Relationships between predisposing, precipitating, and perpetuating factors and executive functioning following mild traumatic brain injury.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to determine the sociodemographic and MTBI-related variables associated with executive functioning (EF). METHODS: Based on the theoretical model of Hou and colleagues, data on predisposing (age, education, premorbid IQ), precipitating (post-traumatic amnesia, loss of consciousness, presence of frontal lesions, post-accident time to evaluation) and perpetuating (anxious and depressive affects and post-concussive symptoms) factors were retrospectively collected from the medical records of 172 patients with MTBI. EF data based on the 3 processes included in Miyake's prediction model (2000) (updating, cognitive flexibility and inhibition) were collected using respectively the Digit span task of the Weschler - 4th edition, the Trails A and B as well as the initiation time on the Tower of London- Drexel University. RESULTS: Updating was significantly associated with education, premorbid IQ, age, anxiety, and depressive affect. Inhibition was associated with education and age. No variable was associated with cognitive flexibility. CONCLUSIONS: Following a MTBI, clinicians should consider that level of education and pre-morbid IQ may "predispose" patients to higher EF performances. They should also measure level of anxiety and depressive affect knowing that these may "perpetuate" some EF impairments (specifically the updating process).

Early reading comprehension and speed of reading impairments in individuals with uncomplicated and complicated mild traumatic brain injury.

PURPOSE: Several studies have investigated cognitive-communication disorders affecting oral expression skills following TBI but very few have dealt with reading comprehension abilities. The current study aims to measure reading comprehension and speed of reading in adults with uncomplicated and complicated mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) and to determine which demographic and TBI-related variables are predictive of their performance. METHOD: The performances of three groups of participants were compared on the Chapman-Cook Speed of Reading Test (CCSRT). The CCSRT was administered in an acute care setting to 85 hospitalized participants with mild TBI showing traumatic cerebral lesions (complicated mild TBI), to 15 hospitalized participants with uncomplicated mild TBI (no cerebral lesions) and to 68 adults without TBI. Linear regression analyses were performed to determine which variables among sex, age, education, TBI severity (measured by the Glasgow Coma Scale score), speed of processing skills, and site of cerebral lesions significantly predicted CCSRT performances. RESULTS: The control group showed a lower percentage of errors than both TBI groups. On the total score of the CCSRT, the uncomplicated and complicated TBI groups performed worse than the control group. Moreover, as age and speed of processing skills increased, and education decreased, the odds of having a lower score on the CCSRT increased. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that reading abilities are compromised after mild TBI. Furthermore, the CCSRT may be a useful bedside tool for clinicians who work with individuals with mild TBI.

Visual memory performance following mild traumatic brain injury and its relationship with intellectual functioning.

To compare the visual memory performance of uncomplicated and complicated mild TBI (mTBI) groups with that of a control group on the Rey Complex Figure Test (RCFT). We also aimed to explore the influence of factors such as age, gender, education, occupation, and intellectual functioning on visual memory in individuals with mTBI. The RCFT and the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASI-II) were administered to 138 participants (90 uncomplicated mTBI patients, 19 complicated mTBI patients, and 29 controls). The mTBI patients demonstrated significantly lower scores than control participants on both immediate and delayed RCFT recall conditions, with performance in the low average and borderline range. However, there was no difference in performance between the two mTBI groups on the recall conditions. In addition, no significant differences were observed across the three groups on the recognition condition. The WASI-II Performance and Verbal IQ scales explained most of the variance in the immediate and delayed RCFT recall conditions but were not associated with performance on the recognition condition. In contrast with the recognition processes involved in visual memory, recall processes seem to be more vulnerable following mTBI and both verbal and performance IQ seem to be related to visual memory performance.