Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Trials ; 25(1): 424, 2024 Jun 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38943204

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Most patients starting chronic in-center hemodialysis (HD) receive conventional hemodialysis (CHD) with three sessions per week targeting specific biochemical clearance. Observational studies suggest that patients with residual kidney function can safely be treated with incremental prescriptions of HD, starting with less frequent sessions and later adjusting to thrice-weekly HD. This trial aims to show objectively that clinically matched incremental HD (CMIHD) is non-inferior to CHD in eligible patients. METHODS: An unblinded, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial will be conducted across diverse healthcare systems and dialysis organizations in the USA. Adult patients initiating chronic hemodialysis (HD) at participating centers will be screened. Eligibility criteria include receipt of fewer than 18 treatments of HD and residual kidney function defined as kidney urea clearance ≥3.5 mL/min/1.73 m2 and urine output ≥500 mL/24 h. The 1:1 randomization, stratified by site and dialysis vascular access type, assigns patients to either CMIHD (intervention group) or CHD (control group). The CMIHD group will be treated with twice-weekly HD and adjuvant pharmacologic therapy (i.e., oral loop diuretics, sodium bicarbonate, and potassium binders). The CHD group will receive thrice-weekly HD according to usual care. Throughout the study, patients undergo timed urine collection and fill out questionnaires. CMIHD will progress to thrice-weekly HD based on clinical manifestations or changes in residual kidney function. Caregivers of enrolled patients are invited to complete semi-annual questionnaires. The primary outcome is a composite of patients' all-cause death, hospitalizations, or emergency department visits at 2 years. Secondary outcomes include patient- and caregiver-reported outcomes. We aim to enroll 350 patients, which provides ≥85% power to detect an incidence rate ratio (IRR) of 0.9 between CMIHD and CHD with an IRR non-inferiority of 1.20 (α = 0.025, one-tailed test, 20% dropout rate, average of 2.06 years of HD per patient participant), and 150 caregiver participants (of enrolled patients). DISCUSSION: Our proposal challenges the status quo of HD care delivery. Our overarching hypothesis posits that CMIHD is non-inferior to CHD. If successful, the results will positively impact one of the highest-burdened patient populations and their caregivers. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT05828823. Registered on 25 April 2023.


Asunto(s)
Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Diálisis Renal , Humanos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Factores de Tiempo , Investigación sobre la Eficacia Comparativa , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Estudios de Equivalencia como Asunto , Estados Unidos , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Fallo Renal Crónico/diagnóstico
2.
Am J Kidney Dis ; 80(2): 227-240.e1, 2022 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34933066

RESUMEN

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Thrice-weekly hemodialysis (HD) is the most common treatment modality for kidney failure in the United States. We conducted a pilot study to assess the feasibility and safety of incremental-start HD in patients beginning maintenance HD. STUDY DESIGN: Pilot study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Adults with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥5 mL/min/1.73 m2 and urine volume ≥500 mL/d beginning maintenance HD at 14 outpatient dialysis units. EXPOSURE: Randomized allocation (1:1 ratio) to twice-weekly HD and adjuvant pharmacologic therapy for 6 weeks followed by thrice-weekly HD (incremental HD group) or thrice-weekly HD (conventional HD group). OUTCOME: The primary outcome was feasibility. Secondary outcomes included changes in urine volume and solute clearance. RESULTS: Of 77 patients invited to participate, 51 consented to do so, representing 66% of eligible patients. We randomized 23 patients to the incremental HD group and 25 patients to the conventional HD group. Protocol-based loop diuretics, sodium bicarbonate, and patiromer were prescribed to 100%, 39%, and 17% of patients on twice-weekly HD, respectively. At a mean follow-up of 281.9 days, participant adherence was 96% to the HD schedule (22 of 23 and 24 of 25 in the incremental and conventional groups, respectively) and 100% in both groups to serial timed urine collection. The incidence rate ratio for all-cause hospitalization was 0.31 (95% CI, 0.08-1.17); and 7 deaths were recorded (1 in the incremental and 6 in the conventional group). At week 24, the incremental HD group had lower declines in urine volume (a difference of 51.0 [95% CI, -0.7 to 102.8] percentage points) and in the averaged urea and creatinine clearances (a difference of 57.9 [95% CI, -22.6 to 138.4] percentage points). LIMITATIONS: Small sample size, time-limited twice-weekly HD. CONCLUSIONS: It is feasible to enroll patients beginning maintenance HD into a randomized study of incremental-start HD with adjuvant pharmacotherapy who adhere to the study protocol during follow-up. Larger multicenter clinical trials are indicated to determine the efficacy and safety of incremental HD with longer twice-weekly HD periods. FUNDING: Funding was provided by Vifor Inc. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT03740048.


Asunto(s)
Fallo Renal Crónico , Adulto , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Proyectos Piloto , Diálisis Renal/métodos , Urea
3.
BMJ Open ; 11(5): e047596, 2021 05 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34031117

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The optimal haemodialysis (HD) prescription-frequency and dose-for patients with incident dialysis-dependent kidney disease (DDKD) and substantial residual kidney function (RKF)-that is, renal urea clearance ≥2 mL/min/1.73 m2 and urine volume ≥500 mL/day-is not known. The aim of the present study is to test the feasibility and safety of a simple, reliable prescription of incremental HD in patients with incident DDKD and RKF. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This parallel-group, open-label randomised pilot trial will enrol 50 patients from 14 outpatient dialysis units. Participants will be randomised (1:1) to receive twice-weekly HD with adjuvant pharmacological therapy for 6 weeks followed by thrice-weekly HD (incremental HD group) or outright thrice-weekly HD (standard HD group). Age ≥18 years, chronic kidney disease progressing to DDKD and urine output ≥500 mL/day are key inclusion criteria; patients with left ventricular ejection fraction <30% and acute kidney injury requiring dialysis will be excluded. Adjuvant pharmacological therapy (ie, effective diuretic regimen, patiromer and sodium bicarbonate) will complement twice-weekly HD. The primary feasibility end points are recruitment rate, adherence to the assigned HD regimen, adherence to serial timed urine collections and treatment contamination. Incidence rate of clinically significant volume overload and metabolic imbalances in the first 3 months after randomisation will be used to assess intervention safety. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Wake Forest School of Medicine in North Carolina, USA. Patient recruitment began on 14 June 2019, was paused between 13 March 2020 and 31 May 2020 due to COVID-19 pandemic, resumed on 01 June 2020 and will last until the required sample size has been attained. Participants will be followed in usual care fashion for a minimum of 6 months from last individual enrolled. All regulations and measures of ethics and confidentiality are handled in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03740048; Pre-results.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Enfermedades Renales , Fallo Renal Crónico , Adolescente , Humanos , Riñón , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , North Carolina , Pandemias , Diálisis Renal , SARS-CoV-2 , Volumen Sistólico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Función Ventricular Izquierda
4.
Clin Nephrol ; 92(4): 165-173, 2019 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31347496

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Incremental hemodialysis (HD) is seldom prescribed in the United States. This study describes longitudinal changes in volume management in patients with incident end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) initiated on bi-weekly (twice a week) HD, later converted to thrice-weekly HD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 23 patients (mean age 65.6 years, 48% male, and 30% black) were included. Repeated measurement analysis of regression was used to test for differences in interdialytic weight gain (IDWG) and ultrafiltration rate (UFR) over three dialysis periods: the first 3 months of bi-weekly HD, the last 3 months of bi-weekly HD, and the first 3 months of thrice-weekly HD. RESULTS: The mean transition time to thrice-weekly HD was 332.9 days. Compared to the first 3 months of HD, the IDWG and UFR increased by 0.6 kg and 2.2 mL/kg/h in the last 3 months of bi-weekly HD (p = 0.02 and 0.009, respectively) and by 0.7 kg and 2.1 mL/kg/h in the first 3 months of thrice-weekly HD (p = 0.002). The average proportion of patients with IDWG > 5.7% of the dry weight was 0% in the first 3 months of bi-weekly HD, 12% in the last 3 months of bi-weekly HD, and 4% in the first 3 months of thrice-weekly HD; while the average proportion of patients with UFR > 10 mL/kg/h was 16%, 39%, and 25%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Fluid management in incident-ESKD patients receiving bi-weekly HD deteriorates prior to conversion to thrice-weekly HD. Further studies are needed to optimize the prescription of incremental HD.


Asunto(s)
Fluidoterapia/métodos , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Diálisis Renal/métodos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ultrafiltración , Aumento de Peso
5.
Am J Nephrol ; 38(6): 453-7, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24280773

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Population ancestry-based differences exist in genetic risk for many kidney diseases. Substantial debate remains regarding returning genetic test results to participants. African-Americans (AAs) and European-Americans (EAs) at risk for end-stage kidney disease were queried for views on the value and use of genetic testing in research. METHODS: A standardized survey regarding attitudes toward genetic testing was administered to 130 individuals (64 AA, 66 EA) with first-degree relatives on dialysis. Fisher's exact test was used to assess differences in participant attitudes between population groups. RESULTS: Mean (SD) age of surveyed AAs and EAs was 45.5 (12.8) and 50.5 (14.4) years, respectively (p = 0.04), with similar familial relationships (p = 0.22). AAs and EAs wished to know their test results if risk could be: (1) reduced by diet or exercise (100 and 98%, p = 0.99); (2) reduced by medical treatment (100 and 98%, p = 0.99), or (3) if no treatments were available (90 and 82%, p = 0.21). If informed they lacked a disease susceptibility variant, 87% of AAs and 88% of EAs would be extremely or pretty likely to inform family members (p = 0.84). If informed they had a disease susceptibility variant, 92% of AAs and 89% of EAs would be extremely or pretty likely to inform their family (p = 0.43). CONCLUSIONS: Attitudes toward obtaining and using genetic test results for disease in research contexts were similar in AAs and EAs at risk for end-stage kidney disease. A substantial majority would want information regardless of available treatments and would share the information with the family. These results have important implications for patient care, study design and the informed consent process.


Asunto(s)
Actitud Frente a la Salud , Pruebas Genéticas , Fallo Renal Crónico/diagnóstico , Fallo Renal Crónico/genética , Negro o Afroamericano , Dieta , Ejercicio Físico , Salud de la Familia , Femenino , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Humanos , Masculino , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Diálisis Renal , Riesgo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos , Población Blanca
6.
Clin Transplant ; 27(4): E498-503, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23781870

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Relationships between race/ethnicity, recipient medical insurance, and living donor kidney transplantation (LKT) are incompletely described. METHODS: Associations between medical insurance and LKT were assessed in 447 recipients at a southeastern US transplant center. Primary and secondary payers were included in the analyses. RESULTS: A total of 387 deceased donor transplantations and 60 LKTs were performed in 246 (55%) European American (EA), 175 (39.2%) African American (AA), 15 (3.4%) Asian, and 11 (2.5%) Hispanic recipients. Among recipients, 182 (40.8%) were privately insured, 125 (28%) had Medicaid, and the remainder had Medicare, Medicare supplements, or Medicare replacement policies. A higher proportion of patients with private insurance, relative to those without private insurance, received LKT (22% vs. 7.6%, p < 0.0001). Among ethnic groups, LKT with, vs. without, private insurance was 27.5% vs. 12.4% in EAs (p = 0.0028) and 14.3% vs. 0.9% in AAs (p = 0.0005). Medicaid recipients (n = 125) were less likely to receive LKT than those without Medicaid (4.8% vs. 16.8%, p = 0.0003). Among the 69 AA recipients with Medicaid, none received LKT (0 Medicaid vs. 9.5% without Medicaid, p = 0.0065). CONCLUSIONS: Recipient insurance status is associated with LKT, positively with private insurance and negatively with Medicaid. AAs were impacted to a greater extent, potentially contributing to lower rates of LKT.


Asunto(s)
Etnicidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Cobertura del Seguro , Fallo Renal Crónico/cirugía , Trasplante de Riñón , Donadores Vivos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/economía , Fallo Renal Crónico/etnología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...