Persistence of remission after lengthening of golimumab in inflammatory joint diseases.

OBJECTIVES: In refractory inflammatory joint diseases (IJDs) biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) may achieve remission. EULAR recommends bDMARD tapering when remission persists. However, guidelines on tapering modalities and criteria for patient selection are lacking. We aimed to evaluate remission persistency after lengthening the time between injections of golimumab in patients affected by IJD and to identify any patient or disease characteristics associated to flare after lengthening. METHODS: Patients affected by rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) treated with golimumab were enrolled in a retrospective observational study. Demographic data, ESR, cRP, DAS28/ BASDAI, were collected at baseline and during the follow-up (T1- defined as a medical check-up after 1 year of treatment or, for patients with longerg exposure, the first medical check-up in 2016, when at our unit we began to experience drug tapering- and T2- 12 months after the lengthening was started). In 22/80 patients in remission at T1, injection time was lengthened. RESULTS: Eighty patients were enrolled, 34 AS, 33 PsA, 9RA and 4 JIA. At baseline, all had an active disease. At T1, 60/80 patients reached remission and 22/60 patients started tapering. At T2, 20/22 pts (91%) were in remission. At T1 BASDAI was higher (2.2, SD 0.28 vs. 0.58, SD 0.47; p<0.001) in patients who lost remission at T2.Patients who flared recovered remission once taken back to a 28-day interval. 4/38 patients maintained at the standard dose flared up and switched/swapped bDMARD. The difference in retention rate toward patients on reduced dose was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Results show that golimumab lengthening is safe and successfully maintains remission. In patients who experienced a flare after lengthening, the standard regimen promptly restored remission.

The positive side of the coin: Sars-Cov-2 pandemic has taught us how much Telemedicine is useful as standard of care procedure in real life.

Patients and health workers were at high risk of infection during the Sars-Cov-2 pandemic lockdown. For this reason, other medical and clinical approaches such as Telemedicine were necessary. Despite Telemedicine was born before COVID-19, the pandemic was the opportunity to accelerate a process already underway for at least a decade and to blow all the barriers away. Our aim is to describe the experience of Telemedicine during and immediately after the first lockdown to assure the follow-up in a 'virtual' outpatient clinic dedicated to Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases (RMDs) and to give an overview of Telemedicine in the rheumatology field. We retrospectively evaluated the patient flow to our rheumatology division from March to September 2020 and, in accordance with local restrictions, three periods were selected. In the 1st period, 96.96% of the outpatient clinic cases were shifted to Telemedicine; these decreased to 52.45% in the 2nd period, while the 3rd period was characterized by the return of the patients at the clinic (97.6%). Diagnostic procedures were postponed during the 1st period, reduced drastically during the 2nd and performed regularly during the third period. Intravenous infusions were maintained as much as possible during the three periods, to assure therapeutic continuity. Shifting stable patients to Telemedicine has the potential to allow continuity of care, while reducing the risk of contagion during a pandemic. In the next future, the integration of Telemedicine as standard of care for specific clinical applications might assure assistance for RMDs patients also in non-pandemic conditions.

Baricitinib in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: clinical and ultrasound evaluation of a real-life single-centre experience.

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound (US) is useful in monitoring RA patients, with the US7 score allowing grey-scale and power-Doppler (PD) semi-quantitative evaluation of synovitis and teno-synovitis. We evaluated real-life efficacy and safety of Baricitinib, an oral selective JAK1-2 inhibitor, in RA patients using clinical, clinimetric, and US assessments. METHODS: Disease activity score in 28 joints calculated with C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP), disease activity score in 28 joints calculated with erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR), clinical disease activity index (CDAI), simplified disease activity index (SDAI), visual analogue scale (VAS)-pain, health assessment questionnaire (HAQ), COCHIN scale, adverse events (AE), concomitant medications, laboratory parameters, and US7 were performed/recorded at baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months in RA patients starting Baricitinib. Responder/non-responder status was determined according to the EULAR Response Criteria at 3 months. SDAI clinical remission or low disease activity (LDA) were calculated at 3 and 6 months. RESULTS: In 43 enrolled patients, a significant improvement in disease activity and US7 components (except tendon PD) and a reduction of steroid dosage were observed. Responders at 3 months showed a significantly higher reduction of CDAI, SDAI, COCHIN scale, VAS-pain, and US7 synovialPD, compared with non-responders. At 3 and 6 months, remission/LDA was achieved by 12.8/53.8% and 21.6/51.3% patients, respectively. The csDMARD co-treatment was independently associated with remission/LDA at 3 months. Safety-related drop-outs were in line with literature data. The steroid dosage was associated with AE development at 6 months. CONCLUSION: The real-life data, also obtained with US evaluation, confirmed the Baricitinib efficacy in RA disease control, as well as the utility of assessment during the follow up of disease activity.

Combination of denosumab and biologic DMARDs in inflammatory muscle-skeletal diseases and connective tissue diseases.

OBJECTIVE: Osteoporosis (OP) can complicate the course of rheumatic musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) and connective tissue diseases (CTDs). Denosumab, a monoclonal antibody against RANK-L, showed beneficial effect in rheumatoid arthritis in inhibiting radiographic progression and erosive burden. We tested the efficacy, safety, and persistence on the treatment of the combination of biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs)/denosumab versus bDMARD in patients with RMD and CTD. METHODS: This is a retrospective evaluation of a single center, including patients with RMD/CTD (including rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis, systemic sclerosis, and overlap syndromes) treatment with bDMARD/denosumab, compared to age, gender, disease, bDMARD, and conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs-matched controls. RESULTS: Twenty-eight bDMARD/denosumab patients and 49 bDMARD patients were eligible. Despite a statistically significant difference during the first-year efficacy (due to the different baseline timepoint), there was no difference in the efficacy profile in the second year of treatment and in the safety profile (including local, systemic, and serious adverse events). Moreover, no statistically significant difference in the persistence of bDMARD treatment over 2 years of evaluation was found. The combination of bDMARD and denosumab was not an independent predictor of disease flare or bDMARD treatment withdrawal. CONCLUSION: The combination of bDMARD and denosumab does not alter the efficacy and the safety profile of the bDMARD in patients with RMD/CTD. Future studies verifying the radiological disease inhibition could support denosumab use in RMD/CTD other than rheumatoid arthritis, when complicated by OP.

Switching from originator adalimumab to biosimilar SB5 in a rheumatology cohort: persistence on treatment, predictors of drug interruption and safety analysis.

AIMS: Medical and non-medical switching strategies have been adopted in Europe in the last few years. We aimed to investigate persistence on treatment with a SB5 Adalimumab (SB5) biosimilar after switching from Adalimumab (ADA) originator among patients with inflammatory rheumatic musculoskeletal diseases (iRMD), identifying possible predictors of drug interruption and describing adverse events. METHOD: iRMD patients previously switched to SB5 after at least 6 months of ADA were enrolled. Data on concomitant medications, disease flares, and persistence on SB5 up to the last available follow up were collected retrospectively. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression models were used. RESULT: A total of 172 patients (106 females, ADA duration 5.8 ± 3.8 years) were enrolled, including 34 rheumatoid arthritis, 59 psoriatic arthritis, and 61 axial spondyloarthritis patients. In a 10 ± 3 months follow up, 65 (37.8%) patients presented with adverse events, with 46 (26.7%) showing a clinically defined disease flare (no disease activity and patient reported outcomes assessment were available); 24 patients interrupted SB5 permanently (among them, 11 back-switched to ADA and 8 were prescribed a different biological therapy). Probability of persistence on SB5 was 94.7% at 6 months and 85.1% at 12 months. Baseline corticosteroid [hazard ratio (HR) 3.209, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.193-8.635, p = 0.021] and therapy with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (HR 2.876, 95% CI 1.229-6.727, p = 0.015), as well as the baseline corticosteroid dose (HR 1.200, 95%CI 1.026-1.403, p = 0.022) were predictors of drug interruption. CONCLUSION: Our data on persistence of treatment and adverse events are in line with previous reports. Further large cohort studies may confirm baseline corticosteroid and NSAIDs use as predictors of SB5 interruption, helping to identify patients at higher risk of failure after switching.

Efficacy and safety of switching from reference adalimumab to SB5 in a real-life cohort of inflammatory rheumatic joint diseases.

OBJECTIVE: SB5 showed comparable efficacy and safety profile in respect to adalimumab originator (ADA) in randomized clinical trials of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriasis. We aimed to describe the efficacy and safety of SB5 after switching from ADA in RA, axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) patients. METHOD: Adult RA, PsA, axSpA, JIA patients treated with ADA for at least 6 months, switched to SB5 in stable clinical conditions, were eligible. Data on safety, activity indexes and patient-reported outcomes were collected at baseline, 3 and 6 months after switching. RESULTS: Eighty-two patients (19 RA, 28 PsA, 32 axSpA and 3 JIA; 45 females, mean age 54 ± 14 years, disease duration 13 ± 7 years, ADA duration 6 ± 3 years) were enrolled. RA patients showed stable conditions, while PsA patients showed an increase in both HAQ, DAS28(CRP) and DAPSA and axSpA patients an increase in VAS pain, VAS patient disease activity and ASDAS, both at 3 months. There were changes in the concomitant medications profile, with regression of activity indexes increases at 6 months. Adverse events were reported by 33.7% patients at 3 months and 16.6% patients at 6 months, mostly disease flares and infectious events. Two patients stopped SB5. CONCLUSIONS: Despite temporary changes in the concomitant medication profile for mild disease flares, our real-life data replicate the safety profile of switching from ADA to SB5 in RA, with additional data for its applicability in PsA and axSpA patients, further supporting switching to biosimilars in treating inflammatory rheumatic conditions. Key Points • Switching from adalimumab originator to SB5 is feasible in real life rheumatic inflammatory joint diseases. • Mild disease flares can present after switching from originator adalimumab to SB5, in particular in axial spondyloarthritis and psoriatic arthritis. • Changes in concomitant medications profile allows the control of minor disease flares presenting after switching from adalimumab originator to SB5.

The switch from etanercept originator to SB4: data from a real-life experience on tolerability and persistence on treatment in joint inflammatory diseases.

AIMS: Switching from originator to biosimilar is part of current practice in inflammatory rheumatic musculoskeletal diseases (iRMDs) such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and axial spondylarthritis (axSpA), with evidences derived from both etanercept (ETN) to SB4-switching randomized controlled trials and real-life registries. We investigated the safety and treatment persistence of ETN/SB4 in a multi-iRMD cohort derived from two rheumatology departments in our region. METHODS: Adult patients with iRMDs, treated with ETN for at least 6 months and switched to SB4 in stable clinical condition, were eligible for this retrospective evaluation. Retrospective data on adverse events, loss of efficacy and persistence on treatment were collected until latest available follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 220 patients (85 RA, 81 PsA, 33 axSpA, 14 juvenile idiopathic arthritis and seven other conditions; 142 females, mean age 58 ± 7 years, disease duration 12 ± 4 years, ETN duration 7 ± 4 years) were enrolled, with median follow-up of 12.1 (9.7-15.8) months. A total of 50 patients (22.7%) presented with at least one adverse event, with 36 (16.4%) disease flares and 30 (13.6%: 11 for safety and 19 loss of efficacy) SB4 withdrawals. Cumulative SB4 treatment persistence was 99.1%, 88.6% and 64.6% at 6, 12 and 18 months respectively. Back-switch to ETN was performed in 17/30 cases, the remaining cases were managed with change of biologic disease modifying or conventional synthetic anti-rheumatic drug. Age was the only significant predictor of SB4 interruption at 6 months. CONCLUSION: Our real-life data confirm the safety profile of switching from ETN to SB4, with slightly higher treatment persistence rates compared with other real-life registries.

Effect of Dysmetabolisms and Comorbidities on the Efficacy and Safety of Biological Therapy in Chronic Inflammatory Joint Diseases.

In the present study we evaluated how systemic arterial hypertension (SAH), dyslipidemia and diabetes mellitus influence the efficacy, safety and retention rate of biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (bDMARD) treatment in rheumatic musculoskeletal disorders (RMDs). The charts of RMD patients treated with the first-line bDMARD were reviewed, collecting data on safety, efficacy and comorbidities at prescription (baseline, BL), after 6 months (6M) and at last observation on bDMARD (last observation time, LoT). In 383 RMD patients, a higher rate of adverse events at 6M (p = 0.0402) and at LoT (p = 0.0462) was present in dyslipidemic patients. Patients who developed dyslipidemia or SAH during bDMARD treatment had similar results (dyslipidemia p = 0.0007; SAH p = 0.0319) with a longer bDMARD retention as well (dyslipidemia p < 0.0001; SAH p < 0.0001). SAH patients on angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEis) or angiotensin-II receptor blockers (ARBs) continued bDMARDs for longer than non-exposed patients (p = 0.001), with higher frequency of drug interruption for long-standing remission rather than inefficacy or adverse reactions (p = 0.0258). Similarly, dyslipidemic patients on statins had a better bDMARD retention than not-exposed patients (p = 0.0420). In conclusion, SAH and dyslipidemia may be associated with higher frequency of adverse events but a better drug retention of first-line bDMARD in RMDs, suggesting an additional effect of ACEis/ARBs or statins on the inflammatory process and supporting their use in RMD bDMARD patients with SAH/dyslipidemia.

Risk of Malignancy and Biologic Therapy in Rheumatic Inflammatory Diseases: A Single-center Experience.

Objectives: Biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) have significantly improved the care of patients with rheumatic muscle-skeletal disorders (RMDs). Considering their immunosuppressive action, a theoretical increase of malignancy risk has been a major concern in the last few decades. The objective of this study is to analyze the incidence of malignancies in a cohort of patients affected by rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriathic arthritis (PsA), and ankylosing spondylitis (AS) treated with bDMARDs. Methods: The charts of bDMARD-treated RMD patients were reviewed, and data about bDMARD exposure and malignant cancers (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer) were collected. Results: 921 patients were included (median age: 50.59 years, 66.67% females); 1374 bDMARD treatments were administered, 87.12% were tumor necrosis factor inhibitors. A total of 21 malignant neoplasms were detected in 21 patients (61.90% females, median age at cancer diagnosis: 64.99 years), 66.67% in RA patients, 19.05% in PsA, and 14.28% in AS. Among them, 10 patients (47.62%) were treated with etanercept, 6 patients (28.57%) with adalimumab, and 1 case each with tocilizumab, certolizumab, golimumab, infliximab, and abatacept. The most common malignancies that we found were lung cancers, ductal mammary carcinomas, melanomas, and lymphomas. The incidence rate (IR) of malignancies in our cohort was 3.47 per 1000 person-years (p-y); the higher IRs were in RA patients (5.13 per 1000 p-y), in males (4.21 per 1000 p-y), and in patients aged >70 years (10.14 per 1000 p-y). Conclusions: The results of our study showed IR of malignancies in RMD patients treated with bDMARDs that is in agreement with literature data.

The challenge of pet therapy in systemic sclerosis: evidence for an impact on pain, anxiety, neuroticism and social interaction.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of our study was to evaluate the effect of animal-assisted intervention (AAI), a complementary support to traditional therapies focused on the interaction between animals and human beings, in improving psychological trait, anxiety and pain in a cohort of systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients. METHODS: 42 SSc patients, undergoing iloprost intravenous infusion, were divided in three groups: 1) 14 patients submitted to 20 AAI sessions; 2) 14 patients engaged in alternative social activity (control group 1 - C1); and 3) 14 patients without any alternative activity (control group 2 - C2). All patients underwent Visual Analog Scale (VAS), the State-anxiety (STAI-S) and emotional faces at the beginning (s0) and at the end (s1) of each single session, while General Anxiety State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-T), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Social Interaction Anxiety Scale (SIAS), Eysenck Personality Questionnaire-Revised (EPQ-R), the Social Phobia Scale (SPS), the Toronto Alexythymia Scale (TAS-20), the Thought Control Questionnaire (TCQ) were administered at baseline (t0) and at the end of the project (t1). RESULTS: AAI group showed a significant decrease of the anxiety state level in respect to the two control groups (p<0.001). VAS scale resulted lower both in AAI (p < 0.001) and C1 group (p<0.01). Moreover, STAI-T and TAS scores were significantly reduced in AAI group (p<0.001). TCQ scale showed that patients treated with AAI, compared to control group C2, had greater capacity to avoid unpleasant and unwanted thoughts (p<0.05). In AAI group, the EPQ-R test revealed an enhancement of extroversion trait compared to both control groups (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that AAI significantly reduces pain perception, anxiety, neuroticism and ameliorates patients' social interaction, therefore it may be a useful to allow a better compliance to traditional therapies.

The Kinetics of Antidrug Antibodies, Drug Levels, and Clinical Outcomes in Infliximab-Exposed Patients with Immune-Mediated Disorders.

BACKGROUND: Hypersensitivity reactions (HRs) and loss of response (LOR) to infliximab (IFX) are related to drug immunogenicity characterized by antidrug antibodies (ADAs). OBJECTIVE: To analyze the timing of ADA appearance and its relationship with drug levels and clinical outcomes in IFX-treated patients with different diseases. METHODS: Samples were longitudinally collected before each infusion from 91 IFX-treated patients and were assayed for ADA and drug levels by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and for IgE by ImmunoCAP system. Clinical data regarding efficacy and safety of therapy were also monitored. RESULTS: The ADA onset occured quite early, irrespective of the type of disease, during the first year and more frequently and earlier during the second cycle of therapy. Patients with HR were more frequently ADA-positive and with higher ADA titers compared with other patient groups. ADA onset tends to precede HRs and LOR; all HRs that occur after a period of drug interruption are preceded by ADA development. Before ADA detection, a progressive decline in IFX levels until a complete disappearance was observed. The ADA titer was maintained for years both in patients with ongoing therapy and in those who interrupted it. IgE ADAs are more frequently developed in patients with higher ADA levels and earlier ADA onset, but their rate of negativization is faster. CONCLUSION: The present data suggest that most IFX-exposed patients develop ADAs within the first year of treatment irrespective of disease type. The clinical outcome to the treatment is preceded by ADA development, which in turn is associated with the reduction in drug serum levels. Both ADA evaluation and therapeutic drug monitoring may have a relevant impact on clinical practice, giving new insights to predict LOR and HRs.

Long-term treatment of scleroderma-related digital ulcers with iloprost: a cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: Raynaud's phenomenon and chronic/recurrent digital ulcers (DU) are main features of systemic sclerosis (SSc). Their treatment includes both systemic (i.e., iloprost) and local therapies. We report the therapeutic effects of iloprost in a cohort of SSc patients during a long-lasting follow-up period. METHODS: Fifty consecutive SSc patients (M/F 7/43, age at SSc diagnosis 43.5±12.7SD years) received iloprost infusions for 10±4.2SD years. Iloprost schedule consisted in monthly infusion at 0.8-1 ng/kg body weight/min (average cumulative dose 25 µg), according to patients' tolerance. For recalcitrant cases, continuous infusion of iloprost (3 days, average 0.2 mg) was administered. RESULTS: 31/50 (62%) patients showed DU at the beginning of iloprost therapy: among them, 22 (71%) resolved during the follow-up, while the other 9 presented recurrent or chronic DU, despite the treatment. With regards the 19/50 patients without DU at baseline, only one developed skin lesions at the end of 10-year follow-up, when severe pulmonary hypertension developed, which lead to exitus. Considering the 31 patients with DU at baseline, a diffuse skin subset was present in 3/22 patients with healed DU, and in 5/9 who did not (13.6% vs. 55.5%; p=0.027). CONCLUSIONS: Iloprost is a long-term effective treatment to achieve healing and prevention in SSc-related DU. Besides the possible problems concerning patients' tolerability or clinical management, iloprost therapy may be considered of great help in the therapeutic strategy of SSc-related ischaemic manifestations.

Lidocaine controls pain and allows safe wound bed preparation and debridement of digital ulcers in systemic sclerosis: a retrospective study.

In Systemic Sclerosis (SSc), digital ulcers (DU) are painful, difficult to heal, and frequently infected. To reduce the risk of bacterial infection and to prevent chronicity, it is essential to carefully remove necrotic tissue from DU, with maximum patient comfort. Debridement, although very efficacious, is invasive and causes local pain: lidocaine is a local anesthetic commonly used as to fight pain during debridement procedures. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of lidocaine 4 % in pain control during debridement procedure of DU in SSc. One hundred eight DU characterized by pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) >3/10 before starting the procedure were treated with lidocaine 4 % (lidocaine cloridrate 200 mg in 5 ml of injecting solution). Pain was measured with NRS (0-10) before starting debridement, after 15 min of lidocaine application and at the end of the procedure. In DU, in respect to baseline (mean NRS 6.74 ± 2.96), pain after application of lidocaine 4 % for 15 min was significantly lower (mean NRS 2.83 ± 2.73) (p < 0.001). At the end of the procedure, pain control was still maintained and significantly lower (mean NRS 2.88 ± 2.65) in respect to baseline (p < 0.001). No systemic adverse event due to topical lidocaine were observed. In SSc, topical application of lidocaine 4 % significantly reduces pain, allowing a safe debridement procedure, thus improving the management of DU.

Premedication prevents infusion reactions and improves retention rate during infliximab treatment.

Infliximab (IFX) is an anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha antibody used to treat inflammatory joint diseases. Infusion reactions (IR) can occur during and after intravenous administration and often require discontinuation of IFX therapy. This retrospective study aimed at evaluating the incidence of IR in patients with joint inflammatory diseases receiving IFX with and without premedication. Clinical charts of rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis patients receiving IFX from January 2002 to December 2014 were reviewed. Patients receiving only one premedication protocol over time were enrolled and clustered based on the type of premedication as follows: group 1 received no premedication; group 2 received paracetamol, esomeprazole, hydrocortisone, and chlorpheniramine maleate; group 3 received paracetamol, hydoxyzine, ranitidine, and 6-methylprednisolone. Adverse events were recorded during the infusion, in the following hours and at control visits. The charts of 105 patients treated with IFX were selected. IR were observed in 23/51 patients of group 1, in 7/35 patients of group 2, and none of 19 patients in group 3. IR incidence was significantly lower in the second (p = 0.021) and third (p < 0.001) compared to the first group. The incidence of IR was significantly lower in group 3 than group 2 (p < 0.043). Moreover, patients in group 1 had a relative risk of developing an IR 2.5 times higher than group 2. In our experience, the use of premedication significantly reduced the number of IR to IFX. In particular, the combination of paracetamol, hydroxyzine, 6-methylprednisolone and ranitidine was more efficacious than paracetamol, esomeprazole, hydrocortisone, and chlorpheniramine maleate combination protocol.

Calcinosis in systemic sclerosis: subsets, distribution and complications.

OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively analyse the features of calcinosis in a cohort of SSc patients. METHODS: Charts of SSc patients attending the Ulcer Unit of the Rheumatology Department, University of Florence and presenting a clinical suspicion of calcinosis were considered in the study. Data on clinical history, including recent skin changes, and clinical examination of all areas with suspected calcinosis, radiological imaging of the calcinotic area, demographics and SSc-related organ involvement and pain measured by a visual analogue scale were recorded. RESULTS: In 52 of 112 SSc patients, a total of 316 calcinoses were recorded and were divided into visible and palpable {154 [47.4%], clustered according to their macroscopic features as mousse [49 (31.8%)] and stone [: 105 (68.2%)]} and non-visible but palpable {: 162 [52.6%]: net [5 (3%)], plate [22 (13.8%)] and stone [135 (83.2%)]}. The X-ray-based classification of all calcinoses, both visible and non-visible, was as follows: stone, 289 (91.4%); net, 12 (3.8%) and plate, 15 (4.8%). Skin ulcers complicated 154 of 316 calcinoses (48.7%). Mousse calcinosis was associated with pulmonary arterial hypertension, the stone subset was suggestive of pulmonary involvement and justified further investigation and the net subset was the slowest to heal. CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that calcinosis may be classified in SSc as mousse, stone, net and plate according to its clinical and X-ray features. This classification awaits validation for a possible use in clinical practice and to support early treatment and prevention of complications.

Assessment, Definition, and Classification of Lower Limb Ulcers in Systemic Sclerosis: A Challenge for the Rheumatologist.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate pathogenesis and clinical features of lower limb ulcers in systemic sclerosis (SSc) and to propose a classification that could be used in clinical practice. METHODS: Charts of 60 patients with SSc who had lower limb cutaneous lesions were reviewed. All patients had videocapillaroscopy and arterial and venous lower limb color Doppler ultrasonography (US). Arteriography was performed if occlusive peripheral arterial disease was suspected. RESULTS: The 554 lesions were classified as hyperkeratosis, ulcers, and gangrenes. There were 341 (61.6%) hyperkeratoses, 208 (37.5%) ulcers, and 5 (0.9%) gangrenes. Ulcers were divided into pure ulcers, ulcers associated with hyperkeratosis, and ulcers secondary to calcinosis. Involvement of arterial and venous macrocirculation as determined by color Doppler US was observed in 17 (18.3%) and 18 (30%) patients, respectively. Seventeen out of 37 patients with pure ulcers (45.9%) presented neither venous insufficiency nor hemodynamically significant macrovascular arterial disease. In these patients, pure ulcers were most likely caused by isolated SSc-related microvascular involvement (pure microvascular ulcers). The only significant risk factor for development of pure microvascular ulcers in the multivariate analysis was the history of lower limb ulcers (OR 26.67, 95% CI 2.75-259.28; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Results of our study indicate that lower limb ulcers in SSc often have a multifactorial pathogenesis that may be difficult to manage. Further studies are needed to validate the proposed classification and to assess the most appropriate management of lower limb ulcers in SSc.

Digital ulcers as a sentinel sign for early internal organ involvement in very early systemic sclerosis.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the presence of digital lesions in very early diagnosis of SSc (VEDOSS) patients and its possible association with internal organ involvement. METHODS: One hundred and ten VEDOSS patients were investigated for the presence of digital ulcers (DUs), digital pitting scars, calcinosis, necrosis or gangrene, nailfold videocapillaroscopic abnormalities, disease-specific autoantibodies (ACA and anti-topo I) and internal organ involvement. RESULTS: Four patients reported a history of digital pitting scars, while 25 patients presented an active DU or reported a history of DUs. In particular, 16 patients presented with active DUs (14/16 also reporting a history of previous DUs), while the other 9 patients reported a history of DUs only. A statistically significant association between DUs and oesophageal manometry alteration was found in the whole DU population, as well as in the history of DU and the presence of active DU with/without a history of DU subgroups (P < 0.01, P = 0.01 and P < 0.05, respectively). DUs were observed in VEDOSS patients with internal organ involvement but not in those without organ involvement. CONCLUSION: DUs are already present in VEDOSS patients characterized by internal organ involvement, significantly correlating and associating with gastrointestinal involvement. DUs may be a sentinel sign for early organ involvement in VEDOSS patients.

Disease activity improvement in rheumatoid arthritis treated with tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors correlates with increased soluble Fas levels.

OBJECTIVE: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is characterized by chronic synovial inflammation and hyperplasia. Tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) plays a pivotal role in RA by interfering with the Fas-Fas ligand (FasL) proapoptotic pathway. We investigated the circulating levels of soluble Fas (sFas) and soluble FasL (sFasL), and their possible correlation with disease activity and improvement after anti-TNF-α treatment in RA. METHODS: Serum levels of sFas and sFasL were measured by quantitative ELISA in 52 patients with RA before and after 3 months of anti-TNF-α treatment (adalimumab, n = 32; infliximab, n = 20). Disease activity measures [Disease Activity Score at 28 joints-erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP)] were recorded before and after treatment. Forty age-matched and sex-matched healthy subjects served as controls. RESULTS: No significant differences in serum sFas levels were detected between anti-TNF-α-naive patients with RA and controls. After anti-TNF-α treatment, serum sFas levels significantly increased in patients with RA compared to both anti-TNF-α-naive patients and controls. Increased sFas levels inversely correlated with disease activity variables (DAS28-ESR: r = -0.739, CRP: r = -0.636, both p < 0.001). No significant differences in sFasL levels were detected in patients with RA before and after anti-TNF-α treatment. CONCLUSION: In RA, an increase in sFas levels closely correlates with improvement in disease activity induced by TNF-α inhibitors, suggesting their ability to modulate Fas-mediated synoviocyte apoptosis.

Serial QuantiFERON TB-gold in-tube testing during LTBI therapy in candidates for TNFi treatment.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the T-cell interferon (IFN)-γ response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific antigens during latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) therapy in candidates for tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors (TNFi). METHODS: 1490 Patients were screened for LTBI. One-hundred and sixty-six of them were treated for LTBI and followed-up with QuantiFERON-TB Gold (QFT-IT) testing at baseline (T0) and therapy completion (T1); 92 subjects were also tested 3-6 months after therapy completion (T2). RESULTS: At T1 the QFT-IT reversion and conversion rates were 24% (27/111) and 18% (10/55), respectively. By multivariate analysis, the likelihood of reversion significantly decreased with older age (>50-60), larger TST size (>15 mm) and higher IFN-γ value at T0 (>1 IU/ml); the likelihood of conversion increased with higher IFN-γ levels at T0 (1 IU/ml) and in female patients. Quantitative data among those who scored QFT-IT-positive at T0 showed a decreasing trend of IFN-γ levels between T0 and T1 that reached statistical significance when T0 was compared to T2, and T1 to T2. CONCLUSIONS: The data confirm the difficulty of interpreting the modulation of IFN-γ levels during LTBI therapy. Currently, there is no evidence to support the use of QFT-IT in the clinical practice of monitoring LTBI treatment in candidates for TNFi.

Outcomes of patients with systemic sclerosis-associated polyarthritis and myopathy treated with tocilizumab or abatacept: a EUSTAR observational study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of tocilizumab and abatacept in systemic sclerosis (SSc)-polyarthritis or SSc-myopathy. METHODS: 20 patients with SSc with refractory polyarthritis and seven with refractory myopathy from the EUSTAR (EULAR Scleroderma Trials and Research) network were included: 15 patients received tocilizumab and 12 patients abatacept. All patients with SSc-myopathy received abatacept. Clinical and biological assessments were made at the start of treatment and at the last infusion. RESULTS: After 5 months, tocilizumab induced a significant improvement in the 28-joint count Disease Activity Score and its components, with 10/15 patients achieving a EULAR good response. Treatment was stopped in two patients because of inefficacy. After 11 months' treatment of patients with abatacept, joint parameters improved significantly, with 6/11 patients fulfilling EULAR good-response criteria. Abatacept did not improve muscle outcome measures in SSc-myopathy. No significant change was seen for skin or lung fibrosis in the different groups. Both treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: In this observational study, tocilizumab and abatacept appeared to be safe and effective on joints, in patients with refractory SSc. No trend for any change of fibrotic lesions was seen but this may relate to the exposure time and inclusion criteria. Larger studies with longer follow-up are warranted to further determine the safety and effectiveness of these drugs in SSc.