Drug-induced sleep endoscopy effect on intraoperative decision making in pediatric sleep surgery: A 2-year follow up.

Objective: To further demonstrate sleep endoscopy's utility in improving surgical outcomes for pediatric OSA. Methods: This is a retrospective review of surgically naïve patients <18 years old with diagnosed moderate-severe OSA who underwent DISE at the time of initial sleep surgery. Patients included in final analysis had both preoperative and postoperative polysomnograms. Surgical success was defined as an oAHI decrease by at least one diagnostic category. Residual OSA was defined as any patient with postoperative oAHI >1. Results: A total of 106 patients had preoperative and postoperative polysomnograms. Patients with comorbidities comprised 53.8% of the group. Average BMI% was 88.2, with 75.5% classified as obese. The most common area of collapse was the base of tongue, occurring in 32.1% of patients. There was a statistically significant decrease from the mean preoperative oAHI of 29.7 to the mean postoperative oAHI of 6.6 (p < 0.001). Surgical success occurred in 76.4% of patients. A postoperative oAHI of <5 was achieved in 57.7% of patients with moderate or severe OSA. The average BMI% of patients who met surgical success was 86.4, while the average BMI% of patients who did not was 90.8. A postoperative oAHI of <5 was achieved in 68.4% of patients with a BMI% < 85, compared with 55.2% of patients with a BMI% ≥ 85. Conclusion: This study supports the utilization of DISE during initial surgery for severe sleep apnea in the pediatric population. It was found to effectively aid in significantly reducing surgically naïve patients' mean oAHI. Level of Evidence: Level III.

Comparing Rates of Fusion and Time to Fusion in Viable Cellular Allograft and Autograft.

BACKGROUND: Autograft or allograft frequently are used to enhance bone union in foot and ankle surgery. Viable cellular bone allograft uses viable cells and bone scaffolding in a gel base, but uncertainty remains around allograft's greater efficacy than autograft regarding rates of fusion (ROF) and time to fusion (TTF). METHODS: Autograft, viable cellular allograft, and viable cellular allograft with autograft were compared in 199 forefoot, midfoot, and hindfoot arthrodeses performed over a 6-year period. Data collected from electronic medical records and radiographs were analyzed to determine ROF and TTF as well as rates of revision surgery for delayed or nonunion and compared among groups. RESULTS: Eighty-seven patients comprised the autograft group, 81 the allograft group, and 31 the combined group. No significant differences were noted in patient demographics among the groups. No statistically significant differences in ROF were noted among the 3 groups, with 86% (75 of 87) fusion in the autograft group, 93% (75 of 81) in the allograft group, and 84% (26 of 31) in the combined group (P = .20). After conducting a multivariate analysis, we found no statistically significant difference for allograft or combined graft on TTF (P = .1379 and .2311, respectively). No significant difference was found in rate of revision surgery for nonunion, which was 1.2% (1 of 81) in the allograft group, 3.4% (3 of 87) in the autograft group, and 6.5% (2 of 31) in the combined group (P = .3). CONCLUSION: No significant difference was found in ROF, TTF, or rate of revision surgery when comparing viable cellular allograft to autograft or combined allograft-autograft. Viable cellular allograft may be a reasonable alternative to the gold standard of autograft and should be considered an option in patients undergoing arthrodesis in foot and ankle surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic.

Use of VOTE score in predicting outcomes in pediatric obstructive sleep apnea.

OBJECTIVES: Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) affects 1-4% of the pediatric population in the U.S. Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy (DISE) is widely used to localize the level(s) of obstruction. The VOTE classification system is used to grade obstructions found at the velum, oropharynx, base of tongue, and epiglottis and has been validated in adults. This study aims to determine if the VOTE score has any predictive value in pediatric OSA postoperative outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 129 patients from January 7, 2016 to 05/30/2020 was performed. Included patients were between the ages of 2 and 17, undergoing DISE, and if they had preoperative and postoperative polysomnography (PSG) data. Excluded patients did not meet one of the above or had other comorbidities contributing to their sleep apnea. 53 patients were included. RESULTS: Pearson's Correlation tests compared intraoperative VOTE score to postoperative BMI, AHI, and O2 nadir and their relationships. We found a weakly positive correlation between the VOTE and postoperative AHI with a coefficient of 0.35 and a p-value of 0.01. We found a relationship between postoperative O2 nadir and AHI, with a coefficient of -0.627 and a p-value <0.0001. Finally, a paired, two-tailed t-test compared the mean change between preoperative and postoperative BMIs (+1.6), oAHIs (-23.5), and O2 nadirs (+14), all with p-value <0.0001. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated a correlation between VOTE and improved postoperative AHI and a relationship between improved postoperative AHI and postoperative O2 nadir. The validity of VOTE may be proven with larger sample size. Alternatively, a different scoring system may be required for pediatric OSA.

Efficacy of Postoperative Oral Antibiotics in Foot and Ankle Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative oral antibiotic use in patients undergoing foot and ankle surgery is standard practice, but no consensus has been reached regarding the efficacy of postoperative oral antibiotics. The purpose of this study was to determine whether postoperative oral antibiotics reduce the rate of surgical site infections (SSIs) in patients, with and without comorbidities, undergoing foot and ankle surgery. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted identifying patients who underwent foot and ankle surgery by 4 fellowship-trained, foot and ankle orthopaedic surgeons between January 1, 2015, and January 1, 2019. Patients were divided into 2 groups: those who received postoperative oral antibiotics (group 1) and those who did not (group 2). Two surgeons routinely prescribed postoperative oral antibiotics, and 2 did not. Demographics, comorbidities, and procedure complexity based on surgical site and Current Procedural Terminology code were recorded from the charts. The primary outcome was postoperative infection (superficial or deep) within 6 months after surgery. Patients with antibiotic use prior to surgery, preoperative infection, or lack of follow-up >6 weeks were excluded. Multivariate logistic regression modeling was used to analyze differences in infection rate and severity. RESULTS: Chart review identified 3631 patients, 1227 of whom did not receive postoperative oral antibiotics whereas 2394 patients did. Routine postoperative oral antibiotic use did not significantly affect postoperative infection rates or severity. However, all covariates studied (diabetes, hypertension, obesity, tobacco use, alcohol use, rheumatoid conditions, and age) influenced postoperative infection rates and severity. CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicate that postoperative oral antibiotics are not associated with differences in infection rates or severity. We do not recommend routine use in foot and ankle surgery.