The usage of population and disease registries as pre-screening tools for clinical trials, a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aims to outline the use of population and disease registries for clinical trial pre-screening. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The search was conducted in the time period of January 2014 to December 2022 in three databases: MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science Core Collection. References were screened using the Rayyan software, firstly based on titles and abstracts only, and secondly through full text review. Quality of the included studies was assessed using the List of Included Studies and quality Assurance in Review tool, enabling inclusion of publications of only moderate to high quality. RESULTS: The search originally identified 1430 citations, but only 24 studies were included, reporting the use of population and/or disease registries for trial pre-screening. Nine disease domains were represented, with 54% of studies using registries based in the USA, and 62.5% of the studies using national registries. Half of the studies reported usage for drug trials, and over 478,679 patients were identified through registries in this review. Main advantages of the pre-screening methodology were reduced financial burden and time reduction. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The use of registries for trial pre-screening increases reproducibility of the pre-screening process across trials and sites, allowing for implementation and improvement of a quality assurance process. Pre-screening strategies seem under-reported, and we encourage more trials to use and describe their pre-screening processes, as there is a need for standardized methodological guidelines.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 study to assess safety, tolerability, and efficacy of RT001 in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: RT001 is a deuterated synthetic homologue of linoleic acid, which makes membrane polyunsaturated fatty acids resistant to lipid peroxidation, a process involved in motor neuron degeneration in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). METHODS: We conducted a randomized, multicenter, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Patients with ALS were randomly allocated to receive either RT001 or placebo for 24 weeks. After the double-blind period, all patients received RT001 during an open-label phase for 24 weeks. The primary outcome measures were safety and tolerability. Key efficacy outcomes included the ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R), percent predicted slow vital capacity, and plasma neurofilament light chain concentration. RESULTS: In total, 43 patients (RT001 = 21; placebo = 22) were randomized. RT001 was well tolerated; one patient required dose reduction due to adverse events (AEs). Numerically, there were more AEs in the RT001 group compared to the placebo group (71% versus 55%, p = 0.35), with gastrointestinal symptoms being the most common (43% in RT001, 27% in placebo, p = 0.35). Two patients in the RT001 group experienced a serious AE, though unrelated to treatment. The least-squares mean difference in ALSFRS-R total score at week 24 of treatment was 1.90 (95% confidence interval = -1.39 to 5.19) in favor of RT001 (p = 0.25). The directions of other efficacy outcomes favored RT001 compared to placebo, although no inferential statistics were performed. CONCLUSIONS: Initial data indicate that RT001 is safe and well tolerated. Given the exploratory nature of the study, a larger clinical trial is required to evaluate its efficacy.

Validity and reliability measures of the Swedish Karolinska version of the Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavioral ALS Screen (SK-ECAS).

OBJECTIVE: Cognitive and behavioral impairment is observed in up to 50% of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). The Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavioral ALS Screen (ECAS) is a 5-domain screening tool customized for quick cognitive screening in patients with ALS. Although the ECAS is available in Swedish at the Karolinska University Hospital (SK-ECAS), it has not yet been validated in Sweden stressing the need to assess validity and reliability of the SK-ECAS Version A. METHODS: The study included 176 patients with ALS or other motor neuron disease diagnosed between September 2017 and October 2021 at the Karolinska ALS Clinical Research Center in Stockholm, Sweden, and 35 age-matched healthy control subjects. SK-ECAS was validated against the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and optimal cutoffs, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated. RESULTS: We identified an optimal cutoff of 108 for the SK-ECAS total score and 82 for the SK-ECAS ALS-specific score to detect cognitive impairment. The SK-ECAS showed good performance in indicating abnormal cognition with an AUC of 0.73 for SK-ECAS ALS-specific score and 0.77 for SK-ECAS total score. There was good internal consistency with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.79. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates good validity and reliability indices for SK-ECAS Version A for the detection of cognitive impairment in newly diagnosed ALS patients.

Long-term prognosis of patients with metabolic (dysfunction)-associated fatty liver disease by non-invasive methods.

BACKGROUND: Non-invasive assessment of fibrosis is predictive of the prognosis of non-alcoholic and alcoholic fatty liver disease but this has not been demonstrated in metabolic (dysfunction)-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD). AIMS: We assessed the prognosis of non-invasive methods in patients with MAFLD. METHODS: All consecutive patients with MAFLD, with liver stiffness measurements, FIB-4 (Fibrosis-4), and LIVERFASt were included in this cohort study. The primary endpoint was analysed by the Kaplan-Meier method and secondary endpoints were estimated by Gray test or logistic regression. Factors independently associated with overall mortality and morbidity were identified by a multivariate Cox model. The prognostic performance of non-invasive methods for prediction of mortality was evaluated by Harrell's C-index and for morbidity by area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC). RESULTS: A total of 1239 patients with MAFLD were analysed (median age 56 years, male 56.5%, median body mass index 31 kg/m2 and obesity 59%). The median follow-up was 62 months [42-91 months] and 73 (5.8%) subjects died. Baseline results of non-invasive methods were correlated with overall and liver-related mortalities (P < 0.001), and with all-cause and liver-related outcomes (P < 0.001). A predictive model (composed of clinical parameters and liver stiffness measurement, FIB-4 or LIVERFASt) was an excellent predictor of overall and liver-related mortalities (C-index 0.8-0.9), and a good predictor of overall and liver-related morbidities (AUC 0.72-0.74). CONCLUSION: Baseline liver stiffness measurement, FIB-4 and LIVERFASt can predict global and liver-related mortality and morbidity in patients with MAFLD and could be prognosis endpoints in clinical trials.

Long-term prognosis of patients with alcohol-related liver disease or non-alcoholic fatty liver disease according to metabolic syndrome or alcohol use.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The boundary between non-alcoholic (NAFLD) and alcohol-related liver disease (ALD) is based on alcohol consumption. However, metabolic syndrome and alcohol use frequently co-exist. The aim of this study was to determine prognostic factors of long-term morbidity and mortality in patients with NAFLD or ALD. METHODS: From 2003 to 2016, all consecutive NAFLD or ALD patients were prospectively included in this cohort study. We evaluated overall survival, specific cause of mortality and occurrence of any complication. The primary endpoint was analysed by the Kaplan Meier method, secondary endpoints were estimated by Gray test method or logistic regressions. Factors independently associated with overall mortality and morbidity were identified by a multivariate Cox model. RESULTS: A total of 3365 patients (1667 with ALD and 1698 with NAFLD) were included. Median follow-up was 54 months (range: 30-86) and 563 subjects died. In the overall population, overall mortality was higher in patients with ALD (HR: 10.1 [7.57-13.3]), and with weekly alcohol consumption >7 units (HR:1.66 [1.41-1.96]). Liver-related mortality was higher in patients with ALD (HR: 11 [7.27-16.5]). In the NAFLD group, weekly alcohol consumption >1 unit was associated with higher overall mortality (HR: 1.9 [1.1-3.4]), and weekly alcohol consumption >7 units was associated with higher overall morbidity (OR: 1.89 [1.61-2.21]). In the ALD group, the presence of metabolic syndrome was associated with higher overall (HR:1.27 [1.02-1.57]), and liver (HR: 1.47 [1.1-1.96]) mortalities, and overall (OR: 1.46 [1.14-1.88]), liver (OR: 1.46 [1.14-1.88]) morbidities. CONCLUSION: In fatty liver diseases, light alcohol consumption and metabolic syndrome are prognosis cofactors.

Subclinical proximal tubulopathy in hepatitis B: The roles of nucleot(s)ide analogue treatment and the hepatitis B virus.

BACKGROUND: The recommended monitoring tools for evaluating nucleot(s)ide analogue renal toxicity, such as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and phosphatemia, are late markers of proximal tubulopathy. Multiple early markers are available, but no consensus exists on their use. AIM: To determine the 24 mo prevalence of subclinical proximal tubulopathy (SPT), as defined with early biomarkers, in treated vs untreated hepatitis B virus (HBV)-monoinfected patients. METHODS: A prospective, non-randomized, multicenter study of HBV-monoinfected patients with a low number of renal comorbidities was conducted. The patients were separated into three groups: Naïve, starting entecavir (ETV) treatment, or starting tenofovir disoproxil (TDF) treatment. Data on the early markers of SPT, the eGFR and phosphatemia, were collected quarterly. SPT was defined as a maximal tubular reabsorption of phosphate/eGFR below 0.8 mmoL/L and/or uric acid fractional excretion above 10%. The prevalence and cumulative incidence of SPT at month 24 (M24) were calculated. Quantitative data were analyzed using analyses of variance or Kruskal-Wallis tests, whereas chi-squared or Fisher's exact tests were used to analyze qualitative data. Multivariate analyses were used to adjust for any potential confounding factors. RESULTS: Of the 196 patients analyzed, 138 (84 naïve, 28 starting ETV, and 26 starting TDF) had no SPT at inclusion. At M24, the prevalence of SPT was not statistically different between naïve and either treated group (21.1% vs 30.7%, P < 0.42 and 50.0% vs 30.7%, P = 0.32 for ETV and TDF, respectively); no patient had an eGFR lower than 50 mL/min/1.73 m² or phosphatemia less than 0.48 mmoL/L. In the multivariate analysis, no explanatory variables were identified after adjustment. The cumulative incidence of SPT over 24 mo (25.5%, 13.3%, and 52.9% in the naïve, ETV, and TDF groups, respectively) tended to be higher in the TDF group vs the naïve group (hazard ratio: 2.283, P = 0.05). SPT-free survival at M24 was 57.6%, 68.8%, and 23.5% for the naïve, ETV, and TDF groups, respectively. The median survival time without SPT, evaluated only in the TDF group, was 5.9 mo. CONCLUSION: The prevalence and incidence of SPT was higher in TDF-treated patients compared to naïve patients. SPT in the naïve population suggests that HBV can induce renal tubular toxicity.

Performance of Simple Fibrosis Scores in Nonobese Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease.

Because only a minority of patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) have advanced fibrosis and would eventually develop liver-related complications, current guidelines recommend initial assessment with noninvasive tests of fibrosis.1-3 Most previous studies focused on overweight and obese patients. Despite a strong association between obesity and NAFLD, 3%-30% of people with relatively normal body mass index (BMI) may still have NAFLD.4,5 Hence, this study aims to evaluate the performance of the common noninvasive tests in non-obese (BMI <25 kg/m2) and obese (BMI ≥25 kg/m2) NAFLD patients.

Liver stiffness measurement predicts long-term survival and complications in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), fibrosis is the strongest prognostic factor and can be assessed by non-invasive methods. We evaluated the ability of liver stiffness measurement (LSM) to predict overall survival and liver, cardiovascular and oncologic complications. METHODS: We prospectively collected data on 2251 consecutive NAFLD patients (mean age 59 years, male 53%, mean body mass index 28 kg/m2 ) in two centres. At inclusion, all patients had LSM, clinical and biological evaluation. During follow-up, we recorded cardiovascular events, cancers, liver complications, liver transplantation and death. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Survival curves according to LSM were first performed using Kaplan-Meier method for the primary endpoint, and Aalen-Johansen method for secondary outcomes to take into account competitive risks. In a second step, a Cox proportional hazard model analysis was done to identify independent predictors of overall survival. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 27 months [IQR: 25-38]. Fifty-five patients died and three patients had liver transplantation. Overall survival significantly decreased as baseline LSM increased. Twenty-one patients (0.9%) had a liver event, 142 (6.3%) developed cancer (excluding HCC) and 151 (6.7%) had a cardiovascular event during follow-up. By multivariable analysis, independent predictors of overall survival were as follows: baseline LSM (adjusted HR (aHR) = 2.85 [1.65-4.92], P = .0002), age (aHR = 1.11 [1.08-1.13], P < .0001) and male sex (aHR = 2.05 [1.17-3.57], P = .012). Patients with elevated LSM were also more likely to develop cardiovascular, and liver events but not other cancers. CONCLUSION: LSM can be used to predict survival, cardiovascular and liver complications in NAFLD patients.

New sequential combinations of non-invasive fibrosis tests provide an accurate diagnosis of advanced fibrosis in NAFLD.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Advanced liver fibrosis is an important diagnostic target in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) as it defines the subgroup of patients with impaired prognosis. The non-invasive diagnosis of advanced fibrosis is currently limited by the suboptimal positive predictive value and the grey zone (representing indeterminate diagnosis) of fibrosis tests. Here, we aimed to determine the best combination of non-invasive tests for the diagnosis of advanced fibrosis in NAFLD. METHODS: A total of 938 patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD were randomized 2:1 into derivation and validation sets. All patients underwent liver stiffness measurement with vibration controlled transient elastography (VCTE) and blood fibrosis tests (NAFLD fibrosis score, Fibrosis-4 [FIB4], Fibrotest, Hepascore, FibroMeter). FibroMeterVCTE, which combines VCTE results and FibroMeter markers in a single test, was also calculated in all patients. RESULTS: For the diagnosis of advanced fibrosis, VCTE was significantly more accurate than the blood tests (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC]: 0.840 ±â€¯0.013, p ≤0.005). FibroMeter was the most accurate blood test (AUROC: 0.793 ±â€¯0.015, p ≤0.017). The combinatory test FibroMeterVCTE outperformed VCTE and blood tests (AUROC: 0.866 ±â€¯0.012, p ≤0.005). The sequential combination of FIB4 then FibroMeterVCTE (FIB4-FMVCTE algorithm) or VCTE then FibroMeterVCTE (VCTE-FMVCTE algorithm) provided an excellent diagnostic accuracy of 90% for advanced fibrosis, with liver biopsy only required to confirm the diagnosis in 20% of cases. The FIB4-FMVCTE and VCTE-FMVCTE algorithms were significantly more accurate than the pragmatic algorithms currently proposed. CONCLUSION: The sequential combination of fibrosis tests in the FIB4-FMVCTE and VCTE-FMVCTE algorithms provides a highly accurate solution for the diagnosis of advanced fibrosis in NAFLD. These algorithms should now be validated for the diagnosis of advanced liver fibrosis in diabetology or primary care settings. LAY SUMMARY: The evaluation of liver fibrosis is mandatory in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), as advanced fibrosis identifies the subgroup of patients with impaired prognosis. FibroMeterVCTE is a new fibrosis test combining blood markers and the result of vibration controlled transient elastography (VCTE) into a single diagnostic test. Our results show that FibroMeterVCTE outperforms other blood fibrosis tests and VCTE alone for the diagnosis of advanced fibrosis in a large multi-centric cohort of 938 patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD. Sequential algorithms using a simple blood test or VCTE as a first-line procedure, then FibroMeterVCTE as a second-line test accurately classified 90% of patients.

Liver Stiffness Measurement With FibroScan: Use the Right Probe in the Right Conditions!

INTRODUCTION: FibroScan's M and XL probes give significantly different results, which could lead to misevaluation of liver fibrosis if the correct probe is not chosen. According to the manufacturer, the M probe should be used when the skin-liver capsule distance (SCD) is <25 mm, and the XL probe should be used when SCD is ≥25 mm. We aimed at validating this recommendation and defining the conditions of use for FibroScan probes in clinical practice. METHODS: Four hundred thirty-nine patients with biopsy-proven chronic liver disease were included. Of them, 382 had successful examinations with both M and XL probes. Advanced fibrosis was defined as Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Clinical Research Network (NASH CRN) F ≥3 or Metavir F ≥2. RESULTS: In a same patient, XL probe results were significantly lower than M probe results: 7.9 (5.6-11.7) vs 9.5 (6.7-14.6) kPa, respectively (P < 0.001). After matching for age, sex, liver fibrosis, and serum transaminases, M probe results in patients with SCD <25 mm and XL probe results in those with SCD ≥25 mm did not significantly differ: 8.8 (6.0-12.0) vs 9.1 (6.7-12.8) kPa, respectively (P = 0.175). Of note, 81.4% of patients with body mass index (BMI) <32 kg/m had SCD <25 mm, and 77.7% of patients with BMI ≥32 kg/m had SCD ≥25 mm. A practical algorithm using BMI first and then the FibroScan Automatic Probe Selection tool was proposed to help physicians accurately choose which probe to use in clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS: There is no significant difference in results between M and XL probes when they are used in the right conditions. In clinical practice, the probe should be selected according to the BMI and the Automatic Probe Selection tool.

Unified interpretation of liver stiffness measurement by M and XL probes in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

OBJECTIVE: The latest model of vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) automatically selects M or XL probe according to patients' body built. We aim to test the application of a unified interpretation of VCTE results with probes appropriate for the body mass index (BMI) and hypothesise that this approach is not affected by hepatic steatosis. DESIGN: We prospectively recruited 496 patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease who underwent VCTE by both M and XL probes within 1 week before liver biopsy. RESULTS: 391 (78.8%) and 433 (87.3%) patients had reliable liver stiffness measurement (LSM) (10 successful acquisitions and IQR:median ratio ≤0.30) by M and XL probes, respectively (p<0.001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves was similar between the two probes (0.75-0.88 for F2-4, 0.83-0.91 for F4). When used in the same patient, LSM by XL probe was lower than that by M probe (mean difference 2.3 kPa). In contrast, patients with BMI ≥30 kg/m2 had higher LSM regardless of the probe used. When M and XL probes were used in patients with BMI <30 and ≥30 kg/m2, respectively, they yielded nearly identical median LSM at each fibrosis stage and similar diagnostic performance. Severe steatosis did not increase LSM or the rate of false-positive diagnosis by XL probe. CONCLUSION: High BMI but not severe steatosis increases LSM. The same LSM cut-offs can be used without further adjustment for steatosis when M and XL probes are used according to the appropriate BMI.

Hepatitis C virus prevention and care for drug injectors: the French approach.

After France removed hepatitis C treatment reimbursement restrictions on 25 May 2016, an expert report presented recommendations, which focused on vulnerable groups including people who inject drugs (PWID). This commentary presents the key points of the chapter with a particular focus on policy. Thanks to the official lifting of restrictions based on disease stage and to the excellent efficacy and tolerance of the new DAA (Direct-Acting Antivirals) among PWID, the main issue is to improve the HCV care cascade. In France, many HCV-infected PWID, especially active/current PWID, remain undiagnosed and unlinked to care. Our challenge is to improve HCV screening by point of care testing (POCT), outreach methods with mobile teams, rapid tests, FibroScan, etc. and to provide PWID with appropriate services in all the settings they attend, such as drug treatment or harm reduction services, social services, prisons, etc. Another important issue is the prevention of reinfection through comprehensive and long-term follow-up. The report recommends a new national policy: testing and treating PWID as a priority, since this is the best way to eliminate HCV infection. It requires a global strategy consisting of combined and long-term interventions: prevention, outreach, screening, DAA, drug treatment programs including opiate substitution treatment (OST) and various harm reduction programs, including needle exchange programs (NEP). Ideally, these services should be delivered in the same place with an integrated approach. This should lead to meeting the national objective set by the government of eliminating hepatitis C by 2025.

Diagnostic accuracy and prognostic significance of blood fibrosis tests and liver stiffness measurement by FibroScan in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: NAFLD is highly prevalent but only a small subset of patients develop advanced liver fibrosis with impaired liver-related prognosis. We aimed to compare blood fibrosis tests and liver stiffness measurement (LSM) by FibroScan for the diagnosis of liver fibrosis and the evaluation of prognosis in NAFLD. METHODS: Diagnostic accuracy was evaluated in a cross-sectional study including 452 NAFLD patients with liver biopsy (NASH-CRN fibrosis stage), LSM, and eight blood fibrosis tests (BARD, NAFLD fibrosis score, FibroMeter(NAFLD), aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index (APRI), FIB4, FibroTest, Hepascore, FibroMeter(V2G)). Prognostic accuracy was evaluated in a longitudinal study including 360 NAFLD patients. RESULTS: LSM and FibroMeter(V2G) were the two best-performing tests in the cross-sectional study: AUROCs for advanced fibrosis (F3/4) were, respectively, 0.831±0.019 and 0.817±0.020 (p⩽0.041 vs. other tests); rates of patients with ⩾90% negative/positive predictive values for F3/4 were 56.4% and 46.7% (p<0.001 vs. other tests); Obuchowski indexes were 0.834±0.014 and 0.798±0.016 (p⩽0.036 vs. other tests). Two fibrosis classifications were developed to precisely estimate the histological fibrosis stage from LSM or FibroMeter(V2G) results without liver biopsy (diagnostic accuracy, respectively: 80.8% vs. 77.4%, p=0.190). Kaplan-Meier curves in the longitudinal study showed that both classifications categorised NAFLD patients into subgroups with significantly different prognoses (p<0.001): the higher was the class of the fibrosis classification, the worse was the prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: LSM and FibroMeter(V2G) were the most accurate of nine evaluated tests for the non-invasive diagnosis of liver fibrosis in NAFLD. LSM and FibroMeter(V2G) fibrosis classifications help physicians estimate both fibrosis stage and patient prognosis in clinical practice. LAY SUMMARY: The amount of liver fibrosis is the main determinant of the liver-related prognosis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). We evaluated eight blood tests and FibroScan in a cross-sectional diagnostic study and found that FibroScan and the blood test FibroMeter(V2G) were the two most accurate tests for the non-invasive evaluation of liver fibrosis in NAFLD. A longitudinal prognostic study showed these two tests initially developed for the diagnosis are also prognostic markers as they allow for the stratification of NAFLD patients in several subgroups with significantly different prognosis.

Controlled attenuation parameter for the diagnosis of steatosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) evaluated with transient elastography (FibroScan) is a recent method for non-invasive assessment of steatosis. Its usefulness in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is unknown. We prospectively investigated the performance of CAP for the diagnosis of steatosis in NAFLD, factors associated with discordances between CAP and steatosis grades, and relationships between CAP and clinical or biological parameters. METHODS: All CAP examinations performed in NAFLD patients with a liver biopsy performed within 1 week of CAP measurement were included. Liver biopsies were assessed for activity and fibrosis stage, NAFLD activity score, and steatosis graded as follows: S0, steatosis < 5%; S1, 5-33%; S2, 34-66%; S3, >66%. RESULTS: Two hundred sixty-one patients (59% male, age 56 years) from two ethnic groups were included. No patient had steatosis < 5%. The area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve of CAP for steatosis ≥S2 and S3 was 0.80 and 0.66, respectively. At a cut-off value of 310 dB/m, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for ≥S2 steatosis were 79%, 71%, 86%, and 71%, respectively. Discordance of at least one grade between CAP and steatosis was observed in 81 patients. By multivariate analysis, only steatosis S2S3 was associated with no discordance. By multivariate analysis, only BMI ≥ 30 kg/m(2) was significantly associated with CAP > 310 dB/m. CONCLUSION: The association of CAP with steatosis, especially in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, and with elevated BMI could be useful for the diagnosis and follow-up of NAFLD patients.

Liver stiffness measurements for evaluation of central venous pressure in congenital heart diseases.

OBJECTIVE: Transient elastography (TE; Fibroscan, Echosens, France) is a non-invasive and reproducible approach to assess liver stiffness (LS). LS has been reported to be associated with fibrosis but central venous pressure (CVP) can also influence LS values. We sought to evaluate the correlation between LS and CVP in a large cohort of children and adults with congenital heart disease. METHODS: All patients referred in our institution between 2012 and 2013 for diagnostic or interventional right heart catheterisation (RHC) were prospectively enrolled excluding patients with acute heart failure, chronic alcohol abuse, chronic liver disease, severe obesity and ascites. Patients underwent LS measurement and CVP measurement by RHC under general anaesthesia within the same or subsequent day. RESULTS: Sixty children (7.4±5.5 years) and 36 adults (38±16 years) were included. Median CVP was 6 mm Hg (range 3-15), median LS was 5 kPa (range 2.8-47.2). LS significantly correlated with CVP (r=0.75, p<10(-4)). In the two subgroups (ie, children and adults), correlation was r=0.68 and r=0.84 (p<10(-4)), respectively. In the overall population, the area under the curve of LS for identification of CVP >10 mm Hg was 0.972 (95% CI 0.855 to 1; p<0.05). Optimal cut-off value of LS for detection of CVP >10 mm Hg was 8.8 kPa (sensitivity=91.67%, specificity=96.25%). CONCLUSIONS: LS measurement using TE is a rapid and reliable method to evaluate CVP in patients with congenital heart disease.

MR relaxometry in chronic liver diseases: Comparison of T1 mapping, T2 mapping, and diffusion-weighted imaging for assessing cirrhosis diagnosis and severity.

BACKGROUND: MR relaxometry has been extensively studied in the field of cardiac diseases, but its contribution to liver imaging is unclear. We aimed to compare liver and spleen T1 mapping, T2 mapping, and diffusion-weighted MR imaging (DWI) for assessing the diagnosis and severity of cirrhosis. METHODS: We prospectively included 129 patients with normal (n=40) and cirrhotic livers (n=89) from May to September 2014. Non-enhanced liver T1 mapping, splenic T2 mapping, and liver and splenic DWI were measured and compared for assessing cirrhosis severity using Child-Pugh score, MELD score, and presence or not of large esophageal varices (EVs) and liver stiffness measurements using Fibroscan(®) as reference. RESULTS: Liver T1 mapping was the only variable demonstrating significant differences between normal patients (500±79ms), Child-Pugh A patients (574±84ms) and Child-Pugh B/C patients (690±147ms; all p-values <0.00001). Liver T1 mapping had a significant correlation with Child-Pugh score (Pearson's correlation coefficient of 0.46), MEDL score (0.30), and liver stiffness measurement (0.52). Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves of liver T1 mapping for the diagnosis of cirrhosis (O.85; 95% confidence intervals (CI), 0.77-0.91), Child-Pugh B/C cirrhosis (0.87; 95%CI, 0.76-0.93), and large EVs (0.75; 95%CI, 0.63-0.83) were greater than that of spleen T2 mapping, liver and spleen DWI (all p-values<0.01). CONCLUSION: Liver T1 mapping is a promising new diagnostic tool for assessing cirrhosis diagnosis and severity, showing higher diagnostic accuracy than liver and spleen DWI, while T2 mapping is not reliable.

Liver and spleen elastography using supersonic shear imaging for the non-invasive diagnosis of cirrhosis severity and oesophageal varices.

BACKGROUND: Elastography is a promising non-invasive approach for assessing liver fibrosis. We assessed diagnostic performances of liver and spleen stiffness using supersonic shear imaging for diagnosing cirrhosis severity and oesophageal varices. METHODS: 401 consecutive cirrhotic patients were prospectively enrolled from November 2012 to March 2014. All patients underwent liver and spleen stiffness measurement with supersonic shear imaging and Fibroscan. RESULTS: Failures of measurement were 6.2% and 29.2% for liver and spleen stiffness (supersonic shear imaging), and 18.4% for liver stiffness (Fibroscan). Liver and spleen stiffness were correlated with severity of cirrhosis, with values increasing according to Child-Pugh subclasses and presence of complications. With a negative predictive value ≥90%, liver stiffness cut-offs for high-risk oesophageal varices, history of ascites, Child-Pugh B/C, variceal bleeding and clinical decompensation were 12.8, 19, 21.4, 30.5, and 39.4 kPa, respectively. Areas under the curve of spleen and liver stiffness (supersonic shear imaging), and liver stiffness (Fibroscan) were 0.80, 0.77 and 0.73 respectively for detection of oesophageal varices. CONCLUSION: Liver stiffness using supersonic shear imaging is a relevant diagnostic tool for assessing cirrhosis severity and its complications. Spleen stiffness shows promising results for the detection of oesophageal varices but is not yet sufficiently robust for clinical practice owing to high failure rates.

Probability-based interpretation of liver stiffness measurement in untreated chronic hepatitis B patients.

BACKGROUND: Liver stiffness measurement (LSM) by transient elastography is a popular noninvasive test of fibrosis. Traditional LSM cutoffs dichotomize patients and do not clearly indicate the confidence of diagnosis. AIM: We derived and validated probability functions of fibrosis and cirrhosis based on LSM and determined the effect of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) on the scores. METHODS: Consecutive chronic hepatitis B patients who underwent liver function tests, LSM, and liver biopsies at six European and Asian centers (2/3 in the training cohort and 1/3 in the validation cohort) were recruited. Binary logistic regression was performed to predict the probabilities of different fibrosis stages based on LSM and/or ALT. RESULTS: A total of 1,051 patients were included in the final analysis (53 % with ALT ≥ 60 IU/L, 32 % F2, 20 % F3, and 24 % F4). The probability functions (LiFA-HBV score) with and without ALT adjustment closely mirrored the proportion with different fibrosis stages in both the training and validation cohorts. For a range of up to 300 IU/L, ALT maintained a weak linear relationship with LSM for each fibrosis stage (r (2) = 0.018-0.13). Based on relative integrated discrimination improvement, the addition of ALT to the LiFA-HBV score increased the correct reclassification of F3-4 and F4 by 5 and 17 %, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: ALT increases LSM in a linear fashion in chronic hepatitis B patients at any fibrosis stage. The LiFA-HBV score accurately predicts the probability of fibrosis. ALT adjustment increases the rate of reclassification modestly and is not essential.

Staging chronic hepatitis B into seven categories, defining inactive carriers and assessing treatment impact using a fibrosis biomarker (FibroTest®) and elastography (FibroScan®).

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The first aim was to extend the validation of FibroTest® (FT) and transient elastography (TE) as markers of occurrence of cirrhosis without complications (F4.1), oesophageal varices (F4.2), and severe complications (F4.3) in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). The second aim was to validate a previous definition of an inactive carrier based on normal FT and ActiTest® (normal-FT-AT). The third aim was to assess the long-term dynamics of fibrosis in patients with sustained virological response. METHODS: The 10-year updated individual data of 1434 patients were pooled from two prospective cohorts. RESULTS: Of the 1312 patients without a history of complications, varices had occurred after 10 years in 14 patients (F4.2, incidence of 1.7%, 95% CI [0.6-2.8]), and severe complications in 25 (F4.3 3.7% [1.8-5.7]), including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in 21 (3.7% [1.5-5.8]). Using Cox-multivariate analysis adjusted for treatment, viral load, HBeAg status and ALT, FT, and TE were predictive of liver complications (n=37; AUROC=0.83 [0.71-0.90]; p<0.0001) and (n=8/844; AUROC=0.82 [0.72-0.89]; p<0.0001) respectively. Normal FT-AT better identified patients with lower fibrosis progression than the ALT-based standard: 3/163 (1.8%) vs. 16/181 (8.8%; p=0.004) in the Paris cohort, and 5/195 (2.6%) vs. 15/228 (6.6%; p=0.05) in the Bordeaux cohort. Of the 582 responders, 23 had complications (incidence 6.2% [3.2-9.1]) including 19 HCC (5.8% [2.6-9.0]) and 10 with varices (2.6% [0.8-4.4]). Of the 138 responders with advanced fibrosis, only 31% (15-47%) had fibrosis regression. CONCLUSIONS: FibroTest® and TE identified three categories of cirrhosis with increasing morbidity. Normal FibroTest® and ActiTest® were better able to identify inactive hepatitis B carriers than the standard definition. Despite virological response, the overall incidence of cirrhosis increased, with a remaining 5.8% risk of HCC.

Non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis with impulse elastography: comparison of Supersonic Shear Imaging with ARFI and FibroScan®.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis by elastography is a rapidly developing field with frequent technological innovations. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic performances of Supersonic Shear Imaging (SSI) for the diagnosis of liver fibrosis in chronic liver disease. METHODS: A total of 349 consecutive patients with chronic liver diseases who underwent liver biopsy from November 2011 to October 2013 were prospectively enrolled. For each patient, liver stiffness was assessed by SSI, ARFI, FibroScan® (M probe for patients with BMI <30 kg/m(2), and XL probe for patients with BMI ⩾30 kg/m(2)), performed within two weeks of liver biopsy. Areas under the receiver operating curves (AUROCs) were performed and compared for each degree of liver fibrosis. RESULTS: SSI, FibroScan®, and ARFI correlated significantly with histological fibrosis score (r=0.79, p<0.00001; r=0.70, p<0.00001; r=0.64, p<0.00001, respectively). AUROCs of SSI, FibroScan®, and ARFI were 0.89, 0.86, and 0.84 for the diagnosis of mild fibrosis; 0.88, 0.84, and 0.81 for the diagnosis of significant fibrosis; 0.93, 0.87, and 0.89, for the diagnosis of severe fibrosis; 0.93, 0.90, and 0.90 for the diagnosis of cirrhosis, respectively. SSI had a higher accuracy than FibroScan® for the diagnosis of severe fibrosis (⩾F3) (p=0.0016), and a higher accuracy than ARFI for the diagnosis of significant fibrosis (⩾F2) (p=0.0003). No significant difference was observed for the diagnosis of mild fibrosis and cirrhosis. CONCLUSIONS: SSI is an efficient method for the assessment of liver fibrosis in chronic liver diseases, comparing favourably to FibroScan® and ARFI.