Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 16 de 16
Filtrar
1.
Health Res Policy Syst ; 22(1): 65, 2024 May 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38822374

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Research evidence has demonstrably improved health care practices and patient outcomes. However, systemic translation of evidence into practice is far from optimal. The reasons are complex, but often because research is not well aligned with health service priorities. The aim of this study was to explore the experiences and perspectives of senior health service executives on two issues: (1) the alignment between local research activity and the needs and priorities of their health services, and (2) the extent to which research is or can be integrated as part of usual health care practice. METHODS: In this qualitative study, semi-structured interviews were conducted with senior health leaders from four large health service organisations that are members of Sydney Health Partners (SHP), one of Australia's nationally accredited research translation centres committed to accelerating the translation of research findings into evidence-based health care. The interviews were conducted between November 2022 and January 2023, and were either audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim or recorded in the interviewer field notes. A thematic analysis of the interview data was conducted by two researchers, using the framework method to identify common themes. RESULTS: Seventeen health executives were interviewed, including chief executives, directors of medical services, nursing, allied health, research, and others in executive leadership roles. Responses to issue (1) included themes on re-balancing curiosity- and priority-driven research; providing more support for research activity within health organisations; and helping health professionals and researchers discuss researchable priorities. Responses to issue (2) included identification of elements considered essential for embedding research in health care; and the need to break down silos between research and health care, as well as within health organisations. CONCLUSIONS: Health service leaders value research but want more research that aligns with their needs and priorities. Discussions with researchers about those priorities may need some facilitation. Making research a more integrated part of health care will require strong and broad executive leadership, resources and infrastructure, and investing in capacity- and capability-building across health clinicians, managers and executive staff.


Asunto(s)
Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , Liderazgo , Investigación Cualitativa , Investigación Biomédica Traslacional , Humanos , Australia , Práctica Clínica Basada en la Evidencia , Prioridades en Salud , Entrevistas como Asunto , Atención a la Salud/organización & administración , Servicios de Salud , Personal Administrativo
2.
Public Health Res Pract ; 30(2)2020 Jun 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32601652

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Our objective is to assess the potential contribution of the Australian Government's mobile smartphone tracing app (COVIDSafe) to the sustained control of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). STUDY TYPE: Development and analysis of a system dynamics model. METHODS: To define the pandemic context and specify model-building parameters, we searched for literature on COVID-19, its epidemiology in Australia, case finding processes, and factors that might affect community acceptance of the COVIDSafe smartphone app for contact tracing. We then developed a system dynamics model of COVID-19 based on a modified susceptible-exposed-infected-recovered compartmental model structure, using initial pandemic data and published information on virus behaviour to determine parameter values. We applied the model to examine factors influencing the projected trends: the extent of viral testing, community participation in social distancing, and the level of uptake of the COVIDSafe app. RESULTS: Modelling suggests that a second COVID-19 wave will occur if social distancing declines (i.e. if the average number of contacts made by each individual each day increases) and the rate of testing declines. The timing and size of the second wave will depend on the rate of decrease in social distancing and the decline in testing rates. At the app uptake level of approximately 27% (current at 20 May 2020), with a monthly 50% reduction in social distancing (i.e. the average number of contacts per day doubling every 30 days until they reach pre-social distancing rates) and a 5% decline in testing, the app would reduce the projected total number of new cases during April-December 2020 by one-quarter. If uptake reaches the possible maximum of 61%, the reduction could be more than half. CONCLUSIONS: Maintenance of a large-scale testing regimen for COVID-19 and widespread community practice of social distancing are vital. The COVIDSafe smartphone app has the potential to be an important adjunct to testing and social distancing. Depending on the level of community uptake of the app, it could have a significant mitigating effect on a second wave of COVID-19 in Australia.


Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus , Técnicas de Laboratorio Clínico/estadística & datos numéricos , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Pandemias/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , Teléfono Inteligente/estadística & datos numéricos , Australia , COVID-19 , Prueba de COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Humanos , Relaciones Interpersonales , Aplicaciones Móviles/estadística & datos numéricos , Modelos Teóricos , Distanciamiento Físico , Neumonía Viral/diagnóstico , Salud Pública , Medición de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2
3.
BMJ Open ; 8(1): e016982, 2018 01 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29358417

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine the economic impact of medication non-adherence across multiple disease groups. DESIGN: Systematic review. EVIDENCE REVIEW: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed and Scopus in September 2017. Studies quantifying the cost of medication non-adherence in relation to economic impact were included. Relevant information was extracted and quality assessed using the Drummond checklist. RESULTS: Seventy-nine individual studies assessing the cost of medication non-adherence across 14 disease groups were included. Wide-scoping cost variations were reported, with lower levels of adherence generally associated with higher total costs. The annual adjusted disease-specific economic cost of non-adherence per person ranged from $949 to $44 190 (in 2015 US$). Costs attributed to 'all causes' non-adherence ranged from $5271 to $52 341. Medication possession ratio was the metric most used to calculate patient adherence, with varying cut-off points defining non-adherence. The main indicators used to measure the cost of non-adherence were total cost or total healthcare cost (83% of studies), pharmacy costs (70%), inpatient costs (46%), outpatient costs (50%), emergency department visit costs (27%), medical costs (29%) and hospitalisation costs (18%). Drummond quality assessment yielded 10 studies of high quality with all studies performing partial economic evaluations to varying extents. CONCLUSION: Medication non-adherence places a significant cost burden on healthcare systems. Current research assessing the economic impact of medication non-adherence is limited and of varying quality, failing to provide adaptable data to influence health policy. The correlation between increased non-adherence and higher disease prevalence should be used to inform policymakers to help circumvent avoidable costs to the healthcare system. Differences in methods make the comparison among studies challenging and an accurate estimation of true magnitude of the cost impossible. Standardisation of the metric measures used to estimate medication non-adherence and development of a streamlined approach to quantify costs is required. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42015027338.


Asunto(s)
Costo de Enfermedad , Enfermedad/economía , Quimioterapia/economía , Cumplimiento de la Medicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Humanos
4.
BMC Med Educ ; 14: 169, 2014 Aug 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25123968

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Entry into specialty training was determined by a National Assessment Centre (NAC) approach using a combination of a behavioural Multiple-Mini-Interview (MMI) and a written Situational Judgement Test (SJT). We wanted to know if interviewers could make reliable and valid decisions about the non-cognitive characteristics of candidates with the purpose of selecting them into general practice specialty training using the MMI. Second, we explored the concurrent validity of the MMI with the SJT. METHODS: A variance components analysis estimated the reliability and sources of measurement error. Further modelling estimated the optimal configurations for future MMI iterations. We calculated the relationship of the MMI with the SJT. RESULTS: Data were available from 1382 candidates, 254 interviewers, six MMI questions, five alternate forms of a 50-item SJT, and 11 assessment centres. For a single MMI question and one assessor, 28% of the variance between scores was due to candidate-to-candidate variation. Interviewer subjectivity, in particular the varying views that interviewer had for particular candidates accounted for 40% of the variance in scores. The generalisability co-efficient for a six question MMI was 0.7; to achieve 0.8 would require ten questions. A disattenuated correlation with the SJT (r = 0.35), and in particular a raw score correlation with the subdomain related to clinical knowledge (r = 0.25) demonstrated evidence for construct and concurrent validity. Less than two per cent of candidates would have failed the MMI. CONCLUSION: The MMI is a moderately reliable method of assessment in the context of a National Assessment Centre approach. The largest source of error relates to aspects of interviewer subjectivity, suggesting enhanced interviewer training would be beneficial. MMIs need to be sufficiently long for precise comparison for ranking purposes. In order to justify long term sustainable use of the MMI in a postgraduate assessment centre approach, more theoretical work is required to understand how written and performance based test of non-cognitive attributes can be combined, in a way that achieves acceptable generalizability, and has validity.


Asunto(s)
Educación Médica , Entrevistas como Asunto/normas , Medicina , Criterios de Admisión Escolar , Adulto , Anciano , Australia , Competencia Clínica , Femenino , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto/métodos , Juicio , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Adulto Joven
5.
Med J Aust ; 199(11): 779-82, 2013 Dec 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24329657

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether recruitment of rural students and uptake of extended rural placements are associated with students' expressed intentions to undertake rural internships and students' acceptance of rural internships after finishing medical school, and to compare any associations. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Longitudinal study of three successive cohorts (commencing 2005, 2006, 2007) of medical students in the Sydney Medical Program (SMP), University of Sydney, New South Wales, using responses to self-administered questionnaires upon entry to and exit from the Sydney Medical School and data recorded in rolls. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Students' expressed intentions to undertake rural internships, and their acceptance of rural internships after finishing medical school. RESULTS: Data from 448 students were included. The proportion of students preferring a rural career dropped from 20.7% (79/382) to 12.5% (54/433) between entry into and exit from the SMP. A total of 98 students took extended rural placements. Ultimately, 8.1% (35/434) accepted a rural internship, although 14.5% (60/415) had indicated a first preference for a rural post. Students who had undertaken an extended rural placement were more than three times as likely as those with rural backgrounds to express a first preference for a rural internship (23.9% v 7.7%; χ(2) = 7.04; P = 0.008) and more than twice as likely to accept a rural internship (21.3% v 9.9%; χ(2) = 3.85; P = 0.05). CONCLUSION: For the three cohorts studied, rural clinical training through extended placements in rural clinical schools had a stronger association than rural background with a preference for, and acceptance of, rural internship.


Asunto(s)
Selección de Profesión , Educación de Pregrado en Medicina , Internado y Residencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Área sin Atención Médica , Servicios de Salud Rural , Estudiantes de Medicina/psicología , Educación de Pregrado en Medicina/métodos , Educación de Pregrado en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Intención , Estudios Longitudinales , Nueva Gales del Sur , Población Rural , Criterios de Admisión Escolar , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Recursos Humanos
7.
Med Educ ; 45(5): 511-2, 2011 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21486332
8.
Nephrology (Carlton) ; 15(1): 48-53, 2010 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20377771

RESUMEN

AIM: Renal nurses in Australia and New Zealand are critical to the care of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), especially those on dialysis. We aimed to obtain the opinions of renal nurses in Australia and New Zealand on the Caring for Australasians with Renal Impairment (CARI) Guidelines. METHODS: A self-administered survey was distributed to all members of the professional organisation for renal nurses (Renal Society of Australasia) in 2006. The results were compared with those from a similar survey in 2002 and an identical 2006 survey of Australian and New Zealand nephrologists. RESULTS: Of the 173 respondents, more than 95% considered the Guidelines to be a good synthesis of the available evidence, 80% indicated that the Guidelines had significantly influenced their practice and 86% considered that the Guidelines had improved patient outcomes. Older respondents were less likely to perceive that the Guidelines had improved patient outcomes, and renal nurse educators were more likely to consider that the Guidelines were based on the best available evidence than other respondents. Respondents were generally more positive about the Guidelines in 2006 than in 2002. Although nephrologists were generally positive about the CARI Guidelines, renal nurses were more positive, especially regarding the effect of the Guidelines on practice and the improvement in health outcomes. CONCLUSION: Australian and New Zealand renal nurses valued the CARI Guidelines highly, used them in practice and considered that they led to improved patient outcomes. Positive responses towards the Guidelines increased between 2002 and 2006.


Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Enfermedades Renales/terapia , Nefrología , Enfermería , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Adulto , Australia , Enfermedad Crónica , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nueva Zelanda , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
9.
Am J Kidney Dis ; 55(2): 241-9, 2010 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20045238

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A consistent gap exists between evidence-based guideline recommendations and clinical practice across all medical disciplines, including nephrology. This study aims to explore nephrologists' perspectives on guidelines and elicit their perspectives on the effects of guidelines on clinical decisions. METHODS: Semistructured face-to-face interviews were undertaken with 19 nephrologists from a variety of clinical settings across Australia. Participants were asked about their views of clinical practice guidelines in nephrology, both local (Caring for Australasians With Renal Impairment [CARI]) and international, and their opinions of other factors that shape their decision making. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed qualitatively. RESULTS: 4 major themes were identified. First, overall, the nephrologists interviewed trusted the CARI guideline process and output. Second, guidelines served a variety of purposes, providing a good summary of evidence, a foundation for practice, an educational resource, and justification for funding requests to policy makers, as well as promoting patient adherence to treatment. Third, guidelines were only one input into decision making. Other inputs included individual patient quality of life and circumstances, opinion leaders, peers, nephrologists' own experiences, the regulation and subsidy framework for drugs and devices, policies and work practices of the local unit, and other sources of evidence. Fourth, guideline uptake varied. Factors that favored the use of guidelines included having a strong evidence base, being current, including specific targets and an explicit treatment algorithm, being sent frequent reminders, and having local peer support for implementation and the necessary personnel and other resources for effective implementation. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence-based guidelines appear to impact strongly on clinical decision making of Australian nephrologists, but are only one input. Improvements in the evidence that underpins guidelines and improvements in the content and formatting of guidelines are likely to make them more influential on decision making. Trust in the guideline groups' processes is a prerequisite for implementation.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Renales/terapia , Nefrología , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Enfermedad Crónica , Femenino , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Masculino
10.
Am J Kidney Dis ; 53(6): 1082-90, 2009 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19394725

RESUMEN

Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines have been a major development in nephrology internationally, but it is uncertain how the nephrology community regards these guidelines. This study aimed to determine the views of nephrologists on the content and effects of their local guidelines (Caring for Australasians with Renal Impairment [CARI]). In 2006, a self-administered survey was distributed to all Australian and New Zealand nephrologists. Seven questions were repeated from a similar survey in 2002. A total of 211 nephrologists (70% of practicing nephrologists) responded. More than 90% agreed that the CARI guidelines were a useful summary of evidence, and nearly 60% reported that the guidelines had significantly influenced their practice. The proportion of nephrologists reporting that the guidelines had improved patient outcomes increased from 14% in 2002 to 38% in 2006. The proportion of nephrologists indicating that the guidelines did not match the best available evidence decreased from 30% in 2002 to 8% in 2006. Older age and male sex showed some associations with a less favorable response for some domains. The CARI approach of rigorous evidence-based guidelines has been shown to be a successful model of guideline production. Almost all nephrologists regarded the CARI guidelines as useful evidence summaries, although only one-third believed that the guidelines affected health outcomes. Attitudes to the guidelines have become more favorable over time; this may reflect changes in the CARI process or attitudinal changes to evidence among nephrologists. Evaluation by the end user is fundamental to ensuring the applicability of guidelines in clinical practice in the future.


Asunto(s)
Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Nefrología/normas , Médicos/normas , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto/normas , Adulto , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Australia , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Femenino , Adhesión a Directriz/normas , Adhesión a Directriz/tendencias , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud/tendencias , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nefrología/métodos , Nefrología/tendencias , Nueva Zelanda , Proyectos Piloto , Adulto Joven
11.
Lancet Oncol ; 7(7): 584-95, 2006 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16814210

RESUMEN

More than half the cases of cancer in the world arise in people in low-income and middle-income countries. This proportion will rise to 70% by 2020. These are regions where the annual gross national income per person is less than 9386 US dollars. Radiotherapy is an essential part of the treatment of cancer. In high-income countries, 52% of new cases of cancer should receive radiotherapy at least once and up to 25% might receive a second course. Because of the different distribution of tumour types worldwide and of the advanced stage at presentation, patients with cancer in low-income and middle-income regions could have a greater need for radiotherapy than those in high-income countries. Radiotherapy for cure or palliation has been shown to be cost effective. Many countries of low or middle income have limited access to radiotherapy, and 22 African and Asian countries have no service at all. In Africa in 2002, the actual supply of megavoltage radiotherapy machines (cobalt or linear accelerator) was only 155, 18% of the estimated need. In the Asia-Pacific region, nearly 4 million cases of cancer arose in 2002. In 12 countries with available data, 1147 megavoltage machines were available for an estimated demand of nearly 4000 megavoltage machines. Eastern Europe and Latin America showed similar shortages. Strategies for developing services need planning at a national level and substantial investment for staff training and equipment. Safe and effective development of services would benefit from: links with established facilities in other countries, particularly those within the same region; access to information, such as free online journal access; and better education of all medical staff about the roles and benefits of radiotherapy.


Asunto(s)
Países en Desarrollo/economía , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Renta , Neoplasias/radioterapia , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Reforma de la Atención de Salud , Humanos , Evaluación de Necesidades , Radioterapia/economía , Resultado del Tratamiento
12.
ANZ J Surg ; 76(5): 318-24, 2006 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16768690

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests that there is considerable variation in the types of procedures used to treat cancer. This variation may result in suboptimal or cost-ineffective care. The present study examined the variation in surgical treatment of melanoma before the establishment of a Melanoma Network that could promote more uniform high-quality care in New South Wales (NSW). The variations in the use of surgical procedures for melanoma by NSW Area Health Service of patient residence were examined. METHODS: Data in the Health Information Exchange of NSW Health collected on procedures carried out on patients with a diagnosis of melanoma in NSW public and private hospitals from 1 July 2001 to 30 June 2002 were examined. Data were aggregated by Area Health Services of patient residence. These data were compared with the numbers of new cases of melanoma notified to the NSW Central Cancer Registry in the same areas in 2001-2002. Excision of skin lesions, skin grafting and numbers and types of lymph node procedures were examined. RESULTS: During the study period, the Central Cancer Registry reported that there were 3085 notifications of melanoma, whereas hospital inpatient data recorded that 6864 procedures were carried out for patients with a melanoma diagnosis in NSW public and private hospitals. Sixty-seven per cent of procedures were carried out in private hospitals. A total of 852 skin grafting procedures were recorded. Of these, 60% were carried out in private hospitals. The average proportion of skin grafts associated with excisions in NSW was 30% (range, 0-53%). Eight hundred and fifty-eight lymph node procedures were recorded for 747 NSW residents. These were biopsies, excisions or both. Forty per cent were carried out in private hospitals. The average proportion of new cases of melanoma associated with a lymph node procedure in NSW was 28% (range, 0-47%). CONCLUSION: Most of the inpatient procedures for patients with melanoma were carried out in private hospitals. The proportions of new cases that underwent skin grafting after excision, or underwent lymph node dissection, varied more than fivefold from one Area Health Service to another. This may indicate variations in casemix, variations in clinical practice or both.


Asunto(s)
Hospitales Privados , Hospitales Públicos , Melanoma/cirugía , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Cutáneas/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático/estadística & datos numéricos , Melanoma/patología , Nueva Gales del Sur , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Trasplante de Piel/estadística & datos numéricos
13.
Aust Health Rev ; 28(2): 238-46, 2004 Nov 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15527404

RESUMEN

This article describes the evolution of community pharmacy in the Australian health system, and assesses its current and potential future contribution to health care. A central theme is the unique extent and accessibility of community pharmacy to the public, with a vast and dispersed infrastructure that is funded by private enterprise. The viability of community pharmacy as a retail trade depends on a diversification of its service roles and retention of its product-supply roles. Initiatives by the pharmacy profession, the pharmacy industry and the Australian Government are likely to give community pharmacy an increasingly prominent place in health promotion and primary, secondary and tertiary prevention, especially in relation to the management of chronic diseases.


Asunto(s)
Atención a la Salud/organización & administración , Farmacias/organización & administración , Farmacéuticos , Rol Profesional , Australia , Atención a la Salud/tendencias , Servicios de Información sobre Medicamentos/provisión & distribución , Prescripciones de Medicamentos , Educación en Farmacia/tendencias , Educación en Salud , Promoción de la Salud , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Farmacias/normas , Farmacias/tendencias , Sector Privado , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud
14.
J Epidemiol Community Health ; 58(7): 538-45, 2004 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15194712

RESUMEN

This glossary seeks to define and explain some of the main concepts underpinning evidence based public health. It draws on the published literature, experience gained over several years analysis of the topic, and discussions with public health colleagues, including researchers, practitioners, policy makers, and students.


Asunto(s)
Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Salud Pública , Terminología como Asunto , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/clasificación , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Formulación de Políticas , Informática en Salud Pública
16.
J Hypertens ; 21(4): 651-63, 2003 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12658005

RESUMEN

The ISH Statement on blood pressure lowering and stroke prevention was finalized after presentation and discussion at the World Health Organization and International Society of Hypertension (WHO-ISH) Meeting on Stroke and Blood Pressure, held in Melbourne Australia, 5-7 December 2002. The meeting was conducted under the auspice of the Austin Hospital Medical Research Foundation, Melbourne.


Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , Presión Sanguínea , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Humanos , Sociedades Médicas
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA