RESUMEN
Autografting with split-thickness skin grafts (STSG) remains an essential procedure in burn and reconstructive surgery. The process of harvesting STSG, however, leaves behind a donor site, an exposed area of partial-thickness dermis left to heal by secondary intention. There has yet to be a consensus amongst surgeons regarding optimal management of the donor site. The ideal donor site dressing is one that allows for expeditious healing while minimizing pain and infection. Despite numerous studies demonstrating the superiority of moist wound healing, many surgeons continue to treat STSG donor sites dry, with petroleum-based gauze. In this study, two burn centers performed a retrospective review of burn patients whose STSG donor sites were treated with either Xeroform® or Mepilex® Ag dressings. Infections were documented and in a subgroup analysis of patients, postoperative pain scores were noted and total opiate usage during hospitalization was calculated. Analysis revealed an overall infection rate of 1.2% in the Mepilex® Ag group and 11.4% in the Xeroform® group (p<0.0001). Patients with Xeroform® donor site dressings had increased odds of donor site infection (OR=10.8, p=0.002). In subgroup analysis, there were no significant differences in maximum pain scores between Mepilex® Ag and Xeroform® groups, nor were there differences in opiate usage. STSG donor sites dressed with silver foam dressings have a lower rate of donor site infection relative to those dressed with petroleum-based gauze. Moist donor site dressings such as foam dressings (including Mepilex® Ag) should be the standard of care in STSG donor site wound care.
La greffes de peau mince (GPM) demeure une procédure essentielle dans la chirurgie de brûlure et de reconstruction. La zone donneuse de greffe (ZDG) représente une perte de substance cutanée superficielle, cicatrisant spontanément. Il n'y a pas de consensus concernant la prise en charge optimale de la ZDG. Le pansement idéal de la ZDG doit promouvoir la cicatrisation et réduire la douleur ainsi que le risque infectieux. Malgré les nombreuses publications montrant l'intérêt d'un environnement humide pour la cicatrisation, de nombreux chirurgiens réalisent des pansements secs vaselinés. Cette étude rétrospective effectuée dans 2 CTB compare les pansements de ZDG réalisés au Xéroform® ou au Mepilex Ag®. Les infections ont été documentées et, dans un sous-groupe, les scores de douleur et la consommation d'opiacés au long de l'hospitalisation ont été notés. Les taux d'infection sont de 1,2% dans le groupe Mepilex Ag® et 11,4% avec Xéroform® (p<0,0001). Le risque d'infection de la ZDG est augmenté (OR 10,8 ; p = 0,002) en cas d'utilisation de Xéroform®. Il n'y avait pas de différence de douleur et de consommation d'opiacés entre les 2 groupes. Les ZDG recouvertes d'un pansement hydrocellulaire imprégné d'argent s'infectent moins que celles traitées avec une gaze imprégnée de vaseline. L'utilisation sur les ZDG d'un pansement humide comme une mousse hydrocellulaire (par exemple Mepilex Ag®) devrait devenir la norme.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: A 40-year-old man with congenital midline defect and wide pubic symphysis diastasis secondary to bladder exstrophy presented with a massive incisional hernia resulting from complications of multiple prior abdominal repairs. Using a multi-disciplinary team of general, plastic, and urologic surgeons, we performed a complex hernia repair including creation of a pubic symphysis with rib graft for inferior fixation of mesh. METHODS: The skin graft overlying the peritoneum was excised, and the posterior rectus sheath mobilized, then re-approximated. The previously augmented bladder and urethra were mobilized into the pelvis, after which a rib graft was constructed from the 7th rib and used to create a symphysis pubis using a mortise joint. This rib graft was used to fix the inferior portion of a 20 × 25 cm porcine xenograft mesh in a retro-rectus position. With the defect closed, prior skin scars were excised and the wound closed over multiple drains. RESULTS: The patient tolerated the procedure well. His post-operative course was complicated by a vesico-cutaneous fistula and associated urinary tract and wound infections. This resolved by drainage with a urethral catheter and bilateral percutaneous nephrostomies. The patient has subsequently healed well with an intact hernia repair. The increased intra-abdominal pressure from his intact abdominal wall has been associated with increased stress urinary incontinence. CONCLUSIONS: Although a difficult operation prone to serious complications, reconstruction of the symphysis pubis is an effective means for creating an inferior border to affix mesh in complex hernia repairs associated with bladder exstrophy.
