Pandemic Responsiveness in an Acute Care Setting: A Community Hospital's Utilization of Operational Resources During COVID-19.

Background: To ensure continuity of services while mitigating patient surge and nosocomial infections during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, acute care hospitals have been required to make significant operational adjustments. Here, we identify and discuss key administrative priorities and strategies utilized by a large community hospital located in Ontario, Canada. Methods: Guided by a qualitative descriptive approach, we performed a thematic analysis of all COVID-19-related documentation discussed by the hospital's emergency operation centre (EOC) during the pandemic's first wave. We then solicited operational strategies from a multidisciplinary group of hospital leaders to construct a narrative for each theme. Results: Seven recurrent themes critical to the hospital's pandemic response emerged: 1) Organizational structure: a modified EOC structure was adopted to increase departmental interoperability and situational awareness; 2) Capacity planning: Design Thinking guided rapid infrastructure decisions to meet surge requirements; 3) Occupational health and workplace safety: a multidisciplinary team provided respirator fit-testing, critical absence adjudication, and wellness needs; 4) Human resources/workforce planning: new workforce planning, recruitment, and redeployment strategies addressed staffing shortages; 5) Personal protective equipment (PPE): PPE conservation required proactive sourcing from traditional and non-traditional suppliers; 6) Community response: local partnerships were activated to divert patients through a non-referral-based assessment and treatment centre, support long-term care and retirement homes, and establish a 70-bed field hospital; and 7) Corporate communication: a robust communication strategy provided timely and transparent access to rapidly evolving information. Conclusion: A community hospital's operational preparedness for COVID-19 was supported by inter-operability, leveraging internal and external expertise and partnerships, creative problem solving, and developing novel tools to support occupational health and community initiatives.

Extended-Release Once-Daily Formulation of Tofacitinib: Evaluation of Pharmacokinetics Compared With Immediate-Release Tofacitinib and Impact of Food.

Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. An extended-release (XR) formulation has been designed to provide a once-daily (QD) dosing option to patients to achieve comparable pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters to the twice-daily immediate-release (IR) formulation. We conducted 2 randomized, open-label, phase 1 studies in healthy volunteers. Study A characterized single-dose and steady-state PK of tofacitinib XR 11 mg QD and intended to demonstrate equivalence of exposure under single-dose and steady-state conditions to tofacitinib IR 5 mg twice daily. Study B assessed the effect of a high-fat meal on the bioavailability of tofacitinib from the XR formulation. Safety and tolerability were monitored in both studies. In study A (N = 24), the XR and IR formulations achieved time to maximum plasma concentration at 4 hours and 0.5 hours postdose, respectively; terminal half-life was 5.9 hours and 3.2 hours, respectively. Area under plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax ) after single- and multiple-dose administration were equivalent between the XR and IR formulations. In study B (N = 24), no difference in AUC was observed for fed vs fasted conditions. Cmax increased by 27% under the fed state. On repeat administration, negligible accumulation (<20%) of systemic exposures was observed for both formulations. Steady state was achieved within 48 hours of dosing with the XR formulation. Tofacitinib administration as an XR or IR formulation was generally well tolerated in these studies.

A phase 3 randomized, double-blind, multicenter comparative study evaluating the effect of etanercept versus methotrexate on radiographic outcomes, disease activity, and safety in Japanese subjects with active rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this phase 3, double-blind study was to compare the radiographic and clinical effects of etanercept (ETN) versus methotrexate (MTX) over 52 weeks in Japanese subjects with active rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: The study population comprised 550 subjects with inadequate response to ≥1 disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs who were randomized to treatment groups of ETN 25 mg twice weekly (BIW; n = 182), ETN 10 mg BIW (n = 192), or MTX (≤8.0 mg/week; n = 176). RESULTS: Of the 550 subjects initially enrolled in the three treatment groups, 21.6% discontinued the study; a significantly higher proportion of those who withdrew from the study due to lack of efficacy were in the MTX (21.6%) group compared with the ETN 25 mg (3.3%) and ETN 10 mg (6.8%) groups (P < 0.001). Mean change from baseline in the modified total Sharp score at week 52 (primary endpoint) was significantly lower in the ETN 25 mg [3.33; standard error (SE), 0.73] and ETN 10 mg (5.19; SE 0.93) groups than in the MTX group (9.82; SE 1.16; P < 0.0001 vs. either ETN group). Compared with subjects receiving MTX, significantly higher percentages of subjects treated with ETN 25 and 10 mg achieved American College of Rheumatology (ACR) ACR20 and ACR50 response rates at all time points (P < 0.01). ETN was well-tolerated, with no unexpected safety findings. CONCLUSIONS: ETN 25 mg BIW and ETN 10 mg BIW slowed radiographic progression and improved clinical outcomes more effectively than MTX in this Japanese population.

Safety and efficacy of long-term etanercept in the treatment of methotrexate-refractory polyarticular-course juvenile idiopathic arthritis in Japan.

OBJECTIVES: Previous short-term trials found etanercept (0.2 or 0.4 mg/kg) to be effective and well tolerated in Japanese children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) who were intolerant/resistant to methotrexate. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of etanercept in Japanese children with JIA. METHODS: Patients (4-19 years) who received etanercept in one of three short-term studies continued onto this long-term open-label study. RESULTS: Of the 32 patients enrolled, 18 (56.3%) completed 192 weeks of the study and 14 (43.8%) were discontinued; 7 (21.9%) for patient refusal, 2 (6.3%) for adverse events (AEs), and 5 (15.6%) for lack of efficacy. All patients reported AEs; 31 (96.9%) reported infections and 6 (18.8%) reported serious AEs. Main efficacy assessments included change from baseline in the American College of Rheumatology Pediatric core components, including mean improvements from baseline in the physician global assessment (90.7%), patient/guardian global assessments (54.1%), Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (84.6%), and median improvements in C-reactive protein levels (92.7%). No unexpected safety results were reported, and early efficacy responses were sustained in the long term. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides further evidence that etanercept is an effective therapeutic option for Japanese children with polyarticular-course JIA.

Etanercept in the treatment of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD)-refractory polyarticular course juvenile idiopathic arthritis: experience from Japanese clinical trials.

Efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics results from 4 studies-3 open-label (OL) and 1 randomized double-blind (DB)-have provided data for approval of etanercept for treatment of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD)-refractory juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) in Japan. Results from the 3 shorter-term (2 OL and 1 DB) studies are reported here. Subjects (4-17 years) enrolled in the OL studies had active JIA, i.e. ≥5 swollen joints and ≥3 joints with limitation of motion and pain or tenderness. Subjects enrolled in the primary OL study received etanercept 0.4 mg/kg subcutaneously twice weekly; in the lower-dose OL study subjects received etanercept 0.2 mg/kg. Subjects in the primary OL study who completed ≥48 weeks could continue into a 12-week DB dose-down extension study in which subjects received etanercept 0.4 or 0.2 mg/kg twice weekly. The primary endpoint in all 3 studies, i.e. 30% improvement in the American College of Rheumatology criteria for JIA (ACR Pedi 30) at 12 weeks, was achieved by ≥80% of subjects by week 2 and sustained to week 12. Common adverse events reported were injection site reactions, nasopharyngitis, and gastroenteritis. These results provide further evidence that etanercept is effective therapy for DMARD-refractory polyarticular JIA patients.