Anti-NMDA encephalitis secondary to an ovarian teratoma presenting as altered mental status in a 32-year-old woman: A case report.

NMDA-R encephalitis is an autoimmune encephalitis that is known to be associated with ovarian teratomas. Eighty to 100 % of patients initially present with neuropsychiatric symptoms. Early recognition and intervention are critical to management and prognosis. This case demonstrates non-specific presenting symptoms of NMDA-R encephalitis. A 32-year-old woman presented to the emergency room with headache, nausea, vomiting, and photophobia. She was discharged with probable aseptic meningitis. Eight days later, she represented with delusional thought content, perseverative speech, and bizarre behavior. Cerebrospinal fluid studies showed elevated protein and mild pleocytosis. A computed tomography scan with contrast showed a 35-mm complex cystic lesion in the right adnexa, which was resected. Confirmatory pathology showed a mature cystic teratoma. Paraneoplastic panel later resulted positive for NMDA-R encephalitis. The patient was treated with methylprednisolone, IVIG, plasmapheresis, and rituximab. The clinical course was complicated by a hypersensitivity reaction to rituximab, non-convulsive status epilepticus requiring intubation, dysphagia requiring a PEG placement, a rectal ulcer causing acute blood loss anemia requiring multiple blood transfusions, bilateral hearing loss, and a left lung pneumothorax. The patient's mood, cognition, and motor function were favorably improving 19 months after diagnosis. This case illustrates presenting signs of NMDA-R encephalitis in a young woman as headache and altered mental status followed by psychosis and epilepsy. Treatment should involve a multidisciplinary team and be individualized and escalated in patients with worsening clinical status refractory to first-line therapy. Further research is warranted to understand the optimal treatment strategy for this disease.

Brain activity during dual-task standing in older adults.

BACKGROUND: In older adults, the extent to which performing a cognitive task when standing diminishes postural control is predictive of future falls and cognitive decline. The neurophysiology of such "dual-tasking" and its effect on postural control (i.e., dual-task cost) in older adults are poorly understood. The purpose of this study was to use electroencephalography (EEG) to examine the effects of dual-tasking when standing on brain activity in older adults. We hypothesized that compared to single-task "quiet" standing, dual-task standing would decrease alpha power, which has been linked to decreased motor inhibition, as well as increase the ratio of theta to beta power, which has been linked to increased attentional control. METHODS: Thirty older adults without overt disease completed four separate visits. Postural sway together with EEG (32-channels) were recorded during trials of standing with and without a concurrent verbalized serial subtraction dual-task. Postural control was measured by average sway area, velocity, and path length. EEG metrics included absolute alpha-, theta-, and beta-band powers as well as theta/beta power ratio, within six demarcated regions-of-interest: the left and right anterior, central, and posterior regions of the brain. RESULTS: Most EEG metrics demonstrated moderate-to-high between-day test-retest reliability (intra-class correlation coefficients > 0.70). Compared with quiet standing, dual-tasking decreased alpha-band power particularly in the central regions bilaterally (p = 0.002) and increased theta/beta power ratio in the anterior regions bilaterally (p < 0.001). A greater increase in theta/beta ratio from quiet standing to dual-tasking in numerous demarcated brain regions correlated with greater dual-task cost (i.e., absolute increase, indicative of worse performance) to postural sway metrics (r = 0.45-0.56, p < 0.01). Lastly, participants who exhibited greater alpha power during dual-tasking in the anterior-right (r = 0.52, p < 0.01) and central-right (r = 0.48, p < 0.01) regions had greater postural sway velocity during dual-tasking. CONCLUSION: In healthy older adults, alpha power and theta/beta power ratio change with dual-task standing. The change in theta/beta power ratio in particular may be related to the ability to regulate standing postural control when simultaneously performing unrelated, attention-demanding cognitive tasks. Modulation of brain oscillatory activity might therefore be a novel target to minimize dual-task cost in older adults.

Interventions to Enhance Adherence to Oral Antineoplastic Agents: A Scoping Review.

BACKGROUND: As new targeted oral antineoplastic therapies have emerged in recent years, the development of effective strategies that promote optimal adherence to cancer medication regimens has become an important priority. METHODS: We conducted a scoping literature review to search for English language articles published through July 15, 2019, to identify studies that reported the testing and/or evaluation of interventions to improve adherence to oral antineoplastic agents. RESULTS: A total of 56 articles were selected for review. Of the studies evaluated, 14 were randomized trials. All interventions except two targeted adult patients. Thirty-three studies enrolled fewer than 100 patients. Most interventions were education- and counseling-based and centered on provision of information about the drug and strategies to manage side effects. Only eight studies used an mHealth tool and/or text messages to target nonadherence. Among studies with a comparison sample, fewer than one-half (44.7%) reported statistically significant improvements in adherence or persistence associated with the intervention; however, some pharmacist-directed programs, particularly those that integrated monitoring or routine follow-up with a provider, did demonstrate efficacy. CONCLUSION: Although the development of adherence-promoting interventions for oral antineoplastic therapies has increased recently, few have been rigorously tested. The nascent literature suggests those that are pharmacist directed and use regular monitoring show promise, though additional prospective studies are needed. Study methodology, population selection, and potential challenges that may be encountered in the implementation and dissemination phases should be considered when developing new interventions to address nonadherence to oral antineoplastic treatment.