How are people with orofacial clefts attended in northwest region of São Paulo state, Brazil?

Characterization of specific birth defects is essential for conducting scientific investigations, care and therapeutic strategies. This article describes demographic, clinical and genetic aspects, risk factors and access to treatment of Brazilian patients with orofacial clefts registered in a specialized collaborative center of the Brazilian Database on Craniofacial Anomalies (BDCA). We interviewed 70 individuals with typical orofacial clefts using a standard instrument from the database and subjected them to genetic testing. The patients were grouped as syndromic and non-syndromic. The majority of individuals were of lower middle class, native ancestry and syndromic. There was a significant difference in the type of clefts regarding gender. There was no significant difference between bilateral and unilateral, between the side affected, right and left, or familial recurrence related to type of oral cleft. The risk factor familial recurrence was significantly higher among non-syndromic cases. Etiological factors were identified or suggested in 62.5% of the syndromic cases. There was a delay in diagnosis and in access to treatment in most cases. We concluded that gender, native ancestry and low family income represent risk factors. Furthermore, the distribution by cleft types and gender is similar to previous studies. The results can guide scientific investigations and care policies.

Syndromic Oral Clefts: Challenges of Genetic Assessment in Brazil and Suggestions to Improve Health Policies.

Addressing the unmet health needs of persons living with congenital anomalies in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) is a major challenge. Registries and databases are exemplary tools capable to link research data with health programs. Since 2009, Brazil's Craniofacial Project, a multicenter and voluntary research initiative, collects socioeconomic, medical, and genetic information on individuals with craniofacial anomalies through the Brazilian Database on Craniofacial Anomalies (BDCA). This article discusses challenges to the provision of genetic assessment and counselling for individuals with syndromic oral clefts (SOC) through public health services in LMIC, such as Brazil. Subjects were selected using methods of the BDCA as described elsewhere. Among 800 records, 66 assigned as SOC with no etiologic diagnosis were preselected for genomic imbalance screening. Only 28 have timely completed basic protocol using public health services, and 22 were able to perform chromosomal microarray analysis. Pathogenic genomic imbalances were identified in 4 (18.18%) and a copy number variation of uncertain clinical significance was detected in one. Results exemplify barriers faced by the majority of the population of Brazil to reach whole genetic assessment either through public genetic services or in research settings. In this unfavorable scenario, BDCA has allowed the recognition of individuals with similar needs, optimizing the scarce genetic laboratory facilities in Brazil. Ultimately, BDCA has facilitated the translation of research into care. This experience may be successfully extended to other congenital anomalies and to LMIC with similar characteristics. A set of suggestions focusing on oral clefts is provided.