Clinical and radiographic performance of late placed and early loaded dental implants with a conditioned hydrophilic surface in posterior mandible sites: A prospective case series with an 8.5- to 9.5-year follow-up.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical outcomes by means of implant and prosthetic survival of late placed and early loaded implants with a hydrophilic, moderately rough surface for partially edentulous patients after a follow-up of 8.5 to 9.5 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective case series study involving 15 patients with single, late placed and early loaded implants in the posterior mandible was performed. Clinical and radiographical parameters, including biological and technical complications and patient satisfaction, were assessed. RESULTS: From an initial sample of 15 patients, 12 were included. A total of 16 implants were observed. After a mean follow-up of 9 years and 7 months (SD ± 3.8 months), implant success and survival rate were 100%. The prosthetic survival rate was 100%, and the prosthetic success rate was 93.8% since a major chipping was observed. No biological complications were observed, and the mean modified plaque index was 0.03 (SD ± 0.09) with a mean probing pocket depth of 2.95 mm (SD ± 0.09). A mean marginal bone level (MBL) of 0.04 mm (SD ± 0.88) and a mean VAS of 9.42 (SD ± 0.90) for patient satisfaction were recorded. CONCLUSION: Late placed and early loaded implants with a moderately rough endosseal surface are a reliable option for rehabilitating partially edentulous patients. An implant survival rate of 100% and a prosthodontic success rate of 93.8% were observed. Patient satisfaction scores were high and peri-implant hard and soft tissues remained healthy. The study findings should be carefully interpreted because of the small sample.

Clinical performance of implant crowns with customized zirconia abutments: A prospective cohort study with a 4.5- to 8.8-year follow-up.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical and esthetic outcomes and patient satisfaction of screw-retained one-piece implant crowns fabricated with zirconia abutments after a 4.5- to 8.8-year follow-up. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty-two patients (12 women and 20 men), who received 40 implant single crowns in anterior and premolar sites, were included in this prospective study. All restorations were based on ceramic hand-veneered customized CAD/CAM zirconia abutments. The follow-up consisted of clinical and radiological examinations. The pink esthetic score-white esthetic score (PES-WES) was used to evaluate the esthetic outcome. Patients' satisfaction was assessed via visual analog scale (VAS). RESULTS: Implant and prosthetic survival rates were 100% and 97.5%, respectively. Mean marginal bone loss was -0.17 mm (SD 1.16 mm). Probing depth was ≤4 mm in 98.7% and 5 mm in 1.3% of the sites; 8.3% of them were bleeding on probing positive. No technical or biological complications were observed except for one abutment fracture. The mean PES-WES scores were 7.0 and 7.1, respectively. VAS scores (10-point) of 9.41 for function and 9.26 for esthetics showed high patient satisfaction. CONCLUSION: After a mean observation period of 6 years and 7 months, screw-retained implant crowns based on veneered customized CAD/CAM zirconia abutments with conical connection showed very good clinical performance and may be recommended for the replacement of missing anterior and premolar teeth. (ClinicalTrials.gov # NCT04370314).

Clinical performance and patient satisfaction obtained with tooth-supported ceramic crowns and fixed partial dentures.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Studies reporting survival rates along with patient-centered outcomes are necessary to select the appropriate restorative material for crowns and fixed partial dentures (FPDs). However, studies that report the survival and complication rates of lithium disilicate crowns and the performance of zirconia FPDs compared with metal-ceramic FPDs are lacking. PURPOSE: The purpose of this clinical study was to assess the failure and complication incidence of tooth-supported ceramic crowns and FPDs in function for at least 5 years. Groups included were pressed lithium disilicate crowns (CP), veneered pressed lithium disilicate crowns (CV), and computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) lithium disilicate crowns (CC). Veneered zirconia-based FPDs (FPDC) were compared with metal-ceramic FPDs (FPDM). Outcomes were survival and failure, success and complications, periodontal conditions, and patient satisfaction assessed at 2 examinations (at baseline ≥1 year after delivery and at the follow-up examination ≥5 years of function). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eighty-two participants with 158 restorations (CP=39, CV=16, CC=20, FPDM=30, FPDC=53) were examined (2.38 ±0.96 years after delivery) to form the baseline data. For the prospective follow-up examination, 70 participants with 141 restorations (CP=39, CV=15, CC=16, FPDM=28, FPDC=43) were examined 4.08 ±0.36 years later. RESULTS: At the follow-up, restorations were in function for a mean of 6.44 ±1.14 years. Survival rates for crowns were 97.1% (CP=97.4%, CV=100%, and CC=93.8%) and 98.6% for FPDs (FPDM=96.4%, FPDC=100%). Among the 68 crowns, 1 technical and 4 biological complications were recorded. FPDs had more biological and technical complications than crowns (15/149 abutment teeth and 11/71 restorations). Technical complications were seen in 9.3% of zirconia FPDs compared with 25% for metal-ceramic FPDs. Complications were commonly observed at the baseline examination (crowns: 12/75 biological and 1/75 technical; FPDs: 40/174 abutment teeth with biological and 8/83 FPDs with technical complications). The periodontal conditions improved significantly after baseline. The patients reported a high level of satisfaction with the esthetics and function of the crowns and FPDs. CONCLUSIONS: Survival rate for ceramic crowns and FPDs was 97.9% after a mean observation time of 6.44 ±1.14 years. Biological complications were more commonly observed than technical complications, and complications were more common in FPDs than in crowns. The complication rate was similar for zirconia FPDs and metal-ceramic FPDs. Adherence to strict maintenance measures may have reduced the risk of biological complications.

Clinical Performance of One-Piece, Screw-Retained Implant Crowns Based on Hand-Veneered CAD/CAM Zirconia Abutments After a Mean Follow-up Period of 2.3 Years.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical performance of one-piece, screw-retained implant crowns based on hand-veneered computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacture (CAD/CAM) zirconium dioxide abutments with a crossfit connection at least 1 year after insertion of the crown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients who had received at least one Straumann bone level implant and one-piece, screw-retained implant crowns fabricated with CARES zirconium dioxide abutments were reexamined. Patient satisfaction, occlusal and peri-implant parameters, mechanical and biologic complications, radiologic parameters, and esthetics were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 50 implant crowns in the anterior and premolar region were examined in 41 patients. The follow-up period of the definitive reconstructions ranged from 1.1 to 3.8 years. No technical and no biologic complications had occurred. At the reexamination, 100% of the implants and reconstructions were in situ. Radiographic evaluation revealed a mean distance from the implant shoulder to the first visible bone-to-implant contact of 0.06 mm at the follow-up examination. CONCLUSION: Screw-retained crowns based on veneered CAD/CAM zirconium dioxide abutments with a crossfit connection seem to be a promising way to replace missing teeth in the anterior and premolar region. In the short term, neither failures of components nor complications were noted, and the clinical and radiographic data revealed stable hard and soft tissue conditions.