Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
PeerJ ; 12: e17368, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38803582

RESUMEN

Objective: During the COVID-19 pandemic, universal mask-wearing became one of the main public health interventions. Because of this, most physical examinations, including lung auscultation, were done while patients were wearing surgical face masks. The aim of this study was to investigate whether mask wearing has an impact on pulmonologist assessment during auscultation of the lungs. Methods: This was a repeated measures crossover design study. Three pulmonologists were instructed to auscultate patients with previously verified prolonged expiration, wheezing, or crackles while patients were wearing or not wearing masks (physician and patients were separated by an opaque barrier). As a measure of pulmonologists' agreement in the assessment of lung sounds, we used Fleiss kappa (K). Results: There was no significant difference in agreement on physician assessment of lung sounds in all three categories (normal lung sound, duration of expiration, and adventitious lung sound) whether the patient was wearing a mask or not, but there were significant differences among pulmonologists when it came to agreement of lung sound assessment. Conclusion: Clinicians and health professionals are safer from respiratory infections when they are wearing masks, and patients should be encouraged to wear masks because our research proved no significant difference in agreement on pulmonologists' assessment of auscultated lung sounds whether or not patients wore masks.


Asunto(s)
Auscultación , COVID-19 , Estudios Cruzados , Máscaras , Ruidos Respiratorios , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , Máscaras/efectos adversos , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Auscultación/métodos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Pandemias/prevención & control , Neumólogos , Anciano
2.
Acta Clin Croat ; 61(4): 722-726, 2022 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37868166

RESUMEN

Acute interstitial pneumonia (AIP) is a rare idiopathic interstitial pneumonia with histology finding of diffuse alveolar damage (DAD). It is characterized by progressive hypoxic respiratory failure, high mortality rate, and absence of guidelines for its treatment. Here we present a case of a 64-year-old woman with progressive dyspnea, acute respiratory failure, diffuse bilateral reticulonodular opacities on standard chest radiograph, diffuse ground-glass opacities on computed tomography, and biopsy proven DAD. Diagnosis of AIP was established after extensive work-up that excluded the known risk factors for acute respiratory distress syndrome. Oxygen therapy and high-dose parenteral corticosteroids led to gradual improvement and resulted in complete respiratory recovery. Since there are no existing guidelines for treating AIP, more case reports and case series if not randomized control trials are warranted in order to define the most effective therapeutic modality.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome Hamman-Rich , Neumonías Intersticiales Idiopáticas , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria , Insuficiencia Respiratoria , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad Aguda , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/etiología , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/terapia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA