[Stem cell transplantation for multiple sclerosis. Hamburg experiences and state of international research]. / Stammzelltransplantation bei Multipler Sklerose. Hamburger Erfahrungen und internationaler Forschungsstand.

BACKGROUND: Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT) is still not the standard treatment for highly inflammatory multiple sclerosis (MS). Even though randomized controlled trials are lacking, predictors for treatment response have been established. Since 2007, ten patients have received aHSCT in Hamburg. OBJECTIVE: To present observational data from patients treated in Hamburg and a review of the literature. METHODS: Descriptive statistics were used for evaluating the course of the expanded disability status scale (EDSS) as a measure for clinical outcome, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and neuropsychology. New gadolinium and T2-MRI uptake lesions per scan were compared. In addition, a systematic review of the currently available literature was performed. RESULTS: The Hamburg series can be divided in two groups, one group including four patients with chronic progressive MS with low inflammatory activity (median EDSS = 6.25, 0.5 relapses per year, no gadolinium-enhancing lesions) and the other group including six patients with mild to moderate disability, relapses and inflammatory activity (median EDSS = 4.25, 1 relapse per year, 2 gadolinium-enhancing lesions). The median follow-up was 2.4 years. While the first group did not seem to benefit from aHSCT, an improvement in five out of six patients was observed in the second group. New T2 lesions occurred within the first 6 months but gadolinium-enhancing lesions were not observed (p < 0.05). A systematic literature search identified a higher efficacy of aHSCT in younger, less disabled MS patients with inflammatory activity, similar to the findings from Hamburg. CONCLUSION: Cohort reports describe aHSCT as a safe and efficient treatment option in highly inflammatory MS. Based on these data aHSCT seems to be a reasonable option in selected patients with highly inflammatory MS but a randomized controlled trial is warranted.

[Autoimmune synaptic encephalopathies]. / Autoimmune synaptische Enzephalopathien.

Antibody-associated limbic encephalitis was usually seen as a paraneoplastic syndrome where the antibodies would target intracellular proteins. However, recent reports challenged this idea and described antibodies that target synaptic proteins expressed on the cell surface. These antibodies are not necessarily linked to tumors and should be regarded as a distinct entity of different autoimmune diseases. They are of direct clinical relevance since their binding to their target antigen is likely the cause of the clinical symptoms and, therefore, immune treatment often results in a beneficial outcome. Tests which differentiate these antibodies are now available in specialized laboratories.

The innate immune response in the central nervous system and its role in glioma immune surveillance.

The innate immune system encompasses natural killer (NK) cells, macrophages and granulocytes, the complement system and antimicrobial peptides. Recognition pathways of the innate immune system include microbial non-self recognition, missing-self recognition and induced- self recognition. The central nervous system (CNS) participates in responses of the innate immune system. However, immune inhibitory and anti-inflammatory mechanisms physiologically outbalance and counteract immune activity and thereby limit immune-mediated tissue damage in the brain. Human gliomas appear to take advantage of this immunosuppressive milieu. Moreover, glioma cells themselves interfere with anti-tumor immune responses by expressing immune inhibitory cell surface molecules, such as HLA-G, or by releasing soluble immunosuppressants such as transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta. Yet, although glioma cells exhibit all cellular features of malignancy, these tumors very rarely metastasize outside the brain, raising the possibility of immune-mediated control of these cells outside, but not inside, the brain. Accordingly, activating the innate immune system by forcing glioma cells to express danger signals such as NKG2D ligands is a promising strategy of immunotherapy for these tumors.

Release of endogenous anti-inflammatory complement regulators FHL-1 and factor H protects synovial fibroblasts during rheumatoid arthritis.

Rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic inflammatory disease of unknown aetiology predominantly affecting cells and tissues of synovial joints. Here we show that the two important complement regulators FHL-1 and factor H play a protective anti-inflammatory role in rheumatoid arthritis. Expression analyses at the mRNA- and protein level show in vitro expression and secretion of both regulators by synovial fibroblasts derived from patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Similarly the two regulators are synthesized in vivo in diseased synovial tissue, and in particular synovial lining cells express high levels of FHL-1. The anti-inflammatory role of these regulators in rheumatoid arthritis is highlighted by their induction with IFN-gamma and dexamethasone, whilst the pro-inflammatory cytokine TNF-alpha had no effect. Transient transfection experiments with various FHL-1/factor H promoter-luciferase reporter constructs into cells of distinct origin show independent cell and tissue specific promoter regulated transcription of these two regulators. The inducible expression, specifically of FHL-1 has physiological consequences. By binding directly to surfaces the released proteins protect cells from inflammatory damage and complement-mediated cell lysis. This study shows a novel protective and anti-inflammatory role of the two important complement regulators FHL-1 and factor H in rheumatoid arthritis and suggests a disease controlling role of the two proteins.

Different regulation of factor H and FHL-1/reconectin by inflammatory mediators and expression of the two proteins in rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Factor H and the FHL-1/reconectin protein are two human plasma proteins that act as important regulators of the alternative complement pathway. Each protein is encoded by a unique transcript, but both mRNAs are derived from the factor H gene by means of alternative processing. In order to address potential functional differences between the two proteins we analysed their expression in hepatic and non-hepatic cells and studied their regulation by inflammatory mediators. We demonstrate that factor H and FHL-1/reconectin transcripts which are regulated by the same gene promoter and are initiated at the same transcription start site are differently expressed. Expression of the molecules is induced and regulated by the inflammatory mediators interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) and the anti-inflammatory glucocorticoid dexamethasone. Both factor H and FHL-1/reconectin are expressed and secreted by synovial fibroblasts and are present in synovial fluid derived from patients suffering from rheumatoid or reactive arthritis. The local synthesis in synovial fibroblasts and their induction by IFN-gamma and dexamethasone, but not by tumour necrosis factor-alpha, suggests for each of the two complement regulators a protective role in RA.

Exceptional resistance of human H2 glioblastoma cells to complement-mediated killing by expression and utilization of factor H and factor H-like protein 1.

Of over 20 nucleated cell lines we have examined to date, human H2 glioblastoma cells have turned out to be the most resistant to complement-mediated cytolysis in vitro. H2 cells expressed strongly the membrane attack complex inhibitor protectin (CD59), moderately CD46 (membrane cofactor protein) and CD55 (decay-accelerating factor), but no CD35 (complement receptor 1). When treated with a polyclonal anti-H2 Ab, anti-CD59 mAb, and normal human serum, only 5% of H2 cells became killed. Under the same conditions, 70% of endothelial-like EA.hy 926 cells and 40% of U251 control glioma cells were killed. A combined neutralization of CD46, CD55, and CD59 increased H2 lysis only minimally, demonstrating that these complement regulators are not enough to account for the resistance of H2 cells. After treatment with Abs and serum, less C5b-9 was deposited on H2 than on U251 and EA.hy 926 cell lines. A reason for the exceptional resistance of H2 cells was revealed when RT-PCR and protein biochemical methods showed that the H2 cells, unlike the other cell lines tested, actively produced the soluble complement inhibitors factor H and factor H-like protein 1. H2 cells were also capable of binding human factor H from the fluid phase to their cell surface and promoted the cleavage of C3b to its inactive form iC3b more efficiently than U251 and EA.hy 926 cells. In accordance, anti-factor H mAbs enhanced killing of H2 glioblastoma cells. Taken together, our results show that production and binding of factor H and factor H-like protein 1 is a novel mechanism that these malignant cells utilize to escape complement-mediated killing.

Factor H and disease: a complement regulator affects vital body functions.

Factor H is a multidomain and multifunctional protein. As a complement regulator factor H determines the fate of newly formed C3b and controls formation and stability of C3 convertases both in the fluid phase and on cell surfaces. In addition, this plasma protein displays functions outside complement control as it has been suggested to act as an adhesion protein, to be a ligand for the cellular integrin receptor CR3 (CD11b/CD18) and to display chemotactic activity. Genetic and pathophysiological analyses describe a role for factor H in vital body functions. Depletion or the absence of factor H due to genetic reasons leads to unrestricted C3 consumption. A reduced amount of factor H in plasma or mutations within the factor H gene may lead to glomerulonephritis (type II MPGN) or hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS). Certain pathogenic organisms have been shown to evade complement attack by binding factor H from the host. Such specific factor H binding components have been demonstrated on the surface of microbes, e.g., Streptococcus pyogenes and Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Here, we summarize the current knowledge how abnormalities in function of the central complement regulator factor H are associated with human diseases.

FHL-1/reconectin and factor H: two human complement regulators which are encoded by the same gene are differently expressed and regulated.

FHL-1/reconectin and factor H are two human complement regulators which are encoded by a single gene. FHL-1/reconectin contains the first 7 of 20 SCR protein domains of factor H and has four unique residues attached to its C-terminal end. The overlapping region of 445 amino acids explains the related complement regulatory functions of the two proteins. However, unique biological functions have also been reported for FHL-1/reconectin, such as cell adhesion and binding to microbial surfaces. Both proteins are synthesised and secreted by the liver. Extrahepatic synthesis occurs in a wide variety of cells, e.g. in monocytes, fibroblasts or neuronal cells. Unexpectedly, FHL-1/reconectin and factor H exhibit distinct expression patterns. This is also observed in disease situations such as in rheumatoid arthritis or malignancies. In rheumatoid arthritis a potentially protective role is suggested by the local synthesis of both FHL-1/reconectin and factor H in synovial fibroblasts and their induction by the anti-inflammatory agent dexamethasone and the cytokine IFN-gamma, but not by TNF-alpha. FHL-1/reconectin is overexpressed in certain tumor cells such as glioblastoma, conferring an exceptional resistance to such cells against complement mediated lysis. Although FHL-1/reconectin and factor H are encoded by a single gene, regulated by the same gene promoter and initiate transcription at the same start site, their transcripts are differently regulated. The putative control levels, which are responsible for this complex regulation, include transcript elongation, RNA processing, alternative splicing and differential poly(A) site selection.