[Quality in acute inpatient rheumatology 2021 : Current aspects of the KOBRA quality label of the Association of Rheumatological Acute Care Clinics]. / Qualität in der akutstationären Rheumatologie 2021 : Aktuelle Aspekte zum KOBRA-Qualitätslabel des Verbandes Rheumatologischer Akutkliniken (VRA e.V.).

A comprehensive health policy quality campaign launched in 2021 aims to improve the quality and transparency of hospital care for people with diseases in Germany. Legal requirements for minimum volumes and the expansion of quality contracts between cost units and hospitals as well as the use of quality indicators relevant to planning for demand-oriented and quality-oriented further development of inpatient care will increase competition in the quality of care between hospitals. The topic of development and definition of quality in medicine was also comprehensively addressed by the Association of Rheumatological Acute Care Clinics (VRA) shortly after its foundation in 1998. At the center of acute inpatient quality management are binding structural criteria linked to the continuous outcome benchmarking in acute rheumatology care (KOBRA) project launched in 2003 in rheumatology (and continuously implemented to date) measuring process and outcome quality. Based on this framework (fulfillment of the structural quality and participation in the KOBRA project) successfully participating rheumatology units can acquire the KOBRA seal of approval for 2 years at a time, which is awarded by the project management, the aQua Institute. The outstanding position of the project is exemplified by data evaluation on treatment change in active rheumatoid arthritis, diagnosis confirmation of connective tissue diseases and vasculitis during the inpatient stay as well as on participatory decision-making processes concerning rheumatoid arthritis (referring to the results of the data collection period 2018). By anchoring projects for structural, process and outcome quality acute inpatient rheumatology is well prepared for the paradigm shift demanded by health policies. Additionally, the KOBRA project is a good prerequisite to meet the requirements concerning quality management fixed in the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) guidelines for recognition as a rheumatology center.

[Complex treatments in rheumatology and geriatrics - Challenges - Differences - Chances]. / Komplextherapien in der Rheumatologie und Geriatrie ­ Herausforderungen ­ Unterschiede ­ Chancen.

With the introduction of the German diagnostic-related groups (G-DRG) system in 2003, remuneration according to DRG was also implemented for the disciplines of rheumatology and geriatrics. For acute inpatient treatment in the field of rheumatology the specialized complex rheumatological treatment (OPS code 8-983) and the related DRG-I97Z (rheumatological complex treatment for diseases and disorders of the musculoskeletal system and connective tissue) were assigned to the DRG system in 2005 and 2006, respectively. The early complex geriatric rehabilitation (OPS code 8-550) is a tool in the treatment of older patients affected by rheumatism. In this article the challenges of realizing complex therapies are described using the examples of OPS code 8-983 and 8-550 and their structural and procedural differences are outlined. Acute inpatient treatment of patients severely affected by a rheumatic disease as well as of multimorbid geriatric patients with rheumatism is supported by the implementation of the respective complex therapy.

[Hospital financing in 2016. Relevant changes for rheumatology]. / Krankenhausfinanzierung 2016. Relevantes für die internistische Rheumatologie.

Hospital financing 2016 will be influenced by the prospects of the approaching considerable changes. It is assumed that the following years will lead to a considerable reallocation of financial resources between hospitals. While not directly targeted by new regulations, reallocations always also affect specialties like rheumatology. Compared to the alterations in the legislative framework the financial effects of the yearly adaptation of the German diagnosis-related groups system are subordinate. Only by comprehensive consideration of current and expected changes a forward-looking and sustainable strategy can be developed. The following article presents the relevant changes and discusses the consequences for hospitals specialized in rheumatology.

[Hospital financing in 2015. Relevant changes for rheumatology]. / Krankenhausfinanzierung 2015. Relevantes für die internistische Rheumatologie.

The announced major reforms will most probably not have an impact on hospital financing before 2016. Nevertheless, the numerous minor changes in the legislative framework and the new version of the German diagnosis-related groups (G-DRG) system can be important for hospitals specialized in rheumatology. The following article presents the relevant changes and discusses the consequences for hospitals specialized in rheumatology.

[Hospital financing in 2014. Relevant changes for rheumatology]. / Krankenhausfinanzierung 2014. Relevantes für die internistische Rheumatologie.

As with others medical disciplines hospitals specialized in rheumatology again face heavy economic burdens in 2014. To meet the challenges knowledge of the new German diagnosis-related groups (G-DRG) system, the legislative framework and current jurisprudence can be helpful. The following article presents the major changes and discusses the consequences for hospitals specialized in rheumatology.

[Hospital financing in 2013: relevant changes for rheumatology]. / Krankenhausfinanzierung 2013 : Relevantes für die internistische Rheumatologie.

Hospital financing is again subjected to a multitude of reforms that can be of relevance for rheumatology in 2013. Besides changes in the German diagnosis-related group (G-DRG) classification system and coding, modifications in the legislation and legal framework conditions have a growing impact on the economic situation and strategy of hospitals. The following article presents the major changes and discusses consequences for hospitals specialized in rheumatology.

Shaping the System - The DRG Evaluation Project of the German Society for Gynaecology and Obstetrics (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, DGGG).

Introduction: The German DRG system is annually adapted to the changing services provided. For the further development, the self-governing body and its DRG Institute (InEK) depend on participation of the users. Methods: For one of the DRG evaluation projects initiated by DGGG, cost and performance data for the year 2011 from 16 hospitals were available. After plausibility checks and corrections, analyses for service and cost homogeneity were performed. In cases of inadequate DRG-representation attributes were sought that would make an appropriate reimbursement possible. Conspicuities and potential solutions were checked for clinical plausibility. Results: 44 concrete modification proposals for further development of the G-DRG system were formulated and submitted in due time to the InEK. In addition, 3 modification proposals were addressed to the German Institute for Medical Documentation and Information (Deutsches Institut für Medizinische Dokumentation und Information, DIMDI) for further development of the diagnosis classification ICD-10-GM. For all modification proposals care was taken to minimise misdirected incentives and to reduce the potential for disputes with the cost bearers and their auditors services in settlements. Discussion: The publication of the G-DRG system 2014 shows which modification proposals have been realised. Essentially, an appropriate redistribution of the resources among the gynaecological and obstetrics departments is to be expected. The financial pressure that is caused by the generally inadequate financing of hospitals will not be reduced by a further development of the G-DRG system.

[Hospital financing in 2012 - Relevant changes for rheumatology]. / Krankenhausfinanzierung 2012 - Relevantes für die Internistische Rheumatologie.

The following article presents the major general and specific changes for the financing of rheumatology in Germany for 2012. Besides relevant changes in the German diagnosis-related groups (G-DRG) classification system and for the coding, the new legislation and the resulting incentives are covered. The consequences for hospitals specialized in rheumatology are discussed.

[Hospital financing for 2011: relevant changes in rheumatology]. / Krankenhausfinanzierung 2011 : Relevantes für die Rheumatologie.

The following article presents the major general and specific changes for rheumatology in the financing of inpatient care in Germany for 2011. In addition to relevant changes in the G-DRG classification system and coding, the new legislation and insurance company auditing procedures are covered. The impact these changes will have on hospitals specialized in rheumatology is discussed.

[The G-DRG System 2009--relevant changes for rheumatology]. / Das G-DRG-System 2010--Relevantes für die Rheumatologie.

The following article presents the major general and specific changes in the G-DRG system, in the classification systems for diagnoses and procedures as well as for the billing process for 2010. Since the G-DRG system is primarily a tool for the redistribution of resources, every hospital needs to analyze the economic effects of the changes by applying the G-DRG transition-grouper to its own cases. Depending on their clinical focus, rheumatological departments may experience positive or negative consequences from the adjustments. In addition, relevant current case law is considered.

[G-DRG system 2009: relevant changes for rheumatology]. / Das G-DRG-System 2009: Relevantes für die Rheumatologie.

The following article presents the main general and specific changes in the G-DRG (German diagnosis-related groups) system in terms of the classification systems for diagnoses and procedures as well as the billing process for 2009. Of fundamental relevance is the national weighting of the G-DRG I97Z (complex rheumatologic treatment), which up to now had to be negotiated individually by each hospital. Emphasis is also put on case auditing by the health insurers. Being primarily a tool for redistribution of resources, every hospital has to analyze the economic effects of the 2009 G-DRG system by applying the G-DRG transition grouper to its own cases. Depending on their clinical focus rheumatological departments may experience positive or negative consequences from the development. The strain imposed on hospitals by inadequate refunding of rising costs has to be assessed separately from the effects of redistribution by the G-DRG system.

[The G-DRG system 2008. Relevant changes for rheumatology]. / Das G-DRG-System 2008. Relevante Neuerungen für die Rheumatologie.

The G-DRG system 2008 once again brings many changes to rheumatological departments in Germany. The following article presents the main general and specific changes in the G-DRG system, as well as in the classification systems for diagnoses and procedures and in invoicing for 2008. Since the G-DRG system is only a tool for the redistribution of resources, every hospital needs to analyze the economic effects of the system by applying the G-DRG transition grouper to its own cases. Depending on their clinical focus, rheumatological departments may experience positive or negative effects from the system's application. The strain placed on hospitals by the inadequate funding of increased costs needs to be assessed separately from the effects of redistribution by the G-DRG system.

[Changes for the field of rheumatology in the G-DRG-System 2007]. / Was gibt es Neues für die Rheumatologie im G-DRG-System 2007?

After extensive revision the partners of the self-administration"Selbstverwaltung" reached an amicable agreement on the new version 2007 of the G-DRG system. Like in the years before, version 2007 brings about large-scale changes for its users. A better representation of inpatient services in Germany combined with an improved economic homogeneity and appropriateness can be assumed. This is based on various factors, e. g. considerably increased data-quality and the optimization of technical influences on the system. Due to the rising level of complexity it is hardly possible to maintain a clinically homogeneous classification on the basis of G-DRGs. There is need [This calls] for a new approach in strategic matters. Various initiatives succeeded in a continuous improvement how the services provided by specialised rheumatologic clinics and departments are represented in the G-DRG system. Meanwhile, even under the pressure caused by the period of convergence, quality standards were focused on as well. The systematic changes of version 2007 as well as modifications concerning co-payments, coding and accounting rules relevant for rheumatologic clinics are presented and the consequences for users are discussed.

[What changes for rheumatologists in the G-DRG system 2006?]. / Was ändert sich für die Rheumatologie im G-DRG-System 2006?

Once more, the revision of the German DRG catalogue 2006 provides for more accurate reimbursement, particularly for specialised medical services. The newly established DRG I97Z (Rheumatologische Komplexbehandlung bei Krankheiten und Störungen an Muskel-Skelett-System und Bindegewebe) for the complex and multimodal treatment of rheumatic diseases allows an accurate picture of clinical practice in specialized rheumatologic departments and hospitals. Using this specific DRG-description, it will be possible to reduce the financial pressure which results from the redistribution of budgets in the second year of the period of convergence. A precondition for the affected hospitals is to deal with budget planning and calculation of G-DRGs without calculated cost weights for 2006. In addition, this article discusses the relevance of other modifications to the G-DRG system, additional payments, the conditions for payment, the coding standards, and the classification systems for diagnosis and procedures.

[Increasingly appropriate depiction of rheumatology for G-DRG reimbursement 2006]. / Zunehmend sachgerechte Abbildung der Rheuma- tologie im G-DRG- Fallpauschalensystem 2006.

Starting with the second year of the so called "convergence period", specialized rheumatological treatment is now represented by a specific DRG (197Z) in the German G-DRG system. The definition of this DRG is based on the procedure codes for the complex and multimodal treatment of rheumatological inpatients (OPS 8-983 and 8-986). This will result in a more appropriate reimbursement of rheumatological treatment. The implementation of specialized rheumatological treatment can be regarded as exemplary for the incorporation of medical specializations into DRG systems. The first step is the definition of the characteristics by procedure codes, which can consequently be utilized within the grouping algorithm. After an inadequate representation of a medical specialization within the DRG system has been demonstrated, a new DRG will be established. As no cost data were available, the calculation of a cost weight for the new G-DRG 197Z is not yet possible for 2006. Hence, reimbursement has to be negotiated between the individual hospital and the budget commission of the health insurers. In this context, the use of clinical pathways is considered helpful.

[Stroke treatment in the 2006 German diagnosis-related group system]. / Schlaganfallbehandlung im deutschen DRG-System 2006.

The 2006 version of the German diagnosis-related group (DRG) system distinguishes for the first time between different forms of treatment for acute stroke. This was made possible through cooperation of the German Stroke Society (Deutsche Schlaganfall Gesellschaft) in further development of the German procedure classification (OPS) and G-DRG system. The 2005 procedure codes for complex neurologic treatment of acute stroke (OPS 8-981) collated treatment methods for the first time in a data base. Their consideration in the 2006 German DRG system was made possible by further data collection from participating hospitals. Hence the complex neurologic treatment of acute stroke now serves as a qualifying criterion for seven higher weighted DRGs. Even though this might not lead directly to a rise in a given hospital's total revenue, it can ease adjustments to the DRG price system and present a more realistic picture of the relationships between the various departments within a hospital.

[The multimodal rheumatologic complex treatment (OPS 8-983)--challenges, solutions and perspectives]. / Die multimodale rheumatologische Komplexbehandlung (OPS 8-983) Herausforderungen, Lösungen und Perspektiven.

As from 2005 the specialized complex rheumatologic treatment can be assigned to the code category 8-983 (Multimodale rheumatologische Komplexbehandlung) of the OPS procedure classification system. Only by means of this specific procedure code, has an appropriate description and consideration in the G-DRG system of the common clinical practice in specialized rheumatologic hospitals/clinics become possible. The complex and multimodal treatment reflects the rheumatologic therapeutic standard for the treatment of inflammatory rheumatic diseases and non-inflammatory pain syndromes. The article focuses on the minimal criteria that have to be met for coding the OPS 8-983. Helpful practical instructions are given concerning how to implement the complex procedure into practice. Even though the newly introduced procedure code OPS 8-983 will not yet develop influence on the grouping process in 2005, other changes in the GDRG system lead to an improved economic valuation of rheumatological services in comparison to 2004.

Recommendations for the classification of HIV associated neuromanifestations in the German DRG system.

HIV associated neuromanifestations are of growing importance in the in-patient treatment of HIV infected patients. In Germany, all in-patients have to be coded according to the ICD-10 classification and the German DRG-system. We present recommendations how to code the different primary and secondary neuromanifestations of HIV infection. These recommendations are based on the commentary of the German DRG procedures and are aimed to establish uniform coding of neuromanifestations.