Perioperative docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil compared to standard chemotherapy for resectable gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Even though the perioperative chemotherapy improves the overall survival (OS) compared to surgery alone in patients with a resectable gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA), prognosis of these patients remains poor. Docetaxel (D), cisplatin (C), and 5-fluorouracil (F) regimen improves OS compared to CF among patients with advanced GEA. We evaluated the potential interest of a perioperative DCF regimen, compared to standard (S) regimens, in resectable GEA patients. METHODS: We identified 459 patients treated with preoperative DCF or S regimens. The primary endpoint was OS. Propensity scores were estimated with a logistic regression model in which all baseline covariates were included. We then used two methods to take PS into account and thus make DCF and S patients comparable. OS analyses were performed with Kaplan-Meier and Cox models in propensity score matched samples, and inverse probability of treatment weighted (IPTW) samples. RESULTS: In the propensity score matched sample, the p-value from the log rank test for OS was 0.0961, and the 3-year OS rate was 73% and 55% in DCF and S groups, respectively. The multivariate Cox regression underlined a Hazard Ratio of 0.55 (95% CI 0.27-1.13) for DCF patients compared to S patients. The results from IPTW analyses showed that DCF was significantly and independently associated with OS (HR = 0.52; 95% CI 0.40-0.69). CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective multicenter, hypothesis-generating study, the propensity score analyses underlined encouraging results in favor of DCF compared to S regimens regarding OS. This promising result should be validated in a phase-3 trial.

Impact of everolimus blood concentration on its anti-cancer activity in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Everolimus has demonstrated its efficacy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Preliminary studies have shown high variability of everolimus blood concentrations (EBC). In other settings, its activity was correlated with EBC. We therefore decided to monitor EBC in patients treated with mRCC to assess its influence on oncologic outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Our study analyzed first 3 months' trough EBC levels in 42 patients treated in 4 French oncologic centers between March 2010 and August 2013. Patients presented a histologically confirmed diagnosis of mRCC and have failed prior anti-angiogenic (AA) therapies. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 25.9 months. A total of 113 EBC were analyzed. The median trough concentration was 14.1 µg/L (range 2.6-91.5). Fourteen patients (67 %) versus 8 (38 %) patients with median EBC above or below 14.1 µg/L were free from progression at 6 months (p = 0.06). Median progression-free survival was 13.3 versus 3.9 months (HR 0.66 95 % CI 0.33-1.31; p = 0.23), and the median overall survival was 26.2 versus 9.9 months (HR 0.62 95 % CI 0.28-1.37; p = 0.24), for patients above or below the median value of trough concentrations, respectively. CONCLUSION: Impact of drug exposure for AA tyrosine kinase inhibitors activity has been demonstrated in mRCC setting. Interpatients EBC variability was confirmed in the present study, and the results suggest a relationship between initial EBC within the first 3 months and the drug activity. It underlines the need to prospectively include EBC monitoring in future clinical trials to determine the need of its implementation in routine use.

Cancer-related pain: a pan-European survey of prevalence, treatment, and patient attitudes.

BACKGROUND: The European Pain in Cancer survey sought to increase understanding of cancer-related pain and treatment across Europe. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with all stages of cancer participated in a two-phase telephone survey conducted in 11 European countries and Israel in 2006-2007. The survey screened for patients experiencing pain at least weekly, then randomly selected adult patients with pain of at least moderate intensity occurring several times per week for the last month completed a detailed attitudinal questionnaire. RESULTS: Of 5084 adult patients contacted, 56% suffered moderate-to-severe pain at least monthly. Of 573 patients randomly selected for the second survey phase, 77% were receiving prescription-only analgesics, with 41% taking strong opioids either alone or with other drugs for cancer-related pain. Of those prescribed analgesics, 63% experienced breakthrough pain. In all, 69% reported pain-related difficulties with everyday activities; however, 50% believed that their quality of life was not considered a priority in their overall care by their health care professional. CONCLUSIONS: Across Europe and Israel, treatment of cancer pain is suboptimal. Pain and pain relief should be considered integral to the diagnosis and treatment of cancer; management guidelines should be revised to improve pain control in patients with cancer.