Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
Anat Sci Educ ; 2024 Apr 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38563462

RESUMEN

Exploring student motivation to learn is a research area that has rapidly expanded over the past decade, especially as the COVID-19 pandemic continues to influence education. In the field of anatomy, most research about motivation to learn targets medical and other health professional students, but little is known about factors that drive students enrolled in science degrees. The aims of this mixed-methods study were to determine: (1) what motivates undergraduate university science students to learn anatomy, and whether motivation differs between cohorts (second- and third-year) and gender; and (2) the impact of COVID-19 on motivation to learn. Students (n = 171) completed a survey (the Science Motivation Questionnaire II [SMQII] and questions about learning experiences during the pandemic) and a subset (n = 12) participated in focus groups/interviews. Quantitative data were analyzed using a combination of parametric and non-parametric statistics, and a general inductive approach was applied to qualitative data. Grade, intrinsic, and career factors were consistently identified as the key components of motivation. No statistically significant differences were found for motivation components between level of study or gender. Students reported that the COVID-19 pandemic negatively impacted motivational components, but it had also fast-tracked the development of online learning, with both positive and negative connotations. Students value traditional in-person lectures but support a blended approach of traditional and online teaching methods for learning anatomy. Educators should utilize these findings when considering how to teach and support science students in ways that embrace motivational components to foster success in those studying anatomy.

2.
Musculoskelet Sci Pract ; 48: 102151, 2020 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32560859

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Symphyseal pain (SP) experienced during pregnancy is a common condition that can negatively influence function and wellbeing. Despite its adverse impact on quality of life, standardised diagnostic criteria for SP as a distinct type of pelvic girdle pain (PGP) are lacking. OBJECTIVES: To develop a reliable self-administered instrument that could differentiate SP from posterior PGP in pregnant women, and ultimately be used for epidemiological or clinical purposes. METHOD: Qualitative data from 17 women (four focus groups) were used to develop a questionnaire. The questionnaire was tested against physical therapy diagnoses based on clinical assessment in 122 pregnant women with SP (n = 41), posterior PGP (n = 41) or no PGP (n = 40); 30 women repeated the questionnaire a day later to assess reliability. Multinomial logistic regression models were used to assess the performance of candidate items in distinguishing between the groups. RESULTS/FINDINGS: The single questionnaire item relating to location of worst pain (diagrammatic form) is useful for differentiating SP from posterior PGP and individuals with no PGP. The worst pain location question with the addition of the Pelvic Girdle Questionnaire provides a measure of "SP with impact", and is the best combination for distinguishing SP and posterior PGP. Test-retest reliability scores were excellent. CONCLUSION: These findings provide new opportunities for diagnosing pregnancy-related SP, and highlight questionnaire items which best differentiate SP from posterior PGP. These items could be used in future epidemiological research, and in clinical settings as a quick, effective screening tool.


Asunto(s)
Complicaciones del Embarazo , Calidad de Vida , Femenino , Humanos , Dolor , Dimensión del Dolor , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/diagnóstico , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Autoinforme , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
3.
Anat Sci Educ ; 13(3): 284-300, 2020 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32306555

RESUMEN

Australian and New Zealand universities commenced a new academic year in February/March 2020 largely with "business as usual." The subsequent Covid-19 pandemic imposed unexpected disruptions to anatomical educational practice. Rapid change occurred due to government-imposed physical distancing regulations from March 2020 that increasingly restricted anatomy laboratory teaching practices. Anatomy educators in both these countries were mobilized to adjust their teaching approaches. This study on anatomy education disruption at pandemic onset within Australia and New Zealand adopts a social constructivist lens. The research question was "What are the perceived disruptions and changes made to anatomy education in Australia and New Zealand during the initial period of the Covid-19 pandemic, as reflected on by anatomy educators?." Thematic analysis to elucidate "the what and why" of anatomy education was applied to these reflections. About 18 anatomy academics from ten institutions participated in this exercise. The analysis revealed loss of integrated "hands-on" experiences, and impacts on workload, traditional roles, students, pedagogy, and anatomists' personal educational philosophies. The key opportunities recognized for anatomy education included: enabling synchronous teaching across remote sites, expanding offerings into the remote learning space, and embracing new pedagogies. In managing anatomy education's transition in response to the pandemic, six critical elements were identified: community care, clear communications, clarified expectations, constructive alignment, community of practice, ability to compromise, and adapt and continuity planning. There is no doubt that anatomy education has stepped into a yet unknown future in the island countries of Australia and New Zealand.


Asunto(s)
Anatomía/educación , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Australia/epidemiología , COVID-19 , Curriculum , Educación a Distancia , Humanos , Nueva Zelanda/epidemiología , Pandemias , Facultades de Medicina , Enseñanza
4.
Clin Anat ; 32(3): 396-407, 2019 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30592090

RESUMEN

The sacrotuberous ligament (STL) has been linked to conditions such as pelvic girdle pain and pudendal nerve entrapment, yet its contribution to pelvic stability is debated. The purpose of this review was to explore the current understanding of the STL and highlight any gaps in knowledge regarding its anatomy and function. A systematic search of the literature was conducted, focussing on the morphology and attachments of the STL, the relationship of the STL with surrounding structures, and its neurovascular supply and function. A total of 67 papers and four textbooks were obtained. The attachment sites of the STL are largely consistent; however, the extent of its connections with the long head of biceps femoris, gluteus maximus, piriformis, the posterior layer of the thoracolumbar fascia, and sacrospinous ligament are unclear. Morphometric parameters, such as mean STL length (6.4-9.4 cm), depth (0.3-0.4 cm), and width (1.8-3.5 cm, at its mid-point) are variable within and between studies, and little is known about potential side-, age-, or sex-related differences. The STL is pierced in several sites by the inferior and superior gluteal arteries, but information on its innervation pattern is sparse. Functionally, the STL may limit sacral nutation but it appears to have a limited contribution to pelvic stability. Some morphological aspects of the STL warrant further investigation, particularly its connections with surrounding structures, innervation pattern and function. Knowledge of the detailed anatomy and function of this ligament is important to better understanding its role in clinical conditions. Clin. Anat. 32:396-407, 2019. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.


Asunto(s)
Ligamentos Articulares/anatomía & histología , Pelvis/anatomía & histología , Fenómenos Biomecánicos , Nalgas/anatomía & histología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Articulación Sacroiliaca/anatomía & histología
5.
Anat Sci Educ ; 11(4): 325-335, 2018 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29205960

RESUMEN

Dissection has long been the accepted method for teaching anatomy to medical students. More recently, some educators have suggested that easier, cheaper, alternative methods are just as effective. But what do the students think? This paper aimed to identify what undergraduate medical students learn, how they cope, and what effects participating in dissection has on them as individuals. A cohort of 267 second year medical students at Otago Medical School were invited to complete three online surveys; before their first dissection laboratory class, after their first musculoskeletal system dissection and following the last semester of studying anatomy. Open-ended questions showcasing the attitudes, beliefs, and opinions on what dissection had taught the medical students over years two and three were analyzed. A general inductive approach was used and common emergent themes were identified. In total, 194 students completed the second, and 108 students completed the third questionnaire. Students commonly conveyed dissection as an appropriate and valuable educational tool, useful for teaching and learning anatomical knowledge and relationships, appreciating the body in three-dimension, teamwork, and how to cope with death/dead bodies. The noted effects of personal growth while participating in dissection were highly varied, but in general, impacted positively on the majority of students. This study shows that at Otago Medical School the students also believe that dissection is not only a useful tool to learn anatomy but also that it fosters teamwork, assists professional development and helps them come to terms with death and dying. Anat Sci Educ 11: 325-335. © 2017 American Association of Anatomists.


Asunto(s)
Anatomía/educación , Disección/educación , Educación de Pregrado en Medicina/métodos , Estudiantes de Medicina/psicología , Adolescente , Adulto , Cadáver , Estudios de Cohortes , Curriculum , Disección/economía , Evaluación Educacional , Femenino , Humanos , Aprendizaje , Masculino , Sistema Musculoesquelético/anatomía & histología , Facultades de Medicina/economía , Facultades de Medicina/organización & administración , Estudiantes de Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven
6.
Surg Radiol Anat ; 39(8): 849-857, 2017 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28258300

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Morphological data pertaining to the pelvis and lower extremity muscles are increasingly being used in biomechanical modeling to compare healthy and pathological conditions. Very few data sets exist that encompass all of the muscles of the lower limb, allowing for comparisons between regions. The aims of this study were to (a) provide physiological cross-sectional area (PCSA) data for the pelvic, thigh, and leg muscles in young, healthy participants, using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and (b) to compare these data with summarized PCSAs obtained from the literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six young and healthy volunteers participated and were scanned using 3 T MRI. PCSAs were calculated from volumetric segmentations obtained bilaterally of 28 muscles/muscle groups of the pelvis, thigh, and leg. These data were compared to published, summarized PCSA data derived from cadaveric, computed tomography, MRI and ultrasound studies. RESULTS: The PCSA of the pelvis, thigh, and leg muscles tended to be 20-130% larger in males than in females, except for the gemelli which were 34% smaller in males, and semitendinosus and triceps surae which did not differ (<20% different). The dominant and the non-dominant sides showed similar and minutely different PCSA with less than 18% difference between sides. Comparison to other studies revealed wide ranges within, and large differences between, the cadaveric and imaging PCSA data. Comparison of the PCSA of this study and published literature revealed major differences in the iliopsoas, gluteus minimus, tensor fasciae latae, gemelli, obturator internus, biceps femoris, quadriceps femoris, and the deep leg flexor muscles. CONCLUSIONS: These volume-derived PCSAs of the pelvic and lower limb muscles alongside the data synthesised from the literature may serve as a basis for comparative and biomechanical studies of the living and healthy young, and enable calculation of muscle forces. Comparison of the literature revealed large variations in PCSA from each of the different investigative modalities, hampering comparability between studies. Sample size, age, post-mortem changes of muscle tone, chemical fixation of cadaveric tissues, and the underlying physics of the imaging techniques may potentially influence PCSA calculations.


Asunto(s)
Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Músculo Esquelético/anatomía & histología , Pelvis/anatomía & histología , Muslo/anatomía & histología , Voluntarios Sanos , Humanos , Factores Sexuales
7.
Clin Anat ; 29(5): 590-605, 2016 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26749552

RESUMEN

Prader-Willi Syndrome (PWS) is estimated to affect 400,000 people worldwide. First described clinically in 1956, PWS is now known to be a result of a genetic mutation, involving Chromosome 15. The phenotypical appearance of individuals with the syndrome follows a similar developmental course. During infancy, universal hypotonia accompanied by feeding problems, hypogonadism, and dolichocephaly are evident. Characteristic facial features such as narrow bifrontal diameter, almond-shaped eyes, and small mouth (with downturned corners and thin upper lip) may also be evident at this stage. In early childhood, the craniofacial features become more obvious and a global developmental delay is observed. Simultaneously, individuals develop hyperphagia that leads to excessive or rapid weight gain, which, if untreated, exists throughout their lifespan and may predispose them to numerous, serious health issues. The standard tool for differential diagnosis of PWS is genetic screening; however, clinicians also need to be aware of the characteristic features of this disorder, including differences between the genetic subtypes. As the clinical manifestations of the syndrome vary between individuals and become evident at different developmental time points, early assessment is hindered. This article focuses on the clinical and anatomical manifestations of the syndrome and highlights the areas of discrepancy and limitations within the existing literature. Clin. Anat. 29:590-605, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Prader-Willi/patología , Dentición , Facies , Humanos , Hipopigmentación/etiología , Anomalías Musculoesqueléticas/etiología , Fenotipo , Síndrome de Prader-Willi/complicaciones , Síndrome de Prader-Willi/fisiopatología , Visión Ocular
8.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 15: 36, 2015 Feb 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25885585

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pregnancy-related pubic symphysis pain is relatively common and can significantly interfere with daily activities. Physiotherapist-prescribed pelvic support belts are a treatment option, but little evidence exists to support their use. This pilot compared two pelvic belts to determine effectiveness (symptomatic relief), tolerance (comfort) and adherence (frequency, duration of use). METHODS: Unblinded, 2-arm, single-center, randomized (1:1) parallel-group trial. Twenty pregnant women recruited from the community (Dunedin, New Zealand), with physiotherapist-diagnosed symphyseal pain, were randomly allocated to wear either a flexible or rigid belt for three weeks. One author, not involved in data collection, randomized the allocation to trial group. The unblinded primary outcome was the Patient Specific Functional Scale (PSFS). Secondary outcomes were pain intensity during the preceding 24 hours and preceding week (visual analogue scale [VAS]), and disability (Modified Oswestry Disability Questionnaire [MODQ]). Duration of use (hours) was recorded daily by text messaging. Participants were assessed at baseline, by weekly phone interviews and at intervention completion (three weeks). To assess comfort, women wore the alternate belt in the fourth week. RESULTS: Twenty pregnant women (mean ± SD age, 29.4 ± 6.5 years; mean gestation at baseline, 30.8 ± 5.2 weeks) were randomized to treatment groups (flexible = 10, rigid =10) and all were included in analysis. When adjusted for baseline, PSFS scores were not significantly different between groups at follow up (mean difference -0.1; 95% CI: -2.5 to 2.3; p =0.94). Pain in the preceding 24 hours reached statistical significance in favor of the flexible belt (VAS, p = 0.049). Combining both groups' data, function and pain were significantly improved at three weeks (mean difference -2.3; 95% CI: 1.2 to 3.5; p< 0.001). Belts were worn for an average of 4.9 ± 2.9 hours per day; women preferred the flexible belt. No adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: These preliminary results suggest the flexible pelvic support belt may be more effective in reducing pain and is potentially better tolerated than a rigid belt. Based on these data, a larger trial is both feasible and clinically useful. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) ACTRN12614000898651 , 25th August, 2014.


Asunto(s)
Tirantes , Manejo del Dolor , Cooperación del Paciente , Prioridad del Paciente , Dolor de Cintura Pélvica , Complicaciones del Embarazo , Actividades Cotidianas , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Manejo del Dolor/instrumentación , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Dimensión del Dolor , Dolor de Cintura Pélvica/diagnóstico , Dolor de Cintura Pélvica/etiología , Dolor de Cintura Pélvica/fisiopatología , Dolor de Cintura Pélvica/terapia , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/diagnóstico , Complicaciones del Embarazo/etiología , Complicaciones del Embarazo/fisiopatología , Complicaciones del Embarazo/terapia , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...