sentinel nodes only at N1 lymph node station, 1 only at N2 station, and 1 had positive sentinel nodes at both N1 and N2 stations. Of 18 patients with negative sentinel lymph nodes, 9 patients had sentinel nodes only at N1, 3 only at N2, 5 at both N1 and N2, and 1 at both N1 and N3. There were no cases in which sentinel lymph nodes were the only sites of metastases. CONCLUSIONS: Sentinel lymph node biopsy using isosulfan blue dye in gastric cancer is a feasible procedure with high sensitivity and accuracy. Sentinel lymph nodes demonstrate the varied lymphatic drainage. If the sentinel nodes at N2 are positive, it will guide surgeons to do a more extended lymph node dissection in early stage gastric cancer.
