Accuracy of MRI in Assessment of High-Grade Partial Distal Biceps Tears.

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is commonly used to diagnose and assess the extent of partial distal biceps injuries. The aim of this study was to report on the accuracy of MRI and the effect of injury history and study timing on its performance. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients who underwent surgical treatment of partial thickness distal biceps tears at a single center by multiple surgeons was performed. Inclusion criteria consisted of the performance of a preoperative MRI and documentation of the intraoperatively visualized extent of the tear, and 68 patients met the criteria for inclusion. A chart review was completed to evaluate the symptom duration, injury history, and tear extent. RESULTS: All patients had distal biceps tears of greater than 50% intraoperatively. However, MRI did not indicate any tearing in 20 (29%) patients, and its sensitivity for high-grade tear was 44%. Magnetic resonance imaging was significantly less likely to be read as high-grade tears in patients with insidious onset of their symptoms in comparison with patients who reported a traumatic onset (27% vs 55%, P = .024). However, the time from symptom onset to MRI did not significantly correlate with diagnosis of a high-grade tear on MRI (r = -0.15, P = .21). CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that MRI can underreport partial distal biceps tear extent, and this more commonly occurs in patients with insidious onset of pain.

Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Repair for Partial Distal Biceps Tendon Tears.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to describe the outcomes of patients treated with surgical repair of partial tears of the distal biceps tendon. METHODS: The study was a retrospective review of repairs of partial tears of the distal biceps tendon performed by multiple surgeons from January 1, 2015 to October 15, 2020. Inclusion criteria consisted of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging indicative of distal biceps pathology without a complete tear and surgical treatment with intraoperative confirmation of a partial tear. The presence of preceding trauma, duration of symptoms, and postoperative complications were documented. Patients were contacted for outcome assessment using the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) and Patient-Reported Elbow Evaluation outcome measures. Clinical outcomes were obtained from 56 of 74 (76%) eligible patients with an average follow-up of 46 months (range: 15-85 months). RESULTS: After surgery, the median QuickDASH was 2.3 (interquartile range, 0-9.7), and the median Patient-Reported Elbow Evaluation score was 1 (interquartile range, 0-12). Postoperative QuickDASH scores were significantly lower than the preoperative scores. Known traumas preceding the symptoms and duration of symptoms before surgery were not significantly associated with the outcome. Of all eligible patients, 30 complications were reported in 25 (34%) patients and included 2 reruptures, 2 cases of heterotopic ossification, 1 deep infection, 1 case of implant irritation, 21 neuropraxias, and 3 hematomas. Five (7%) patients underwent 6 reoperations including 1 revision for a rerupture, 1 irrigation and debridement, 2 heterotopic ossification excisions, 1 hematoma evacuation, and 1 implant removal. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the repair of partial distal biceps tendon tears is a viable treatment option with significant improvement in QuickDASH. There was no significant relationship between the postoperative outcome and duration of symptoms or known traumas preceding the symptoms. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Internal Fixation Construct and Defect Size Affect Healing of a Translational Porcine Diaphyseal Tibial Segmental Bone Defect.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Porcine translational models have become the gold-standard translational tool to study the effects of major injury and hemorrhagic shock because of their similarity to the human immunologic response to trauma. Segmental bone defects (SBDs) typically occur in warfighters with associated severe limb trauma. The purpose of this study was to develop a translational porcine diaphyseal SBD model in Yucatan minipigs (YMPs), which could be used in bone healing investigations that simulate injury-relevant conditions. We were specifically working toward developing a critical sized defect (CSD). METHODS: We used an adaptive experimental design in which both 25.0 mm and 40.0 mm SBDs were created in the tibial mid-diaphysis in skeletally mature YMPs. Initially, eight YMPs were subjected to a 25.0 mm SBD and treated with intramedullary nailing (intramedullary nail [IMN] 25mm). Due to unanticipated wound problems, we subsequently treated four specimens with identical 25.0 mm defect with dual plating (open reduction with internal fixation [ORIF] 25mm). Finally, a third group of four YMPs with 40.0 mm defects were treated with dual plating (ORIF 40mm). Monthly radiographs were made until sacrifice. Modified Radiographic Union Score for Tibia fractures (mRUST) measurements were made by three trauma-trained orthopedic surgeons. CT scans of the tibias were used to verify the union results. RESULTS: At 4 months post-surgery, mean mRUST scores were 11.7 (SD ± 1.8) in the ORIF 25mm YMPs vs. 8.5 (SD ± 1.4) in the IMN 25mm YMPs (P < .0001). All four ORIF 25mm YMPs were clinically healed. In contrast, none of the IMN 25mm YMPs were clinically healed and seven of eight IMN 25mm YMPs developed delayed wound breakdown. All four of the ORIF 40mm YMPs had flail nonunions with complete hardware failure by 3 months after surgery and were sacrificed early. CT scanning confirmed that none of the IMN 25mm YMPs, none of the ORIF 40mm YMPs, and two of four ORIF 25mm YMPs were healed. A third ORIF 25mm specimen was nearly healed on CT scanning. Inter-rater and intra-rater reliability interclass coefficients using the mRUST scale were 0.81 and 0.80, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: YMPs that had a 40 mm segment of bone removed from their tibia and were treated with dual plating did not heal and could be used to investigate interventions that accelerate bone healing. In contrast, a 25 mm SBD treated with dual plating demonstrated delayed but successful healing, indicating it can potentially be used to investigate bone healing adjuncts or conversely how concomitant injuries may impair bone healing. Pigs treated with IMN failed to heal and developed consistent delayed wound breakdown presumably secondary to chronic limb instability. The porcine YMP SBD model has the potential to be an effective translational tool to investigate bone healing under physiologically relevant injury conditions.

The effects of spaceflight and fracture healing on distant skeletal sites.

Spaceflight results in reduced mechanical loading of the skeleton, which leads to dramatic bone loss. Low bone mass is associated with increased fracture risk, and this combination may compromise future, long-term, spaceflight missions. Here, we examined the systemic effects of spaceflight and fracture surgery/healing on several non-injured bones within the axial and appendicular skeleton. Forty C57BL/6, male mice were randomized into the following groups: (1) Sham surgery mice housed on the earth (Ground + Sham); (2) Femoral segmental bone defect surgery mice housed on the earth (Ground + Surgery); (3) Sham surgery mice housed in spaceflight (Flight + Sham); and (4) Femoral segmental bone defect surgery mice housed in spaceflight (Flight + Surgery). Mice were 9 weeks old at the time of launch and were euthanized approximately 4 weeks after launch. Micro-computed tomography (µCT) was used to evaluate standard bone parameters in the tibia, humerus, sternebra, vertebrae, ribs, calvarium, mandible, and incisor. One intriguing finding was that both spaceflight and surgery resulted in virtually identical losses in tibial trabecular bone volume fraction, BV/TV (24-28% reduction). Another important finding was that surgery markedly changed tibial cortical bone geometry. Understanding how spaceflight, surgery, and their combination impact non-injured bones will improve treatment strategies for astronauts and terrestrial humans alike.

Comparative Analysis of Bibliometric, Authorship, and Collaboration Trends Over the Past 30-Year Publication History of the Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma and Injury.

OBJECTIVES: In the scientific and medical field, authorship has become increasingly important for tenure and career advancement in addition to improvement in medical care. It was the purpose of this study to investigate changes in bibliometric variables, authorship, and collaboration trends in the Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma (JOT) and Injury over a 30-year period. METHODS: A bibliometric analysis was completed for all manuscripts meeting the inclusion criteria and published throughout 1 representative year of each decade over the past 30 years. A total of 444 and 1105 manuscripts for JOT and Injury, respectively, met the inclusion criteria. Standard statistical analyses were performed with nonparametric methods for continuous variables and Pearson χ and Cochran linear trend tests for categorical variables. A P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: There were significant increases over time in all bibliometric variables for both journals, except in the number of countries and pages in JOT. For JOT, the overall percentage of female first authors increased 2.3 times from 1987 to 2015 (P = 0.021). The overall percentage of female corresponding authors was 7.3%. For Injury, the overall percentage of female first authors increased 1.5 times (P = 0.007). The overall percentage of female corresponding authors was 13.1%. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding changes in publishing characteristics over time and by region is critical with the rising demands of publishing in academic medicine. JOT and Injury have showed an increase in most variables analyzed. However, female authorship in JOT is climbing at a higher rate than Injury.

Authorship trends in the Journal of Orthopaedic Research: A bibliometric analysis.

Publications are an important tool to measure one's success and achievement in academia. They can help propel a career forward and move one into a position of leadership. The overall purpose of this study was to investigate changes in bibliometric variables, authorship, and collaboration trends in the Journal of Orthopaedic Research (JOR®), since its inception in 1983. A bibliometric analysis was completed for all manuscripts meeting the inclusion criteria (638), which were published throughout the inaugural year plus one representative year of each decade. Several parameters were investigated including numbers of manuscripts, authors, collaborating institutions/countries, references, pages, and citations; region of origin and gender of authors over time and by region were main focuses. Significant increases over time were observed in all bibliometric variables analyzed except in the number of pages and citations. There was an approximate 27% point increase for both female first and corresponding authors from 1983 to 2015. While this is most likely due to the increase in the number of women that have entered the field over time, similar increases in the percentage of women holding positions on the JOR editorial board or in leadership positions within in the field may have also contributed to improvements in gender parity. Understanding changes in publishing characteristics over time, by region, and by gender are critical, especially with the rising demands of publishing in academia. JOR has seen increase in most variables analyzed, including improvements in authorship by women in the field of orthopaedic research. © 2018 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 36:3071-3080, 2018.

Historical Analysis of Bibliometric Trends in the Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics With a Particular Focus on Sex.

BACKGROUND: Orthopaedics is the clinical discipline with the lowest percentage of female residents and faculty. Pediatric orthopaedics has a higher percentage of women than other orthopaedic subspecialties. It was the purpose of this study to examine bibliometric trends in the Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics (JPO) with a specific focus on sex. METHODS: A bibliometeric analysis for the years 2015, 2005, 1995, 1985, 1981 was performed. The names of first and corresponding authors; corresponding author position; country of origin; number of institutions, countries, authors, printed pages, and references was tabulated. Author sex was identified for the first and corresponding authors using the "Baby Name Guesser" (www.gpeters.com/names/baby-names.php). A P<0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: There were 746 publications; 68.7% were from North America. The average number of authors, corresponding author position, collaborating institutions, countries, and number of references increased, whereas the number of printed pages decreased. Asia had the greatest number of authors (4.4), with Australia/New Zealand the fewest (3.4). Sex was determined for 98.3% of the first authors and 98.5% of the corresponding authors. There was a significant increase in the number of female first authors over time (5.9% to 25.6%, P<10), especially in Europe and North America. There were significant increase in the number of female corresponding authors over time (5.8% to 17.6%, P=0.000009). There was a significant trend to have a greater percentage of both female first and corresponding authors over time (P=0.0005) with a reverse trend for both male first and corresponding authors (P<10). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we noted that the number of female first and corresponding authors in Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics has been steadily increasing. This should result in more female pediatric orthopaedic surgeons in academic faculty positions.

Bibliometric analysis of authorship trends and collaboration dynamics over the past three decades of BONE's publication history.

The existence of a gender gap in academia has been a hotly debated topic over the past several decades. It has been argued that due to the gender gap, it is more difficult for women to obtain higher positions. Manuscripts serve as an important measurement of one's accomplishments within a particular field of academia. Here, we analyzed, over the past 3 decades, authorship and other trends in manuscripts published in BONE, one of the premier journals in the field of bone and mineral metabolism. For this study, one complete year of manuscripts was evaluated (e.g. 1985, 1995, 2005, 2015) for each decade. A bibliometric analysis was then performed of authorship trends for those manuscripts. Analyzed fields included: average number of authors per manuscript, numerical position of the corresponding author, number of institutions collaborating on each manuscript, number of countries involved with each manuscript, number of references, and number of citations per manuscript. Each of these fields increased significantly over the 30-year time frame (p<10-6). The gender of both the first and corresponding authors was identified and analyzed over time and by region. There was a significant increase in the percentage of female first authors from 23.4% in 1985 to 47.8% in 2015 (p=0.001). The percentage of female corresponding authors also increased from 21.2% in 1985 to 35.4% in 2015 although it was not significant (p=0.07). With such a substantial emphasis being placed on publishing in academic medicine, it is crucial to comprehend the changes in publishing characteristics over time and geographical region. These findings highlight authorship trends in BONE over time as well as by region. Importantly, these findings also highlight where challenges still exist.

Bibliometric Analysis of Female Authorship Trends and Collaboration Dynamics Over JBMR's 30-Year History.

In academia, authorship is considered a currency and is important for career advancement. As the Journal of Bone and Mineral Research (JBMR) is the highest-ranked journal in the field of bone, muscle, and mineral metabolism and is the official publication of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, we sought to examine authorship changes over JBMR's 30-year history. Two bibliometric methods were used to collect the data. The "decade method" included all published manuscripts throughout 1 year in each decade over the past 30 years starting with the inaugural year, yielding 746 manuscripts for analysis. The "random method" examined 10% of published manuscripts from each of the 30 years, yielding 652 manuscripts for analysis. Using both methods, the average number of authors per manuscript, numerical location of the corresponding author, number of collaborating institutions, number of collaborating countries, number of printed manuscript pages, and the number of times each manuscript was cited all significantly increased between 1986 and 2015 (p < 10-4 ). Using the decade method, there was a significant increase in the percentage of female first authors over time from 35.8% in 1986 to 47.7% in 2015 (p = 0.02), and this trend was confirmed using the random method. The highest percentage of female first authors in 2015 was in Europe (60.0%), and Europe also had the most dramatic increase in female first authors over time (more than double in 2015 compared with 1986). Likewise, the overall number of female corresponding authors significantly increased during the past 30 years. With the increasing demands of publishing in academic medicine, understanding changes in publishing characteristics over time and by geographical region is important. These findings highlight JBMR's authorship trends over the past 30 years and demonstrate those countries having the most changes and where challenges still exist. © 2017 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.