RESUMEN
Gafchromic films are utilized for two-dimensional dose distribution measurements, especially in radiotherapy. In this study, we investigated a close connection between energy and dose rate of Gafchromic EBT3 films irradiating with 6 MV and Co-60 photon beams over a broad dose range. EBT3 films were exposed to 6 MV and Co-60 photon beams using 4 and 2 Gy/min dose rates over a 10-400 cGy dose range. The films were scanned in red, green, and blue channels to obtain the optical density (OD)-dose curves. The OD-dose curves resulted from three-color scans for different photon energies and dose rates were compared by statistical independent t-test. For the radiations of Co-60 and 6 MV photon beams, the highest correlation was obtained between the 2 and 4 Gy/min dose rates with red and green channels, respectively. Moreover, the red channel had a greater OD response per dose value, following the green and blue channels. There was no significant difference between different photon energies' (Co-60 and 6 MV) and dose rates' (2 and 4 Gy/min) dependence on OD-dose response of EBT3 films over a broad domain of radiation dose, except for different photon energies in the blue channel. Our results revealed that the OD-dose response of EBT3 films is independent on photon energies (Co-60 and 6 MV) and dose rate (2 and 4 Gy/min) in the evaluated dose range (10-400 cGy). Therefore, the EBT3 films are suitable, consistent, and reliable instruments for dose measurements in radiotherapy.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To assess and compare radiation dose and image quality from non-contrast head and neck computed tomography (CT) examinations from four different multi-detector CT (MDCT) scanners. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Four CT scanners with different numbers of detector rows including one 4-MDCT, a 6-MDCT, a 16-MDCT, and a 64-MDCT were investigated. Common CT dose descriptors including volumetric CT dose index (CTDIv), dose length product (DLP), and the effective dose (ED), and image quality parameters include image noise, uniformity, and spatial resolution (SR) were estimated for each CT scanner with standard tools and methods. To have a precise comparison between CT scanners and related doses and image quality parameters, the ImPACT Q-factor was used. RESULTS: Minimum and maximum CTDIv, DLP, and ED in the head scan were 18 ± 3 and 49 ± 4 mGy, 242 ± 28 and 692 ± 173 mGy × cm, 0.46 ± 0.4 and 1.31 ± 0.33 mSv for 16-MDCT and 64-MDCT, respectively. And 16 ± 2 to 27 ± 3, 286 ± 127 to 645 ± 79 and 1.46 ± 0.65 to 3.29 ± 0.40 for neck scan, respectively. The Q-factor in head scan was 2.4, 3.3, 4.4 and 5.6 for 4-MDCT, 6-MDCT, 16-MDCT and 64-MDCT, respectively. The Q-factor in neck scan was 3.4, 4.6, 4.7 and 6.0 for 4-MDCT, 6-MDCT, 16-MDCT and 64-MDCT, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results clearly indicate an increasing trend in the Q-factor from 4-MDCT to 64-MDCT units in both head and neck examinations. This increasing trend is due to a better SR and less noise of images taken and/or fewer doses in 64-MDCT.
RESUMEN
This study aimed to compare and evaluated the dosimetric characteristics of esophagus, spinal cord, carotid artery, lungs, and brachial plexus in patients with breast cancer undergoing four various techniques of supraclavicular irradiation. By keeping unchanged the breast tangential radiotherapy fields, four different treatment field arrangements were created to irradiate the supraclavicular region as follows: (1) four field (4F; 1 anterior-posterior and 1 posterior-anterior), (2) six field (6F; 2 anterior-posterior and 2 posterior-anterior), (3) five field-1 (5F-1; 2 anterior-posterior and 1 posterior-anterior), and (4) five field-2 (5F-2; 1 anterior-posterior and 2 posterior-anterior). Then, the dosimetric parameters for the above-mentioned organs were evaluated. The mean dose (Dmean) of the esophagus had significant difference between 6F and 5F-2 techniques. For the spinal cord, the Dmean dosimetric parameter demonstrated significant difference between the 4F and 6F techniques, and between the 4F and 5F-1 techniques, with lower values for the 4F technique. There was no significant difference between the different irradiation techniques in all the dosimetric parameters for the carotid artery. The Dmean of the left lung significantly differed between the 4F and 5F-2 techniques, with lower values for the 5F-2 technique. Furthermore, the V20Gy dosimetric parameter had significant difference between the 4F and 6F, and also 4F and 5F-2, techniques with lower values for 5F-2. The maximum dose (Dmax) of the brachial plexus showed significant difference between the two techniques of 5F. The V45Gy dosimetric parameter of the brachial plexus revealed significant difference between the 4F and 6F techniques, and also between the 4F and 5F-1 techniques, with lower values for 5F-1. In general, these techniques had similar dosimetric results, with little differences. The dosimetric parameters for the esophagus and lung showed better results with the 5F-2 technique in comparison with other techniques. Dosimetric results for the brachial plexus and spinal cord improved with the 5F-1 and 4F techniques, respectively, against other techniques. Dose distribution for the carotid artery did not differ in the four irradiation techniques.
