High-dose chemotherapy for relapsed germ cell tumours: outcomes in low-volume specialized centres.

OBJECTIVE: To report treatment patterns and survival outcomes of patients with relapsed and refractory metastatic germ cell tumours (GCTs) treated with high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) and autologous stem-cell transplantation in low-volume specialized centres within the widely dispersed populations of Australia and New Zealand between 1999 and 2019. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 111 patients across 13 institutions. Patients were identified from the Australasian Bone Marrow Transplant Recipient Registry. We reviewed treatment regimens, survival outcomes, deliverability and toxicities. Primary endpoints included overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Cox proportional hazards models were used to test the association of survival outcomes with patient and treatment factors. RESULTS: The median (range) age was 30 (14-68) years and GCT histology was non-seminomatous in 84% of patients. International Prognostic Factors Study Group (IPFSG) prognostic risk category was very low/low, intermediate, high and very high in 18%, 36%, 25% and 21% of patients, respectively. Salvage conventional-dose chemotherapy (CDCT) was administered prior to HDCT in 59% of patients. Regimens included paclitaxel, ifosfamide, carboplatin and etoposide (50%), carboplatin and etoposide (CE; 28%), carboplatin, etoposide and ifosfamide (CEI; 6%), carboplatin, etoposide and cyclophosphamide (CEC; 5%), CEC-paclitaxel (6%) and other (5%). With a median follow-up of 4.4 years, the 1-, 2- and 5-year PFS rates were 62%, 57% and 52%, respectively, and OS rates were 73%, 65% and 61%, respectively. There were five treatment-related deaths. Progression on treatment occurred in 17%. In a univariable analysis, worse International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group (IGCCCG) and IPFSG prognostic groups were associated with inferior survival outcomes. An association of inferior survival was not found with the number of high-dose cycles received nor when HDCT was delivered after salvage CDCT. CONCLUSION: This large dual-national registry-based study reinforces the efficacy and deliverability of HDCT for relapsed and refractory metastatic GCT in low-volume specialized centres in Australia and New Zealand, with survival outcomes comparable to those found in international practice.

A prospective audit on the use of prophylactic antiemetics and rates of CINV in patients receiving carboplatin AUC≥4 or combination anthracycline-cyclophosphamide.

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) are two of the most frequently experienced and distressing side effects of cancer treatment. Recent updates by ESMO/MASCC and ASCO on guidelines for prevention of CINV have recommended the addition of a neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist to antiemetic regimens for patients receiving carboplatin-based chemotherapy area under the curve (AUC) ≥4 mg/mL per minute, and an addition of olanzapine for those receiving combination anthracycline/cyclophosphamide chemotherapy. AIMS: To assess current use of prophylactic antiemetics and rates of CINV in patients under the care of MidCentral Regional Cancer Treatment Service (MRCTS) receiving carboplatin AUC≥4 or combination anthracycline/cyclophosphamide. METHODS: Data was prospectively collected on patients under the care of MRCTS receiving carboplatin AUC≥4 or combination anthracycline/cyclophosphamide chemotherapy, including breast cancer patients receiving 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (FEC) and lymphoma patients receiving rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (R-CHOP). Questionnaires were given to eligible patients to be completed daily from day two to day six of first cycle of chemotherapy only. Data on each patient's gender, age, types of chemotherapies, types of malignancies, presence of nausea or vomiting, number of dry retching or vomiting episodes and anti-emetics were recorded. RESULTS: From 15 September 2018 to 10 August 2019, a total of 44 patients receiving carboplatin-based chemotherapy AUC≥4 and 30 patients receiving combination anthracycline/cyclophosphamide were included. Twenty-two patients (50%) had either emesis or significant nausea in the overall and delayed phase when treated with carboplatin AUC≥4, and only three (7%) in the acute phase. Fourteen patients (56%) had either emesis or significant nausea in the overall phase when treated with FEC chemotherapy, mostly in the acute phase (13 patients) rather than in the delayed phase (9 patients). CONCLUSION: The rates of CINV are high with the existing antiemetic regimens used at MidCentral Regional Cancer Treatment Service. Therefore, in accordance with international guidelines, we will add a neurokinin-1 antagonist to the antiemetic regimens for patients receiving carboplatin-based chemotherapy AUC≥4, and olanzapine for those receiving combination anthracycline/cyclophosphamide chemotherapy, in an attempt to improve the rates of CINV in these groups. Repeating this audit post-implementation of above recommendations will be important to assess for any improvement.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in non-metastatic breast cancer: a study on practice trends in a regional cancer treatment service.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is increasingly used for managing locally advanced and high risk non-metastatic breast cancer. AIMS: To describe trends in NACT use, assess compliance to best practice recommendations and determine treatment response rates in a regional cancer treatment service. METHODS: In this retrospective cross- sectional study, electronic records of patients who underwent NACT in centres covered by the MidCentral Regional Cancer Treatment Service in 2013 and 2017 were reviewed. Data pertaining to patient demographics, disease status, compliance to best practice recommendations and treatment outcomes were extracted and analysed. RESULTS: Of a total of 502 referrals for non-metastatic breast cancer, 34 underwent NACT with the estimated NACT rate rising from 3.85% (2013) to 9.92% (2017). Compliance to practice recommendations improved in all domains (pre-treatment tumour and axillary evaluation, marker placement, multidisciplinary discussion). Overall, NACT was well tolerated with only three patients experiencing treatment limiting toxicity. Response rates mirror published data (complete response: 29.4%, partial: 61.8%) with higher responses registered in HER2 positive and triple negative subtypes. Discordance between radiological and pathological response was 28%, with imaging overestimating response in five out of seven cases. Of the 11 (32%) patients who initially underwent breast conserving surgery, six required a second surgery. CONCLUSION: NACT is increasingly used in the Regional Cancer Treatment Service, with improving compliance to practice recommendations. These results are reassuring and can be used to help patients develop a realistic expectation towards NACT.

Everolimus and zoledronic acid in patients with renal cell carcinoma with bone metastases: a randomized first-line phase II trial.

BACKGROUND: Bone metastases from renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are a major cause of morbidity. Post hoc analysis has suggested that bone turnover markers can identify patients at risk of skeletal-related events (SREs) among those receiving zoledronic acid. This study sought to evaluate the effect on bone metastases of everolimus alone compared with everolimus plus zoledronic acid. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty treatment-naive patients with RCC and ≥ 1 bone metastases were randomized 1:1 to everolimus (10 mg daily) versus everolimus plus zoledronic acid (4 mg intravenously 4-weekly). Bone-specific assessments were performed at baseline and at weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12. Treatment was continued on allocated arm until progression per RECIST 1.1 (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1). The primary outcome measure was urine N-telopeptide (uNTX) level, with secondary measures of plasma C-telopeptide (CTX), quality of life (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Pain [FACT-BP], Brief Pain Inventory [BPI]), progression-free survival (PFS), SREs, and safety. RESULTS: After 12 weeks, reduction in mean uNTX and CTX on everolimus plus zoledronic acid relative to everolimus was 68.4% (95% CI, 60.1%-74.9%; P < .0001) and 76.2% (95% CI, 67.3%-82.7%; P < .0001), respectively. There was no evidence of a difference for FACT-BP (P = .5), but evidence was favorable for BPI Severity (P = .05) and BPI Interference (P = .06). Median PFS was 7.5 months (95% CI, 3.4-11.2) on everolimus plus zoledronic acid and 5.4 months (95% CI, 3.2-6.3) on everolimus (P = .009). Median time to first SRE was 9.6 months (95% CI, 4.3-15.5) on everolimus plus zoledronic acid and 5.2 months (95% CI, 1.6-8.2) on everolimus (P = .03). CONCLUSION: In this RCC population, the addition of zoledronic acid to everolimus significantly reduced bone resorption markers and may prolong tumor control.

Bleeding from gastrointestinal tract recurrence of non-seminomatous germ cell tumour testis, showing temporary response to gemcitabine and oxaliplatin chemotherapy.

The first reported case of gemcitabine/oxaliplatin (GemOx) chemotherapy used for recurrent non-seminomatous germ cell tumour of the testis metastatic to the gastrointestinal tract causing uncontrolled bleeding which induced a temporary response.

A workforce survey of New Zealand medical oncologists.

AIM: There is wide recognition that the challenge of providing health care into the future requires planning for a sustainable workforce particularly in the context of increasing service demand. The Medical Oncology Work Group (MOWG) undertook a survey of vocationally registered medical oncologists which aimed to support future workforce planning and the development of models of care. METHODS: The survey was developed and carried out by the MOWG in conjunction with the Ministry of Health during 2009. Medical oncologists were sent the survey and forwarded unnamed completed responses to one of the authors (SB). RESULTS: A total of 33 out of 40 practising medical oncologists completed the survey, representing an 82% response rate. The survey found that there is an emerging movement from a male-dominated workforce largely working full time, to a workforce with a higher proportion of females and part-time workers. The median full-time medical oncologist in New Zealand was responsible for 220 first specialist assessments (FSAs) per annum, 40 more than the number considered reasonable by the surveyed practitioners. In qualitative responses, medical oncologists expressed frustration with lack of resources and high workloads that constrained their ability to appropriately deploy their skills and undertake teaching and research. Positive aspects included collegial collaboration and patient contact. Prominent suggestions for improving job satisfaction included use of skilled administrative staff or nurse specialists to free up time for oncologists to better use their skills. CONCLUSION: The survey highlights high clinical workload and frustration within the medical oncology workforce. In addition there is increasing service demand. This survey has formed the basis of work to develop new models of care in medical oncology.

Capecitabine, bevacizumab, and mitomycin in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: results of the Australasian Gastrointestinal Trials Group Randomized Phase III MAX Study.

PURPOSE: To determine whether adding bevacizumab, with or without mitomycin, to capecitabine monotherapy improves progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in an open-label, three-arm randomized trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Overall, 471 patients in Australia, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom with previously untreated, unresectable mCRC were randomly assigned to the following: capecitabine; capecitabine plus bevacizumab (CB); or capecitabine, bevacizumab, and mitomycin (CBM). We compared CB with capecitabine and CBM with capecitabine for progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included overall survival (OS), toxicity, response rate (RR), and quality of life (QOL). RESULTS: Median PFS was 5.7 months for capecitabine, 8.5 months for CB, and 8.4 months for CBM (capecitabine v CB: hazard ratio [HR], 0.63; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.79; P < .001; C v CBM: HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.75; P < .001). After a median follow-up of 31 months, median OS was 18.9 months for capecitabine and was 16.4 months for CBM; these data were not significantly different. Toxicity rates were acceptable, and all treatment regimens well tolerated. Bevacizumab toxicities were similar to those in previous studies. Measures of overall QOL were similar in all groups. CONCLUSION: Adding bevacizumab to capecitabine, with or without mitomycin, significantly improves PFS without major additional toxicity or impairment of QOL.

Seek and ye shall find: Hodgkin's lymphoma presenting as paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration.

Paraneoplastic neurological syndromes (PNS) are rare complications of cancer and may be the presenting sign of an occult malignancy. Diagnosis of PNS is often challenging and treatment of the underlying tumour remains the best therapeutic option for preventing further neurological damage. We report on a patient who developed a rapidly progressive cerebellar ataxia and underwent extensive investigations before a paraneoplastic aetiology was confirmed by detection of an underlying malignancy.

The use of complementary/alternative medicine by cancer patients in a New Zealand regional cancer treatment centre.

AIM: To study the prevalence and patterns of complementary/alternative medicine (CAM) use in cancer patients managed by a New Zealand regional cancer treatment centre. METHODS: A self-administered anonymous questionnaire was used to survey patients attending outpatient clinics of the MidCentral Regional Cancer Treatment Service. Questions addressed patient demographics, cancer diagnosis and conventional treatments received. CAM users were asked to identify types of therapies used, reasons for use, perceived effectiveness, safety and financial cost. RESULTS: Questionnaires were distributed to 350 patients, with 200 assessable replies received. Overall, 49% of patients in this group used CAM, with vitamins, antioxidants, alternative diets, and herbal therapies the most commonly used agents and usage was more common in younger patients. CAM was used by 47% to improve quality of life and by 30% in the hope of a cure of their cancer. Of CAM users, 71% believed these therapies had been helpful in the management of their cancer, and 89% felt they were safe. Only 41% of users had discussed CAM with their oncologist and almost one third had started such therapies before being seen at the Cancer Treatment Centre. The median cost of CAM was NZ$55/month. CONCLUSIONS: CAM is commonly used by New Zealand cancer patients, who often use multiple therapies, not only during conventional treatment, but also without consultation with their oncologist. This lack of open communication about CAM between patients and medical staff may prevent identification not only of potential harmful effects, but also of positive and negative drug interactions between CAM and conventional therapies.