The adaptation of a youth mental health intervention to a peer-delivery model utilizing CBPR methods and the ADAPT-ITT framework in Sierra Leone.

Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) carry a significant proportion of the global burden of untreated mental health disorders. Peer-delivered programs offer LMICs with limited mental health professionals an opportunity to increase mental health service access. This study describes the process of adapting a lay-worker-delivered evidence-based youth mental health intervention to a peer-delivery model in Sierra Leone using participatory methods. We convened Youth Community Advisory Boards (YCABs) as partners to develop a peer-delivery model for an evidence-based intervention. In collaboration with YCABs, the Assessment, Decision, Administration, Production, Topical experts, Integration, Training, Testing (ADAPT-ITT) framework was applied to guide the adaptation. The ADAPT-ITT framework is an eight-step process to adapt evidence-based interventions. The ADAPT-ITT framework facilitated the adaptation of the Youth Readiness Intervention (YRI), an evidence-based mental health program intervention that has been delivered by adult lay-workers to the youth peer-delivery platform in Sierra Leone. The YCABs identified program modifications, including the incorporation of storytelling, refinement of metaphors, and alterations to make delivery more accessible to low-literacy youth with particular attention to gender. YCABs also provided recommendations on how to support youth facilitators in providing psychosocial support, emphasizing self-care and boundary setting to ensure high-quality intervention delivery and do-no-harm principles. Study findings suggest that the ADAPT-ITT framework can be feasibly applied to guide the intervention adaptation process in LMICs. The use of participatory methods generated modifications that reflected youth experiences, needs, and concerns as facilitators and participants. Next steps include refinement and pilot testing of the adapted intervention.

Integrating Youth Readiness Intervention and Entrepreneurship in Sierra Leone: A Hybrid Type II Cluster Randomized Trial.

OBJECTIVE: Conflict-affected youth are at risk for poor psychological and social outcomes, yet few receive mental health services. Strategies to expand access and sustain evidence-based interventions (EBIs) across novel delivery platforms must be tested. The present study was a hybrid type II implementation-effectiveness trial using a cluster randomized design. The primary goal was to evaluate feasibility and impact of using the collaborative team approach to deliver the Youth Readiness Intervention (YRI), an EBI, integrated into a youth entrepreneurship program (ENTR) with quality control in post-conflict Sierra Leone. METHOD: Youth were screened and randomly assigned to control, ENTR, or combined YRI and ENTR (YRI+ENTR). Implementation outcomes were dissemination and implementation indicators, competence, and fidelity. Effectiveness outcomes were emotion regulation, psychological distress, and interpersonal functioning. Secondary outcomes were third-party reporter assessments of youth functioning and behavior. RESULTS: Data were collected and analyzed from 1,151 youth participants and 528 third-party reporters. Scores on implementation constructs, competence, and fidelity demonstrated acceptable intervention response and quality. YRI+ENTR participants showed overall improvements in depression (ß = -.081, 95% CI -0.124 to -0.038, d = -0.154) and anxiety (ß = -.043, 95% CI -0.091 to -0.005, d = 0.082) symptoms compared with control participants. Community leaders indicated that YRI+ENTR participants demonstrated improvements in overall work or training performance compared with control participants (ß = -.114, 95% CI 0.004 to 0.232, d = 0.374). CONCLUSION: Integration of EBIs such as the YRI into youth employment programs has the potential to address limited reach of EBIs in conflict and post-conflict settings. A collaborative team implementation approach can facilitate integration and fidelity. DIVERSITY & INCLUSION STATEMENT: We worked to ensure sex and gender balance in the recruitment of human participants. We worked to ensure that the study questionnaires were prepared in an inclusive way. We worked to ensure race, ethnic, and/or other types of diversity in the recruitment of human participants. One or more of the authors of this paper self-identifies as a member of one or more historically underrepresented racial and/or ethnic groups in science. One or more of the authors of this paper self-identifies as a member of one or more historically underrepresented sexual and/or gender groups in science. We actively worked to promote sex and gender balance in our author group. We actively worked to promote inclusion of historically underrepresented racial and/or ethnic groups in science in our author group. The author list of this paper includes contributors from the location and/or community where the research was conducted who participated in the data collection, design, analysis, and/or interpretation of the work. One or more of the authors of this paper received support from a program designed to increase minority representation in science. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: Youth FORWARD Phase 2 YRI and EPP Study; https://clinicaltrials.gov/; NCT03542500.

Alternative Delivery Platforms for Expanding Evidence-based Mental Health Interventions for Youth in Sierra Leone: A Pilot Study.

Given the high rates of mental health problems and poor service access among youth in war-affected countries throughout Sub-Saharan Africa, incorporating evidence-based mental health interventions into alternative delivery platforms could improve service access in these settings. We conducted a randomized controlled pilot study with high-risk Sierra Leonean youth to investigate the feasibility of implementing the Youth Readiness Intervention (YRI), a cognitive behavioral and interpersonal therapy-based group intervention, within an employment promotion program (EPP) and preliminary effects of the YRI on mental health outcomes. Participants were 175 youth (females=62%) ages 18-30 recruited via flyers and radio announcements. Participants were assigned to geographic clusters stratified by gender; clusters were randomized into YRI+EPP (n=58) or EPP-only (n=57). Statistically matched controls were recruited from comparable chiefdoms (n=60). The 12-session YRI was delivered bi-weekly, following EPP completion. Qualitative findings indicated that the YRI was highly feasible and acceptable as integrated into the EPP. Mixed linear effects models showed promising trends. Compared with controls, both YRI+EPP and EPP-only males reported significantly reduced post-traumatic stress symptoms, and YRI+EPP reported marginally significantly reduced emotional regulation difficulties. EPP-only females reported significantly reduced functional impairment compared to controls. Findings suggest that the YRI can be feasibly implemented within an EPP. Integrating the YRI into existing delivery platforms may help increase access to mental health care in Sierra Leone and provide a leverage point for scaling up evidence-based mental health interventions in other low-resource settings globally. [Clinicaltrials.gov; NCT0360361; 5/18/18].

Investigating Outcomes of a Family Strengthening Intervention for Resettled Somali Bantu and Bhutanese Refugees: An Explanatory Sequential Mixed Methods Study.

Pre- and post-migration stressors can put resettled refugee children at risk of poor mental health outcomes. The Family Strengthening Intervention for Refugees (FSI-R) is a peer-delivered preventative home visiting program for resettled refugees that aims to draw upon families' strengths to foster improved family communication, positive parenting, and caregiver-child relationships, with the ultimate goal of reducing children's risk of mental health problems. Using an explanatory sequential mixed methods design, this study draws upon qualitative interviews with caregivers (n = 19) and children (n = 17) who participated in a pilot study of the FSI-R intervention in New England, as well as interventionists (n = 4), to unpack quantitative findings on mental health and family functioning from a randomized pilot study (n = 80 families). Most patterns observed in the quantitative data as published in the pilot trial were triangulated by qualitative data. Bhutanese caregivers and children noted that children were less shy or scared to speak up after participating in the FSI-R. Somali Bantu families spoke less about child mental health and underscored feasibility challenges like language barriers between caregivers and children. Interventionists suggested that families with higher levels of education were more open to implementing behavior change. In both groups, families appreciated the intervention and found it to be feasible and acceptable, but also desired additional help in addressing broader family and community needs such as jobs and literacy programs.

An Academic-Health Department Community Partnership to Expand Disease Investigation and Contact Tracing Capacity and Efficiency During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Disease investigation and contact tracing are long-standing public health strategies used to control the spread of infectious disease. Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, health departments across the country have lacked the internal workforce capacity and technology needed to efficiently isolate positive cases and quarantine close contacts to slow the spread of SARS-CoV-2. This article describes an innovative disease investigation and contact tracing program developed through a formalized community partnership between a local county health department and local university. This innovative new program added 108 contact tracers to the county's public health workforce, as well as enabled these contact tracers to work remotely using a call center app and secure cloud-based platform to manage the county's caseload of cases and contacts. An overview of the requirements needed to develop this program (eg, hiring, health data security protocols, data source management), as well as lessons learned is discussed.

The mental, reproductive, and physical health impacts of female children's association with armed forces and groups.

BACKGROUND: Globally, over 300,000 children are being used in armed groups, including young girls some as young as eight years old. These young girls often called female children associated with armed groups and armed forces (CAAFAG), are exposed to high levels of violence and experience extensive abuse. OBJECTIVE: This review aimed to understand the unique health consequences of association on female CAAFAG and the factors associated with their increased health vulnerability. METHODS: The research utilized a review protocol, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) standards. The search yielded 449 unique articles, 53 (12 %) of which were included for final analysis to identify health concerns for female CAAFAG. Qualitative literature was also analyzed using thematic analysis to identify factors and experiences associated with female CAAFAG's increased risk of experiencing adverse health outcomes. RESULTS: Internalizing and functional impairment presented unique challenges for females, largely due to their distinct experiences with stigma upon return to communities and returning with children. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the findings of this review, female CAAFAG are at a unique risk for internalizing, functional impairment, and reduced adaptive behaviors. This review also highlights girls' post-conflict experiences of stigma, internal tensions, and returning with a child as modifiable risk factors for poor mental health.

Family-Based Mental Health Promotion for Somali Bantu and Bhutanese Refugees: Feasibility and Acceptability Trial.

PURPOSE: There are disparities in mental health of refugee youth compared with the general U.S. POPULATION: We conducted a pilot feasibility and acceptability trial of the home-visiting Family Strengthening Intervention for refugees (FSI-R) using a community-based participatory research approach. The FSI-R aims to promote youth mental health and family relationships. We hypothesized that FSI-R families would have better psychosocial outcomes and family functioning postintervention compared with care-as-usual (CAU) families. We hypothesized that FSI-R would be feasible to implement and accepted by communities. METHODS: A total of 40 Somali Bantu (n = 103 children, 58.40% female; n = 43 caregivers, 79.00% female) and 40 Bhutanese (n = 49 children, 55.30% female; n = 62 caregivers, 54.00% female) families were randomized to receive FSI-R or CAU. Refugee research assistants conducted psychosocial assessments pre- and post-intervention, and home visitors delivered the preventive intervention. Multilevel modeling assessed the effects of FSI-R. Feasibility was measured from retention, and acceptability was measured from satisfaction surveys. RESULTS: The retention rate of 82.50% indicates high feasibility, and high reports of satisfaction (81.50%) indicate community acceptance. Across communities, FSI-R children reported reduced traumatic stress reactions, and caregivers reported fewer child depression symptoms compared with CAU families (ß = -.42; p = .03; ß = -.34; p = .001). Bhutanese FSI-R children reported reduced family arguing (ß = -1.32; p = .04) and showed fewer depression symptoms and conduct problems by parent report (ß = -9.20; p = .04; ß = -.92; p = .01) compared with CAU. There were no significant differences by group on other measures. CONCLUSIONS: A family-based home-visiting preventive intervention can be feasible and acceptable and has promise for promoting mental health and family functioning among refugees.

Advancing Cancer Research in Africa Through Early-Career Awards: The BIG Cat Initiative.

PURPOSE: The burden of cancer in Africa is growing rapidly, and increased cancer research on the continent is a critical component of an effective response. In 2010, the US National Cancer Institute, in partnership with the African Organization for Research and Training in Cancer, launched the Beginning Investigator Grant for Catalytic Research (BIG Cat) initiative to support cancer research projects conducted by early-career African investigators. METHODS: To date, BIG Cat has provided 18 awards of up to $50,000 to support 2-year cancer research projects. In 2017, the National Cancer Institute evaluated BIG Cat's early outcomes for cancer research and impacts on career development and local cancer research capacity. Data collection consisted of a review of project documentation and a survey fielded to the 12 investigators who had completed their BIG Cat awards. RESULTS: BIG Cat-supported research projects have generated locally relevant findings that address a range of cancer sites and multiple areas of scientific interest. The 11 survey respondents produced 43 scholarly products (e.g., publications, presentations) about findings from their BIG Cat research. They reported increases in cancer research funding applications and awards after receipt of the BIG Cat award compared with before the award. They also reported increased resources for cancer research, participation in teaching and mentoring on cancer research, and supervision of cancer research staff. Investigators identified scientific mentoring as a key facilitator of the success of their BIG Cat projects and limited time and funding as key challenges. CONCLUSION: Findings provide early evidence that BIG Cat advanced locally relevant cancer research and facilitated career advancement and development of local cancer research capacity. Findings have implications for the design of future related efforts.