Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt ; 44(2): 258-269, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38062894

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: This retrospective analysis of electronic medical record (EMR) data investigated the natural history of myopic progression in children from optometric practices in Ireland. METHODS: The analysis was of myopic patients aged 7-17 with multiple visits and not prescribed myopia control treatment. Sex- and age-specific population centiles for annual myopic progression were derived by fitting a weighted cubic spline to empirical quantiles. These were compared to progression rates derived from control group data obtained from 17 randomised clinical trials (RCTs) for myopia. Linear mixed models (LMMs) were used to allow comparison of myopia progression rates against outputs from a predictive online calculator. Survival analysis was performed to determine the intervals at which a significant level of myopic progression was predicted to occur. RESULTS: Myopia progression was highest in children aged 7 years (median: -0.67 D/year) and progressively slowed with increasing age (median: -0.18 D/year at age 17). Female sex (p < 0.001), a more myopic SER at baseline (p < 0.001) and younger age (p < 0.001) were all found to be predictive of faster myopic progression. Every RCT exhibited a mean progression higher than the median centile observed in the EMR data, while clinic-based studies more closely matched the median progression rates. The LMM predicted faster myopia progression for patients with higher baseline myopia levels, in keeping with previous studies, which was in contrast to an online calculator that predicted slower myopia progression for patients with higher baseline myopia. Survival analysis indicated that at a recall period of 12 months, myopia will have progressed in between 10% and 70% of children, depending upon age. CONCLUSIONS: This study produced progression centiles of untreated myopic children, helping to define the natural history of untreated myopia. This will enable clinicians to better predict both refractive outcomes without treatment and monitor treatment efficacy, particularly in the absence of axial length data.


Asunto(s)
Miopía , Adolescente , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Miopía/terapia , Refracción Ocular , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Pruebas de Visión , Masculino , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
2.
Acta Ophthalmol ; 102(3): e245-e256, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37694816

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The Myopia Outcome Study of Atropine in Children (MOSAIC) is an investigator-led, double-masked, randomized controlled trial investigating the efficacy and safety of 0.01% atropine eye drops for managing myopia progression in a predominantly White, European population. METHODS: Children aged 6-16 years with myopia were randomly allocated 2:1 to nightly 0.01% atropine or placebo eye drops in both eyes for 2 years. The primary outcome was cycloplegic spherical equivalent (SE) progression at 24 months. Secondary outcomes included axial length (AL) change, safety and acceptability. Linear mixed models with random intercepts were used for statistical analyses. RESULTS: Of 250 participants enrolled, 204 (81.6%) completed the 24-month visit (136 (81.4%) treatment, 68 (81.9%) placebo). Baseline characteristics, drop-out and adverse event rates were similar between treatment and control groups. At 24 months, SE change was not significantly different between 0.01% atropine and placebo groups (effect = 0.10 D, p = 0.07), but AL growth was lower in the 0.01% atropine group, compared to the placebo group (-0.07 mm, p = 0.007). Significant treatment effects on SE (0.14 D, p = 0.049) and AL (-0.11 mm, p = 0.002) were observed in children of White, but not non-White (SE = 0.05 D, p = 0.89; AL = 0.008 mm, p = 0.93), ethnicity at 24 months. A larger treatment effect was observed in subjects least affected by COVID-19 restrictions (SE difference = 0.37 D, p = 0.005; AL difference = -0.17 mm, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Atropine 0.01% was safe, well-tolerated and effective in slowing axial elongation in this European population. Treatment efficacy varied by ethnicity and eye colour, and potentially by degree of COVID-19 public health restriction exposure during trial participation.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Miopía , Niño , Humanos , Atropina , Miopía/diagnóstico , Miopía/tratamiento farmacológico , Miopía/epidemiología , Refracción Ocular , Resultado del Tratamiento , Longitud Axial del Ojo , Soluciones Oftálmicas , Progresión de la Enfermedad , COVID-19/epidemiología
3.
Ophthalmol Sci ; 2(1): 100092, 2022 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36246180

RESUMEN

Purpose: To investigate whether spectacle lens sales data can be used to estimate the population distribution of refractive error among patients with ametropia and hence to estimate the current and future risk of vision impairment. Design: Cross-sectional study. Participants: A total of 141 547 436 spectacle lens sales records from an international European lens manufacturer between 1998 and 2016. Methods: Anonymized patient spectacle lens sales data, including refractive error information, was provided by a major European spectacle lens manufacturer. Data from the Gutenberg Health Survey was digitized to allow comparison of a representative, population-based sample with the spectacle lens sales data. A bootstrap analysis was completed to assess the comparability of both datasets. The expected level of vision impairment resulting from myopia at 75 years of age was calculated for both datasets using a previously published risk estimation equation combined with a saturation function. Main Outcome Measures: Comparability of spectacle lens sales data on refractive error with typical population surveys of refractive error and its potential usefulness to predict vision impairment resulting from refractive error. Results: Equivalent estimates of the population distribution of spherical equivalent refraction can be provided from spectacle lens data within limits. For myopia, the population distribution was equivalent to the Gutenberg Health Survey (≤ 5% deviation) for levels of -2.0 diopters (D) or less, whereas for hyperopia, the distribution was equivalent (≤ 5% deviation) for levels of +3.0 D or more. The estimated rates of vision impairment resulting from myopia were not statistically significantly different (chi-square, 182; degrees of freedom, 169; P = 0.234) between the spectacle lens dataset and Gutenberg Health Survey dataset. Conclusions: The distribution of refractive error and hence the risk of vision impairment resulting from refractive error within a population can be determined using spectacle lens sales data. Pooling this type of data from multiple industry sources could provide a cost-effective, timely, and globally representative mechanism for monitoring the evolving epidemiologic features of refractive error and associated vision impairment.

4.
Curr Eye Res ; 47(6): 953-962, 2022 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35179442

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Visual acuity (VA) assessment is the most commonly performed vision screening method for drivers. The standards and repeat assessment intervals used, however, are arbitrary, lack an evidence base and are highly variable across different countries. This study utilizes the power of Big Data to provide evidence-based recommendations for standardized driver vision screening. METHODS: Anonymized electronic medical record data were gathered from 40 Irish optometry practices comprising 81,184 unique patients. A Kaplan-Meier Survival (KMS) analysis was used to determine the effect of increasing age and time since screening on the likelihood of passing the VA standard for driving. A logistic function was fit to assess the effect of varying the minimum VA standard required to drive on the screening pass rate within the population. RESULTS: The likelihood of failing repeat screening increased as a function of time since initial screening for all age groups (χ2 =1447, df = 6, p<.001), with older patients most affected. Rescreening intervals for individuals who initially met the vision standard unaided reduced as a function of age. Using an 80% survivability threshold, intervals ranged from every eight years for drivers under 50, reducing to every two years for those aged over 80. Rescreening intervals for drivers requiring optical correction to meet the standard also decreased with age. Approximately, 1% of individuals are excluded from driving using a 0.3 logMAR VA standard with correction. CONCLUSIONS: VA-based screening should take place at regular intervals for all drivers, not just those over 70. Re-screening intervals should be based on age, with shorter intervals for older drivers due to the combined effect of age and time on the likelihood of passing the driving VA standards. The most commonly used standard of 0.3 logMAR results in a minimal number of potential drivers being excluded from driving.


Asunto(s)
Conducción de Automóvil , Selección Visual , Anciano , Macrodatos , Análisis de Datos , Humanos , Agudeza Visual
5.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci ; 62(5): 7, 2021 04 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33909031

RESUMEN

Purpose: The International Myopia Institute (IMI) Yearly Digest highlights new research considered to be of importance since the publication of the first series of IMI white papers. Methods: A literature search was conducted for articles on myopia between 2019 and mid-2020 to inform definitions and classifications, experimental models, genetics, interventions, clinical trials, and clinical management. Conference abstracts from key meetings in the same period were also considered. Results: One thousand articles on myopia have been published between 2019 and mid-2020. Key advances include the use of the definition of premyopia in studies currently under way to test interventions in myopia, new definitions in the field of pathologic myopia, the role of new pharmacologic treatments in experimental models such as intraocular pressure-lowering latanoprost, a large meta-analysis of refractive error identifying 336 new genetic loci, new clinical interventions such as the defocus incorporated multisegment spectacles and combination therapy with low-dose atropine and orthokeratology (OK), normative standards in refractive error, the ethical dilemma of a placebo control group when myopia control treatments are established, reporting the physical metric of myopia reduction versus a percentage reduction, comparison of the risk of pediatric OK wear with risk of vision impairment in myopia, the justification of preventing myopic and axial length increase versus quality of life, and future vision loss. Conclusions: Large amounts of research in myopia have been published since the IMI 2019 white papers were released. The yearly digest serves to highlight the latest research and advances in myopia.


Asunto(s)
Miopía/terapia , Procedimientos de Ortoqueratología/métodos , Calidad de Vida , Refracción Ocular/fisiología , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Humanos , Miopía/clasificación , Miopía/fisiopatología
6.
PLoS One ; 16(4): e0250468, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33891638

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To examine whether data sourced from electronic medical records (EMR) and a large industrial spectacle lens manufacturing database can estimate refractive error distribution within large populations as an alternative to typical population surveys of refractive error. SUBJECTS: A total of 555,528 patient visits from 28 Irish primary care optometry practices between the years 1980 and 2019 and 141,547,436 spectacle lens sales records from an international European lens manufacturer between the years 1998 and 2016. METHODS: Anonymized EMR data included demographic, refractive and visual acuity values. Anonymized spectacle lens data included refractive data. Spectacle lens data was separated into lenses containing an addition (ADD) and those without an addition (SV). The proportions of refractive errors from the EMR data and ADD lenses were compared to published results from the European Eye Epidemiology (E3) Consortium and the Gutenberg Health Study (GHS). RESULTS: Age and gender matched proportions of refractive error were comparable in the E3 data and the EMR data, with no significant difference in the overall refractive error distribution (χ2 = 527, p = 0.29, DoF = 510). EMR data provided a closer match to the E3 refractive error distribution by age than the ADD lens data. The ADD lens data, however, provided a closer approximation to the E3 data for total myopia prevalence than the GHS data, up to age 64. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of refractive error within a population can be estimated using EMR data in the absence of population surveys. Industry derived sales data can also provide insights on the epidemiology of refractive errors in a population over certain age ranges. EMR and industrial data may therefore provide a fast and cost-effective surrogate measure of refractive error distribution that can be used for future health service planning purposes.


Asunto(s)
Macrodatos , Miopía/epidemiología , Errores de Refracción/epidemiología , Agudeza Visual/fisiología , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Anciano , Lentes de Contacto , Manejo de Datos , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Estudios Epidemiológicos , Anteojos , Femenino , Humanos , Irlanda/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Miopía/diagnóstico , Miopía/patología , Miopía/prevención & control , Errores de Refracción/patología , Errores de Refracción/prevención & control , Distribución por Sexo , Pruebas de Visión , Adulto Joven
7.
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt ; 31(2): 137-44, 2011 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21309800

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To validate a novel ultrasonic sensor for logging reading distances. In addition, this device was used to compare the habitual reading distances between low and high myopes. METHODS: First, the stability and sensitivity of the ultrasonic device were determined by repeated measures using artificial targets. Then, thirty Hong Kong Chinese (20-30 years) were recruited, of whom fifteen were considered to be high myopes (mean ± S.D. = -8.7 ± 0.5 D) and 15 to be low to non-myopes (mean ± S.D. = -2.0 ± 0.2 D). Each subject read a newspaper with their habitual visual aid continuously for 10 min in two sessions at their preferred working distance(s). The reading distances were recorded continuously using a novel nearwork analyzer. The modal working distance was considered as the 'habitual' reading distance. In addition, habitual reading distance was reported orally by each subject. RESULTS: The nearwork analyzer gave accurate and repeatable measurements over a range of distances and angles. Using this instrument, high myopes were found to have a significantly shorter reading distance than low myopes or non-myopes (mean ± S.D. = 35.9 ± 9.8 cm vs 50.9 ± 24.8 cm; two-sample t-test, p = 0.04, df = 18). The reading distances reported orally by the subjects were not correlated with those recorded by the nearwork analyzer. CONCLUSIONS: The nearwork analyzer was found to be an effective tool for measuring nearwork reading distance in a small group of emmetropic and myopic adults over a 10 min interval. Differences between the reading distance between high myopes and low/non-myopes was detected by the device. Further study is needed to determine if a closer working distance is a cause or effect of myopia development.


Asunto(s)
Miopía/epidemiología , Optometría/instrumentación , Acomodación Ocular/fisiología , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Miopía/etiología , Lectura , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Adulto Joven
8.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci ; 44(8): 3526-32, 2003 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12882803

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To determine whether subretinal Schwann cell transplantation can prolong the survival of photoreceptors in the rhodopsin knockout (rho(-/-)) mouse. METHODS: Schwann cells were prepared from postnatal day (PN) 5 to 7 mouse pups and grafted subretinally into the eyes of PN35 rho(-/-) mice. RT-PCR was performed on similarly prepared cells to determine growth factor production in vitro. Eyes were retrieved at PN70 for anatomic and statistical analysis. Control animals received grafts of fibroblasts or sham surgery. RESULTS: RT-PCR demonstrated the presence of message for ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF), brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), and glia-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) in the cultured Schwann cells. Schwann cell grafts produced a statistically significant rescue of photoreceptors in a restricted area of retina at PN70, but the effect was lost by PN140. Preserved inner segments could be identified, but outer segments were never present. Sham surgery also resulted in photoreceptor rescue but at a reduced level. Fibroblast grafts appeared to produce little or no rescue effect. Grafts of Schwann cells or fibroblasts and sham surgery induced a reactive Müller glial response. CONCLUSIONS: Schwann cells can prolong photoreceptor survival in the rhodopsin knockout mouse until at least PN70.


Asunto(s)
Retina/cirugía , Degeneración Retiniana/cirugía , Rodopsina/genética , Células de Schwann/trasplante , Animales , Factor Neurotrófico Derivado del Encéfalo/genética , Factor Neurotrófico Derivado del Encéfalo/metabolismo , Recuento de Células , Supervivencia Celular , Trasplante de Células , Factor Neurotrófico Ciliar/genética , Factor Neurotrófico Ciliar/metabolismo , Fibroblastos/trasplante , Factor Neurotrófico Derivado de la Línea Celular Glial , Ratones , Ratones Noqueados , Factores de Crecimiento Nervioso/genética , Factores de Crecimiento Nervioso/metabolismo , Células Fotorreceptoras de Vertebrados/patología , ARN Mensajero/metabolismo , Retina/patología , Degeneración Retiniana/genética , Degeneración Retiniana/patología , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa de Transcriptasa Inversa , Células de Schwann/metabolismo , Nervio Ciático/citología , Trasplante Isogénico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...