Genetic parameters for carcass traits of progeny of beef bulls mated to dairy cows.

Beef × dairy crossbred cattle (n = 615) were used to evaluate the effect of preharvest indicator traits and genotypes on the accuracy of estimated breeding values (EBVs) of seedstock candidates for selection. Genotypes for 100,000 single nucleotide polymorphisms were provided by the American Simmental Association of purebred and crossbred seedstock animals (n = 2,632). Five hundred and ninety-five of the 615 beef × dairy cattle had carcass camera and ultrasound data. Phenotypes were not used for any of the seedstock animals even though some may have had performance and ultrasound data. We estimated the genomic relationship matrix among 3,247 animals including both phenotyped and unphenotyped animals. We computed genetic parameters among 37 traits using 666 bivariate restricted maximum likelihood analyses. The accuracy of EBV depends on heritability. For the sake of brevity, we report accuracy for marbling as a proxy for other traits with similar heritability. We focus on accuracy for marbling because marbling is the primary determinant of carcass value. We computed EBV for all 3,247 animals for marbling based on camera data postharvest using best linear unbiased prediction. We report evidence of overlap in causative genes among postharvest carcass traits; marbling, ribeye area, yield grade, fat thickness, and hot carcass weight (HCW) based on genetic correlations. Genetic correlations range from -0.73 to 0.89. Several live animal traits (frame size, body weight and ultrasound fat thickness and ribeye area) were genetically correlated with postharvest traits; including HCW, ribeye area, yield grade, fat thickness, and marbling. Genetic correlations between pre- and postharvest traits ranged from -0.53 to 0.95. Accuracy for marbling ranged from 0.64 to 0.80 for animals with marbling recorded, and from 0.09 to 0.60 for animals without marbling recorded. The accuracy of animals without phenotypes was related to the genomic relationship between animals with phenotype and those without. Live animal traits were useful for predicting economically important carcass traits based on genetic correlations. The accuracy of EBV for seedstock animals that were not phenotyped was low, but this is consistent with theory, and accuracy is expected to increase with the addition of genotypes and carcass data from beef × dairy animals.

Low-cost genotyping platforms and sexed-semen have enabled the production of high breeding value dairy replacement heifers from a fraction of the herd representing the most elite cows. The remainder of the cow herd can be bred to beef bulls using male-sexed-semen. Camera carcass data postharvest and ultrasound carcass estimates preharvest (live animals) on beef × dairy animals combined with genotypes and ultrasound on seedstock animals may provide an efficient scheme for selecting beef bulls to mate to dairy cows in the future to maximize carcass value of the progeny. Genotypes are needed to link carcass data from previously harvested to seedstock bull selection candidates because pedigree is typically not available for beef × dairy cattle. We report that live animal ultrasound carcass estimates are predictive of postharvest economically important carcass traits. The accuracy of genetic evaluation of selection candidates without recorded carcass traits was low but is expected to increase with more genotypes and phenotypes on beef × dairy cattle. Genotypes, ultrasound estimates, and camera carcass data on thousands of beef × dairy cattle could enable increased accuracy of selection with periodic infusion of new phenotypes from future generations.

Crossbreeding beef sires to dairy cows: cow, feedlot, and carcass performance.

Genetic and reproductive advancements in the dairy industry, volatile milk markets, and beef packer restrictions on dairy carcasses have increased the popularity of crossbreeding beef sires to dairy cows in the United States. This observational study aimed to understand performance of dairy cows bred to beef sires and feedlot and carcass performance of crossbred beef × dairy cattle. For dairy cow performance, archived records from two dairies representing two successive lactations were evaluated in cows (Dairy A: n = 72/group; Dairy B: n = 456/group) representing 1) All Dairy, where previous sire type of conception was Holstein for both lactations, or 2) Beef on Dairy, where previous sire type of conception was Holstein for the preceding lactation and a beef breed for the subsequent lactation. For feedlot performance, closeout data from pens (n = 26/cattle type) of beef and beef × dairy steers and heifers were evaluated. For carcass performance, individual carcass data were compared between conventional beef (n = 966), beef × dairy (n = 518), and Holstein (n = 935) steers sampled across a variety of processing facilities, harvest lots, and geographical regions. Cow lactation performance was minimally impacted by sire type of previous conception. Cows conceived to beef sires exhibited a 2 to 3 d greater (P < 0.01) gestation length than cows conceived to Holstein sires. Beef × dairy cattle were not largely different in weight gain at the feedlot but exhibited 1-unit lesser (P < 0.01) dressing percentage than beef cattle. Beef × dairy carcasses possessed 18% lesser (P < 0.05) 12th rib fat thickness than beef cattle and 5% greater (P< 0.05) ribeye area than dairy cattle. Additionally, beef cattle produced nearly double (P < 0.05) the percentage of yield grade 4 carcasses produced by beef × dairy and Holstein cattle.

Invited review: a carcass and meat perspective of crossbred beef × dairy cattle.

Crossbreeding dairy cows with beef sires has greatly altered the consist of U.S. dairy-influenced slaughter cattle and generated an influx of crossbred beef × dairy cattle to the U.S. fed beef slaughter supply in 2021. This review provides a summary of our observations of carcass and meat traits in the recent U.S. beef × dairy crossbred population and, based on these observations, exposes future opportunities for consideration. Strip loin steaks from beef × dairy cattle can be marketed alongside conventional beef products in retail display without consumer discrimination based on color or steak shape previously experienced in steaks from straightbred dairy cattle. Additionally, beef from crossbred beef × dairy cattle cannot be discriminated against for eating quality attributes (tenderness, flavor, and juiciness) as it exhibits similar, if not improved, performance of these attributes to beef from conventional beef cattle. We have also demonstrated that live expression of beef-type versus dairy-type character within the beef × dairy crossbred population has minimal effect on eating quality. With proper genetic selection and management, crossbred beef × dairy cattle can capture carcass premiums from an optimal combination of carcass quality (marbling) and red meat yield. Future beef × dairy crossbred mating and management systems should emphasize increases in total carcass muscling and reductions in liver abscess prevalence. A story of quality, sustainability, and traceability in the large and constant supply of beef from crossbred beef × dairy cattle may present profitable branding and marketing opportunities for these products.