Intrauterine Device Placement Success for Adolescents and Young Adults at Community-Based Reproductive Health Clinics.

BACKGROUND: Despite the endorsement of intrauterine device (IUD) use in adolescents and young adults (AYAs) by leading professional organizations and demonstrated acceptance and desirability by AYAs, clinicians may worry about the procedural difficulty of IUD device placement in younger patients. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of first-attempt IUD placement in an AYA population by vaginal delivery (VD) history. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients under 25 years old at reproductive health clinics with an IUD placement attempt between January 1 and August 31, 2017. We abstracted sociodemographic characteristics, pregnancy history, and procedural characteristics including complications. Bivariate analyses compared successful first-attempt IUD placement by VD history. We also assessed the frequency of secondary clinical outcomes including ancillary measures used, provider type, symptoms reported during the procedure, and complications. RESULTS: We included 1325 participants (median age = 21.3 years), including 42 (3.2%) with a previous VD. Nearly all IUD placements were successful on the first attempt (n = 1301, 98.2%) and performed by advanced practice clinicians (n = 1314, 99.2%). First-attempt IUD placement success was similar in those participants with and without VD (P > .999). Ancillary measures other than nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were used infrequently (n = 16, 3.6%). Among participants with an unsuccessful placement, 66.7% returned, and all had a successful IUD placement on the second attempt. Documented complications within 6 months of placement were rare (n = 29) and mostly comprised expulsions (n = 27, 93.1%). CONCLUSION: IUD placement success among AYAs at community-based reproductive health clinics is high and is not associated with a history of VD.

Effect of sublingual application of cannabinoids on intraocular pressure: a pilot study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the effect on intraocular pressure (IOP) and the safety and tolerability of oromucosal administration of a low dose of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Delta-9-THC) and cannabidiol (CBD). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled, 4 way crossover study was conducted at a single center, using cannabis-based medicinal extract of Delta-9-THC and CBD. Six patients with ocular hypertension or early primary open angle glaucoma received a single sublingual dose at 8 AM of 5 mg Delta-9-THC, 20 mg CBD, 40 mg CBD, or placebo. Main outcome measure was IOP. Secondary outcomes included visual acuity, vital signs, and psychotropic effects. RESULTS: Two hours after sublingual administration of 5 mg Delta-9-THC, the IOP was significantly lower than after placebo (23.5 mm Hg vs. 27.3 mm Hg, P=0.026). The IOP returned to baseline level after the 4-hour IOP measurement. CBD administration did not reduce the IOP at any time. However, the higher dose of CBD (40 mg) produced a transient elevation of IOP at 4 hours after administration, from 23.2 to 25.9 mm Hg (P=0.028). Vital signs and visual acuity were not significantly changed. One patient experienced a transient and mild paniclike reaction after Delta-9-THC administration. CONCLUSIONS: A single 5 mg sublingual dose of Delta-9-THC reduced the IOP temporarily and was well tolerated by most patients. Sublingual administration of 20 mg CBD did not reduce IOP, whereas 40 mg CBD produced a transient increase IOP rise.