Assessment of rare bleeding disorders in adolescents with heavy menstrual bleeding.

INTRODUCTION: There are a significant number of patients with mucocutaneous bleeding, specifically heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB), who do not have a diagnosed bleeding disorder. These patients receive nontargeted interventions and may have suboptimal treatments. Functional assays, particularly for fibrinolytic and rare platelet function defects, are not robust and not readily available. AIM: We aimed to prospectively evaluate the prevalence of genetic defects associated with rare bleeding disorders and describe alterations of coagulation and fibrinolysis in a cohort of adolescents with HMB. METHODS: We performed a prospective observational cohort study of patients with HMB and unexplained bleeding. The study utilized a next generation sequencing panel and investigational global assays of coagulation and fibrinolysis. Additionally, specific functional assays were performed to help characterize novel variants that were identified. RESULTS: In 10 of the 17 patients (∼59%), genetic variants were identified on molecular testing. Thrombin generation by calibrated thromboelastography was not significantly altered in this patient population. The clot formation and lysis assay showed a trend towards increased fibrinolysis with rapid phase of decline in 23% of the patients. Further corresponding functional assays and study population are described. CONCLUSION: Our study describes a unique correlative model in a homogenous cohort of patients with HMB and unexplained bleeding which may inform future diagnostic algorithms, genotype-phenotype correlations as well as aid in specific targeted treatment approaches. Larger future studies may inform risk stratification of patients and improve health related outcomes in patients with HMB.

The common VWF variant p.Y1584C: detailed pathogenic examination of an enigmatic sequence change.

BACKGROUND: As knowledge of the human genome has advanced, so too has the recognition that interpretation of the pathogenic nature of sequence variants can be challenging. The von Willebrand factor (VWF) gene exhibits a significant degree of sequence variability, and the first VWF variant associated with type 1 von Willebrand disease (VWD), c.4751 A>G, p.Y1584C, was described in 2003. However, since that time, the pathogenic nature of this variant has remained unclear, being assigned properties ranging from a risk factor to a pathogenic variant. OBJECTIVES: To provide additional evaluation on the interpretation of pathogenicity for this common VWF variant. METHODS: Fifty-eight subjects with only the p.Y1584C variant were recruited from 2 cohort studies (the Zimmerman Program and the Canadian type 1 VWD study). Clinical and laboratory phenotypes were assessed. RESULTS: The prevalence of the p.Y1584C variant in our cohorts was 23- to 27-fold higher than that in large normal population databases. Significantly more p.Y1584C subjects had an abnormal bleeding score when compared to Y1584 individuals. In comparison with a group of 35 subjects without the p.Y1584C variant, subjects with the variant had lower mean VWF:antigen and VWF:ristocetin cofactor values and significantly higher VWF propeptide/VWF:antigen ratios suggestive of enhanced clearance. CONCLUSION: Collectively, the results of this analysis suggest that p.Y1584C is likely pathogenic, however, due to influences such as incomplete penetrance, variable expressivity, and other genetic modifiers like ABO blood group, the straightforward assignment of pathogenicity to this variant is inevitably challenging.

Von Willebrand Factor (VWF) multiplex activity assay differentiation of type 1 von Willebrand Disease (VWD) and variant VWD.

INTRODUCTION: VWD diagnosis is challenging requiring multiple VWF activity tests using many individual assays. We have developed an ELISA-based VWF Multiplex Activity Assay (VWF-MAA) to address this concern; however, the ability of the VWF-MAA to discriminate between type 1 VWD, variant VWD, and normal subjects has not been evaluated. AIM: To evaluate the VWF-MAA and its ability to differentiate between type 1 VWD, variant VWD and normal subjects in individuals undergoing an initial laboratory evaluation for bleeding. METHODS: A total of 177 plasma samples from the Zimmerman Program: Comparative Effectiveness in the Diagnosis of VWD were evaluated from 11 centres across the US and Canada. The VWF-MAA was compared to Versiti Blood Research Institute (VBRI) and Local Center (LC) assigned VWD diagnosis. RESULTS: Overall, 129/177 (72.9%) were correctly assigned as normal (non-VWD), type 1, or variant VWD compared to the VBRI assigned diagnosis. VWF-MAA assigned non-VWD accurately in 29/57 (50.9%) samples, and type 1 VWD accurately in 93/110 (84.6%) samples. Considering LC diagnosis where there was agreement with VWF-MAA and not VBRI diagnosis, type 1 VWD was accurate in 105/110 (95.5%) samples. Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated good correlation between laboratory methods. VWD, types 2A, 2B, 1C VWD were also assigned by the VWF-MAA. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that the VWF-MAA has utility in differentiating type 1 VWD, variant VWD and normal subjects in individuals undergoing an initial laboratory evaluation for bleeding.

Characterization of copy-number variants in a large cohort of patients with von Willebrand disease reveals a relationship between disrupted regions and disease type.

Background: Genetic analysis for von Willebrand disease (VWD) commonly utilizes DNA sequencing to identify variants in the von Willebrand factor (VWF) gene; however, this technique cannot always detect copy-number variants (CNVs). Additional mapping of CNVs in patients with VWD is needed. Objectives: This study aimed to characterize CNVs in a large sample of VWF mutation-negative VWD patients. Methods: To determine the role of CNVs in VWD, a VWF high-resolution comparative genomic hybridization array was custom-designed to avoid multiple sequence variations, repeated sequences, and the VWF pseudogene. This was performed on 204 mutation-negative subjects for whom clinical variables were also available. Results: Among the 204 patients, 7 unique CNVs were found, with a total of 24 CNVs (12%). Of the 7 unique CNVs, 1 was novel, 1 was found in a VWF database, and 5 were previously reported. All patients with type 1C VWD and a CNV had the same exon 33 and 34 in-frame deletion. Certain clinical variables were also significantly different between those with and without CNVs. Conclusion: The in-frame deletion in patients with type 1C VWD exactly matches the D4N module of the D4 domain, a region where mutations and deletions are known to affect clearance. We observed significantly higher VWF-to-ristocetin cofactor levels in patients with type 1C VWD and a CNV than in patients without a CNV, suggesting a relationship between CNVs and the increased clearance observed in patients with type 1C VWD. Glycoprotein IbM activity was significantly lower in patients with type 1 VWD and a CNV than in patients without a CNV, suggesting that platelet binding is more affected by CNVs than single base pair mutations. This work elucidates some of the underlying genetic mechanisms of CNVs in these patients.

Building the foundation for a community-generated national research blueprint for inherited bleeding disorders: research priorities for mucocutaneous bleeding disorders.

BACKGROUND: Excessive or abnormal mucocutaneous bleeding (MCB) may impact all aspects of the physical and psychosocial wellbeing of those who live with it (PWMCB). The evidence base for the optimal diagnosis and management of disorders such as inherited platelet disorders, hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT), hypermobility spectrum disorders (HSD), Ehlers-Danlos syndromes (EDS), and von Willebrand disease (VWD) remains thin with enormous potential for targeted research. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: National Hemophilia Foundation and American Thrombosis and Hemostasis Network initiated the development of a National Research Blueprint for Inherited Bleeding Disorders with extensive all-stakeholder consultations to identify the priorities of people with inherited bleeding disorders and those who care for them. They recruited multidisciplinary expert working groups (WG) to distill community-identified priorities into concrete research questions and score their feasibility, impact, and risk. RESULTS: WG2 detailed 38 high priority research questions concerning the biology of MCB, VWD, inherited qualitative platelet function defects, HDS/EDS, HHT, bleeding disorder of unknown cause, novel therapeutics, and aging. CONCLUSIONS: Improving our understanding of the basic biology of MCB, large cohort longitudinal natural history studies, collaboration, and creative approaches to novel therapeutics will be important in maximizing the benefit of future research for the entire MCB community.

More people experience mucocutaneous bleeding (MCB), affecting tissues like skin and gums, than have hemophilia A or B. MCB is not understood as well as hemophilia. Common types of MCB include nosebleeds, bleeding gums, heavy menstrual bleeding, and digestive tract bleeding. Mucocutaneous inherited bleeding disorders include inherited platelet disorders, hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT), hypermobility spectrum disorders (HSD) and Ehlers-Danlos syndromes (EDS), von Willebrand Disease (VWD), and others. Diagnosing and treating MCB is complicated and sometimes medical providers dismiss the bleeding that patients report when they cannot find a medical explanation for it. Many people with mucocutaneous bleeding (PWMCB) do not receive the care they need; for example, women with VWD live with symptoms for, on average, 16 years before they are diagnosed in the US. This struggle to obtain care has important negative impacts on patients' physical and psychological health and their quality-of-life. The National Hemophilia Foundation (NHF), a large US bleeding disorders patient advocacy organization, set out to develop a National Research Blueprint for Inherited Bleeding Disorders focused on community priorities. They brought together a group of patients, providers, and researchers with MCB expertise to identify the research that would most improve the lives of PWMCB through targeted and accessible diagnostics and therapies. We report in this paper that research is needed to better understand the biology of MCB and to define the mechanisms of disease in these disorders. We also describe high priority research questions for each of the main disorders, novel therapeutics, and aging.

Beyond the guidelines: how we approach challenging scenarios in the diagnosis and management of von Willebrand disease.

Although von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common inherited bleeding disorder, its diagnosis and management are often challenging. Clinical practice guidelines, developed through systematic review of the medical literature and considering the best available evidence, provide guidance for common clinical scenarios. However, in the clinical setting, patients often present with characteristics and nuances that may fall outside the realm of available evidence and guidelines, and hence, shared decision-making will be essential in the evaluation and management of these patients. The challenges in the diagnosis of VWD are mainly attributable to the heterogeneity of the disorder, limitations of laboratory assays, and the significant impact of various physiologic processes on von Willebrand factor. The impact of physiologic normalization of von Willebrand factor, which may occur in various settings such as pregnancy, inflammation, or aging, remains uncertain, as is the optimal management in these scenarios. Multidisciplinary and individualized care, based on evolving evidence supported by clinicians, patients, caregivers, and stakeholders, will be needed to ensure the highest quality care for those who live with VWD.

Ristocetin dependent cofactor activity in von Willebrand disease diagnosis: Limitations of relying on a single measure.

Background: Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is a common inherited bleeding disorder, however the diagnosis can be complicated by a subjective bleeding history and issues with some current von Willebrand factor (VWF) laboratory assays. Objectives: In the Zimmerman Program, we sought to determine how often a type 1 diagnosis was based on a single low VWF ristocetin cofactor (VWF:RCo) level resulting from the common genetic variant p.D1472H or an isolated assay issue, if that low value was corroborated by the VWF glycoprotein-IbM (VWF:GPIbM) assay, and if retesting confirmed original levels. Methods: New patients being evaluated for bleeding were consented. Analysis included VWF sequencing, bleeding scores, and comparisons of local VWF antigen (VWF:Ag) and VWF:RCo to central VWF:Ag and VWF:GPIbM. Results: A total of 18% of VWD subjects had a low local VWF:RCo, but normal VWF:Ag and normal central testing including VWF:GPIbM. Seventy percent of the low VWF:RCo cohort had no pathogenic VWF variants; however, 33% carried p.D1472H. Low VWF:RCo subjects with follow-up local testing within 2 years showed those with p.D1472H continued to have low VWF:RCo and VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag ratio with normal VWF:GPIbM. Subjects without p.D1472H had an increase mean VWF:RCo, resulting in 59% with normal levels on repeat testing. Conclusions: The diagnosis of VWD based on a single low VWF:RCo but normal VWF:Ag, was often attributed to p.D1472H or variability in VWF:RCo that was eliminated with VWF:GPIbM. Our study suggests that using VWF:RCo alone for diagnostic purposes may be insufficient while repeat VWF:RCo or VWF:GPIbM testing can be valuable in establishing a VWD diagnosis.

Molecular pathogenesis and heterogeneity in type 3 VWD families in U.S. Zimmerman program.

BACKGROUND: Type 3 von Willebrand Disease (VWD) is a rare and severe form of VWD characterized by the absence of von Willebrand factor (VWF). OBJECTIVES: As part of the Zimmerman Program, we sought to explore the molecular pathogenesis, correlate bleeding phenotype and severity, and determine the inheritance pattern found in type 3 VWD families. PATIENTS/METHODS: 62 index cases with a pre-existing diagnosis of type 3 VWD were analyzed. Central testing included FVIII, VWF:Ag, VWF:RCo, and VWFpp. Bleeding symptoms were quantified using the ISTH bleeding score. Genetic analysis included VWF sequencing, comparative genomic hybridization and predictive computational programs. RESULTS: 75% of subjects (46) had central testing confirming type 3, while 25% were re-classified as type 1-Severe or type 1C. Candidate VWF variants were found in all subjects with 93% of expected alleles identified. The majority were null alleles including frameshift, nonsense, splice site, and large deletions, while 13% were missense variants. Additional studies on 119 family members, including 69 obligate carriers, revealed a wide range of heterogeneity in VWF levels and bleeding scores, even amongst those with the same variant. Co-dominant inheritance was present in 51% of families and recessive in 21%, however 28% were ambiguous. CONCLUSION: This report represents a large cohort of VWD families in the U.S. with extensive phenotypic and genotypic data. While co-dominant inheritance was seen in approximately 50% of families, this study highlights the complexity of VWF genetics due to the heterogeneity found in both VWF levels and bleeding tendencies amongst families with type 3 VWD.

Outcomes of long-term von Willebrand factor prophylaxis use in von Willebrand disease: A systematic literature review.

BACKGROUND: Von Willebrand Disease (VWD) is a common inherited bleeding disorder. Patients with VWD suffering from severe bleeding may benefit from the use of secondary long-term prophylaxis. AIM: Systematically summarize the evidence on the clinical outcomes of secondary long-term prophylaxis in patients with VWD and severe recurrent bleedings. METHODS: We searched Medline and EMBASE through October 2019 for relevant randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and comparative observational studies (OS) assessing the effects of secondary long-term prophylaxis in patients with VWD. We used Cochrane Risk of Bias (RoB) tool and the RoB for Non-Randomized Studies of interventions (ROBINS-I) tool to assess the quality of the included studies. We conducted random-effects meta-analyses and assessed the certainty of the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. RESULTS: We included 12 studies. Evidence from one placebo controlled RCT suggested that VWD prophylaxis as compared to no prophylaxis reduced the rate of bleeding episodes (Rate ratio [RR], .24; 95% confidence interval [CI], .17-.35; low certainty evidence), and of epistaxis (RR, .38; 95%CI, .21-.67; moderate certainty evidence), and may increase serious adverse events RR 2.73 (95%CI .12-59.57; low certainty). Evidence from four before-and-after studies in which researchers reported comparative data suggested that VWD prophylaxis reduced the rate of bleeding (RR .34; 95%CI, .25-.46; very low certainty evidence). CONCLUSION: VWD prophylaxis treatment seems to reduce the risk of spontaneous bleeding, epistaxis, and hospitalizations. More RCTs should be conducted to increase the certainty in these benefits.

Gynecologic and obstetric management of women with von Willebrand disease: summary of 3 systematic reviews of the literature.

von Willebrand disease (VWD) disproportionately affects women because of the potential for heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB), delivery complications, and postpartum hemorrhage (PPH). To systematically synthesize the evidence regarding first-line management of HMB, treatment of women requiring or desiring neuraxial analgesia, and management of PPH. We searched Medline and EMBASE through October 2019 for randomized trials, comparative observational studies, and case series comparing the effects of desmopressin, hormonal therapy, and tranexamic acid (TxA) on HMB; comparing different von Willebrand factor (VWF) levels in women with VWD who were undergoing labor and receiving neuraxial anesthesia; and measuring the effects of TxA on PPH. We conducted duplicate study selection, data abstraction, and appraisal of risk of bias. Whenever possible, we conducted meta-analyses. We assessed the quality of the evidence using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach. We included 1 randomized trial, 3 comparative observational studies, and 10 case series. Moderate-certainty evidence showed that desmopressin resulted in a smaller reduction of menstrual blood loss (difference in mean change from baseline, 41.6 [95% confidence interval, 16.6-63.6] points in a pictorial blood assessment chart score) as compared with TxA. There was very-low-certainty evidence about how first-line treatments compare against each other, the effects of different VWF levels in women receiving neuraxial anesthesia, and the effects of postpartum administration of TxA. Most of the evidence relevant to the gynecologic and obstetric management of women with VWD addressed by most guidelines is very low quality. Future studies that address research priorities will be key when updating such guidelines.

von Willebrand factor levels in the diagnosis of von Willebrand disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

von Willebrand disease (VWD) is associated with significant morbidity as a result of excessive mucocutaneous bleeding. Early diagnosis and treatment are important to prevent and treat these symptoms. We systematically reviewed the accuracy of diagnostic tests using different cutoff values of von Willebrand factor antigen (VWF:Ag) and platelet-dependent von Willebrand factor (VWF) activity assays in the diagnosis of VWD. We searched Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, and Embase databases for eligible studies. We pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity and reported patient-important outcomes when relevant. This review included 21 studies that evaluated VWD diagnosis. The results showed low certainty in the evidence for a net health benefit from reconsidering the diagnosis of VWD vs removing the disease diagnosis in patients with VWF levels that have normalized with age. For the diagnosis of type 1 VWD, VWF sequence variants were detected in 75% to 82% of patients with VWF:Ag < 0.30 IU/mL and in 44% to 60% of patients with VWF:Ag between 0.30 and 0.50 IU/mL. A sensitivity of 0.90 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83-0.94) and a specificity of 0.91 (95% CI, 0.76-0.97) were observed for a platelet-dependent VWF activity/VWF:Ag ratio < 0.7 in detecting type 2 VWD (moderate certainty in the test accuracy results). VWF:Ag and platelet-dependent activity are continuous variables that are associated with an increase in bleeding risk with decreasing levels. This systematic review shows that using a VWF activity/VWF:Ag ratio < 0.7 vs lower cutoff levels in patients with an abnormal initial VWD screen is more accurate for the diagnosis of type 2 VWD.

Screening for von Willebrand disease does not impact posttonsillectomy bleeding in a low-risk population.

BACKGROUND: Bleeding is an important complication in children following tonsillectomy. Screening with coagulation tests prior to procedure is common to assess bleeding risk in the perioperative period, although ASH/ASPHO Choosing Wisely guidelines recommend against routine PT/PTT testing. Our aim was to compare von Willebrand factor antigen (VWF:Ag) and activity levels among patients with postoperative bleeding following tonsillectomy to evaluate for potential risk for bleeding. PROCEDURE: Eligible subjects were aged 0-18 without significant personal or family history of major bleeding. Postoperative bleeding diaries were collected and symptoms measured using a postoperative bleeding score. Plasma VWF levels were drawn at time of anesthesia administration. RESULTS: Postoperative bleeding occurred in 248 cases out of 1399 total subjects. Median VWF:Ag was 86 in patients with postoperative bleeding scores of 1-2, 86 for scores 3-4, 84 for scores 5-6, and 83 for scores >6, with no significant difference among groups (p = .98). Additionally, no difference was observed for subjects with multiple days of postoperative bleeding as compared to those with only 1 day of postoperative bleeding. Finally, no difference in VWF:Ag was observed for subjects whose first reported bleed occurred early in the postoperative course compared to those whose first reported bleed occurred later. VWF:Ag does not correlate with severity of bleeding, time of onset of first bleeding event, or recurrence of bleeding in healthy children with no personal or family history of bleeding who have postoperative bleeding following tonsillectomy. CONCLUSIONS: This data does not support routine von Willebrand disease screening prior to tonsillectomy.

Von Willebrand Disease: Current Status of Diagnosis and Management.

Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is a common bleeding disorder, affecting male and female individuals equally, that often manifests in mucosal bleeding. VWD can be secondary to a quantitative (Type 1 and Type 3) or qualitative (Type 2) defects in Von Willebrand factor (VWF). Initial testing includes VWF antigen, as well as a platelet binding assay to differentiate between qualitative and quantitative defects. Further subtyping requires additional testing and is needed to ensure appropriate treatment. Desmopressin, antifibrinolytics, hormonal treatments for heavy menstrual bleeding, and VWF concentrates are commonly used in the treatment of VWD.

Fibronectin binding to von Willebrand factor occurs via the A1 domain.

BACKGROUND: Collagen interactions with von Willebrand factor (VWF) perform an important role in initiation of hemostasis. OBJECTIVES: We hypothesized that in addition to collagen, other extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins such as fibronectin can bind VWF. METHODS: Fibronectin-VWF interactions were measured by ELISA using both plasma-derived and recombinant VWF-containing variants in specific domains. Inhibition was measured by antibody competition using antibodies directed against both VWF and fibronectin. Binding affinities were measured by the Octet Biosensor for fibronectin and collagen IV. RESULTS: Fibronectin was able to bind both plasma-derived and recombinant wild-type VWF. This interaction was inhibited by both anti-VWF antibodies and collagen types III and IV. Several VWF A1 domain variants in the region of the collagen IV binding site also demonstrated absent fibronectin binding, as did variants with defects in high-molecular-weight multimers. Binding affinity testing showed fibronectin has a strong affinity for VWF, in a range similar to that of collagen IV. Fibronectin binds VWF via a restricted region of the A1 domain. This interaction requires high-molecular-weight multimers and is similar to that seen with vascular collagens. CONCLUSIONS: Therefore, VWF would appear to be the common factor linking platelet adhesion to various ECM proteins and facilitating hemostasis under conditions of ECM exposure.

ASH ISTH NHF WFH 2021 guidelines on the management of von Willebrand disease.

BACKGROUND: von Willebrand disease (VWD) is a common inherited bleeding disorder. Significant variability exists in management options offered to patients. OBJECTIVE: These evidence-based guidelines from the American Society of Hematology (ASH), the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH), the National Hemophilia Foundation (NHF), and the World Federation of Hemophilia (WFH) are intended to support patients, clinicians, and health care professionals in their decisions about management of VWD. METHODS: ASH, ISTH, NHF, and WFH formed a multidisciplinary guideline panel. Three patient representatives were included. The panel was balanced to minimize potential bias from conflicts of interest. The University of Kansas Outcomes and Implementation Research Unit and the McMaster Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Centre supported the guideline development process, including performing and updating systematic evidence reviews (through November 2019). The panel prioritized clinical questions and outcomes according to their importance to clinicians and patients. The panel used the GRADE approach, including GRADE Evidence-to-Decision frameworks, to assess evidence and make recommendations, which were subject to public comment. RESULTS: The panel agreed on 12 recommendations and outlined future research priorities. CONCLUSIONS: These guidelines make key recommendations regarding prophylaxis for frequent recurrent bleeding, desmopressin trials to determine therapy, use of antiplatelet agents and anticoagulant therapy, target VWF and factor VIII activity levels for major surgery, strategies to reduce bleeding during minor surgery or invasive procedures, management options for heavy menstrual bleeding, management of VWD in the context of neuraxial anesthesia during labor and delivery, and management in the postpartum setting.

ASH ISTH NHF WFH 2021 guidelines on the diagnosis of von Willebrand disease.

BACKGROUND: von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common inherited bleeding disorder known in humans. Accurate and timely diagnosis presents numerous challenges. OBJECTIVE: These evidence-based guidelines of the American Society of Hematology (ASH), the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH), the National Hemophilia Foundation (NHF), and the World Federation of Hemophilia (WFH) are intended to support patients, clinicians, and other health care professionals in their decisions about VWD diagnosis. METHODS: ASH, ISTH, NHF, and WFH established a multidisciplinary guideline panel that included 4 patient representatives and was balanced to minimize potential bias from conflicts of interest. The Outcomes and Implementation Research Unit at the University of Kansas Medical Center (KUMC) supported the guideline-development process, including performing or updating systematic evidence reviews up to 8 January 2020. The panel prioritized clinical questions and outcomes according to their importance for clinicians and patients. The panel used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, including GRADE Evidence-to-Decision frameworks, to assess evidence and make recommendations, which were subsequently subject to public comment. RESULTS: The panel agreed on 11 recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: Key recommendations of these guidelines include the role of bleeding-assessment tools in the assessment of patients suspected of VWD, diagnostic assays and laboratory cutoffs for type 1 and type 2 VWD, how to approach a type 1 VWD patient with normalized levels over time, and the role of genetic testing vs phenotypic assays for types 2B and 2N. Future critical research priorities are also identified.

Laboratory variability in the diagnosis of type 2 VWD variants.

Essentials Patients with von Willebrand disease were enrolled in our study. Type 2 VWD diagnoses were based on original test results. Repeat evaluation resulted in many patients receiving a different type 2 diagnosis. Some genetic variants were particularly likely to move type 2 subcategories. ABSTRACT: Introduction Type 2 von Willebrand disease (VWD) refers to patients with a qualitative defect in von Willebrand factor. Accurate diagnosis of type 2 VWD subtypes can be challenging. Aim of the study To compare the historical diagnosis of type 2 VWD with current laboratory testing. Methods Subjects were enrolled in the Zimmerman Program either because of a preexisting diagnosis of VWD (retrospective cohort) or from evaluation for bleeding symptoms or suspected VWD (prospective cohort). Original diagnosis was assigned by the local center and central diagnosis was based on central laboratory testing. Results Two hundred and seventeen index cases in the retrospective cohort and 35 subjects in the prospective cohort carried a local diagnosis of type 2 VWD (29% and 6% of enrolled index cases, respectively). In the retrospective cohort, the diagnosis was confirmed in 66% of cases with a preexisting diagnosis of 2A, 77% 2B, 54% 2M, and 72% 2N. In the prospective cohort, 31% were confirmed 2A, 60% 2B, 23% 2M, and 100% 2N. Several genetic variants were repeatedly implicated in subjects with changed diagnosis: p.M1304R, p.R1315C, p.R1374C, and p.R1374H. Conclusions Both the prospective and retrospective cohorts demonstrated consistent variation in subjects whose diagnosis changed between 2A, 2B, and 2M. The importance of accurately diagnosing type 2 VWD may be most significant in the 2B subtype given potential concerns with the use of desmopressin in type 2B VWD. Some genetic variants appear in multiple types of VWD, making specific diagnoses challenging.

von Willebrand factor variant D1472H has no effect in mice with humanized VWF-platelet interactions.

The von Willebrand factor ristocetin cofactor activity assay (VWF:RCo) is used for diagnosis of von Willebrand disease (VWD) because of its ability to evaluate VWF binding to platelets. VWF sequence variant p.D1472H is associated with lower VWF:RCo levels in the absence of associated bleeding symptoms, indicating the VWF:RCo may not be accurate for characterizing VWF function in individuals with this variant. Thus, this study aimed to determine the implications of the variant on VWF functioning in vivo. Mice were engineered with humanized wild-type (WT*) VWF A1/A2 and VWF with the p.D1472H (1472H) variant along with humanized platelet GPIbα and bred to homozygosity. VWF antigen and VWF binding to GPIbα were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Gel electrophoresis was used for VWF multimer analysis. Tail bleeding assays were performed at a 3-mm defined length. Normal VWF multimers were preserved in both WT* and 1472H mice. VWF expression was normal in the WT* and 1472H mice, and VWF binding to GPIbα did not statistically differ between the groups. Additionally, tail bleeding times were similar for WT* and 1472H mice. These results show the p.D1472H variant does not impair hemostasis in mice, and support the conclusion that p.D1472H is a normal variant in humans.