Early unfractionated heparin treatment in patients with STEMI - trial design and rationale.

The early unfractionated heparin (UFH) treatment in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is a single-center, open-label, randomized controlled trial. The study population are patients with STEMI that undergo primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). The trial was designed to investigate whether early administration of unfractionated heparin immediately after diagnosis of STEMI is beneficial in terms of patency of infarct-related coronary artery (IRA) when compared to established UFH administration at the time of coronary intervention. The patients will be randomized in 1:1 fashion in one of the two groups. The primary efficacy endpoint of the study is Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grades 2 and 3 on diagnostic coronary angiography. Secondary outcome measures are: TIMI flow after PPCI, progression to cardiogenic shock, 30-day mortality, ST-segment resolution, highest Troponin I and Troponin I values at 24 hours. The safety outcome is bleeding complications. The study of early heparin administration in patients with STEMI will address whether pretreatment with UFH can increase the rate of spontaneous reperfusion of infarct-related coronary artery.

Case report: Treatment of tachycardia-induced cardiogenic shock with permanent His bundle pacing and atrioventricular node ablation.

Tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy (T-CMP) related to supraventricular arrhythmia is a rare and often unrecognized cause of refractory cardiogenic shock. When rhythm control interventions are ineffective or no longer pursued, atrioventricular node ablation (AVNA) with pacemaker implantation is indicated. Conduction system pacing provides normal synchronous activation of the ventricles after AVNA. However, there is a lack of data on pace and ablate strategy in hemodynamically unstable patients. We report on 2 patients with T-CMP presenting with refractory cardiogenic shock who were successfully treated with His bundle pacing in conjunction with AVNA.

Diagnostic challenge of Strongyloides stercoralis hyperinfection syndrome: a case report.

Strongyloides stercoralis causes chronic, mostly asymptomatic infections but hyperinfection syndrome may occur in immunosuppressed patients, especially in those receiving corticosteroids. We report a case of S. stercoralis hyperinfection syndrome in a solid organ transplant recipient that occurred approximately 2.5 months after heart transplantation. The patient presented to the intensive care unit with acute respiratory distress, bacteremia, and petechial rash on abdomen and toe. Microbiology testing of respiratory samples excluded infection with Pneumocystis jirovecii, respiratory viruses, pathogenic bacteria and fungi. No eosinophilia was found. Histopathological examination of the skin biopsy of the petechial rash provided the first indication of the diagnosis, revealing the presence of isolated filariform S. stercoralis larvae in the dermis. Subsequent microbiology testing confirmed the diagnosis. This case highlights the role of histopathological examination of a skin rash in diagnosing patients with atypical clinical presentation of Strongyloides hyperinfection syndrome.

A multicentre, prospective, randomised controlled trial to assess the safety and effectiveness of cooling as an adjunctive therapy to percutaneous intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction: the COOL AMI EU Pivotal Trial.

BACKGROUND: Despite primary PCI (PPCI), ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) can still result in large infarct size (IS). New technology with rapid intravascular cooling showed positive signals for reduction in IS in anterior STEMI. AIMS: We investigated the effectiveness and safety of rapid systemic intravascular hypothermia as an adjunct to PPCI in conscious patients, with anterior STEMI, without cardiac arrest. METHODS: Hypothermia was induced using the ZOLL® Proteus™ intravascular cooling system. After randomisation of 111 patients, 58 to hypothermia and 53 to control groups, the study was prematurely discontinued by the sponsor due to inconsistent patient logistics between the groups resulting in significantly longer total ischaemic delay in the hypothermia group (232 vs 188 minutes; p<0.001). RESULTS: There were no differences in angiographic features and PPCI result between the groups. Intravascular temperature at wire crossing was 33.3+0.9°C. Infarct size/left ventricular (IS/LV) mass by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) at day 4-6 was 21.3% in the hypothermia group and 20.0% in the control group (p=0.540). Major adverse cardiac events at 30 days increased non-significantly in the hypothermia group (8.6% vs 1.9%; p=0.117) while cardiogenic shock (10.3% vs 0%; p=0.028) and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (43.1% vs 3.8%; p<0.001) were significantly more frequent in the hypothermia group. CONCLUSIONS: The ZOLL Proteus intravascular cooling system reduced temperature to 33.3°C before PPCI in patients with anterior STEMI. Due to inconsistent patient logistics between the groups, this hypothermia protocol resulted in a longer ischaemic delay, did not reduce IS/LV mass and was associated with increased adverse events.

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation with Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in a Patient with Profound Accidental Hypothermia and Refractory Ventricular Fibrillation.

We describe a patient with severe accidental hypothermia (≤25.4°C) and prolonged refractory ventricular fibrillation, lasting at least 4 hours and 8 minutes, who underwent cardiopulmonary resuscitation with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and survived without neurologic deficit.

COOL AMI EU pilot trial: a multicentre, prospective, randomised controlled trial to assess cooling as an adjunctive therapy to percutaneous intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

AIMS: We aimed to investigate the rapid induction of therapeutic hypothermia using the ZOLL Proteus Intravascular Temperature Management System in patients with anterior ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) without cardiac arrest. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 50 patients were randomised; 22 patients (88%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 69-97%) in the hypothermia group and 23 patients (92%; 95% CI: 74-99) in the control group completed cardiac magnetic resonance imaging at four to six days and 30-day follow-up. Intravascular temperature at coronary guidewire crossing after 20.5 minutes of endovascular cooling decreased to 33.6°C (range 31.9-35.5°C). There was a 17-minute (95% CI: 4.6-29.8 min) cooling-related delay to reperfusion. In "per protocol" analysis, median infarct size/left ventricular mass was 16.7% in the hypothermia group versus 23.8% in the control group (absolute reduction 7.1%, relative reduction 30%; p=0.31) and median left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 42% in the hypothermia group and 40% in the control group (absolute reduction 2.4%, relative reduction 6%; p=0.36). Except for self-terminating paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (32% versus 8%; p=0.074), there was no excess of adverse events in the hypothermia group. CONCLUSIONS: We rapidly and safely cooled patients with anterior STEMI to 33.6°C at the time of coronary guidewire crossing. This is ≥1.1°C lower than in previous cooling studies. Except for self-terminating atrial fibrillation, there was no excess of adverse events and no clinically important cooling-related delay to reperfusion. A statistically non-significant numerical 7.1% absolute and 30% relative reduction in infarct size warrants a pivotal trial powered for efficacy.

Emergency percutaneous implantation of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in the catheterisation laboratory.

AIMS: Our aim was to describe our protocol for emergency percutaneous implantation of femoral veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) in the catheterisation laboratory and to compare its effectiveness and safety with implantation in the intensive care unit and the operating room. METHODS AND RESULTS: Our retrospective observational study enrolled 56 consecutive patients undergoing VA ECMO implantation in the catheterisation laboratory (n=23), the intensive care unit (n=8) and the operating room (n=25). Among patients undergoing catheterisation laboratory implantation, 11 patients had profound cardiogenic shock but preserved arterial pulsations, and 12 patients had refractory cardiac arrest undergoing automated mechanical chest compression. Using our fluoroscopy-guided protocol, arterial and venous cannulas were successfully implanted and the desired ECMO flow obtained in each patient. There was no vessel perforation/dissection. Moderate/severe GUSTO or BARC 3 and 5 bleeding occurred in 13%. Ipsilateral limb ischaemia occurred in one of eight patients (13%) with upfront perfusion sheath implantation, and in two of three patients (75%) in whom this strategy was not used (p=0.15). There was no infection at the site of cannula implantation. Complications related to implantation in the catheterisation laboratory were comparable to surgical implantation in the operating room and percutaneous implantation in the intensive care unit using ultrasound guidance. CONCLUSIONS: Fluoroscopy-guided emergency implantation of femoral VA ECMO by an interventional cardiologist in the catheterisation laboratory is effective and safe for both patients in cardiogenic shock and those in refractory cardiac arrest.

Heart rate-guided, but not dose-guided titration of beta blockers stabilizes ventricular repolarization in patients with chronic heart failure.

AIMS: We compared the effects of heart rate-guided and dose-guided beta-blocker titration strategies on QT variability in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). METHODS: In a prospective study we recorded 5-minute resting high-resolution ECGs (HRECG) in 100 patients with CHF and measured heart rate (HR) and ventricular repolarization by QT variability index (QTVI). In a subgroup of patients not reaching target HR (<70bpm) we uptitrated beta blockers and repeated HRECG measurements 3months thereafter. RESULTS: Target HR was present in 46 patients (group A), and in 54 patients HR was above target (group B). The groups did not differ in age, gender, NYHA class, NT pro-BNP, creatinine, or beta blocker dose. Patients in group A displayed significantly lower QTVI than patients in group B (-1.25±0.55 vs. -1.52±0.42, P=0.013). When uptitrating beta-blockers we found a decrease in HR (from 91±15bpm to 71±15bpm, P<0.001), NTpro BNP levels (from 4474±3878pg/ml to 3042±2566pg/ml, P=0.024), and NYHA class (from 3.0±0.8 to 2.5±0.7, P=0.006). With beta-blocker uptitration QTVI decreased in 10 of 24 patients (42%). In these patients HR decreased more than in the remaining cohort (-25±20bpm vs. -15±17bpm, P=0.017). On multivariate analysis, the presence of target HR was a predictor of QTVI decrease (P=0.017), but beta-blocker dose was not. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with CHF treated by beta-blockers, changes in QT variability appear to occur in parallel with changes of heart rate. This suggests that heart rate-guided titration of beta-blockers may be associated with decreased risk of sudden cardiac death.

The presence of electromechanical mismatch in nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy is associated with ventricular repolarization instability.

BACKGROUND: We analyzed electromechanical mismatch (EMM) and its relationship to ventricular repolarization in patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). METHODS AND RESULTS: In 39 DCM patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <40% and New York Heart Association functional class ≥III, electroanatomic mapping was used to quantify areas of EMM. High-resolution electrocardiograph was used to measure heart rate variability (HRV) and QT variability index (QTVI). EMM was present in 22 patients (56%, group 1), whereas 17 patients presented no mismatched segments (44%, group 2). The groups did not differ in age (56 ± 10 years in group 1 vs 57 ± 7 years in group 2; P = .82), sex (male: 82% vs 94%; P = .40), LVEF (27 ± 8% vs 25 ± 6%; P = .18), or N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (2,350 pg/mL vs 2,831 pg/mL; P = .32). Although heart rate and HRV were similar in both groups (rate: 80 ± 20 beats/min in group 1 vs 74 ± 19 beats/min in group 2 [P = .47]; standard deviation of normal-to normal RR intervals: 106 ± 79 vs 88 ± 115 [P = .61]), we found significantly higher QTVI values in patients from group 1 (-1.15 ± 0.46 vs -1.62 ± 0.51 in group 2; P = .005). In patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, ventricular arrhythmias recorded ≤1 year before enrollment were more frequent in group 1 than in group 2 (58% vs 13%; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: EMM is present in a majority of patients with DCM and is associated with ventricular repolarization instability.

Treatment of sepsis and ARDS with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and interventional lung assist membrane ventilator in a patient with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

We report an 18-year-old ice skater with acute lymphoblast leukemia. She developed Staphylococcus epidermidis bacteremia, severe sepsis, septic shock, and ARDS following chemotherapy-induced severe bone marrow failure. She was successfully treated with extraordinary life support measures, which included extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, double lumen lung ventilation for management of hemoptysis, and lung assist membrane ventilation. After 57 days of ICU treatment and a year of rehabilitation, the patient has fully regained her functional status, is now finishing high school, and is ice skating again.

Diabetes does not affect ventricular repolarization and sudden cardiac death risk in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: We studied the effects of diabetes on ventricular repolarization parameters and sudden cardiac death in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). METHODS: We enrolled 132 consecutive patients in New York Heart Association (NYHA) heart failure functional classes II or III and left ventricular ejection fraction <40% without evidence of coronary artery disease. In 45 patients (34%), diabetes was diagnosed according to standard criteria (study group), and the remaining 87 (66%) had no diabetes (controls). All patients underwent a 5-minute high-resolution electrocardiogram recording for determination of QT variability (QTV) index and were followed for 1 year thereafter. RESULTS: At baseline, the two groups did not differ in age, gender, left ventricular ejection fraction, NYHA functional class, or plasma brain natriuretic peptide levels. Similarly, QTV index did not differ between the study group (-0.51 +/- 0.55) and controls (-0.48 +/- 0.51; P = 0.48). During follow-up, 18 patients (14%) died of cardiac causes. Of the 18 deaths, eight were attributed to heart failure, and 10 to sudden cardiac death. Mortality was higher in the study group (10/45, 20%) than in controls (8/87, 10%) (P = 0.03). The same was true of the heart failure mortality (6/45 [13%] vs 2/87 [2%], P = 0.01), but not of the sudden cardiac death rate (3/45 [7%] vs 7/87 [8%], P = 0.78). By multiple variable analyses, diabetes predicted total and heart failure mortality, and a high QTV predicted sudden cardiac death. CONCLUSIONS: Diabetes appears to increase the risk of heart failure in patients with DCM without affecting ventricular repolarization parameters and sudden cardiac death risk.