Neurodevelopmental Disorders Including Autism Spectrum Disorder and Intellectual Disability as a Risk Factor for Delayed Diagnosis of Catatonia.

OBJECTIVE: Catatonia is a distinct and severe medical syndrome comprising motor, somatic, and psychiatric symptoms that is reported in upwards of 17% of young patients with autism spectrum disorders. Clinical experience indicates catatonia is often under-recognized in this clinical population. Here we characterize the clinical presentation of catatonia in patients with and without neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) including autism, including the time from symptom onset to diagnosis of catatonia. METHOD: Retrospective chart review of electronic medical records at a large, academic pediatric medical center identified 113 pediatric and young adult patients with a charted history of catatonia, as identified by an encounter diagnosis or problem list entry between September 2017 and September 2021. Workup, treatments, and diagnoses (psychiatric, neurodevelopmental, and genetic) were identified. RESULTS: We observed a clear and substantial delay in identification of catatonia in those with NDDs (diagnosis after 330 days for those without psychosis) compared with neurotypical patients (∼16 days). Psychiatry involvement was associated with shorter delays. CONCLUSION: Intellectual disability and autism are risk factors for significantly delayed diagnosis of catatonia. It is unknown whether delayed diagnosis contributes to the difficulty in treating catatonia in this patient population or whether the treatment difficulties relate instead to differential and ongoing biological mechanisms and underlying encephalopathy. Overall, these findings highlight the importance of increased recognition of catatonia symptoms in patients with NDDs and suggest early referral to psychiatric specialists may shorten the delay to diagnosis.

Patterns in Medication Use for Treatment of Depression in Autistic Spectrum Disorder.

INTRODUCTION: Depression impacts many individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), carrying increased risk of functional impairment, hospitalization, and suicide. Prescribing medication to target depression in patients with ASD occurs despite limited available systematic data describing medication management of depression in this population. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to discover prescribing patterns for individuals with MDD and ASD during this time period (2004-2012) to inform current and future prescribing practices with historical data. METHOD: Drawing from a large clinical database describing the prescribing practices in patients with ASD, we identified 166 individuals with ASD (mean age 14.5 ± 8.3 years old) who received medication targeting symptoms of depression. We report prescribing rates for specific drugs, drug treatment duration, and reasons for drug discontinuation when applicable. RESULTS: Sertraline, mirtazapine, and fluoxetine were the three most commonly prescribed medications to treat comorbid depression for this patient population. Among 241 drug starts, 123 (49%) drug treatments were continued at the final reviewed follow-up visit (average treatment duration of ± 0.72 years). The most common reason for discontinuation across all medications prescribed was loss of or lack of effectiveness. CONCLUSION: This study raises concern that standard of care pharmacological treatments for depression in individuals with ASD may be less effective than in neurotypical populations. There remains a need to develop effective interventions for depression specifically tailored to the needs of individuals with ASD.

Genetic syndromes are prevalent in patients with comorbid neurodevelopmental disorders and catatonia.

Catatonia occurs at high rates in idiopathic and syndromic neurodevelopmental disorders. At our institution's multidisciplinary catatonia clinic, clinical genetic testing (including microarray, fragile X PCR and methylation, autism/ID expanded panels, and exome sequencing) was commonly completed as part of clinical workup on patients with co-occurring neurodevelopmental disorders and catatonia (performed in 36/48 cases or 75%). This testing identified a pathogenic or likely pathogenic finding in 15/36 patients (42%). Testing identified a VUS (variant of uncertain significance) in 9/36 patients (25%). On review of the VUS findings, 4/9 were felt to be suspicious and potentially diagnostic. Testing was negative for 12/36 patients (33%). Many of the variants identified in this cohort were found in genes involved in gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA) and glutamatergic synaptic signaling; imbalances of these neurotransmitters are hypothesized to be drivers of catatonia. More work is needed to further characterize the molecular underpinnings of catatonia in the setting of neurodevelopmental disorders, including expanding genetic testing to larger cohorts in the future.