Five-Year Outcomes Among U.S. Bronchiectasis and Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Registry Patients.

RATIONALE: Nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are prevalent among patients with bronchiectasis. However, the long-term natural history of patients with NTM and bronchiectasis is not well described. OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of NTM on 5-year clinical outcomes and mortality in patients with bronchiectasis. METHODS: Patients in the United States Bronchiectasis and Nontuberculous Mycobacteria Research Registry with ≥5 years of follow-up were eligible. Data were collected for all-cause mortality, lung function, exacerbations, hospitalizations, and disease severity. Outcomes were compared between patients with and without NTM at baseline. Mortality was assessed using Cox proportional hazards models and the log-rank test. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In total, 2,634 patients were included: 1,549 (58.8%) with and 1,085 (41.2%) without NTM at baseline. All-cause mortality (95% confidence interval) at Year 5 was 12.1% (10.5%, 13.7%) overall, 12.6% (10.5%, 14.8%) in patients with NTM, and 11.5% (9.0%, 13.9%) in patients without NTM. Independent predictors of 5-year mortality were baseline forced expiratory volume in 1 second % predicted, age, hospitalization within 2 years before baseline, body mass index, and gender (all p<0.01). The probabilities of acquiring NTM or Pseudomonas aeruginosa were approximately 4% and 3% per year, respectively. Spirometry, exacerbations, and hospitalizations were similar irrespective of NTM status, except that annual exacerbations were lower in patients with NTM (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes including exacerbations, hospitalizations, rate of loss of lung function, and mortality rate were similar across 5 years in patients with bronchiectasis with or without NTM.

Latent tuberculosis infection in the outpatient general medicine clinic: Efficacy of a nurse-run electronic directly observed treatment program.

Tuberculosis (TB) is a leading cause of infectious death worldwide, with nearly 2 billion currently infected globally. While the largest burden of active TB resides in low to middle-income countries, the US contributes to the global epidemic and can play a significant role in interrupting the spread of TB by recognizing and treating latent TB infection (LTBI). The vast majority of active TB in the US originates from the reactivation of LTBI. This cross-sectional study examines the prevalence of LTBI in a general medicine practice and explores the efficacy of a primary care nurse-run electronic directly observed therapy (eDOT) treatment program. 1221 patients were screened for the presence of historical risk factors for LTBI. Of those screened, 192 were offered QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) testing and a CXR if indicated, resulting in 35 being offered treatment for LTBI. After an initial provider visit to decide on the treatment regimen, patients received weekly nurse calls to verify adherence, assess for side effects and answer additional patient questions. Provider follow-up appointments occurred at the midpoint and completion of treatment. 33 (94%) of patients with LTBI completed treatment. Patients found the nurse calls very helpful to reassure them about their treatment and to address treatment concerns. Primary care providers are particularly well-positioned to identify and treat LTBI. Screening is simple and treatment is generally well tolerated. Utilization of a nurse-run eDOT) program can be quite helpful in facilitating adherence and treatment completion.

Chasing the Ghost: Hyperinflammation Does Not Cause Sepsis.

Sepsis is infection sufficient to cause illness in the infected host, and more severe forms of sepsis can result in organ malfunction or death. Severe forms of Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19), or disease following infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are examples of sepsis. Following infection, sepsis is thought to result from excessive inflammation generated in the infected host, also referred to as a cytokine storm. Sepsis can result in organ malfunction or death. Since COVID-19 is an example of sepsis, the hyperinflammation concept has influenced scientific investigation and treatment approaches to COVID-19. However, decades of laboratory study and more than 100 clinical trials designed to quell inflammation have failed to reduce sepsis mortality. We examine theoretical support underlying widespread belief that hyperinflammation or cytokine storm causes sepsis. Our analysis shows substantial weakness of the hyperinflammation approach to sepsis that includes conceptual confusion and failure to establish a cause-and-effect relationship between hyperinflammation and sepsis. We conclude that anti-inflammation approaches to sepsis therapy have little chance of future success. Therefore, anti-inflammation approaches to treat COVID-19 are likewise at high risk for failure. We find persistence of the cytokine storm concept in sepsis perplexing. Although treatment approaches based on the hyperinflammation concept of pathogenesis have failed, the concept has shown remarkable resilience and appears to be unfalsifiable. An approach to understanding this resilience is to consider the hyperinflammation or cytokine storm concept an example of a scientific paradigm. Thomas Kuhn developed the idea that paradigms generate rules of investigation that both shape and restrict scientific progress. Intrinsic features of scientific paradigms include resistance to falsification in the face of contradictory data and inability of experimentation to generate alternatives to a failing paradigm. We call for rejection of the concept that hyperinflammation or cytokine storm causes sepsis. Using the hyperinflammation or cytokine storm paradigm to guide COVID-19 treatments is likewise unlikely to provide progress. Resources should be redirected to more promising avenues of investigation and treatment.

A missense mutation in TFRC, encoding transferrin receptor 1, causes combined immunodeficiency.

Patients with a combined immunodeficiency characterized by normal numbers but impaired function of T and B cells had a homozygous p.Tyr20His substitution in transferrin receptor 1 (TfR1), encoded by TFRC. The substitution disrupts the TfR1 internalization motif, resulting in defective receptor endocytosis and markedly increased TfR1 expression on the cell surface. Iron citrate rescued the lymphocyte defects, and expression of wild-type but not mutant TfR1 rescued impaired transferrin uptake in patient-derived fibroblasts. Tfrc(Y20H/Y20H) mice recapitulated the immunological defects of patients. Despite the critical role of TfR1 in erythrocyte development and function, patients had only mild anemia and only slightly increased TfR1 expression in erythroid precursors. We show that STEAP3, a metalloreductase expressed in erythroblasts, associates with TfR1 and partially rescues transferrin uptake in patient-derived fibroblasts, suggesting that STEAP3 may provide an accessory TfR1 endocytosis signal that spares patients from severe anemia. These findings demonstrate the importance of TfR1 in adaptive immunity.