Syringomatous adenoma of the nipple: A case series and systematic review.

Key Clinical Message: SAN should be considered in the setting of nipple discharge or morphology changes with typical histological findings. There are limited published cases of SAN, and workup of this pathology is still not clear to date. Abstract: Syringomatous adenoma of the nipple (SAN) is known to be a rare benign breast neoplasm. With a few cases documented in the literature, preoperatively diagnosing this tumor is a challenge, which often leads to invasive procedure such as mass excision with nipple removal. This study was aimed at presenting a case report of SAN and to conduct a review of published cases. Literature search was conducted through PubMed databases. Articles published from year 1983 to March of 2022 were included. Only histologically confirmed cases of SAN were included. The review was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. Twenty-eight cases, including the newly reported case, were included in the review after going through inclusion criteria. The mean age at diagnosis was 44 ± 16 years. 7% were male. The most common presentation was palpable mass. Preoperative biopsy was done for 9 cases, out of which 7 did not indicate typical histopathological characteristic of SAN. Most common treatment was wide local excision with nipple removal. Immunohistochemical staining of the resected tumor was performed in 16 cases postoperatively. 32.1% (9/28) utilized p63 in constellation with histologic findings. Five cases that utilized staining also used Estrogen Receptor (ER) marker, while three used progesterone receptor (PR) marker. SAN should be considered in the setting of nipple discharge or morphology changes with typical histological findings. There are limited published cases of SAN, and workup of this pathology is still not clear to date. The case presented here and our comprehensive literature review suggest that pathohistological findings of SAN can be heterogeneous. Clinicians would also benefit from recognizing these variances. Further research and reported cases are needed to confidently diagnose SAN, which may open doors for less aggressive surgical treatment or surveillance option for asymptomatic patients.

A case report of biallelic CHEK2 heterozygous variant presenting with breast cancer.

Pathogenic germline variants in the CHEK2 gene have been shown to cause a moderate increased risk of breast cancer. Here, we present a striking CHEK2 family with a biallelic carrier of two frameshift pathogenic variants, to draw attention and to encourage a comprehensive genetic and cancer risk education for biallelic carriers of CHEK2 pathogenic variants.

The CHEK2*1100delC Mutation and Adolescent Breast Cancer: A Case Report of Breast Cancer in a 19-Year-Old and a Review of the Literature.

Background: Breast cancer (BC) is the most common non-skin cancer affecting women but is extremely uncommon in the adolescent population. Genetic inheritance has been linked to <10% of BCs. CHEK2 is an uncommon genetic variant with a reported incidence of 0.3-1.6% in the general population and 4.9-5.7% in those with a family history of BC. Commonly, this mutation presents in females of European descent and is rare in North America. Case Presentation: A 19-year-old Caucasian female presented with breast pain and mass. She had an extensive family history of cancer, as well as a known CHEK2 gene mutation in 2 of her paternal aunts. Ultrasound and MRI confirmed a 4.5-cm mass with an enlarged right axillary lymph node. Image guided biopsy of the breast mass showed ER/PR-positive grade 1 invasive mucinous ductal cancer. Genetic testing confirmed an isolated CHEK2 mutation. After discussion by a multidisciplinary tumor board, the patient deferred bilateral mastectomy and underwent a right mastectomy with sentinel-lymph-node biopsy and immediate tissue-expander reconstruction. Final pathology confirmed ER/PR-positive Stage 1A (pT2 pN0 M0) invasive mucinous carcinoma. Chemotherapy was not recommended. Summary: Malignant adolescent breast masses are relatively rare and CHEK2 does not typically present at younger than 20 years of age. While there are many different differential diagnoses when evaluating an adolescent with a breast mass, we wish to increase providers' suspicion of malignancy, specifically in those individuals who have a strong family history of BC and the CHEK2*1100delC mutation.

Opioid-Sparing Multimodal Analgesia Protocol for Lumpectomy Patients Results in Superior Postoperative Pain Control.

BACKGROUND: We sought to determine if lumpectomy patients who received perioperative opioid-sparing multimodal analgesia reported less pain when compared with those who received traditional opioid-based care. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective cohort of patients undergoing lumpectomy who received an opioid-sparing multimodal analgesia protocol [no opioids group (NOP)] was compared with a large cohort of patients who received traditional care [opioids group (OG)]. In-hospital and discharge opioids were compared using oral morphine equivalents (OMEs). Postoperative day one and week one pain scores were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test. RESULTS: Overall, 1153 patients underwent lumpectomy: 634 patients received the protocol (NOP), and 519 patients did not (OG). Median pain scores were significantly lower in the NOP cohort when compared with the OG cohort the day after surgery (2 vs. 0, p < 0.001) and the week after surgery (1 vs. 0, p < 0.001). NOP patients were significantly less likely to report severe pain (7-10 on a 10-point scale) the day after surgery compared with OG patients (15.7% vs. 6.9%, p = 0.004). Patients in the NOP cohort were discharged with a median of zero OMEs (range 0-150), while patients in the OG were discharged with a median of 90 OMEs (range 0-360; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Implementation of an opioid-sparing multimodal analgesia protocol for lumpectomy patients resulted in superior pain control without a routine opioid prescription. Surgeons can improve their own patients' outcomes while addressing the larger societal issue of the opioid crisis by adopting similar protocols that decrease the quantity of opioids available for diversion.

Intraoperative Ketorolac Use Does Not Increase the Risk of Bleeding in Breast Surgery.

BACKGROUND: The use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs is an effective adjunct in managing perioperative pain. We sought to determine if the use of intraoperative ketorolac as part of a multimodal ERAS protocol increased the risk of bleeding complications in breast surgery. METHODS: A subset analysis of a prospective cohort study including patients undergoing lumpectomy and mastectomy compared two groups: those who received intraoperative ketorolac and those who did not. Bleeding complications were compared using Fisher's exact test or t test, and analyzed with respect to surgical modality. Patients undergoing immediate reconstruction were excluded. RESULTS: Seven hundred and fifty-eight breast surgeries were performed in a 13-month period: 157 lumpectomy patients and 57 mastectomy patients met inclusion criteria between July 2017 and August 2018. Two hundred and fourteen patients were included in the analysis: 115 received ketorolac and 99 did not. The two groups were similar with regards to sex, age, race, tobacco use, and comorbidities. When analyzed together, there was no difference in bleeding complications between the group that received intraoperative ketorolac and those who did not (2% vs. 2.6%, p = 1.00). No hematomas occurred in the lumpectomy patients, and three occurred in mastectomy patients: one of which received ketorolac, and two did not (5.9% vs. 5.0%, p = 0.575). The rates of seroma, infection, or dehiscence were not significantly different between the two groups, regardless of surgical modality. CONCLUSIONS: The use of intraoperative ketorolac is a useful adjunct in perioperative pain management in breast surgery and does not increase the risk of bleeding.

Mastectomy is no longer an indication for postoperative opioid prescription at discharge.

BACKGROUND: A 10-step protocol employing multimodal analgesia was implemented in patients undergoing mastectomy to decrease the quantity of opioids prescribed at discharge. METHODS: Patients who received the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol were compared to a control group. Inpatient and discharge prescription of opioids were compared using oral morphine equivalents (OMEs), along with postoperative pain scores. RESULTS: Between 2017 and 2018, fifty-seven patients were eligible for inclusion: 20 patients received ERAS and 37 received usual care (UC). The ERAS group received a mean of 2.4 (0-13) inpatient OMEs and the UC group received 13.7 (0-80) (p = 0.002). The ERAS group received 2.0 (0-40) OMEs at discharge and the UC group received 59.8 (0-120) (p < 0.001). Postoperative pain scores were significantly lower in the patients who received the ERAS protocol. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who received the ERAS protocol required less postoperative opioids and reported lower pain scores when compared to a control group.

Leveraging the variable natural history of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) to select optimal therapy.

PURPOSE: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a non-obligate precursor to invasive ductal carcinoma. The authors sought to discuss the evidence suggesting that not all DCIS will progress to invasive disease if left untreated. RESULTS: Four lines of evidence align to suggest that not all of this in-situ disease progresses to invasive cancer: its prevalence on screening mammography, studies of missed diagnoses, incidental findings in autopsy specimens, and large retrospective reviews of those treated with excision alone. CONCLUSION: A clearer understanding of the variable history of DCIS coupled with advances in genomic profiling of the disease holds the promise of reducing widespread over-treatment of this non-invasive cancer. Additionally, identification of higher risk of recurrence subsets may select patients for whom more aggressive treatment may be appropriate.

Proliferação lobular lactogênica com formação de fístula e hiperprodução de leite fora do ciclo gravídico-puerperal / Lactogenic lobular proliferation with formation of fistula and milk overproduction in a non-pregnant and non-puerperal patient

As proliferações lobulares lactogênicas são alterações da mama específicas do ciclo gravídico-puerpural e que regridem, espontaneamente, com o término da amamentação. Neste relato, apresentamos o caso de uma pacientes que manifestou abundante saída de secreção leitosa sem pertuito periareolar da mama esquerda sem estar grávida ou no puerpério. O diagnóstico anatomopatológico foi adenoma da lactação, descartanto-se qualquer tipo de malignidade. Os autores traçam paralelo entre as características da doença no ciclo gravídico-puerpural e no caso relatado. Não foi encontrado caso semelhante na literatura, sendo esse possivelmente o único publicado. Esse resumo de caso foi aprovado pela Comissão de Ética do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu (Unesp), com expresso consentimento da paciente.

Proliferations lactogenic lobular breast changes are specific to pregnancy and puerpural and regress spontaneously, with the end of breastfeeding. Here we present a case of a patient who expressed abundant output without milky secretion periareolar orifice of the left breast without being pregnant or postpartum. The pathological diagnosis was adenoma of lactation, descartanto to any type of malignancy. The authors draw parallels between the characteristics of the disease in pregnancy and puerpural and in our case. No similar case was found in the literature, this being possibly the only published. This case summary was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Hospital of the Medical School of Botucatu (UNESP), with the express consent of the patient.