Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Am J Perinatol ; 36(12): 1216-1222, 2019 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30991442

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of antenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease (CHD) using screening methods including a combination of elevated hemoglobin A1c, detailed anatomy ultrasound, and fetal echocardiography. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study of all pregnancies complicated by pregestational diabetes from January 2012 to December 2016. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated for each screening regimen. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated for each regimen with effectiveness defined as additional CHD diagnosed. RESULTS: A total of 378 patients met inclusion criteria with an overall prevalence of CHD of 4.0% (n = 15). When compared with a detailed ultrasound, fetal echocardiography had a higher sensitivity (73.3 vs. 40.0%). However, all cases of major CHD were detected by detailed ultrasound (n = 6). Using an elevated early A1c > 7.7% and a detailed ultrasound resulted in a sensitivity and specificity of 60.0 and 99.4%, respectively. The use of selective fetal echocardiography for an A1c > 7.7% or abnormal detailed anatomy ultrasound would result in a 63.3% reduction in cost per each additional minor CHD diagnosed (ICER: $18,290.52 vs. $28,875.67). CONCLUSION: Fetal echocardiography appears to have limited diagnostic value in women with pregestational diabetes. However, these results may not be generalizable outside of a high-volume academic setting.


Asunto(s)
Ecocardiografía/economía , Corazón Fetal/diagnóstico por imagen , Hemoglobina Glucada/análisis , Cardiopatías Congénitas/diagnóstico por imagen , Embarazo en Diabéticas , Ultrasonografía Prenatal/economía , Adulto , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Humanos , Tamizaje Masivo/economía , Embarazo , Embarazo en Diabéticas/sangre , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
2.
J Ultrasound Med ; 32(10): 1713-9, 2013 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24065251

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine whether normal fetal cardiac anatomy could be successfully demonstrated and congenital heart disease detected transabdominally at 14 to 18 weeks' gestation in fetuses with a nuchal translucency greater than or equal to the 95th percentile. METHODS: In this retrospective chart review, grayscale images, Z scores, and Doppler evaluations, including pulsed, color, and spectral Doppler imaging, were reviewed to determine whether fetal heart evaluation findings at 14 to 18 weeks' gestation were normal or abnormal. RESULTS: Normal cardiac anatomy was successfully evaluated in 32 of 33 normal cases; only an aortic arch and a ductal arch were not successfully visualized in 1 case. Major congenital heart disease was detected prenatally in 4 abnormal cases. CONCLUSIONS: The fetal heart can be successfully evaluated at an earlier gestational age but may be dependent on the skill of the sonographer and reading physician. Maternal decisions can be made earlier in gestation, before the pregnancy is obvious, and can allow planning for a pregnancy that will need to be delivered at a medical center that has a level 3 nursery.


Asunto(s)
Cardiopatías Congénitas/diagnóstico por imagen , Cardiopatías Congénitas/embriología , Medida de Translucencia Nucal/métodos , Ultrasonografía Prenatal/métodos , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Corazón Fetal , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Masculino , Medida de Translucencia Nucal/normas , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Embarazo , Primer Trimestre del Embarazo , Valores de Referencia , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Ultrasonografía Prenatal/normas , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA