Drug repurposing-a promising approach for patients with angina but non-obstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA).

In today's era of individualized precision medicine drug repurposing represents a promising approach to offer patients fast access to novel treatments. Apart from drug repurposing in cancer treatments, cardiovascular pharmacology is another attractive field for this approach. Patients with angina pectoris without obstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA) report refractory angina despite standard medications in up to 40% of cases. Drug repurposing also appears to be an auspicious option for this indication. From a pathophysiological point of view ANOCA patients frequently suffer from vasomotor disorders such as coronary spasm and/or impaired microvascular vasodilatation. Consequently, we carefully screened the literature and identified two potential therapeutic targets: the blockade of the endothelin-1 (ET-1) receptor and the stimulation of soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC). Genetically increased endothelin expression results in elevated levels of ET-1, justifying ET-1 receptor blockers as drug candidates to treat coronary spasm. sGC stimulators may be beneficial as they stimulate the NO-sGC-cGMP pathway leading to GMP-mediated vasodilatation.

Characterization and implications of intracoronary hemodynamic assessment during coronary spasm provocation testing.

BACKGROUND: Current diagnostic criteria for coronary spasm are based on patient's symptoms, ECG shifts and epicardial vasoconstriction during acetylcholine (ACh) spasm testing. AIMS: To assess the feasibility and diagnostic value of coronary blood flow (CBF) and resistance (CR) assessment as objective parameters during ACh testing. METHODS: Eighty-nine patients who underwent intracoronary reactivity testing including ACh testing with synchronous Doppler wire-based measurements of CBF and CR were included. Coronary microvascular and epicardial spasm, respectively, were diagnosed based on COVADIS criteria. RESULTS: Patients were 63 ± 13 years old, predominantly female (69%) and had preserved LV ejection fraction (64 ± 8%). Overall, assessment of CBF and CR during ACh testing revealed a decrease in CBF of 0.62 (0.17-1.53)-fold and an increase of CR of 1.45 [0.67-4.02]-fold in spasm patients compared to 2.08 (1.73-4.76) for CBF and 0.45 (0.44-0.63) for CR in patients without coronary spasm (both p < 0.01). Receiver operating characteristic revealed a high diagnostic ability of CBF and CR (AUC 0.86, p < 0.001, respectively) in identifying patients with coronary spasm. However, in 21% of patients with epicardial spasm and 42% of patients with microvascular spasm a paradoxical response was observed. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates feasibility and potential diagnostic value of intracoronary physiology assessments during ACh testing. We observed opposite responses of CBF and CR to ACh in patients with positive vs. negative spasm test. While a decrease in CBF and an increase in CR during ACh seem pathognomonic for spasm, some patients with coronary spasm demonstrate paradoxical ACh response demanding further scientific investigations.