Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Eur J Breast Health ; 18(4): 306-314, 2022 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36248752

RESUMEN

Objective: To assess the impact of the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic screening restrictions on the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer in a single health system. Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective, cohort investigation of breast cancer patients at a multi-institution health system from March 1, 2019 to December 31, 2020 with two time periods related to the pandemic: "Early phase" (March 18 - June 7) reflecting the time of the screening mammography moratorium and "Late phase" (June 8 - December 31) to reflect the time once screening mammography resumed. 2020 was compared to 2019 to exclude potential differences from temporal or seasonal changes. Variables included demographics, COVID related-deferral, cancer specific data, method of detection, type of treatment recommended and received. Results: Fewer patients presented with a breast cancer diagnosis during Early phase 2020 when compared to any other time period. Numbers increased significantly in Late phase 2020; total numbers of patients seen in 2020 approached but did not completely reach that of 2019. When compared to other time periods, patients who presented during the moratorium on screening were younger, more likely to be black, had a higher Body Mass Index, and were more likely to have a human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive tumor. There was a slight increase in size of presenting tumor and node positivity, although no differences in breast or axillary surgical management were identified. Conclusion: Despite an increase in tumor size and positive nodal status seen during the screening moratorium, surgical treatment was not negatively impacted.

2.
Curr Breast Cancer Rep ; 13(4): 235-240, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34703524

RESUMEN

Purpose of Review: Across the world, medical training has been affected by the COVID-19 virus and this has changed the way physicians are educated. What is less clear is the effect of the pandemic on breast surgical oncology fellows who were in training during this time. This review discusses the experience of breast surgical oncology fellows during the pandemic and how fellowships adapted to preserve the educational experience and conserve the quality of training. Recent Findings: The challenges and changes experienced by breast surgery fellows during the COVID-19 pandemic have proved to be sudden shifts in not only fellowship training, but future patient care and research opportunities, all while confronting the global impact of a deadly pandemic. While experiences between fellowships varied, the similarities and differences encountered highlight the regional and temporal differences in how fellowships responded to the pandemic. Summary: Breast surgical oncology fellowship is one year long, with every day allocated to ensure the surgeon has a deep understanding of the multidisciplinary approach to this ever-evolving field. As the pandemic spread and affected different regions with varying severity, elective cases were canceled, resources were re-allocated, and uncertainty abounded. At the same time, novel approaches to fellowship training were rapidly implemented. It will take time and additional research to fully understand the long-term consequences for trainees affected during their breast surgery fellowship.

3.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 28(9): 5112-5118, 2021 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33604827

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Angiosarcoma of the breast is rare and aggressive. It can occur as a de novo tumor or secondary to breast cancer treatment. The purpose of this study is to analyze differences between patients with primary and secondary angiosarcoma of the breast and investigate potential risk factors for its development. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program of the National Cancer Institute database was queried to identify patients with angiosarcoma of the breast, trunk, shoulder, and upper arm. The population-based incidence was analyzed. Primary and secondary angiosarcoma cases were identified and compared. Breast cancer characteristics of secondary angiosarcoma patients were compared with all breast cancer patients in the database who did not develop angiosarcoma. RESULTS: Overall, 904 patients were included, and 65.4% were secondary angiosarcomas. These patients had worse survival, were older, more likely to be White, more likely to have regionally advanced disease, and had angiosarcoma tumors of higher pathologic grade. Independent factors associated with development of secondary angiosarcoma among breast cancer patients included White race, older age, invasive tumor, lymph node removal, lumpectomy, radiation treatment, and left-sided tumor. Although the mean time to develop angiosarcoma after breast cancer diagnosis was 8.2 years, the risk continues to increase up to 30 years after breast cancer treatment. CONCLUSION: Angiosarcoma is rare but increasing in incidence. Secondary angiosarcomas are more common and exhibit more aggressive behavior. Several factors for angiosarcoma after breast cancer treatment could be identified, which may help us counsel and identify patients at risk.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Hemangiosarcoma , Anciano , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Mama/etiología , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Femenino , Hemangiosarcoma/epidemiología , Hemangiosarcoma/etiología , Hemangiosarcoma/cirugía , Humanos , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático , Mastectomía Segmentaria
5.
J Surg Res ; 257: 203-212, 2021 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32858321

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hibernating American black bears have significantly different clotting parameters than their summer active counterparts, affording them protection against venous thromboembolism during prolonged periods of immobility. We sought to evaluate if significant differences exist between the expression of microRNAs in the plasma of hibernating black bears compared with their summer active counterparts, potentially contributing to differences in hemostasis during hibernation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MicroRNA sequencing was assessed in plasma from 21 American black bears in summer active (n = 11) and hibernating states (n = 10), and microRNA signatures during hibernating and active state were established using both bear and human genome. MicroRNA targets were predicted using messenger RNA (mRNA) transcripts from black bear kidney cells. In vitro studies were performed to confirm the relationship between identified microRNAs and mRNA expression, using artificial microRNA and human liver cells. RESULTS: Using the bear genome, we identified 15 microRNAs differentially expressed in the plasma of hibernating black bears. Of these microRNAs, three were significantly downregulated (miR-141-3p, miR-200a-3p, and miR-200c-3p), were predicted to target SERPINC1, the gene for antithrombin, and demonstrated regulatory control of the gene mRNA expression in cell studies. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the hibernating black bears' ability to maintain hemostasis and achieve protection from venous thromboembolism during prolonged periods of immobility may be due to changes in microRNA signatures and possible upregulation of antithrombin expression.


Asunto(s)
Hemostasis/genética , Hibernación/genética , MicroARNs/metabolismo , Ursidae/genética , Tromboembolia Venosa/genética , Animales , Antitrombina III/genética , Línea Celular Tumoral , Femenino , Silenciador del Gen , Hepatocitos , Humanos , Masculino , MicroARNs/sangre , Estaciones del Año , Regulación hacia Arriba , Ursidae/sangre , Tromboembolia Venosa/prevención & control
7.
Clin Breast Cancer ; 19(3): e428-e432, 2019 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30876714

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The objective of the study was to evaluate the morbidity, mortality, and postoperative outcomes associated with simple or subcutaneous mastectomy in the management of prophylactic versus therapeutic resection. In this study we aimed to assess if simple or subcutaneous mastectomy for prophylaxis affects perioperative outcomes compared with resection performed for biopsy proven malignancy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for subjects who underwent simple or subcutaneous mastectomy between 2007 and 2012. Patient demographic characteristics, comorbid conditions, and postoperative complications were analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 30,803 patients, 30,644 (99.5%) underwent therapeutic mastectomy and 159 (0.5%) underwent prophylactic mastectomy. Subjects who underwent prophylactic surgery were more likely to be younger (45 vs. 58 years; P < .01) and white (134 [84%] vs. 20,647 [67%]; P < .01). Surgery time was significantly greater in the prophylactic group (265 vs. 166 minutes; P < .01). There was no significant difference in mortality between groups. There was a trend toward greater 30-day morbidity (15 [9%] vs. 1835 [6%]; P = .09) and occurrence of deep venous thrombosis (DVT; 2 [1%] vs. 74 [0.2%]; P = .06) in those who underwent prophylactic mastectomy. After age adjustment, the prophylactic group showed a nearly sixfold increase in DVT (odds ratio [OR], 5.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.37-24.22), which persisted when controlling for surgery time (OR, 4.95; 95% CI, 1.18-20.86). CONCLUSION: Prophylactic simple or subcutaneous mastectomy incurs significant additional 30-day postoperative morbidity related to perioperative DVT. Risk-mitigating strategies should be considered in the perioperative care of this patient population.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Bases de Datos Factuales , Mastectomía/efectos adversos , Mastectomía/clasificación , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Trombosis de la Vena/etiología , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Trombosis de la Vena/patología
9.
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech ; 26(5): 410-416, 2016 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27661202

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous cholecystostomy tube placement has widely been used as an alternative treatment to cholecystectomy, especially in advanced disease or critically ill patients. Reported postprocedural complication rates have varied significantly over the last decade. The goal of this study is to evaluate the safety of percutaneous cholecystostomy tube treatment in critically ill patients. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a retrospective chart analysis of 96 critically ill patients who underwent cholecystostomy tube placement during an intensive care unit (ICU) stay between 2005 and 2010 in a tertiary care center in central Massachusetts. Complications within 72 hours of cholecystostomy tube placement and any morbidity or mortality relating to presence of cholecystostomy tube were considered. RESULTS: A total of 65 male and 31 female patients with a mean age of 67.4 years underwent percutaneous cholecystostomy tube placement during an ICU stay. Sixty-six patients experienced a total of 121 complications, resulting in an overall complication rate of 69%. Fifty-four of these complications resulted from the actual procedure or the presence of the cholecystostomy tube; the other 67 complications occurred within 72 hours of the cholecystostomy procedure. Ten patients died. Tube dislodgment was the most common complication with a total of 34 episodes. CONCLUSIONS: Cholecystostomy tube placement is associated with frequent complications, the most common of which is tube dislodgment. Severe complications may contribute to serious morbidity and death in an ICU population. Complication rates may be underreported in the medical literature. The potential impact of cholecystostomy tube placement in critically ill patients should not be underestimated.


Asunto(s)
Colecistitis Aguda/cirugía , Colecistostomía/efectos adversos , Cuidados Críticos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Colecistostomía/instrumentación , Enfermedad Crítica , Falla de Equipo , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Seguridad del Paciente , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Factores de Riesgo
10.
J Intensive Care Med ; 29(5): 247-54, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23753232

RESUMEN

Intraabdominal infections are frequent and dangerous entity in intensive care units. Mortality and morbidity are high, causes are numerous, and treatment options are variable. The intensivist is challenged to recognize and treat intraabdominal infections in a timely fashion to prevent complications and death. Diagnosis of intraabdominal infection is often complicated by confounding underlying disease or masked by overall comorbidity. Current research describes a wide heterogeneity of patient populations, making it difficult to suggest a general treatment regimen and stressing the need of an individualized approach to decision making. Early focus-oriented intervention and antibiotic coverage tailored to the individual patient and hospital is warranted.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Infecciones Intraabdominales/diagnóstico , Infecciones Intraabdominales/terapia , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infección Hospitalaria/diagnóstico , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Infección Hospitalaria/terapia , Toma de Decisiones , Diagnóstico por Imagen , Humanos , Infecciones Intraabdominales/microbiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA